Top

Wireless Personal Communications

Published in:

04-10-2023

Robotics in Medical Domain: The Future of Surgery, Healthcare and Imaging

Authors: Anisha Halder Roy, Sanchita Ghosh, Bharat Gupta

Published in: Wireless Personal Communications | Issue 4/2023

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Robotics is a popular branch of Machine Learning that has grown the interest of researchers for many years. Machine learning is used for developing various robotic systems which find their applications in different sectors specially in medical domain. This paper shows how robotics have evolved over the years and how robots are helping doctors as a medical assistant in their everyday work like surgeries, medical imaging, healthcare, manufacturing Prosthetics and patients aids, rehabilitation etc. Even major surgeries like Eye Surgery, Heart Surgery, Soft Surgery Operations, Abdominal Surgeries, and Orthopaedics etc. can be done by medical robots to make life easier for both doctors and patients. The main reasons of increasing robotic helps in healthcare sector are (a) robots are tireless, (b) they don’t take stress, (c) their hand never shakes, (d) can do repetitive work effortlessly, (e) can perform precise surgeries. Here, we have reviewed few of robotics application in medical field and discussed all the merits, demerits and future aspects in this regards.

previous article Lifetime Optimization of the LEACH Protocol in WSNs with Simulated Annealing Algorithm

next article Deep Learning Assisted Transceiver Design Methods for Multisource and Multidestination AF Relay Systems

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Denecke, K., & Baudoin, C. R. (2022). A Review of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Transformed Health Ecosystems. Frontiers in Medicine (Lausanne), 9, 795957. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.795957CrossRef

Lanfranco, A. R., Castellanos, A. E., Desai, J. P., & Meyers, W. C. (2004). Robotic surgery: A current perspective. Annals of Surgery, 239(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000103020.19595.7dCrossRef

Ngu, J. C., Tsang, C. B., & Koh, D. C. (2017). The da Vinci Xi: A review of its capabilities, versatility, and potential role in robotic colorectal surgery. Robotic Surgery, 4, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.2147/RSRR.S119317CrossRef

Kraft, B. M., Jäger, C., Kraft, K., Leibl, B. J., & Bittner, R. (2004). The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: Increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient? Surgical Endoscopy, 18(8), 1216–1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9200-zCrossRef

Dardona, T., Eslamian, S., Reisner, L. A., & Pandya, A. (2019). Remote presence: Development and usability evaluation of a head-mounted display for camera control on the da Vinci Surgical system. Robotics, 8(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics8020031CrossRef

Miura, K., Kadone, H., Koda, M., Abe, T., Endo, H., Murakami, H., Doita, M., Kumagai, H., Nagashima, K., Fujii, K., Noguchi, H., Funayama, T., Kawamoto, H., Sankai, Y., & Yamazaki, M. (2018). The hybrid assisted limb (HAL) for Care Support, a motion assisting robot providing exoskeletal lumbar support, can potentially reduce lumbar load in repetitive snow-shoveling movements. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 49, 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.11.020CrossRef

Gardner, A. D., Potgieter, J. & Noble, F. K. (2017). A review of commercially available exoskeletons’ capabilities. In 2017 24th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP) (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1109/M2VIP.2017.8211470

González-Jiménez, J., Galindo, C., & Ruiz-Sarmiento, J. R. (2012). Technical improvements of the Giraff telepresence robot based on users’ evaluation. Proceedings—IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343854CrossRef

Qureshi, M. O., & Syed, R. S. (2014). The impact of robotics on employment and motivation of employees in the service sector, with special reference to health care. Safety and Health at Work, 5(4), 198–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2014.07.003CrossRef

10.

Kim, J., Gu, G. M., & Heo, P. (2016). Robotics for healthcare. In H. Jo, H. W. Jun, J. Shin, & S. Lee (Eds.), Biomedical engineering: Frontier research and converging technologies. Biosystems & biorobotics. (Vol. 9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21813-7_21CrossRef

11.

Coleman-Wood, K., Lathan, C., & Kaufman, K. (2009). Development of an interactive upper extremity gestural robotic feedback system: From bench to reality. In Conference proceedings: ... Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference (pp. 5973–5976). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333523.

12.

Palagi, S., & Fischer, P. (2018). Bioinspired microrobots. Nature Reviews Materials, 3, 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-018-0016-9CrossRef

13.

Soriano, G. P., Yasuhara, Y., Ito, H., Matsumoto, K., Osaka, K., Kai, Y., Locsin, R., Schoenhofer, S., & Tanioka, T. (2022). Robots and robotics in nursing. Healthcare, 10(8), 1571. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10081571CrossRef

14.

Guru, K. A., Esfahani, E. T., Raza, S. J., Bhat, R., Wang, K., Hammond, Y., Wilding, G., Peabody, J. O., & Chowriappa, A. J. (2015). Cognitive skills assessment during robotic-assisted surgery: Separating the wheat from the chaff. BJU International, 115(1), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12657CrossRef

15.

Hung, A. J., Chen, J., & Gill, I. S. (2018). Automated performance metricsand machine learning algorithms to measure surgeon performance and anticipate clinical outcomes in robotic surgery. JAMA Surgery, 153(8), 770–771. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1512CrossRef

16.

Habuza, T., Navaz, A. N., Hashim, F., Alnajjar, F., Zaki, N., Serhani, M. A., & Statsenko, Y. (2021). AI applications in robotics, diagnostic image analysis and precision medicine: Current limitations, future trends, guidelines on CAD systems for medicine. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100596CrossRef

17.

Grischke, J., Johannsmeier, L., Eich, L., Griga, L., & Haddadin, S. (2020). Dentronics: Towards robotics and artificial intelligence in dentistry. Dental Materials, 36(6), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.03.021CrossRef

18.

Raabe, D., Alemzadeh, K., Harrison, A. J. L., & Ireland, A. J. (2009). The chewing robot: A new biologically-inspired way to evaluate dental restorative materials. In 2009 Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (pp. 6050–6053). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5332590

19.

Carvalho, A., Brito, P., Santos, J., Caramelo, F. J., Veiga, G., Vasconcelos, B., et al. (2011). Evaluation of two dental impression materials using a robot arm. Bulletin du GIRSO, 50, 36–37.

20.

Mohammad, S. (2013). Robotic surgery. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research., 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2013.03.002CrossRef

21.

Zhang, Y. D., Jiang, J. G., Liang, T., & Hu, W. P. (2011). Kinematics modeling and experimentation of the multi-manipulator tooth-arrangement robot for full denture manufacturing. Journal of Medical Systems, 35, 1421–1429.CrossRef

22.

Zhu, Z. A., Lu, Y. C., You, C. H., & Chiang, C. K. (2019). Deep learning for sensor-based rehabilitation exercise recognition and evaluation. Sensors (Basel)., 19(4), 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19040887CrossRef

23.

Hamidah, A., Adiono, T., Syafalni, I., Andriana, M., Kurnia, M., Ratunanda, S. (2019). Review on machine learning applications in assisted treadmill for stroke rehabilitation. In 2019 International symposium on electronics and smart devices (ISESD) (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISESD.2019.8909416

24.

Jamin, P., Duret, C., Hutin, E., Bayle, N., Koeppel, T., Gracies, J.-M., & Pila, O. (2022). Using robot-based variables during upper limb robot-assisted training in subacute stroke patients to quantify treatment dose. Sensors, 22(8), 2989. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22082989CrossRef

25.

Zhang, W., Su, C., & He, C. (2020). Rehabilitation exercise recognition and evaluation based on smart sensors with deep learning framework. IEEE Access, 8, 77561–77571. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2989128CrossRef

26.

Liu, Z., Liu, Q., Xu, W., Wang, L., & Zhou, Z. (2020). Robot learning towards smart robotic manufacturing: A review. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 77, 102360.CrossRef

27.

Shoushtari, A. L., Dario, P., & Mazzoleni, S. (2016). A review on the evolvement trend of robotic interaction control. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 43(5), 535.CrossRef

28.

Krebs, H. I., & Hogan, N. (2006). Therapeutic robotics: A technology push. Proceedings of the IEEE, 94(9), 1727–1738. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2006.880721CrossRef

29.

Kong, K., & Tomizuka, M. (2009). Control of exoskeletons inspired by fictitious gain in human model. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 14(6), 689–698.CrossRef

30.

Atashzar, S. F., Shahbazi, M., Tavakoli, M., & Patel, R. V. (2017). A grasp-based passivity signature for haptics-enabled human–robot interaction: Application to design of a new safety mechanism for robotic rehabilitation. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 36(5–7), 778.CrossRef

31.

Miyake, H., Motoyama, D., Matsushita, Y., Watanabe, H., Tamura, K., Otsuka, A., & Fujisawa, M. (2023). Initial experience of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using hinotori surgical robot system: Single institutional prospective assessment of perioperative outcomes in 30 cases. Journal of Endourology. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0775,37,5,(531-534)CrossRef

32.

Qian, L., Wu, J. Y., DiMaio, S. P., Navab, N., & Kazanzides, P. (2020). A review of augmented reality in robotic-assisted surgery. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMRB.2019.2957061CrossRef

33.

Choi, P. J., Oskouian, R. J., & Tubbs, R. S. (2018). Telesurgery: Past, present, and future. Cureus., 10(5), e2716. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2716CrossRef

34.

Xiong, L., Chng, C. B., Chui, C. K., Yu, P., & Li, Y. (2017). Shared control of a medical robot with haptic guidance. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 12(1), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1425-0CrossRef

35.

Almujalhem, A., & Rha, K. H. (2020). Surgical robotic systems: What we have now? A urological perspective. Buji Compasss, 1(5), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.31CrossRef

36.

http://bme240.eng.uci.edu/students/10s/sgupta1/Developments.html

37.

Mirbagheri, A., Farahmand, F., Sarkar, S., Alamdar, A., Moradi, M., & Afshari, E. (2020). The sina robotic telesurgery system. In Handbook of robotic and image-guided surgery (pp. 107–121). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814245-5.00007-4

38.

Wang, G., Zeng, Y., & Sheng, X. (2021). Instructions for use of Da Vinci surgical robots. In G. Wang, Y. Zeng, & X. Sheng (Eds.), Robotic surgery and nursing. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0510-9_2CrossRef

39.

Gorpas, D., Phipps, J., Bec, J., et al. (2019). Autofluorescence lifetime augmented reality as a means for real-time robotic surgery guidance in human patients. Science and Reports, 9, 1187. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37237-8CrossRef

40.

Winata, S. (2018). Wireless teleoperation control interface of articulated forceps for minimally invasive surgery. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16450.43201

41.

Pakkasjärvi, N., Luthra, T., & Anand, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence in surgical learning. Surgeries, 4(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries4010010CrossRef

42.

Morgan, A. A., Abdi, J., Syed, M. A. Q., Kohen, G. E., Barlow, P., & Vizcaychipi, M. P. (2022). Robots in healthcare: A scoping review. Current Robotics Reports, 3(4), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-022-00095-4CrossRef

43.

Kyrarini, M., Lygerakis, F., Rajavenkatanarayanan, A., et al. (2021). A survey of robots in healthcare. Technologies, 9, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies9010008CrossRef

44.

Eto, M., & Naito, S. (2005). Robotic surgery assisted by the ZEUS system. In H. Kumon, M. Murai, & S. Baba (Eds.), Endourooncology. Recent advances in endourology. (Vol. 6). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-27173-2_4CrossRef

45.

Muradore, R., Bresolin, D., Geretti, L., Fiorini, P., & Villa, T. (2011). Robotic surgery. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 18(3), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2011.942112CrossRefMATH

46.

Masamune, K., & Hong, J. (2014). Advanced imaging and robotics technologies for medical applications. International Journal of Optomechatronics, 4(5), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/15599612.2011.633210CrossRef

47.

Erin, O., Boyvat, M., Tiryaki, M. E., Phelan, M., & Sitti, M. (2019). Magnetic resonance imaging system–driven medical robotics. Advanced Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.201900110CrossRef

48.

Spin-Neto, R., Mudrak, J., Matzen, L. H., Christensen, J., Gotfredsen, E., & Wenzel, A. (2013) Cone beam CT image artefacts related to head motion simulated by a robot skull: Visual characteristics and impact on image quality.

49.

Burdea, G. C., Dunn, S. M., Elmendorf, C. H., & Mallik, M. (1991). Real-time sensing of tooth position for dental digital subtraction radiography. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 38, 366–378.CrossRef

50.

Ebert, L. C., Ptacek, W., Naether, S., Fürst, M., Ross, S., Buck, U., Weber, S., & Thali, M. (2010). Virtobot—A multi-functional robotic system for 3D surface scanning and automatic post mortem biopsy. The International Journal of Medical Robotics Computer Assisted Surgery: MRCAS, 6, 18–27.CrossRef

51.

Won, H. J., Kim, N., Kim, G. B., Seo, J. B., & Kim, H. (2017). Validation of a CT-guided intervention robot for biopsy and radiofrequency ablation: Experimental study with an abdominal phantom. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology., 23(3), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2017.16422CrossRef

52.

Frutiger, D. R., Vollmers, K., Kratochvil, B. E., & Nelson, B. J. (2010). Small, fast, and under control: wireless resonant magnetic micro-agents. Int. J. Rob. Res., 29, 613.CrossRef

53.

Spin-Neto, R., Matzen, L. H., Schropp, L. W., Sørensen, T. S., & Wenzel, A. (2018). An ex vivo study of automated motion artefact correction and the impact on cone beam CT image quality and interpretability. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology., 47(5), 20180013. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180013CrossRef

54.

Kummer, M. P., Abbott, J. J., Kratochvil, B. E., Borer, R., Sengul, A., & Nelson, B. J. (2010). OctoMag: An electromagnetic system for 5-DOF wireless micromanipulation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 26, 1006.CrossRef

55.

Son, D., Dogan, M. D., & Sitti, M. (2017) In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (p. 1132). IEEE

56.

Niravkumar, P., Jiawen, Y., Gang, L., Reza, M., Lukasz, P., Helen, D.-S., Joyce, J., Andrew, D., Andreas, M., Karun, S., Iulian, I., & Kevin, C. (2021). Body-mounted robotic system for MRI-guided shoulder arthrography: Cadaver and clinical workflow studies. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.667121CrossRef

57.

Hashem, J. A., Pryor, M., Landsberger, S., Hunter, J., & Janecky, D. R. (2018). Automating high-precision X-ray and neutron imaging applications with robotics. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 15(2), 663–674. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2017.2675709CrossRef

58.

Von Haxthausen, F., Böttger, S., Wulff, D., et al. (2021). Medical robotics for ultrasound imaging: Current systems and future trends. Curr Robot Rep, 2, 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-020-00037-yCrossRef

59.

MGIUS-R3 robotic ultrasound system [Internet]. Available from: https://en.mgitech.cn/products/instruments_info/11/

60.

Adams, S. J., Burbridge, B. E., Badea, A., Kanigan, N., Bustamante, L., Babyn, P., et al. (2018). A crossover comparison of standard and telerobotic approaches to prenatal sonography. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 37, 2603–2612. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14619CrossRef

61.

Georgescu, M., Sacccomandi, A., Baudron, B., & Arbeille, P. L. (2016). Remote sonography in routine clinical practice between two isolated medical centers and the university hospital using a robotic arm: A 1-year study. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 22, 276–281. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2015.0100CrossRef

62.

Avgousti, S., Panayides, A. S., Jossif, A. P., Christoforou, E. G., Vieyres, P., Novales, C., et al. (2016). Cardiac ultrasonography over 4G wireless networks using a tele-operated robot. Healthcare Technology Letters, 3, 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1049/htl.2016.0043CrossRef

63.

Mathiassen, K., Fjellin, J. E., Glette, K., Hol, P. K., & Elle, O. J. (2016). An ultrasound robotic system using the commercial robot UR5. Frontiers in Robotics AI, 3, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00001CrossRef

64.

Geng, C., Xie, Q., Chen, L., Li, A., & Qin, B. (2020) Study and analysis of a remote robot-assisted ultrasound imaging system. In 2020 IEEE 4th information technology, networking, electronic and automation control conference (ITNEC) (pp. 389–393) IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNEC48623.2020.9084796

65.

Huang, Q., & Lan, J. (2019). Remote control of a robotic prosthesis arm with six-degree-of-freedom for ultrasonic scanning and three-dimensional imaging. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 54, 101606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101606CrossRef

66.

Merouche, S., Allard, L., Montagnon, E., Soulez, G., Bigras, P., & Cloutier, G. (2016). A robotic ultrasound scanner for automatic vessel tracking and three-dimensional reconstruction of b-mode images. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 63, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2015.2499084CrossRef

67.

Holland, J., Kingston, L., McCarthy, C., Armstrong, E., O’Dwyer, P., Merz, F., & McConnell, M. (2021). Service robots in the healthcare sector. Robotics, 10(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10010047CrossRef

68.

Bezerra Junior, J. E., Queiroz, P. G. G., & de Lima, R. W. (2018). A study of the publications of educational robotics: A systematic review of literature. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 16(4), 1193–1199. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2018.8362156CrossRef

69.

Cesta, A., Cortellessa, G., Orlandini, A., & Tiberio, L. (2016). Long-term evaluation of a telepresence robot for the elderly: Methodology and ecological case study. International Journal of Social Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0337-zCrossRef

70.

Nickelsen, N. C. M., & Abildgaard, J. S. (2022). The entwinement of policy, design and care scripts: Providing alternative choice-dependency situations with care robots. Sociology of Health and Illness. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13434CrossRef

71.

Malik, N., Hanapiah, F., Rahman, R. A. A., & Yussof, H. (2016). Emergence of socially assistive robotics in rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy: A review. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems. https://doi.org/10.5772/64163CrossRef

72.

https://www.medlabmag.com/article/1094/Fall_2012/RoboCourier_from_Swisslog/

73.

Hang, Su., & De Momi, E. (2023). Towards human activity recognition enhanced robot assisted surgery. Robot Design, 123, 143.CrossRef

74.

Hashimoto, D. A., Rosman, G., Witkowski, E. R., Stafford, C., Navarette- Welton, A. J., Rattner, D. W., Lillemoe, K. D., Rus, D. L., & Meireles, O. R. (2019). Computer vision analysis of intraoperative video: Automated recognition of operative steps in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Annals of Surg, 270, 414–421. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003460CrossRef

75.

Vedula, S. S., Ishii, M., & Hager, G. D. (2017). Objective assessment of surgical technical skill and competency in the operating room. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 19(1), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044435CrossRef

76.

Gomez, E. D., Aggarwal, R., McMahanW, B. K., & Kuchenbecker, K. J. (2016). Objective assessment of robotic surgical skill using instrument contact vibrations. Surgical Endoscopy, 30, 1419–1431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4346-zCrossRef

77.

Egert, M., Steward, J. E., & Sundaram, C. P. (2020). Machine learning and artificial intelligence in surgical fields. Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 11, 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-020-01166-8CrossRef

78.

Carpenter, B. T., & Sundaram, C. P. (2017). Training the next generation of surgeons in robotic surgery. Robotics Surgery, 4, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.2147/RSRR/S70552CrossRef

79.

Sridhar, A. N., Briggs, T. P., Kelly, J. D., et al. (2017). Training in robotic surgery—An overview. Current Urology Reports, 18, 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0710-yCrossRef

80.

Kim, B., & Deshpande, A. D. (2017). An upper-body rehabilitation exoskeleton Harmony with an anatomical shoulder mechanism: Design, modeling, control, and performance evaluation. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 36, 414–435.CrossRef

81.

Yang, B., Huang, J., Chen, X., Xiong, C., & Hasegawa, Y. (2021). Supernumerary robotic limbs: A review and future outlook. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, 3(3), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMRB.2021.3086016CrossRef

82.

https://www.jhuapl.edu/prosthetics

83.

Tran, P., Jeong, S., Herrin, K. R., & Desai, J. P. (2021). Review: Hand exoskeleton systems, clinical rehabilitation practices, and future prospects. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, 3(3), 606–622. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMRB.2021.3100625CrossRef

84.

https://news.brown.edu/articles/2012/05/braingate2

85.

Laut, J., Porfiri, M., & Raghavan, P. (2016). The present and future of robotic technology in rehabilitation. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 4(4), 312.CrossRef

86.

https://www.physiopedia.com/Robotic_Rehabilitation_for_the_Lower_Extremity

87.

https://www.hocoma.com/

88.

Ogata, T., Abe, H., Samura, K., Hamada, O., Nonaka, M., Iwaasa, M., Higashi, T., Fukuda, H., Shiota, E., Tsuboi, Y., & Inoue, T. (2015). Hybrid assistive limb (HAL) rehabilitation in patients with acute hemorrhagic stroke. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica (Tokyo)., 55(12), 901–906. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2015-0209CrossRef

89.

https://ir.eksobionics.com/press-releases/detail/570/ekso-gt-robotic-exoskeletoncleared-by-fda-for-use-with

90.

Buettner, R., Renner, A., & Boos, A. (2020) A systematic literature review of research in the surgical field of medical robotics. In 2020 IEEE 44th annual computers, software, and applications conference (COMPSAC) (pp. 517–522). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC48688.2020.0-200

91.

Goh, E. Z., & Ali, T. (2022). Robotic surgery: An evolution in practice. Journal of Surgical Protocols and Research Methodologies, 2022(1), snac003. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsprm/snac003CrossRef

92.

93.

Chang, K. D., Raheem, A. A., & Rha, K. H. (2018). Novel robotic systems and future directions. Indian Journal of Urology, 34(2), 110–114. https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_316_17CrossRef

94.

Salcudean, S. E., Moradi, H., Black, D. G., & Navab, N. (2022). Robot-assisted medical imaging: A review. Proceedings of the IEEE, 110(7), 951–967. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2022.3162840CrossRef

95.

Burdea, G. C., Dunn, S. M., & Levy, G. (1999). Evaluation of robot-based registration for subtraction radiography. Medical Image Analysis, 3, 265–274.CrossRef

96.

Morgan, A. A., Abdi, J., Syed, M. A. Q., et al. (2022). Robots in healthcare: A scoping review. Current Robotics Reports, 3, 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-022-00095-4CrossRef

Title: Robotics in Medical Domain: The Future of Surgery, Healthcare and Imaging
Authors: Anisha Halder Roy
Sanchita Ghosh
Bharat Gupta
Publication date: 04-10-2023
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Wireless Personal Communications / Issue 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Electronic ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10747-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2023

Lifetime Optimization of the LEACH Protocol in WSNs with Simulated Annealing Algorithm

Performance Investigation of Phishing Website Detection by Improved Deep Learning Techniques

Node Layout Optimization Strategy Based on Aquaculture Water Quality Monitoring System

Modulation Recognition Based on Denoising Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Network

SDCast: A Software-Defined Networking Based Clustered Routing Protocol for Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks

Unveiling the Cutting Edge: A Comprehensive Survey of Localization Techniques in WSN, Leveraging Optimization and Machine Learning Approaches