Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Future Directions in Robotic Surgery Read chapter Read first chapter

2011 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

28. Robotic-Assisted Urologic Applications

Authors : Thomas S. Lendvay, Ryan S. Hsi

Published in: Surgical Robotics

Publisher: Springer US

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The clinical use of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has been most prevalent in urologic care. The robotic prostatectomy is the procedure that has highlighted the potential of robotics. Because this procedure has become so rapidly embraced, urologists have readily adapted the robotic platform to other procedures such as radical cystectomy, partial nephrectomy, pediatric reconstructive procedures, and now female urologic and fertility procedures. Data on comparative effectiveness between the robotic, laparoscopic, and open versions of urologic procedures is still sparse, yet public pressure has forced a demand for access to robotic urologic care. It remains to be seen if adequate robotic training can keep up with the exploding need to provide robotic surgery options, but simulation training is ideally situated to offer a solution to novice trainees and experienced surgeons who wish to embark on robotic urologic surgery.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter History of Robots in Orthopedics
next chapter Applications of Surgical Robotics in Cardiac Surgery
Literature
1.
Bagrodia, A., Raman, J.D.: Ergonomics considerations of radical prostatectomy: physician perspective of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques. J. Endourol. 23(4), 627–633 (2009)CrossRef
2.
Khan, M.S., Shah, S.S., Hemel, A., Rimington, P., Dasgupta, P: Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surg. MRCAS 4(3), 197–201 (2008)CrossRef
3.
Smith, J.A., Jr., Chan, R.C., Chang, S.S., Herrell, S.D., Clark, P.E., Baumgartner, R., Cookson, M.S.: A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 178(6), 2385–2389 (2007)CrossRef
4.
Guru, K.A., Wilding, G.E., Piacente, P., Thompson, J., Deng, W., Kim, H.L., Mohler, J., O’Leary, K.: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: assessment of postoperative pain. Can. J. Urol. 14(6), 3753–3756 (2007)
5.
Mufarrij, P.W., Woods, M., Shah, O.D., Palese, M.A., Berger, A.D., Thomas, R., Stifelman, M.D.: Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience. J. Urol. 180(4), 1391–1396 (2008)CrossRef
6.
Pruthi, R.S., Wallen, E.M.: Current status of robotic prostatectomy: promises fulfilled. J. Urol. 181(6), 2420–2421 (2009)CrossRef
7.
Binder, J., Kramer, W.: Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 87(4), 408–410 (2001)CrossRef
8.
Guillonneau, B., Jayet, C., Tewari, A., Vallancien, G.: Robot assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. J. Urol. 166(1), 200–201 (2001)CrossRef
9.
Rogers, C., Laungani, R., Krane, L.S., Bhandari, A., Bhandari, M., Menon, M.: Robotic nephrectomy for the treatment of benign and malignant disease. BJU Int. 102(11), 1660–1665 (2008)CrossRef
10.
Rogers, C.G., Singh, A., Blatt, A.M., Linehan, W.M., Pinto, P.A.: Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique. Eur. Urol. 53(3), 514–521 (2008)CrossRef
11.
Patel, M.N., Bhandari, M., Menon, M., Rogers, C.G.: Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 103(9), 1296–1311 (2009)CrossRef
12.
Wang, A.J., Bhayani, S.B.: Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: single-surgeon analysis of >100 consecutive procedures. Urology 73(2), 306–310 (2009)CrossRef
13.
Brunaud, L., Ayav, A., Zarnegar, R., Rouers, A., Klein, M., Boissel, P., Bresler, L: Prospective evaluation of 100 robotic-assisted unilateral adrenalectomies. Surgery 144(6), 995–1001 (2008)CrossRef
14.
Hyams, E.S., Stifelman, M.D.: The role of robotics for adrenal pathology. Curr. Opin. Urol. 19(1), 89–96 (2009)CrossRef
15.
Shu, T., Taghechian, S., Wang, R.: Initial experience with robot-assisted varicocelectomy. Asian J. Androl. 10(1), 146–148 (2008)CrossRef
16.
Hidalgo-Tamola, J., Sorenson, M.D., Bice, J.B., Lendvay, T.S.: Pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic varicocelectomy. J. Endourol. 23(8), 1297–1300 (2009)CrossRef
17.
Kramer, B.A., Whelan, C.M., Powell, T.M., Schwartz, B.F.: Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as management for pelvic organ prolapse. J. Endourol. 23(4), 655–658 (2009)CrossRef
18.
Casale, P.: Robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population. Curr. Opin. Urol. 19(1), 97–101 (2009)CrossRef
19.
Casale, P.: Robotic pediatric urology. Exp. Rev. Med. Dev. 5(1), 59–64 (2008)CrossRef
20.
Kutikov, A., Nguyen, M., Guzzo, T., Canter, D., Casale, P.: Laparoscopic and robotic complex upper-tract reconstruction in children with a duplex collecting system. J. Endourol. 21(6), 621–624 (2007)CrossRef
21.
Lendvay, T.S., Shnorhavorian, M., Grady, R.W.: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy and antegrade continent enema colon tube creation in a pediatric spina bifida patient. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 18(2), 310–312 (2008)CrossRef
22.
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., et al.: Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J. Clin. 59, 225–249 (2009)CrossRef
23.
Roehl, K.A., Han, M., Ramos, C. G., et al.: Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J. Urol. 172, 910–914 (2004)CrossRef
24.
Hull, G.W., Rabbani, F., Abbas, F., et al.: Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J. Urol. 167, 528–534 (2002)CrossRef
25.
Hu, J.C., Wang, Q., Pashos, C. L., et al.: Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 2278–2284 (2008)CrossRef
26.
Badani, K.K., Kaul, S., Menon, M.: Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer 110, 1951–1958 (2007)CrossRef
27.
Grossfeld, G.D., Chang, J. J., Broering, J. M., et al.: Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database. J. Urol. 163, 1171–1177 (2000); quiz 1295CrossRef
28.
Ficarra, V., Cavalleri, S., Novara, G., et al.: Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur. Urol. 51, 45–55 (2007)CrossRef
29.
Ahlering, T.E., Woo, D., Eichel, L., et al.: Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon’s outcomes. Urology 63, 819–822 (2004)CrossRef
30.
Touijer, K., Kuroiwa, K., Eastham, J. A., et al.: Risk-adjusted analysis of positive surgical margins following laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 52, 1090–1096 (2007)CrossRef
31.
Tewari, A., Srivasatava, A., Menon, M.: A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int. 92, 205–210 (2003)CrossRef
32.
Berryhill, R., Jr., Jhaveri, J., Yadav, R., et al.: Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. Urology 72, 15–23 (2008)CrossRef
33.
Ficarra, V., Novara, G., Artibani, W., et al.: Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur. Urol. (2009)
34.
Miller, J., Smith, A., Kouba, E., et al.: Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 178, 854–858 (2007); discussion 859CrossRef
35.
Herrell, S.D., Smith, J. A., Jr.: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve? Urology 66, 105–107 (2005)CrossRef
36.
Nelson, B., Kaufman, M., Broughton, G., et al.: Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 177, 929–31 (2007)CrossRef
37.
Schroeck, F.R., Krupski, T. L., Sun, L., et al.: Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 54, 785–93 (2008)CrossRef
38.
Konety, B.R., Joslyn, S. A., O’Donnell, M. A.: Extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy and its impact on outcome in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer: analysis of data from the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program data base. J. Urol. 169, 946–950 (2003)CrossRef
39.
Snyder, C., Harlan, L., Knopf, K., et al.: Patterns of care for the treatment of bladder cancer. J. Urol. 169, 1697–1701 (2003)CrossRef
40.
Stein, J.P., Lieskovsky, G., Cote, R., et al.: Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J. Clin. Oncol. 19, 666–675 (2001)
41.
Parra, R.O., Andrus, C. H., Jones, J. P., et al.: Laparoscopic cystectomy: initial report on a new treatment for the retained bladder. J. Urol. 148, 1140–1144 (1992)
42.
Hubert, J., Chammas, M., Larre, S., et al.: Initial experience with successful totally robotic laparoscopic cystoprostatectomy and ileal conduit construction in tetraplegic patients: report of two cases. J. Endourol. 20, 139–143 (2006)CrossRef
43.
Balaji, K.C., Yohannes, P., McBride, C. L., et al.: Feasibility of robot-assisted totally intracorporeal laparoscopic ileal conduit urinary diversion: initial results of a single institutional pilot study. Urology 63, 51–55 (2004)CrossRef
44.
Sala, L.G., Matsunaga, G. S., Corica, F. A., et al.: Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy and totally intracorporeal ileal neobladder. J. Endourol. 20, 233–235 (2006); discussion 236CrossRef
45.
Menon, M., Hemal, A. K., Tewari, A., et al.: Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int. 92, 232–236 (2003)CrossRef
46.
Guru, K.A., Kim, H. L., Piacente, P. M., et al.: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: initial experience at Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Urology 69, 469–474 (2007)CrossRef
47.
Rhee, J.J., Lebeau, S., Smolkin, M., et al.: Radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion: early prospective evaluation of the impact of robotic assistance. BJU Int. 98, 1059–1063 (2006)CrossRef
48.
Pruthi, R.S., Smith, A., Wallen, E. M.: Evaluating the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy. J. Endourol. 22, 2469–2474 (2008)CrossRef
49.
Ng, C.K., Kauffman, E. C., Lee, M. M., et al.: A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy. Eur. Urol. (2009)
50.
Pruthi, R.S., Wallen, E. M.: Is robotic radical cystectomy an appropriate treatment for bladder cancer? Short-term oncologic and clinical follow-up in 50 consecutive patients. Urology 72, 617–620 (2008); discussion 620–622CrossRef
51.
Nguyen, M.M., Gill, I. S., Ellison, L. M.: The evolving presentation of renal carcinoma in the United States: trends from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program. J. Urol. 176, 2397–2400 (2006); discussion 2400CrossRef
52.
Lane, B.R., Gill, I. S.: 5-Year outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J. Urol. 177, 70–74 (2007); discussion 74CrossRef
53.
Phillips, C.K., Taneja, S. S., Stifelman, M. D.: Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: the NYU technique. J. Endourol. 19, 441–445 (2005); discussion 445CrossRef
54.
Gettman, M.T., Blute, M. L., Chow, G. K., et al.: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 64, 914–918 (2004)CrossRef
55.
Kaul, S., Laungani, R., Sarle, R., et al.: da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur. Urol. 51, 186–191 (2007); discussion 191–192CrossRef
56.
Rogers, C.G., Singh, A., Blatt, A. M., et al.: Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique. Eur. Urol. 53, 514–521 (2008)CrossRef
57.
Caruso, R.P., Phillips, C. K., Kau, E., et al.: Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience. J. Urol. 176, 36–39 (2006)CrossRef
58.
Deane, L.A., Lee, H. J., Box, G. N., et al.: Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: a comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution. J. Endourol. 22, 947–952 (2008)CrossRef
59.
Lee, R.S., Sethi, A. S., Passerotti, C. C., et al.: Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a viable and safe option in children. J. Urol. 181, 823–828 (2009); discussion 828–829CrossRef
60.
Benway, B.M., Bhayani, S. B., Rogers, C. G., et al.: Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J. Urol. (2009)
61.
Rogers, C.G., Metwalli, A., Blatt, A. M., et al.: Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors: a multi-institutional analysis. J. Urol. 180, 2353–2356 (2008); discussion 2356CrossRef
62.
Gautam, G., Benway, B. M., Bhayani, S. B., et al.: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: current perspectives and future prospects. Urology (2009)
63.
Carr, M.C., El-Ghoneimi, A.: Anomalies and Surgery of the Ureteropelvic Junction in Children. Campbell-Walsh Urology, 9th edn., pp. 3359–3382. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA (2007)
64.
Peters, C.A.: Robotic assisted surgery in pediatric urology. Pediatr. Endosurg. Innov. Tech. 7, 403–413 (2003)CrossRef
65.
Thakre, A.A., Bailly, Y., Sun, L.W., Van Meer, F. Yeung, C.K.: Is smaller workspace a limitation for robot performance in laparoscopy? J. Urol. 179(3), 1138–1142 (2008)CrossRef
66.
Anderson, J.C., Hynes, W.: Retrocaval ureter. A case diagnosed preoperatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br. J. Urol. 21, 209–212 (1949)CrossRef
67.
Hotaling, J.M., Shear, S., Lendvay, T. S.: 14-Gauge angiocatheter: the assist port. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Tech. 19(5) (2009)
68.
Ginger, V., Lendvay, T. S.: Intraoperative ultrasound: application in pediatric pyeloplasty. Urology 73(2), 377–379 (2008)CrossRef
69.
Kim, S., Canter, D., Leone, N., Patel, R., Casale, P.: A comparative study between laparoscopic and robotically assisted pyeloplasty in the pediatric population. In: Abstract #1037, American Urological Association Meeting, Anaheim, CA, 17–22 May 2007
70.
Lee, R.S., Retik, A. B., Borer, J. G., Peters, C. A.: Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery. J. Urol. 175(2), 683–687 (2006)CrossRef
71.
Atala, A., Kavoussi, L.R., Goldstein, D.S., Retik, A.B., Peters, C.A.: Laparoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux. J. Urol. 150(2 Pt 2), 748–751 (1993)
72.
Ehrlich, R.M., Gershman, A., Fuchs, G.: Laparoscopic vesicoureteroplasty in children: initial case reports. Urology 43(2), 255–261 (1994)CrossRef
73.
Peters, C.A.: Robotically assisted surgery in pediatric urology. Urol. Clin. N. Am. 31(4), 743–752 (2004)CrossRef
74.
Lich, R., Jr., Howerton, L.W., Davis, L.A.: Childhood urosepsis. J. Kentucky Med. Assoc. 59, 1177 (1961)
75.
Lendvay, T.: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic management of vesicoureteral reflux. Adv. Urol. 732942 (2008) (online)
76.
Casale, P., Patel, R. P., Kolon, T.F.: Nerve sparing robotic extravesical ureteral reimplantation. J. Urol. 179(5), 1987–1989 (2008)CrossRef
77.
Blinman, T.: Trocar incision tensions do not sum. In: International Pediatric Endosurgical Group Abstract S009, Buenos Aires, Sept 6–7, 2007.
78.
Yeung, C.K., Sihoe, J.D.Y., Borzi, P.A., Endoscopic cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation under carbon dioxide bladder insufflation: a novel technique. J. Endourol. 19, 295–299 (2005)CrossRef
79.
Lendvay, T., Casale, P., Sweet, R., Peters, C.: Initial validation of a virtual-reality robotic simulator. J. Robot. Surg. 2, 145–149 (2008).CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robotic-Assisted Urologic Applications
Authors
Thomas S. Lendvay
Ryan S. Hsi
Copyright Year
2011
Publisher
Springer US
Book
Surgical Robotics

Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1125-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4419-1126-1

Copyright Year: 2011

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1126-1_28