Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Social Business: Defining and Situating the Concept Read chapter Read first chapter

2014 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

12. Social Business and Poverty Alleviation: Lessons from Grameen Danone and Grameen Veolia

Authors : Kerstin Humberg, Boris Braun

Published in: Social Business

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Since Muhammad Yunus first began launching joint ventures with multinational corporations such as Group Danone (2006) and Veolia Water (2008) in Bangladesh, his social business concept has received international attention. With reference to empirical findings from a comprehensive field study in rural Bangladesh, this paper suggests that Yunus’ early social business joint ventures do contribute to poverty reduction in terms of the sustainable livelihoods approach. Both Grameen Danone Foods and Grameen Veolia Water Ltd. provide low-income consumers with access to products for their basic needs, while at the same time creating new sources of social and economic capital. However, considering the multidimensional character of poverty, the findings are not suggestive of a panacea. Given the fact that the conscious abdication of personal financial gain by those who invest in a social business company is the defining attribute in Yunus’ concept, the authors conclude that his idea is primarily a strong plea for social entrepreneurship. It is a strong call for the efficient use of philanthropic resources in contrast with a more conventional charity approach.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Social Business Marketing Mix
next chapter The One and the Many Sides of Social Business: A Critical Reflection
Literature
Ahmed, Z. (2011). Social business and new economics paradigm – one that places people at the centre, not on the periphery. The Journal of Social Business, 1(1), 3–6.
Alt, F., & Spiegel, P. (2009). Gute Geschäfte: Humane Marktwirtschaft als Ausweg aus der Krise. Berlin: Aufbau Verlag.
Bohle, H., Downing, T., Field, J., & Ibrahim, F. N. (1993). Coping with vulnerability and criticality. Case studies on food-insecure people and places. Saarbrücken/Fort Lauderdale: Verlag für Entwicklungspolitik.
Bornstein, D. (2007). How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. New York: Oxford University Press.
Braun, B., & Aßheuer, T. (2011). Floods in megacity environments: Vulnerability and coping strategies of slum dwellers in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Natural Hazards, 58(2), 771–787.CrossRef
Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. (2008). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32(1), 1–14.CrossRef
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Chambers, R. (1995). Poverty and livelihoods: Whose reality counts? Environment and Urbanization, 7(1), 173–204.CrossRef
Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. In IDS Discussion Paper. Sussex, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
Donaldson, C., Baker, R., McHugh, N., Gillespie, M., Sinclair, S., Cornish, F., Cheater, F., Godwin, J., & Tombs, J. (2011). Markets and health in the home of Smith and Yunus. The Journal of Social Business, 1(1), 24–45.
Dougherty, L. (2009). Putting poverty in museums: Strategies to encourage the creation of the for-profit social business. Boston Third World Law Journal, 29(2), 357–380.
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and ‘the corporate objective revisited’. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.CrossRef
Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In W. C. Zimmerli, M. Holzinger, & K. Richter (Eds.), Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173–178). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Frumkin, P. (2002). On being nonprofit: Conceptual and policy primer. London/Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grameen Group, & Danone Asia Pte Ltd. (2006). Grameen Danone Foods (A social business enterprise): Joint venture agreement – Key principles. Internal document. Dhaka/Singapore: Grameen Group/Danone Asia Pte Ltd.
GVW. (2009). Grameen Veolia Water Ltd. (Flyer). Dhaka: Grameen Veolia Water Ltd. (GVW).
Hackenberg, H., & Empter, S. (Eds.). (2011). Social entrepreneurship – Social business: Für die Gesellschaft unternehmen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Hammond, A. L., Kramer, W. J., Katz, R. S., Tran, J. T., & Walker, C. (2007). The next 4 billion: Market size and business strategy at the base of the pyramid. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute and International Finance Corporation (IFC).
Hansmann, H. (1986). The role of nonprofit enterprise. In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), The economics of nonprofit institutions: Studies in structure and policy (pp. 58–84). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hart, S. L. (2007). Capitalism at the crossroads: Aligning business, earth, and humanity (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Wharton School Publishing.
Hopkins, M. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and international development: Is business the solution? London: Earthscan.
Humberg, K. (2011). Poverty reduction through social business? Lessons learnt from Grameen Joint Ventures in Bangladesh. München: Oekom verlag.
Krantz, L. (2001). The sustainable livelihood approach to poverty reduction: An introduction division for policy and socio-economic analysis. Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA).
Kuhlemann, A.-K. (2010). Social business: Corporate citizenship 2.0. In H. Backhaus-Maul, C. Biedermann, S. Nährlich, & J. Polterauer (Eds.), Corporate citizenship in Deutschland: Gesellschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen. Bilanz und Perspektiven (pp. 706–710). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRef
Lawson, S., Heacock, D., & Stupnytska, A. (2007). Beyond the BRICS: A look at the “Next 11”. In G. Sachs (Ed.), BRICS and Beyond (pp. 131–164). New York Goldman Sachs Global Economics Department.
London, T. (2009). Making better investments at the base of the pyramid. Harvard Business Review, 87(5), 106–113.
Mauksch, S., Engelke, H., Darkow, I.-L., & Gracht, H. v. d. (2011). Soziale Vision oder rentables Geschäftsmodell? Social Business in Deutschland 2030, ed. Center für Zukunftsforschung und Wissensmanagement. Wiesbaden: EBS Business School.
Menascé, D., & Dalsace, F. (2011). Getting involved: BOP versus social business. The Journal of Social Business, 1(1), 117–124.
Nicholls, A. (2008). Social entrepreneurship: New models of sustainable social change. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nuscheler, F. (2008). Die umstrittene Wirksamkeit der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit. In INEF-Report. Duisburg: Universität Duisburg/Essen, Institut für Entwicklung und Frieden.
Osterwalder, A. (2004). The business model ontology. A proposition in a design science approach. Ph.D. dissertation, l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne.
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15(May), 1–38.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism – and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.
Prahalad, C. K. (2006). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits, enabling dignity and choice through markets. Upper Saddle River: Wharton School Publishing.
Rahman, A. A., Alam, M., Alam, S. S., Uzzaman, M. R., Rashid, M., & Rabbani, G. (2007). Risks, vulnerability and adaptation in Bangladesh. In UNDP Human Development Report. Dhaka: Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies.
Rauch, T. (2007). Von basic needs zu MDGs: Vier Jahrzehnte Armutsbekämpfung in Wissenschaft und Praxis und kein bisschen weiter. Peripherie, 107(27), 216–245.
Rauch, T. (2009). Entwicklungspolitik: Theorien, Strategien, Instrumente. Braunschweig: Westermann Verlag.
Rauch, T., & Redder, A. (1987). Autozentrierte Entwicklung in ressourcenarmen ländlichen Regionen durch kleinräumige Wirtschaftskreisläufe. Die Erde, 118, 109–126.
Rose, H. (2007). The social business: The viability of a new business entity type. Williamette Law Review, 44(1), 131–159.
Scholz, F. (2004). Geographische Entwicklungsforschung – Methoden und Theorien. Berlin/Stuttgart: Borntraeger.
Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. In IDS working paper 72. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies (IDS), University of Sussex.
Scoones, I. (2009). Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 171–196.CrossRef
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shaffer, P. (2009). Poverty dynamics: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Journal of Development Studies, 45(5), 823–825.CrossRef
Skinner, A. (2011). Adam Smith: Science and human nature. The Journal of Social Business, 1(1), 24–45.
Sobhan, R. (2010). Challenging the injustice of poverty: Agendas for inclusive development in South Asia, New Delhi. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRef
Spicker, P. (2007). The idea of poverty. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Spiegel, P. (2011). Social impact business – Soziale und ökologische Probleme unternehmerisch lösen. In H. Hackenberg & S. Empter (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship – Social business: Für die Gesellschaft unternehmen (pp. 133–146). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRef
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Struthers, J. J. (2011). Finance and banking in alleviating poverty: Microcredit and microfinance in an age of financial crises. The Journal of Social Business, 1(1), 62–77.
Taylor, C. (2010). Carpe crisis: Capitalizing on the breakdown of capitalism to consider the creation of social businesses. New York Law School Review, 54(October), 743–771.
UNDP. (2008). Creating value for all: Strategies for doing business with the poor. In Growing inclusive markets: Business works for development – Development works for business. New York: United Nations Development Program (UNDP).
United Nations. (1995). Report on the world summit for social development. In World summit for social development. Copenhagen: United Nations.
Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate societal engagement: Development and evaluation of value creating societal strategies. München: Oekom Verlag.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Yunus, M. (2006a). Nobel lecture “We can put poverty into museums.” Paper read at The Nobel Peace Prize Ceremony 2006. Oslo, 10 Dec 2006.
Yunus, M. (2007b). Creating a world without poverty: Social business and the future of capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.
Yunus, M. (2007c). Social business. GDI-Impuls, 25(3), 40–47.
Yunus, M. (2008). Social business for a new global economic architecture. Paper read at Glasgow University’s Adam Smith Lecture. Glasgow, 1 Dec 2008.
Yunus, M. (2010). Building social business – The new kind of capitalism that serves humanity’s most pressing needs. New York: Public Affairs.
Metadata
Title
Social Business and Poverty Alleviation: Lessons from Grameen Danone and Grameen Veolia
Authors
Kerstin Humberg
Boris Braun
Copyright Year
2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Book
Social Business

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45274-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-45275-8

Copyright Year: 2014

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45275-8_12