Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

7. Renewable Energy Cooperatives

Authors : Jens Lowitzsch, Florian Hanke

Published in: Energy Transition

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The realisation of the Energy Transition and the compliance of climate and sustainability goals are among the greatest political challenges in Europe inseparably connected with a shift towards a decentralised renewable energy (RE) supply. The question is no longer whether this process is to be continued but how this transition can be facilitated. In this context RE cooperatives have gained importance as the collective organisation of a common objective in the form of a cooperative is based on particular benefits for all stakeholders and hence a cooperative surplus. Optimistic assessments surmise that by 2050 half of the EU population could be producing its own energy from RES and that collective projects, such as RE cooperatives, could contribute 37 per cent of the electricity produced by “energy citizens”. There are currently about 3500 RE cooperatives, mainly in Western European countries, of which 1500 and their one million members are represented by the European federation of RE cooperatives, REScoop.eu (REScoop.eu 2018b, 2018c; Huybrechts et al. 2018) and registered as a Renewable Energy Sources Cooperative (REScoop). Thereby RE cooperatives have the potential to not only become a successful model for consumer ownership in RE projects all over Europe but substantially contribute to the success of the energy transition as such. This chapter introduces the concept of RE cooperatives, discusses its advantages and disadvantages as a business model and investigates their potential as well as the obstacles to further development in the context of the Energy Transition. This analysis draws on examples from the countries under consideration as well as on information provided by REScoop.eu.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Those principles are voluntary and open membership; democratic member control, economic participation by members; autonomy and independence; education, training and information; cooperation among cooperatives; and concern for community (ICA 1995).
 
2
Resource-based and activity-based RE cooperatives are commonly distinguished. The former focuses on the relevant resources they use, for example, photovoltaic, wind energy, bioenergy and service and marketing cooperatives. The latter refers to the main type of business activity and the value chain approach in the energy sector.
 
3
With respect to a comparative approach across jurisdictions, the fact that sources of cooperative law vary according to the respective legal system complicates the analysis with differences in regional or state competence for cooperative regulation adding complexity.
 
4
For an international overview of cooperative law, see Cracogna et al. (2013): Part III Cooperative Law: An International Overview.
 
5
For an in-depth analysis of institutional factors (community, locality and cooperative tradition) on the emergence of RE cooperatives in South Tyrol (Wirth 2014).
 
6
Some cooperative laws acknowledge “investing members” which may be granted additional voting rights; however, these still are not proportional to capital contributions and are limited by the principle that no member may have a dominating influence.
 
7
Voting agreements in company law may stipulate the utilising of voting rights according to instructions by a third party or codify behaviour during elections or voting. In Germany under certain restrictions, this applies also to cooperative law although in conflict with the principle of exercising individual suffrage (Lehnhoff et al. 2016).
 
8
In Germany, in cooperatives with more than 1500 members, representative’s meetings are allowed. This however limits direct participation and increases the dynamics common to the principal-agent problem. The introduction of alternative formats such as virtual assemblies is discussed in this context, but the legal basis for such methods remains unclear (Holstenkamp and Degenhart 2013).
 
9
A European cooperative financing tool will provide financing solutions to start RE cooperatives and take ownership in their projects; the REScoop MECISE project (http://​www.​rescoop-mecise.​eu/​) will then push the local cooperative to raise funds from local citizens and support their fund-raising campaign (REScoop.eu 2018a).
 
10
National support instruments like FITs provide security for citizens as investors making it easier for them to assess a project’s earnings (Yildiz 2014); however, with a Europe-wide trend to auction schemes substituting FITs, this will change in the foreseeable future.
 
11
Return on investment is often not the only reason, indeed, not the main reason why people participate in RE cooperatives. During the development phase, it may turn out that a RE cooperative is less profitable than initially expected or not profitable at all. By communicating such changing risks and their consequences openly, it is possible that members of a RE cooperative still decide to continue with the project (REScoop 2015a).
 
12
For detailed country reports on national legislations and cooperative law, see Cracogna et al. (2013); for country reports on policy frameworks for the social economy, see Liger et al. (2016).
 
Literature
go back to reference Bonus, H. (1986). The cooperative association as a business enterprise: A study in the economics of transactions. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 142(2), 310–339. Bonus, H. (1986). The cooperative association as a business enterprise: A study in the economics of transactions. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 142(2), 310–339.
go back to reference Ecorys. (2010). Assessment of non-cost barriers to renewable energy growth in EU Member States—AEON (No. TREN/D1/48—2008). Rotterdam: ECORYS Nederland BV. Ecorys. (2010). Assessment of non-cost barriers to renewable energy growth in EU Member States—AEON (No. TREN/D1/48—2008). Rotterdam: ECORYS Nederland BV.
go back to reference Fairbairn, B. (1994). The meaning of rochdale: The rochdale pioneers and the co-operative principles. Saskatoon, SK: Centre for the Study of Co-operatives, University of Saskatchewan. Fairbairn, B. (1994). The meaning of rochdale: The rochdale pioneers and the co-operative principles. Saskatoon, SK: Centre for the Study of Co-operatives, University of Saskatchewan.
go back to reference George, W. (2012). Vorteile von Genossenschaftslösungen in der Energiewende. Informationen Zur Raumentwicklung, Heft, 9(10), 503–514. George, W. (2012). Vorteile von Genossenschaftslösungen in der Energiewende. Informationen Zur Raumentwicklung, Heft, 9(10), 503–514.
go back to reference Hansmann, H. (2000). The ownership of enterprise (1. Harvard Univ. Press paperback ed). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press. Hansmann, H. (2000). The ownership of enterprise (1. Harvard Univ. Press paperback ed). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.
go back to reference Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. (2000). The essential role of organizational law. The Yale Law Journal, 110(3), 387–440.CrossRef Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. (2000). The essential role of organizational law. The Yale Law Journal, 110(3), 387–440.CrossRef
go back to reference Holstenkamp, L., & Degenhart, H. (2013). Bürgerbeteiligung für erneuerbare Energien. Eine Begriffsbestimmung auf finanzwirtschaftlicher Perspektive (Arbeitspapierreihe Wirtschaft & Recht No. 13). Lüneburg: Leuphana Universität Lüneburg. Holstenkamp, L., & Degenhart, H. (2013). Bürgerbeteiligung für erneuerbare Energien. Eine Begriffsbestimmung auf finanzwirtschaftlicher Perspektive (Arbeitspapierreihe Wirtschaft & Recht No. 13). Lüneburg: Leuphana Universität Lüneburg.
go back to reference Holstenkamp, L., Centgraf, S., Dorniok, D., Kahla, F., Masson, T., Müller, J. R., Radtke, J., & Yildiz, Ö. (2017). Bürgerenergiegesellschaften in Deutschland. In L. Holstenkamp & J. Radtke (Eds.), Handbuch Energiewende und Partizipation (pp. 1057–1076). Wiesbaden: Springer. Holstenkamp, L., Centgraf, S., Dorniok, D., Kahla, F., Masson, T., Müller, J. R., Radtke, J., & Yildiz, Ö. (2017). Bürgerenergiegesellschaften in Deutschland. In L. Holstenkamp & J. Radtke (Eds.), Handbuch Energiewende und Partizipation (pp. 1057–1076). Wiesbaden: Springer.
go back to reference Huybrechts, B., & Mertens, S. (2014). The relevance of the cooperative model in the field of renewable energy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85(2), 193–212.CrossRef Huybrechts, B., & Mertens, S. (2014). The relevance of the cooperative model in the field of renewable energy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85(2), 193–212.CrossRef
go back to reference Huybrechts, B., Creupelandt, D., & Vansintjan, D. (2018). Networking renewable energy cooperatives—The experience of the European Federation REScoop.eu. In L. Holstenkamp & J. Radtke (Eds.), Handbuch Energiewende und Partizipation (pp. 847–858). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09416-4_50.CrossRef Huybrechts, B., Creupelandt, D., & Vansintjan, D. (2018). Networking renewable energy cooperatives—The experience of the European Federation REScoop.eu. In L. Holstenkamp & J. Radtke (Eds.), Handbuch Energiewende und Partizipation (pp. 847–858). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-658-09416-4_​50.CrossRef
go back to reference ICA. (2007). Factsheet: Differences between co-operatives, corporations and non-profit organisations; US Overseas Cooperative Development Council. ICA. (2007). Factsheet: Differences between co-operatives, corporations and non-profit organisations; US Overseas Cooperative Development Council.
go back to reference Kampman, B., Blommerde, J., & Afman, M. (2016). The potential of energy citizens in the European Union (No. 16.3J00.75). Delft: CE Delft. Kampman, B., Blommerde, J., & Afman, M. (2016). The potential of energy citizens in the European Union (No. 16.3J00.75). Delft: CE Delft.
go back to reference Klagge, B., Schmole, H., Seidl, I., & Schön, S. (2016). Zukunft der deutschen Energiegenossenschaften (Future of German energy co-operatives). Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 74(3), 243–258. Klagge, B., Schmole, H., Seidl, I., & Schön, S. (2016). Zukunft der deutschen Energiegenossenschaften (Future of German energy co-operatives). Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 74(3), 243–258.
go back to reference Lehnhoff, D. J., Holthaus, J., & Germany. (Eds.). (2016). Genossenschaftsgesetz: Gesetz, betreffend die Erwerbs- und Wirtschaftsgenossenschaften: mit Erläuterungen zum Umwandlungsgesetz und zur Europäischen Genossenschaft (SCE) (38., neu bearbeitete Auflage). Berlin: De Gruyter. Lehnhoff, D. J., Holthaus, J., & Germany. (Eds.). (2016). Genossenschaftsgesetz: Gesetz, betreffend die Erwerbs- und Wirtschaftsgenossenschaften: mit Erläuterungen zum Umwandlungsgesetz und zur Europäischen Genossenschaft (SCE) (38., neu bearbeitete Auflage). Berlin: De Gruyter.
go back to reference Peeters, M., & Schomerus, T. (2014). An EU law perspective on the role of regional authorities in the field of renewable energy. In Renewable Energy Law in the EU (pp. 10–34). Edward Elgar Publishing. Peeters, M., & Schomerus, T. (2014). An EU law perspective on the role of regional authorities in the field of renewable energy. In Renewable Energy Law in the EU (pp. 10–34). Edward Elgar Publishing.
go back to reference Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.CrossRef Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.CrossRef
go back to reference REScoop. (2015). The energy transition to energy democracy. REScoop. (2015). The energy transition to energy democracy.
go back to reference Rommel, J., Radtke, J., von Jorck, G., Mey, F., & Yildiz, Ö. (2018). Community renewable energy at a crossroads: A think piece on degrowth, technology, and the democratization of the German energy system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(Part 2), 1746–1753.CrossRef Rommel, J., Radtke, J., von Jorck, G., Mey, F., & Yildiz, Ö. (2018). Community renewable energy at a crossroads: A think piece on degrowth, technology, and the democratization of the German energy system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(Part 2), 1746–1753.CrossRef
go back to reference Sykuta, M. E., & Cook, M. L. (2001). A new institutional economics approach to contracts and cooperatives. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(5), 1273–1279.CrossRef Sykuta, M. E., & Cook, M. L. (2001). A new institutional economics approach to contracts and cooperatives. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(5), 1273–1279.CrossRef
go back to reference Yildiz, Ö. (2013). Energiegenossenschaften in Deutschland–Bestandsentwicklung und institutionenökonomische Analyse. Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, 63(3), 173–186.CrossRef Yildiz, Ö. (2013). Energiegenossenschaften in Deutschland–Bestandsentwicklung und institutionenökonomische Analyse. Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, 63(3), 173–186.CrossRef
go back to reference Yildiz, Ö. (2014). Financing renewable energy infrastructures via financial citizen participation – The case of Germany. Renewable Energy, 68, 677–685. Yildiz, Ö. (2014). Financing renewable energy infrastructures via financial citizen participation – The case of Germany. Renewable Energy, 68, 677–685.
go back to reference Yildiz, Ö., & Radtke, J. (2015). Energy cooperatives as a form of workplace democracy? A theoretical assessment. Economic Sociology: The European Electronic Newsletter, 16(3), 17–24. Yildiz, Ö., & Radtke, J. (2015). Energy cooperatives as a form of workplace democracy? A theoretical assessment. Economic Sociology: The European Electronic Newsletter, 16(3), 17–24.
go back to reference Zenke, I., & Dessau, C. (2013). Bürgerbeteiligungen als Schlüssel einer kommunalen Energiewende. KommJur, 8, 288–291. Zenke, I., & Dessau, C. (2013). Bürgerbeteiligungen als Schlüssel einer kommunalen Energiewende. KommJur, 8, 288–291.
Metadata
Title
Renewable Energy Cooperatives
Authors
Jens Lowitzsch
Florian Hanke
Copyright Year
2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93518-8_7