Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Empirical Software Engineering 7/2022

01-12-2022

SmartFast: an accurate and robust formal analysis tool for Ethereum smart contracts

Authors: Zhaoxuan Li, Siqi Lu, Rui Zhang, Rui Xue, Wenqiu Ma, Rujin Liang, Ziming Zhao, Sheng Gao

Published in: Empirical Software Engineering | Issue 7/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Recently, although state-of-the-art (SOTA) tools were designed and developed to analyze the vulnerabilities of smart contracts on Ethereum, security incidents caused by these vulnerabilities are still widespread. This can be attributed to the fact that each tool has various standards for judging the severity of vulnerabilities. More importantly, tools fail to identify all the vulnerabilities accurately and comprehensively as the evolution of vulnerabilities. To this end, we first propose a vulnerability assessment model to unify the vulnerability measurement standards. Next, we design a static analysis tool called SmartFast, which expresses the contract source code as a novel intermediate representation named SmartIR. Using preset rules and taint tracking technology, SmartFast matches SmartIR to locate the vulnerability code. Furthermore, SmartFast can recommend the optimization of the contract code automatically. Finally, we implement a prototype of SmartFast with 25K lines of code and compare it with 7 SOTA tools on three datasets (a total of 13,687 public contracts). The results indicate that SmartFast is efficient (only took a few seconds per contract) and robust (0.4% failure rate and resistance to the general code confusion methods). Besides, compared with other tools, SmartFast can detect more kinds of vulnerabilities (119) with a higher precision rate (98.43%) and a recall rate (85.12%), which confirms the conclusion of the theoretical analysis in the paper.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Bocek T, Stiller B (2018) Smart contracts–blockchains in the wings. In: Digital marketplaces unleashed. Springer, pp 169–184 Bocek T, Stiller B (2018) Smart contracts–blockchains in the wings. In: Digital marketplaces unleashed. Springer, pp 169–184
go back to reference Chen T, Cao R, Li T, Luo X, Gu G, Zhang Y, Liao Z, Zhu H, Chen G, He Z, Tang Y, Lin X, Zhang X (2020) SODA: a generic online detection framework for smart contracts. In: NDSS. The Internet Society Chen T, Cao R, Li T, Luo X, Gu G, Zhang Y, Liao Z, Zhu H, Chen G, He Z, Tang Y, Lin X, Zhang X (2020) SODA: a generic online detection framework for smart contracts. In: NDSS. The Internet Society
go back to reference Choi J, Kim D, Kim S, Grieco G, Groce A, Cha S K (2021) SMARTIAN: enhancing smart contract fuzzing with static and dynamic data-flow analyses. In: ASE. IEEE, pp 227–239 Choi J, Kim D, Kim S, Grieco G, Groce A, Cha S K (2021) SMARTIAN: enhancing smart contract fuzzing with static and dynamic data-flow analyses. In: ASE. IEEE, pp 227–239
go back to reference Durieux T, Ferreira J F, Abreu R, Cruz P (2020) Empirical review of automated analysis tools on 47, 587 ethereum smart contracts. In: ICSE. ACM, pp 530–541 Durieux T, Ferreira J F, Abreu R, Cruz P (2020) Empirical review of automated analysis tools on 47, 587 ethereum smart contracts. In: ICSE. ACM, pp 530–541
go back to reference Feist J, Grieco G, Groce A (2019) Slither: a static analysis framework for smart contracts. In: WETSEB@ICSE. IEEE/ACM, pp 8–15 Feist J, Grieco G, Groce A (2019) Slither: a static analysis framework for smart contracts. In: WETSEB@ICSE. IEEE/ACM, pp 8–15
go back to reference Frank J, Aschermann C, Holz T (2020) ETHBMC: a bounded model checker for smart contracts. In: USENIX Security symposium. USENIX Association, pp 2757–2774 Frank J, Aschermann C, Holz T (2020) ETHBMC: a bounded model checker for smart contracts. In: USENIX Security symposium. USENIX Association, pp 2757–2774
go back to reference Grishchenko I, Maffei M, Schneidewind C (2018a) Ethertrust: sound static analysis of ethereum bytecode. Technische Universität Wien. Tech Rep Grishchenko I, Maffei M, Schneidewind C (2018a) Ethertrust: sound static analysis of ethereum bytecode. Technische Universität Wien. Tech Rep
go back to reference Grishchenko I, Maffei M, Schneidewind C (2018b) Foundations and tools for the static analysis of ethereum smart contracts. In: CAV (1), vol 10981. Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp 51–78 Grishchenko I, Maffei M, Schneidewind C (2018b) Foundations and tools for the static analysis of ethereum smart contracts. In: CAV (1), vol 10981. Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp 51–78
go back to reference Grishchenko I, Maffei M, Schneidewind C (2018c) A semantic framework for the security analysis of ethereum smart contracts. In: POST. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10804. Springer, pp 243–269 Grishchenko I, Maffei M, Schneidewind C (2018c) A semantic framework for the security analysis of ethereum smart contracts. In: POST. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10804. Springer, pp 243–269
go back to reference He J, Balunovic M, Ambroladze N, Tsankov P, Vechev M T (2019) Learning to fuzz from symbolic execution with application to smart contracts. In: CCS. ACM, pp 531–548 He J, Balunovic M, Ambroladze N, Tsankov P, Vechev M T (2019) Learning to fuzz from symbolic execution with application to smart contracts. In: CCS. ACM, pp 531–548
go back to reference Hildenbrandt E, Saxena M, Rodrigues N, Zhu X, Daian P, Guth D, Moore B M, Park D, Zhang Y, Stefanescu A, Rosu G (2018) KEVM: a complete formal semantics of the ethereum virtual machine. In: CSF. IEEE Computer Society, pp 204–217 Hildenbrandt E, Saxena M, Rodrigues N, Zhu X, Daian P, Guth D, Moore B M, Park D, Zhang Y, Stefanescu A, Rosu G (2018) KEVM: a complete formal semantics of the ethereum virtual machine. In: CSF. IEEE Computer Society, pp 204–217
go back to reference Jiao J, Kan S, Lin S, Sanán D, Liu Y, Sun J (2020) Semantic understanding of smart contracts: Executable operational semantics of solidity. In: IEEE S&P. IEEE, pp 1695–1712 Jiao J, Kan S, Lin S, Sanán D, Liu Y, Sun J (2020) Semantic understanding of smart contracts: Executable operational semantics of solidity. In: IEEE S&P. IEEE, pp 1695–1712
go back to reference Kalra S, Goel S, Dhawan M, Sharma S (2018) ZEUS: analyzing safety of smart contracts. In: NDSS. The Internet Society Kalra S, Goel S, Dhawan M, Sharma S (2018) ZEUS: analyzing safety of smart contracts. In: NDSS. The Internet Society
go back to reference Kasampalis T, Guth D, Moore B, Serbanuta T, Serbanuta V, Filaretti D, Rosu G, Johnson R (2018) Iele: an intermediate-level blockchain language designed and implemented using formal semantics. Tech. rep. Kasampalis T, Guth D, Moore B, Serbanuta T, Serbanuta V, Filaretti D, Rosu G, Johnson R (2018) Iele: an intermediate-level blockchain language designed and implemented using formal semantics. Tech. rep.
go back to reference Krupp J, Rossow C (2018) Teether: gnawing at ethereum to automatically exploit smart contracts. In: USENIX security symposium. USENIX Association, pp 1317–1333 Krupp J, Rossow C (2018) Teether: gnawing at ethereum to automatically exploit smart contracts. In: USENIX security symposium. USENIX Association, pp 1317–1333
go back to reference Liu C, Liu H, Cao Z, Chen Z, Chen B, Roscoe B (2018) Reguard: finding reentrancy bugs in smart contracts. In: ICSE. ACM, pp 65–68 Liu C, Liu H, Cao Z, Chen Z, Chen B, Roscoe B (2018) Reguard: finding reentrancy bugs in smart contracts. In: ICSE. ACM, pp 65–68
go back to reference Lu N, Wang B, Zhang Y, Shi W, Esposito C (2019) Neucheck: a more practical ethereum smart contract security analysis tool. Softw: Pract Exp Lu N, Wang B, Zhang Y, Shi W, Esposito C (2019) Neucheck: a more practical ethereum smart contract security analysis tool. Softw: Pract Exp
go back to reference Luu L, Chu D, Olickel H, Saxena P, Hobor A (2016) Making smart contracts smarter. In: CCS. ACM, pp 254–269 Luu L, Chu D, Olickel H, Saxena P, Hobor A (2016) Making smart contracts smarter. In: CCS. ACM, pp 254–269
go back to reference Nguyen T D, Pham L H, Sun J, Lin Y, Minh QT (2020) sfuzz: an efficient adaptive fuzzer for solidity smart contracts. In: ICSE. ACM, pp 778–788 Nguyen T D, Pham L H, Sun J, Lin Y, Minh QT (2020) sfuzz: an efficient adaptive fuzzer for solidity smart contracts. In: ICSE. ACM, pp 778–788
go back to reference Nipkow T, Paulson L C, Wenzel M (2283) Isabelle/HOL—a proof assistant for higher-order logic. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Nipkow T, Paulson L C, Wenzel M (2283) Isabelle/HOL—a proof assistant for higher-order logic. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer
go back to reference Permenev A, Dimitrov D, Tsankov P, Drachsler-Cohen D, Vechev MT (2020) Verx: safety verification of smart contracts. In: IEEE symposium on security and privacy. IEEE, pp 1661–1677 Permenev A, Dimitrov D, Tsankov P, Drachsler-Cohen D, Vechev MT (2020) Verx: safety verification of smart contracts. In: IEEE symposium on security and privacy. IEEE, pp 1661–1677
go back to reference Reis J S, Crocker P A, de Sousa S M (2020) Tezla, an intermediate representation for static analysis of michelson smart contracts. In: FMBC@CAV, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, OASIcs, vol 84, pp 4:1–4:12 Reis J S, Crocker P A, de Sousa S M (2020) Tezla, an intermediate representation for static analysis of michelson smart contracts. In: FMBC@CAV, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, OASIcs, vol 84, pp 4:1–4:12
go back to reference Rodler M, Li W, Karame G O, Davi L (2019) Sereum: protecting existing smart contracts against re-entrancy attacks. In: NDSS. The Internet Society Rodler M, Li W, Karame G O, Davi L (2019) Sereum: protecting existing smart contracts against re-entrancy attacks. In: NDSS. The Internet Society
go back to reference Schneidewind C, Grishchenko I, Scherer M, Maffei M (2020) Ethor: practical and provably sound static analysis of ethereum smart contracts. In: CCS. ACM, pp 621–640 Schneidewind C, Grishchenko I, Scherer M, Maffei M (2020) Ethor: practical and provably sound static analysis of ethereum smart contracts. In: CCS. ACM, pp 621–640
go back to reference Sergey I, Hobor A (2017) A concurrent perspective on smart contracts. In: Financial cryptography workshops. Lecture Notes In Computer Science, vol 10323. Springer, pp 478–493 Sergey I, Hobor A (2017) A concurrent perspective on smart contracts. In: Financial cryptography workshops. Lecture Notes In Computer Science, vol 10323. Springer, pp 478–493
go back to reference Sergey I, Kumar A, Hobor A (2018) Scilla: a smart contract intermediate-level language. CoRR. arXiv:1801.00687 Sergey I, Kumar A, Hobor A (2018) Scilla: a smart contract intermediate-level language. CoRR. arXiv:1801.​00687
go back to reference Tikhomirov S, Voskresenskaya E, Ivanitskiy I, Takhaviev R, Marchenko E, Alexandrov Y (2018) Smartcheck: static analysis of ethereum smart contracts. In: WETSEB@ICSE. ACM, pp 9–16 Tikhomirov S, Voskresenskaya E, Ivanitskiy I, Takhaviev R, Marchenko E, Alexandrov Y (2018) Smartcheck: static analysis of ethereum smart contracts. In: WETSEB@ICSE. ACM, pp 9–16
go back to reference Torres C F, Schütte J, State R (2018) Osiris: hunting for integer bugs in ethereum smart contracts. In: ACSAC. ACM, pp 664–676 Torres C F, Schütte J, State R (2018) Osiris: hunting for integer bugs in ethereum smart contracts. In: ACSAC. ACM, pp 664–676
go back to reference Tsankov P, Dan A M, Drachsler-Cohen D, Gervais A, Bünzli F, Vechev M T (2018) Securify: practical security analysis of smart contracts. In: CCS. ACM, pp 67–82 Tsankov P, Dan A M, Drachsler-Cohen D, Gervais A, Bünzli F, Vechev M T (2018) Securify: practical security analysis of smart contracts. In: CCS. ACM, pp 67–82
go back to reference Wood G, et al. (2014) Ethereum: a secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum Project Yellow Paper 151(2014):1–32 Wood G, et al. (2014) Ethereum: a secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum Project Yellow Paper 151(2014):1–32
Metadata
Title
SmartFast: an accurate and robust formal analysis tool for Ethereum smart contracts
Authors
Zhaoxuan Li
Siqi Lu
Rui Zhang
Rui Xue
Wenqiu Ma
Rujin Liang
Ziming Zhao
Sheng Gao
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering / Issue 7/2022
Print ISSN: 1382-3256
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7616
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-022-10218-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2022

Empirical Software Engineering 7/2022 Go to the issue

Premium Partner