Top

Published in:

2022 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Research Progress and Hotspot Analysis of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS): A Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace

Authors : Qin Li, Yijun Liu, Wenlong Li, Yongqiang Yan, Zhonghao Wu

Published in: Climate Change and Environmental Sustainability

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The issue of global climate change has become increasingly prominent. The reduction of fossil energy consumption and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions have attracted more and more attention from countries. Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technology is considered to have the synergistic effect of achieving large-scale greenhouse gas emission reduction and low-carbon utilization of fossil energy. It is one of the important technological choices for the global response to climate change in the future. It has attracted governments and enterprises from all over the world and the high attention of the academic community. This paper screened out 1890 scientific articles related to global CCUS from the Web of Science Core Collection and used the CiteSpace to analyze the knowledge graph of the papers since 2011. The paper visually displays the most productive institutions, authors, and sources in the CCUS research. In addition, the paper explains how research subjects have changed over time and analyzes research frontiers. The results show that: (1) CCUS research has accelerated globally in the past ten years, with the United States, the United Kingdom, and China ranking the top three. (2) Research hotspots mainly focus on engineering, energy and fuels, engineering chemistry, engineering environment, science and technology, green sustainable technology, environmental science, and ecology. (3) CCUS has become a multidisciplinary research, in which all research subjects related to CCUS have been cited and correlated. In general, this research is helpful for policy guidance and follow-up research.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Towards Mitigating Climate Change by Pipeline Integrity Management: Resilient Pipelines

next chapter Using Air2water Model to Predict the Water Temperature of Fuxian Lake

Aminu, M. D., Nabavi, S. A., Rochelle, C. A., et al. (2017). A review of developments in carbon dioxide storage. Applied Energy, 208, 1389–1419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.015

Anderson, K., & Peters, G. (2016). The trouble with negative emissions. Science, 354(6309), 182–183. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah4567ADSCrossRefPubMed

Bhave, A., Taylor, R., Fennell, P., et al. (2017). Screening and techno-economic assessment of biomass-based power generation with CCS technologies to meet 2050 CO₂ targets. Applied Energy, 190, 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.120CrossRef

Boot-Handford, M., Abanades, J., Anthony, E., et al. (2013). Carbon capture and storage update. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee42350fCrossRef

Bui, M., Adjiman, C. S., Bardow, A., et al. (2018). Carbon capture and storage (CCS): The way forward. Energy & Environmental Science, 11, 1062–1176. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ee02342aCrossRef

Chaomei, C. (2017). Science mapping: Asystematic review of the literature. Journal of Data & Information Science, 2017(2), 1–40.

Chen, C. (2010). CiteSpace: Visualizing patterns and trends in scientific literature. Retrieved January 27.

Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal Data and Information Science , 2(2), 1e40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006

Cuéllar-Franca, R. M., Azapagic, A. (2015). Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: A critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 9(1), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2014.12.001

Dowell, N. M., Fennell, P. S., Shah, N., et al. (2017). The role of CO₂ capture and utilization in mitigating climate change. Nature Climate Change, 7(4), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE3231ADSCrossRef

Fajardy, M., & Mac Dowell, N. (2017). Can BECCS deliver sustainable and resource efficient negative emissions? Energy & Environmental Science, 10, 1389–1426. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ee00465fCrossRef

Fan, J. L., Xu, M., Yang, L., et al. (2019). Benefit evaluation of investment in CCS retrofitting of coal-fired power plants and PV power plants in China based on real options. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 115, 109350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109350CrossRef

Fan, J. L., Shen, S., Xu, M., et al. (2020). Cost-benefit comparison of carbon capture, utilization, and storage retrofitted to different thermal power plants in China based on real options approach. Advances in Climate Change Research

Fan, C. (2015). Analysis of optimal carbon capture and sequestration policy. Jinan University

Fuss, S., Canadell, J., Peters, G., et al. (2014). Betting on negative emissions. Nature Climate Change, 4, 850–853. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2392ADSCrossRef

Fuss, S., Lamb, F. W., Callaghan, M. W., et al. (2018). Negative emissions—Part 2: costs, potentials and side effects. Environmental Research Letters, 13(6), 063002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9fADSCrossRef

Garfield, E., Pudovkin, A. I., & Istomin, V. S. (2002). Algorithmic citation-linked historiography—Mapping the literature of science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Annual Meeting, 39, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.1450390102CrossRef

GCCSI (2017). The Global Status of CCS: 2017, Docklands, Australia. Accessed September 2020. https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/2017-Global-Status-Report.pdf

Guo, P., Tian, W., Li, H., et al. (2020). Global characteristics and trends of research on construction dust: Based on bibliometric and visualized analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research , 27(37). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09723-y

Id, K. H., Qi, K., Guan, Q., et al. (2016). A scientometric visualization analysis for night-time light remote sensing research from 1991 to 2016. Remote Sensing, 9(8), 802. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9080802 CrossRef

IEA. Technology roadmap, carbon capture and storage, 2013 edn. International Energy Agency, Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172246

International Energy Agency. (2020). Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage. https://www.iea.org/fuels-and-technologies/carbon-capture-utilisation-and-storage. Accessed August 3, 2020.

Introduction to “Kyoto Protocol”. Net of Chinese people. http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/npc/zxft/zxft8/2009-08/24/content_1515035.htm

IPCC. (2005). IPCC Special Report on carbon dioxide capture and storage; Prepared by Working Group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In B. O. Metz, H. C. Davidson, M. L. de Coninck, L. A. Meyer (Eds.), Cambridge University Press.

IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press.

Kang, D., Jo, H., Lee, M. G., et al. (2016). Carbon dioxide utilization using a pretreated brine solution at normal temperature and pressure. Chemical Engineering Journal, 284, 1270–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.043CrossRef

Kemper, J. (2015). Biomass and carbon dioxide capture and storage: A review. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 40, 401–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.012CrossRef

Koornneef, J., Keulen, T. V., Faaij, A., et al. (2008). Life cycle assessment of a pulverized coal power plant with post-combustion capture, transport and storage of CO₂. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2(4), 448–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.06.008CrossRef

Leung, D. Y., Caramanna, G., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014). An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 426–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093CrossRef

Liu, Q., Ye, Y. (2012). A study on mining bibliographic records by designed software SATI: case study on library and information science. Journal of Information Resources Management, 2(1), 50e58. https://doi.org/10.13365/j.jirm.2012.01.012

Mac Dowell, N., Fennell, P., Shah, N., et al. (2017). The role of CO₂ capture and utilization in mitigating climate change. Nature Climate Change, 7, 243–249 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3231

Mechleri, E., Brown, S., Fennell, P. S., et al. (2017). CO2 capture and storage (CCS) cost reduction via infrastructure right-sizing. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 119, 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2017.01.016CrossRef

Meerow, S., & Stults, M. (2016). Comparing conceptualizations of urban climate resilience in theory and practice. Sustainability, 8, 701. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/7/701

Middleton, R. S., & Bielicki, J. M. (2009). A scalable infrastructure model for carbon capture and storage: SimCCS. Energy Policy, 37(3), 1052–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.049CrossRef

Milman, A., & Short, A. (2008). Incorporating resilience into sustainability indicators: an example for the urban water sector. Global Environmental Change, 18, 758–767.CrossRef

Minx, J. C., et al. (2018). Negative emissions: Part 1—Research landscape, ethics and synthesis. Environmental Research Letters, 13(6), 063–071. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9bCrossRef

Muller, M. (2007). Adapting to climate change: Water management for urban resilience. Environment and Urbanization, 19, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247807076726CrossRef

Ooi, R. E. H., Foo, D. C. Y., Ng, D. K. S., & Tan, R. R. (2013). Planning of carbon capture and storage with pinch analysis techniques. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 91(12), 2721–2731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2013.04.007CrossRef

Park, S., Min, J., Lee, M. G., et al. (2013). Characteristics of CO2 fixation by chemical conversion to carbonate salts. Chemical Engineering Journal, 231, 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.07.032CrossRef

Park, S., Jo, H., Kang, D., & Park, J. (2014). A study of CO2 precipitation method considering an ionic CO₂ and Ca(OH)₂ slurry. Energy, 75, 624–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.08.036CrossRef

Pérez-Fortes, M., Schöneberger, J. C., Boulamanti, A., et al. (2016). Methanol synthesis using captured CO₂ as raw material: Techno-economic and environmental assessment. Applied Energy-Barking Then Oxford, 161(15), 718–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.067CrossRef

Regufe, M. J., Pereira, A., Ferreira, A., et al. (2021). Current developments of carbon capture storage and/or utilization—looking for net-zero emissions defined in the Paris agreement. Energies, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092406

Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D. P., Kriegler, E., et al. (2016). The Shared Socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Global Environmental Change, 42, 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009CrossRef

Rogelj, J., Luderer, G., Pietzcker, R., et al. (2015). Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5°C. Nature Climate Change, 5, 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2572ADSCrossRef

Romasheva, N., & Ilinova, A. (2019). CCS projects: How regulatory framework influences their deployment. Resources, 8, 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8040181CrossRef

Shen, Y., & Wang, G. (2013). Key findings and assessment results of IPCC WGI fifth assessment report. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2013(05), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2013.0120CrossRef

Simboli, B., & Zhang, M., (2004). Software: Science literature clustering concepts. Science, 303(5659), 768. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094282

Smith, P., Davis, S., Creutzig, F., et al. (2016). Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO₂ emissions. Nature Climate Change, 6, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2870ADSCrossRef

Stuardi, F. M., MacPherson, F., & Leclaire, J. (2019). Integrated CO2 capture and utilization: a priority research direction. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 16, 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2019.02.003CrossRef

Tan, R. R., et al. (2012). Optimal source-sink matching in carbon capture and storage systems with time, injection rate, and capacity constraints. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 32(2), 411–416.CrossRef

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (1994). United Nations Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/

Yang, L., Xu, M., Yang, Y., et al. (2019). Comparison of subsidy schemes for carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) investment based on real option approach: evidence from China. Applied Energy, 255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113828

Zhu, E., Qi, Q., & Sha, M. (2021). Identify the effects of urbanization on carbon emissions (EUCE): A global scientometric visualization analysis from 1992 to 2018. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021(8), 1–12.

Title: Research Progress and Hotspot Analysis of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS): A Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace
Authors: Qin Li
Yijun Liu
Wenlong Li
Yongqiang Yan
Zhonghao Wu
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Climate Change and Environmental Sustainability
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-12014-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-12015-2

Copyright Year: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12015-2_3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"