Top

Learning & Behavior

Published in:

08-01-2018

Simians in the Shape School: A comparative study of executive attention

Authors: Kristin French, Michael J. Beran, Kimberly Andrews Espy, David A. Washburn

Published in: Learning & Behavior | Issue 3/2018

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Executive functions (EF) have been studied extensively in children and adults. However, EF tasks for young children can be difficult to administer and interpret. Espy (1997, Developmental Neuropsychology, 13, 495–499) designed the Shape School task to measure inhibition and switching in preschool-aged children. Shape School presents cartoon-like characters that children must flexibly name by their color, their shape, or both, depending on cues that indicate the appropriate rule. Shape School has been found to be age sensitive as well as predictive of performance on other EF tasks. We presented a computerized analogue of Shape School to seven rhesus macaques. Monkeys were trained to categorize characters by color or shape, or to inhibit this response, depending on whether the characters had eyes open, eyes closed, or wore hats. Monkeys performed above chance on the inhibition and switching components of the task. Long runs of a single classification rule and long runs of noninhibition trials had no significant impact on performance when the rule changed or inhibition was required. This nonverbal adaptation of Shape School can measure EF in nonhuman animals and could be used in conjunction with other EF tasks to provide a clearer picture of both human and nonhuman executive functions.

previous article Proactive interference by cues presented without outcomes: Differences in context specificity of latent inhibition and conditioned inhibition

next article Rotational stress influences sensitized, but not habituated, exploratory behaviors in the woodlouse, Porcellio scaber

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Avdagic, E., Jensen, G., Altschul, D., & Terrace, H. S. (2014). Rapid cognitive flexibility of rhesus macaques performing psychophysical task-switching. Animal Cognition, 17, 619–631.CrossRefPubMed

Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65–94.CrossRefPubMed

Beran, M. J., Washburn, D. A., & Rumbaugh, D. M. (2007). A Stroop-like effect in color-naming of color-word lexigrams by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodyte). Journal of General Psychology, 134, 217–228.CrossRefPubMed

Buschman, T. J., Denovellis, E. L., Diogo, C., Bullock, D., & Miller, E. K. (2012). Synchronous oscillatory neural ensembles for rules in the prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 76, 838–846.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Caselli, L., & Chelazzi, L. (2011). Does the macaque monkey provide a good model for studying human executive control? A comparative behavioral study of task switching. PLOS ONE, 6, e21489.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Clark, C. A., Sheffield, T. D., Chevalier, N., Nelson, J. M., Wiebe, S. A., & Espy, K. A. (2013). Charting early trajectories of executive control with the shape school. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1481–1493.CrossRefPubMed

Davidson, M. C., Amso, D., Anderson, L. C., & Diamond, A. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2037–2078.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Diamond, A. (2012). Activities and programs that improve children’s executive functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 335–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412453722 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168.CrossRefPubMed

Dias, R., Robbins, T. W., & Roberts, A. C. (1996). Primate analogue of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Effects of excitotoxic lesions of the prefrontal cortex in the marmoset. Behavioral Neuroscience, 110, 872–876.

Espy, K. A. (1997). The Shape School: Assessing executive function in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 13, 495–499.CrossRef

Espy, K. A., Bull, R., Martin, J., & Stroup, W. (2006). Measuring the development of executive control with the shape school. Psychological Assessment, 18, 373–381.CrossRefPubMed

Fagundo, A. B., De la Torre, R., Jiménez-Murcia, S., Agüera, Z., Granero, R., Tárrega, S., … & Forcano, L. (2012). Executive functions profile in extreme eating/weight conditions: From anorexia nervosa to obesity. PLoS ONE, 7, e43382.

Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101–135.CrossRef

Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 201–225.CrossRef

Gerstadt, C. L., Hong, Y. J., & Diamond, A. (1994). The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children 3 1/2–7 years old on a Stroop-like day-night test. Cognition, 53, 129–153.CrossRefPubMed

Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1987). Development of cortical circuitry and cognitive function. Child Development, 52(3), 601–622.CrossRef

Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1995). Architecture of the prefrontal cortex and the central executive. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 769(1), 71–84.CrossRefPubMed

Henry, L. A., & Bettenay, C. (2010). The assessment of executive functioning in children. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 15, 110–119.CrossRef

Isquith, P. K., Crawford, J. S., Espy, K. A., & Gioia, G. A. (2005). Assessment of executive function in preschool-aged children. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 11, 209–215.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

James, T. D., Choi, H. J., Wiebe, S. A., & Espy, K. A. (2016). II. The preschool problem solving study: Sample, data, and statistical methods. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 81(4), 30–46.CrossRefPubMed

Logan, G. D. (1985). Executive control of thought and action. Acta Psychologica, 60, 193–210.CrossRef

Lyon, G. R, & Krasnegor, N. A. (1996). Attention, memory, and executive function. Baltimore: Brookes

MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.CrossRefPubMed

MacLeod, C. M. (1992). The Stroop task: The “gold standard” of attentional measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 12–14.CrossRef

Maestripieri, D. (Ed.). (2003). Primate psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Mansouri, F. A., Matsumoto, K., & Tanaka, K. (2006). Prefrontal cell activities related to monkeys’ success and failure in adapting to rule changes in a Wisconsin Card Sorting Test analog. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 2745–2756.CrossRefPubMed

Michelet, T., Bioulac, B., Langbour, N., Goillandeau, M., Guehl, D., & Burbaud, P. (2015). Electrophysiological correlates of a versatile executive control system in the monkey anterior cingulate cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 26(4), 1684–1697.CrossRefPubMed

Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.CrossRefPubMed

Moore, T. L., Schettler, S. P., Killiany, R. J., Rosene, D. L., & Moss, M. B. (2009). Effects on executive function following damage to the prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Behavioral Neuroscience, 123(2), 231.CrossRefPubMed

Nakahara, K., Hayashi, T., Konishi, S., & Miyashita, Y. (2002). Functional MRI of macaque monkeys performing a cognitive set-shifting task. Science, 295, 1532–1536.CrossRefPubMed

Ozonoff, S. (1997). Components of executive function in autism and other disorders. In J. Russell (Ed.), Autism as an executive disorder (pp. 179–211). New York: Oxford University Press.

Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. J. (1991). Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic individuals: Relationship to theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 1081–1105.CrossRefPubMed

Pritchard, V. E., & Woodward, L. J. (2011). Preschool executive control on the Shape School task: Measurement considerations and utility. Psychological Assessment, 23, 31–43.CrossRefPubMed

Richardson, W. K., Washburn, D. A., Hopkins, W. D., Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., & Rumbaugh, D. M. (1990). The NASA/LRC computerized test system. Behavior Research Methods, 22, 127–131.

Roberts, R. J., Jr., & Pennington, B. F. (1996). An interactive framework for examining prefrontal cognitive processes. Developmental Neuropsychology, 12, 105–126.CrossRef

Roitblat, H. L., Bever, T. G., & Terrace, H. S (1984). Animal cognition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Rumbaugh, D., Richardson, W., Washburn, D., Hopkins, W., & Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. (1989). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), video tasks, and implications for stimulus-response spatial contiguity. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103, 32–38.CrossRefPubMed

Salimpoor, V. N., & Desrocher, M. (2006). Increasing the utility of EF assessment of executive function in children. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 34, 15–42.

Shettleworth, S. J. (2009). Cognition, evolution, and behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.

Smith, J. D., Redford, J. S., Beran, M. J., & Washburn, D. A. (2010). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) adaptively monitor uncertainty while multi-tasking. Animal Cognition, 13, 93–101.CrossRefPubMed

Stoet, G., & Snyder, L. H. (2006). Effects of the NMDA antagonist ketamine on task-switching performance: Evidence for specific impairments of executive control. Neuropsychopharmacology, 31, 1675–1681.CrossRefPubMed

Tomasello, M., & Call, J. (1997). Primate cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Washburn, D. A. (1994). Stroop-like effects for monkeys and humans: Processing speed or strength of association? Psychological Science, 5, 375–379.CrossRefPubMed

Washburn, D. A. (2016). The Stroop effect at 80: The competition between stimulus control and cognitive control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 105, 3–13.CrossRefPubMed

Watkins, L. H., Sahakian, B. J., Robertson, M. M., Veale, D. M., Rogers, R. D., Pickard, K. M., … & Robbins, T. W. (2005). Executive function in Tourette’s syndrome and obsessive–compulsive disorder. Psychological Medicine, 35, 571–582.

Wattiez, N., Poitou, T., Rivaud-Péchoux, S., & Pouget, P. (2016). Evidence for spatial tuning of movement inhibition. Experimental Brain Research, 234, 1957–1966.CrossRefPubMed

Wiebe, S. A., Sheffield, T., Nelson, J. M., Clark, C. A., Chevalier, N., & Espy, K. A. (2011). The structure of executive function in 3-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 436–452.CrossRefPubMed

Willcutt, E. G., Doyle, A. E., Nigg, J. T., Faraone, S. V., & Pennington, B. F. (2005). Validity of the executive function theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1336–1346.CrossRefPubMed

Zentall, T. R., Wasserman, E. (Eds.). (2012). Oxford handbook of comparative cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Title: Simians in the Shape School: A comparative study of executive attention
Authors: Kristin French
Michael J. Beran
Kimberly Andrews Espy
David A. Washburn
Publication date: 08-01-2018
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Learning & Behavior / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1543-4494
Electronic ISSN: 1543-4508
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-017-0310-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Attention toward contexts modulates context-specificity of behavior in human predictive learning: Evidence from the n-back task

Are chimpanzees “stuck” on their “selves” in video?

Proactive interference by cues presented without outcomes: Differences in context specificity of latent inhibition and conditioned inhibition

Fake snakes uncover chimpanzees’ mind-reading ability

Investigating the balance between goal-directed and habitual control in experimental and real-life settings

Removing but not adding elements of a context affects generalization of instrumental responses

Premium Partner