Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Wireless Personal Communications
Published in: Wireless Personal Communications 3/2022

22-08-2021

Resource Utilization for IoT Oriented Framework Using Zero Hour Policy

Authors: Heena Wadhwa, Rajni Aron

Published in: Wireless Personal Communications | Issue 3/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The cloud computing paradigm offers several services to handle a large amount of data. These services include data storage, exploration, and analysis. Due to the increase in the Internet of Thing devices, traditional computing systems are shifting to fog computing. Resource utilization is a complex task that is often compromised due to the non-availability of required resources on the fog layer. The dynamic nature of fog layer resources depends on the users’ requirements for resources. Due to limited resources available at the fog layer, a resource utilization policy is required to ensure efficient resource usability. Therefore, it is significant to allocate the resources and scheduling tasks on the fog layer. In this paper, a soft real-time based resource utilization framework has been proposed. This framework offers a zero hour policy that caters to resource utilization. The proposed policy is evaluated on the iFogsim simulator and compared with the existing approach. The experimental results demonstrated that zero hour policy effectively minimizes execution time and loop delay of applications.
previous article Performance of Uplink NOMA with User Mobility Under Short Packet Transmission
next article Machine Learning Approaches for Anomaly Detection in IoT: An Overview and Future Research Directions

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
Abbasi, M., Yaghoobikia, M., Rafiee, M., Jolfaei, A., & Khosravi, M. R. (2020). Efficient resource management and workload allocation in fog-cloud computing paradigm in IoT using learning classifier systems. Computer Communications, 153, 217–228.CrossRef
2.
Adhikari, M., Mukherjee, M., & Srirama, S. N. (2019). Dpto: A deadline and priority-aware task offloading in fog computing framework leveraging multilevel feedback queueing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(7), 5773–5782.CrossRef
3.
Agarwal, S., Yadav, S., & Yadav, A. K. (2016). An efficient architecture and algorithm for resource provisioning in fog computing. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 8(1), 48.CrossRef
4.
Benamer, A. R., Teyeb, H., & Hadj-Alouane, N. B. (2018). Latency-aware placement heuristic in fog computing environment. In: OTM Confederated International Conferences “On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems” (pp. 241–257). Springer.
5.
Bittencourt, L. F., Diaz-Montes, J., Buyya, R., Rana, O. F., & Parashar, M. (2017). Mobility-aware application scheduling in fog computing. IEEE Cloud Computing, 4(2), 26–35.CrossRef
6.
Bonadio, A., Chiti, F., Fantacci, R., & Vespri, V. (2020). An integrated framework for blockchain inspired fog communications and computing in internet of vehicles. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(2), 755–762.CrossRef
7.
Brogi, A., & Forti, S. (2017). Qos-aware deployment of IoT applications through the fog. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(5), 1185–1192.CrossRef
8.
Calheiros, R. N., Ranjan, R., Beloglazov, A., De Rose, C. A., & Buyya, R. (2011). Cloudsim: A toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Software: Practice and experience, 41(1), 23–50.
9.
Chang, C., Srirama, S. N., & Buyya, R. (2019). Internet of things (IoT) and new computing paradigms. In Fog and edge computing: Principles and paradigms, pp. 1–23.
10.
Chiang, M., & Zhang, T. (2016). Fog and IoT: An overview of research opportunities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(6), 854–864.CrossRef
11.
Dighriri, M., Alfoudi, A. S. D., Lee, G. M., Baker, T., & Pereira, R. (2018). Resource allocation scheme in 5g network slices. In 2018 32nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), pp. 275–280. IEEE.
12.
Etemad, M., Aazam, M., & St-Hilaire, M. (2017). Using DEVS for modeling and simulating a fog computing environment. In 2017 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) (pp. 849–854). IEEE.
13.
Ghobaei-Arani, M., Jabbehdari, S., & Pourmina, M. A. (2018). An autonomic resource provisioning approach for service-based cloud applications: A hybrid approach. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78, 191–210.CrossRef
14.
Goudarzi, M., Wu, H., Palaniswami, M. S., & Buyya, R. (2020). An application placement technique for concurrent IoT applications in edge and fog computing environments. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 20, 1298–1311.CrossRef
15.
Gupta, H., Vahid Dastjerdi, A., Ghosh, S. K., & Buyya, R. (2017). ifogsim: A toolkit for modeling and simulation of resource management techniques in the internet of things, edge and fog computing environments. Software: Practice and Experience, 47(9), 1275–1296.
16.
Jie, Y., Guo, C., Choo, K. K. R., Liu, C. Z., & Li, M. (2020). Game-theoretic resource allocation for fog-based industrial internet of things environment. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7, 3041–3052.CrossRef
17.
Kamal, M.B., Javaid, N., Naqvi, S.A.A., Butt, H., Saif, T., & Kamal, M.D. (2018). Heuristic min-conflicts optimizing technique for load balancing on fog computing. In International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (pp. 207–219). Springer.
18.
19.
Kocakulak, M., & Butun, I. (2017). An overview of wireless sensor networks towards internet of things. In 2017 IEEE 7th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
20.
Lin, S. Y., Du, Y., Ko, P. C., Wu, T. J., Ho, P. T., Sivakumar, V., et al. (2020). Fog computing based hybrid deep learning framework in effective inspection system for smart manufacturing. Computer Communications, 160, 636–642.CrossRef
21.
Liu, L., Zhang, M., Buyya, R., & Fan, Q. (2017). Deadline-constrained coevolutionary genetic algorithm for scientific workflow scheduling in cloud computing. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 29(5), e3942.CrossRef
22.
Liu, Y., Fieldsend, J. E., & Min, G. (2017). A framework of fog computing: Architecture, challenges, and optimization. IEEE Access, 5, 25445–25454.CrossRef
23.
Lopes, M. M., Higashino, W. A., Capretz, M. A., & Bittencourt, L. F. (2017). Myifogsim: A simulator for virtual machine migration in fog computing. In Companion Proceedings of the10th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing, pp. 47–52.
24.
Mahmud, R., Koch, F. L., & Buyya, R. (2018). Cloud-fog interoperability in IoT-enabled healthcare solutions. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on distributed computing and networking, pp. 1–10.
25.
Mayer, R., Graser, L., Gupta, H., Saurez, E., & Ramachandran, U. (2017). Emufog: Extensible and scalable emulation of large-scale fog computing infrastructures. In: 2017 IEEE Fog World Congress (FWC) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
26.
Mishra, S. K., Puthal, D., Sahoo, B., Jena, S. K., & Obaidat, M. S. (2018). An adaptive task allocation technique for green cloud computing. The Journal of Supercomputing, 74(1), 370–385.CrossRef
27.
Naha, R. K., Garg, S., Chan, A., & Battula, S. K. (2020). Deadline-based dynamic resource allocation and provisioning algorithms in fog-cloud environment. Future Generation Computer Systems, 104, 131–141.CrossRef
28.
Ni, L., Zhang, J., Jiang, C., Yan, C., & Yu, K. (2017). Resource allocation strategy in fog computing based on priced timed petri nets. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(5), 1216–1228.CrossRef
29.
Oprescu, A. M., & Kielmann, T. (2010). Bag-of-tasks scheduling under budget constraints. In 2010 IEEE second international conference on cloud computing technology and science (pp. 351–359). IEEE.
30.
Östberg, P. O., Byrne, J., Casari, P., Eardley, P., Anta, A. F., Forsman, J., Kennedy, J., Le Duc, T., Marino, M. N., & Loomba, R., et al. (2017). Reliable capacity provisioning for distributed cloud/edge/fog computing applications. In 2017 European conference on networks and communications (EuCNC) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
31.
Pooranian, Z., Shojafar, M., Naranjo, P. G. V., Chiaraviglio, L., & Conti, M. (2017). A novel distributed fog-based networked architecture to preserve energy in fog data centers. In 2017 IEEE 14th international conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS) (pp. 604–609). IEEE.
32.
Qayyum, T., Malik, A. W., Khattak, M. A. K., Khalid, O., & Khan, S. U. (2018). Fognetsim++: A toolkit for modeling and simulation of distributed fog environment. IEEE Access, 6, 63570–63583.CrossRef
33.
Rafique, H., Shah, M. A., Islam, S. U., Maqsood, T., Khan, S., & Maple, C. (2019). A novel bio-inspired hybrid algorithm (nbiha) for efficient resource management in fog computing. IEEE Access, 7, 115760–115773.CrossRef
34.
Rahbari, D., & Nickray, M. (2019). Low-latency and energy-efficient scheduling in fog-based IoT applications. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 27(2), 1406–1427.CrossRef
35.
Raju, I. R. K., Varma, P. S., Sundari, M. R., & Moses, G. J. (2016). Deadline aware two stage scheduling algorithm in cloud computing. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(4), 1–10.
36.
Rathee, G., Sandhu, R., Saini, H., Sivaram, M., & Dhasarathan, V. (2020). A trust computed framework for IoT devices and fog computing environment. Wireless Networks, 26(4), 2339–2351.CrossRef
37.
Santos, J., Wauters, T., Volckaert, B., & De Turck, F. (2019). Resource provisioning in fog computing: From theory to practice. Sensors, 19(10), 2238.CrossRef
38.
Saroa, M. K., & Aron, R. (2018). Fog computing and its role in development of smart applications. In 2018 IEEE Intl Conf on Parallel & Distributed Processing with Applications, Ubiquitous Computing & Communications, Big Data & Cloud Computing, Social Computing & Networking, Sustainable Computing & Communications (ISPA/IUCC/BDCloud/SocialCom/SustainCom) (pp. 1120–1127). IEEE.
39.
Singh, P., Dutta, M., & Aggarwal, N. (2017). A review of task scheduling based on meta-heuristics approach in cloud computing. Knowledge and Information Systems, 52(1), 1–51.CrossRef
40.
Sun, Y., Lin, F., & Xu, H. (2018). Multi-objective optimization of resource scheduling in fog computing using an improved NSGA-II. Wireless Personal Communications, 102(2), 1369–1385.CrossRef
41.
Taneja, M., & Davy, A. (2017). Resource aware placement of iot application modules in fog-cloud computing paradigm. In 2017 IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management (IM) (pp. 1222–1228). IEEE.
42.
Tuli, S., Basumatary, N., Gill, S. S., Kahani, M., Arya, R. C., Wander, G. S., & Buyya, R. (2020). Healthfog: An ensemble deep learning based smart healthcare system for automatic diagnosis of heart diseases in integrated iot and fog computing environments. Future Generation Computer Systems, 104, 187–200.CrossRef
43.
Tychalas, D., & Karatza, H. (2020). A scheduling algorithm for a fog computing system with bag-of-tasks jobs: Simulation and performance evaluation. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 98(101), 982.
44.
Velasquez, K., Abreu, D. P., Gonçalves, D., Bittencourt, L., Curado, M., Monteiro, E., & Madeira, E. (2017). Service orchestration in fog environments. In 2017 IEEE 5th international conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud) (pp. 329–336). IEEE.
45.
Wadhwa, H., & Aron, R. (2018). Fog computing with the integration of internet of things: Architecture, applications and future directions. In 2018 IEEE Intl Conf on Parallel & Distributed Processing with Applications, Ubiquitous Computing & Communications, Big Data & Cloud Computing, Social Computing & Networking, Sustainable Computing & Communications (ISPA/IUCC/BDCloud/SocialCom/SustainCom) (pp. 987–994). IEEE.
46.
Wang, L., Von Laszewski, G., Younge, A., He, X., Kunze, M., Tao, J., & Fu, C. (2010). Cloud computing: A perspective study. New Generation Computing, 28(2), 137–146.CrossRef
47.
Xu, X., Liu, Q., Qi, L., Yuan, Y., Dou, W., & Liu, A. X. (2018). A heuristic virtual machine scheduling method for load balancing in fog-cloud computing. In 2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Big Data Security on Cloud (BigDataSecurity), IEEE International Conference on High Performance and Smart Computing,(HPSC) and IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data and Security (IDS) (pp. 83–88). IEEE.
48.
Yang, Y., Wang, K., Zhang, G., Chen, X., Luo, X., & Zhou, M. T. (2018). Meets: Maximal energy efficient task scheduling in homogeneous fog networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(5), 4076–4087.CrossRef
49.
Yangui, S., Ravindran, P., Bibani, O., Glitho, R. H., Hadj-Alouane, N. B., Morrow, M. J., & Polakos, P. A. (2016). A platform as-a-service for hybrid cloud/fog environments. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN) (pp. 1–7). IEEE.
50.
Yigitoglu, E., Mohamed, M., Liu, L., & Ludwig, H. (2017). Foggy: A framework for continuous automated IoT application deployment in fog computing. In 2017 IEEE international conference on AI & Mobile Services (AIMS) (pp. 38–45). IEEE.
51.
Yousefpour, A., Fung, C., Nguyen, T., Kadiyala, K., Jalali, F., Niakanlahiji, A., et al. (2019). All one needs to know about fog computing and related edge computing paradigms: A complete survey. Journal of Systems Architecture, 98, 289–330.CrossRef
52.
Zeng, D., Gu, L., Guo, S., Cheng, Z., & Yu, S. (2016). Joint optimization of task scheduling and image placement in fog computing supported software-defined embedded system. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 65(12), 3702–3712.MathSciNetCrossRef
53.
Zhang, H., Xiao, Y., Bu, S., Niyato, D., Yu, F. R., & Han, Z. (2017). Computing resource allocation in three-tier IoT fog networks: A joint optimization approach combining stackelberg game and matching. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(5), 1204–1215.CrossRef
54.
Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Gu, Y., Niyato, D., & Han, Z. (2017). A hierarchical game framework for resource management in fog computing. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(8), 52–57.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Resource Utilization for IoT Oriented Framework Using Zero Hour Policy
Authors
Heena Wadhwa
Rajni Aron
Publication date
22-08-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Wireless Personal Communications / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Electronic ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08993-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Wireless Personal Communications 3/2022 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Internet of Things Energy Efficient Cluster-Based Routing Using Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization for Wireless Sensor Network

OriginalPaper

Network Functions Virtualization for Mobile Core and Heterogeneous Cellular Networks

ReviewPaper

RPL Enhancement to Support Video Traffic for IoMT Applications

OriginalPaper

Enhancement of Beam Width and Side Lobe Level Reduction Using PEC Ground Plane in Antenna Array

OriginalPaper

Identifying Malicious Secondary User Presence Within Primary User Range in Cognitive Radio Networks

OriginalPaper

A 4-step Blockchain Equipped Approach to Energy Efficiency and Routing in Homing Pigeon Based Delay Tolerant Network