Top

Published in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Side-by-Side Human–Computer Design Using a Tangible User Interface

Authors : Matthew V. Law, Nikhil Dhawan, Hyunseung Bang, So-Yeon Yoon, Daniel Selva, Guy Hoffman

Published in: Design Computing and Cognition '18

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

We present a digital–physical system to support human–computer collaborative design. The system consists of a sensor-instrumented “sand table” functioning as a tangible space for exploring early-stage design decisions.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter The Effect of Tangible Interaction on Spatial Design Tasks

next chapter Utility of Evolutionary Design in Architectural Form Finding: An Investigation into Constraint Handling Strategies

We initially intended to explore a third hypothesis addressing learning outcomes but were unable to do so due to an error in data collection.

In the case that user-generated designs dominated any configurations on the reference frontier, they were assigned the negation of this distance. Overall, we acknowledge that this choice of reference may limit the validity of our finding to a small time or a small number of function evaluations

Allen JF, Guinn CI, Horvtz E (1999) Mixed-initiative interaction. IEEE Intel Syst Appl 14(5):14–23CrossRef

Arias E, Eden H, Fischer G, Gorman A, Scharff E (2000) Transcending the individual human mind–creating shared understanding through collaborative design. ACM Trans Computer-Human Int (TOCHI) 7(1):84–113CrossRef

Arrow KJ (2012) Social choice and individual values, vol 12. Yale University Press

Babbar-Sebens M, Minsker BS (2012) Interactive genetic algorithm with mixed initiative interaction for multi-criteria ground water monitoring design. Appl Soft Comput J 12(1):182–195CrossRef

Balling R (1999) Design by shopping: a new paradigm? In: Proceedings of the third world congress of structural and multidisciplinary optimization (WCSMO-3), vol 1, pp 295–297

Chen R, Wang X (2008) An empirical study on tangible augmented reality learning space for design skill transfer. Tsinghua Science and Technology 13 Supple (October):13–18

Cho SB (2002) Towards creative evolutionary systems with interactive genetic algorithm. Appl Intel 16(2):129–138CrossRef

Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: Nsga-ii. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197CrossRef

Deb K, Karthik S et al (2007) Dynamic multi-objective optimization and decision-making using modified nsga-ii: a case study on hydro-thermal power scheduling. In: International conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimization. Springer, pp 803–817

10.

Dhanalakshmi S, Kannan S, Mahadevan K, Baskar S (2011) Application of modified nsga-ii algorithm to combined economic and emission dispatch problem. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33(4):992–1002CrossRef

11.

Do-Lenh S, Jermann P, Cuendet S, Zufferey G, Dillenbourg P (2010) Task performance versus learning outcomes: a study of a tangible user interface in the classroom. In: European conference on technology enhanced learning. Springer, pp 78–92

12.

Durillo JJ, Nebro AJ (2011) jmetal: A java framework for multi-objective optimization. Adv Eng Softw 42(10):760–771CrossRef

13.

Egan P, Cagan J (2016) Human and computational approaches for design problem-solving. In: Experimental design research. Springer, pp 187–205

14.

Ferguson G, Allen JF et al (1998) Trips: an integrated intelligent problem-solving assistant. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp 567–572

15.

Fischer G (2004) Social creativity: turning barriers into opportunities for collaborative design. In: Proceedings of the eighth conference on participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices-Volume 1, ACM, pp 152–161

16.

Gero JS (1998) Conceptual designing as a sequence of situated acts. In: Artificial intelligence in structural engineering. Springer, pp 165–177

17.

Grosz BJ (1996) Collaborative systems (aaai-94 presidential address). AI Mag 17(2):67MathSciNet

18.

Hay L, Duffy AHB, McTeague C, Pidgeon LM, Vuletic T, Grealy M (2017) A systematic review of protocol studies on conceptual design cognition: design as search andexploration. Des Sci 3:e10. arXiv:1011.1669v3

19.

Hitomi N, Bang H, Selva D (2017) Extracting and applying knowledge with adaptive knowledge-driven optimization to architect an earth observing satellite system. AIAA Information Systems-AIAA Infotech@ Aerospace, p 0794

20.

Ishibuchi H, Masuda H, Tanigaki Y, Nojima Y (2015) Modified distance calculation in generational distance and inverted generational distance. EMO 2:110–125

21.

Ishii H, Ratti C, Piper B, Wang Y, Biderman A, Ben-Joseph E (2004) Bringing clay and sand into digital design—continuous tangible user interfaces. BT Technol J 22(4):287–299CrossRef

22.

Jeyadevi S, Baskar S, Babulal C, Iruthayarajan MW (2011) Solving multiobjective optimal reactive power dispatch using modified nsga-ii. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33(2):219–228CrossRef

23.

Jordà S, Geiger G, Alonso M, Kaltenbrunner M (2007) The reactable: exploring the synergy between live music performance and tabletop tangible interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction, ACM, pp 139–146

24.

Kaltenbrunner M (2009) Reactivision and tuio: a tangible tabletop toolkit. In: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on interactive tabletops and surfaces, ACM, pp 9–16

25.

Kicinger R, Arciszewski T, De Jong K (2005) Evolutionary computation and structural design: A survey of the state-of-the-art. Comput Struct 83(23):1943–1978CrossRef

26.

Kim HS, Cho SB (2000) Application of interactive genetic algorithm to fashion design. Eng Appl Artif Intell 13(6):635–644CrossRef

27.

Kim M, Maher M (2005) Comparison of designers using a tangible user interface and graphical user interface and impact on spatial cognition. Proc Human Behav Des 5

28.

Kim MJ, Maher ML (2008) The impact of tangible user interfaces on spatial cognition during collaborative design. Des Stud 29(3):222–253CrossRef

29.

Laugwitz B, Held T, Schrepp M (2008) Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In: Symposium of the Austrian HCI and usability engineering group. Springer, pp 63–76

30.

Laumanns M, Thiele L, Deb K, Zitzler E (2002) Combining convergence and diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. Evol Comput 10(3):263–282CrossRef

31.

Liu H, Tang M (2006) Evolutionary design in a multi-agent design environment. Appl Soft Comput J 6(2):207–220MathSciNetCrossRef

32.

Maher ML, Lee L (2017) Designing for gesture and tangible interaction. Synth Lect Human-Centered Interact 10(2):i–111

33.

McCarthy J (2007) What is artificial intelligence. URL: http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai.html

34.

Ozgur A, Johal W, Mondada F, Dillenbourg P (2017) Windfield: learning wind meteorology with handheld haptic robots. In: HRIâ€™17: ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction proceedings, ACM, EPFL-CONF-224130, pp 156–165

35.

Patten J, Ishii H (2000) A comparison of spatial organization strategies in graphical and tangible user interfaces. In: Proceedings of DARE 2000 on designing augmented reality environments, ACM, pp 41–50

36.

Petersson K, Kyroudi A, Bourhis J, Ceberg C, Knöös T, Bochud F, Moeckli R (2017) A clinical distance measure for evaluating treatment plan quality difference with pareto fronts in radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 3:53–56CrossRef

37.

Ramchurn SD, Wu F, Jiang W, Fischer JE, Reece S, Roberts S, Rodden T, Greenhalgh C, Jennings NR (2016) Human-agent collaboration for disaster response. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 30(1):82–111CrossRef

38.

Reed P, Minsker BS, Goldberg DE (2003) Simplifying multiobjective optimization: an automated design methodology for the nondominated sorted genetic algorithm-ii. Water Resour Res 39(7)

39.

Selva D (2014a) Experiments in knowledge-intensive system architecting: interactive architecture optimization. In: Aerospace conference, 2014 IEEE, IEEE, pp 1–12

40.

Selva D (2014b) Knowledge-intensive global optimization of earth observing system architectures: a climate-centric case study. In: Sensors, systems, and next-generation satellites XVIII, international society for optics and photonics, vol 9241, p 92411S

41.

Selva D, Cameron BG, Crawley EF (2014) Rule-based system architecting of earth observing systems: earth science decadal survey. J Spacecraft Rockets

42.

Shen W, Hao Q, Li W (2008) Computer supported collaborative design: retrospective and perspective. Comput Ind 59(9):855–862CrossRef

43.

Shirado H, Christakis NA (2017) Locally noisy autonomous agents improve global human coordination in network experiments. Nature 545(7654):370–374CrossRef

44.

Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial. MIT press

45.

Smithers T, Conkie A, Doheny J, Logan B, Millington K (1989) Design as intelligent behavior: an ai in design research program. In: Gero JS (ed) Artificial intelligence in design

46.

Smithwick D, Kirsh D, Sass L (2017) Designerly pick and place: coding physical model making to inform material-based robotic interaction. In: Design computing and cognition’16. Springer, pp 419–436

47.

Starcic AI, Zajc M (2011) An interactive tangible user interface application for learning addition concepts_1217 131. 135. Br J Edu Technol 42(6):E131–E135CrossRef

48.

Thornton C, Du Boulay B (2012) Artificial intelligence through search. Springer Science and Business Media

49.

Ullmer B, Ishii H (1997) The metadesk: models and prototypes for tangible user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, ACM, pp 223–232

50.

Van Veldhuizen DA, Lamont GB (1998) Evolutionary computation and convergence to a pareto front. In: Late breaking papers at the genetic programming 1998 conference, pp 221–228

51.

Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the panas scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54(6):1063CrossRef

52.

Xie L, Antle AN, Motamedi N (2008) Are tangibles more fun? comparing children’s enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on tangible and embedded interaction, ACM, pp 191–198

53.

Zitzler E, Brockhoff D, Thiele L (2007) The hypervolume indicator revisited: on the design of pareto-compliant indicators via weighted integration. In: Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization. Springer, pp 862–876

Title: Side-by-Side Human–Computer Design Using a Tangible User Interface
Authors: Matthew V. Law
Nikhil Dhawan
Hyunseung Bang
So-Yeon Yoon
Daniel Selva
Guy Hoffman
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Design Computing and Cognition '18
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05362-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-05363-5

Copyright Year: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05363-5_9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partners