Skip to main content
Top

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. Social Media, Public Sphere and Democracy

Authors : Petros Iosifidis, Mark Wheeler

Published in: Public Spheres and Mediated Social Networks in the Western Context and Beyond

Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter explores the academic debate concerning the socio-politics of the Internet and social media, with particular emphasis on the political value of Web 2.0 technologies. Here we examine whether social networks lead to new politics, and the reduced role of the state and increasing empowerment of citizens in the era of electronic governance. We share the views of Evgeny Morozov, who contends that the Internet is a tool that both revolutionaries and authoritarian governments can exploit, and thus in the latter case, social media sites have been used to entrench dictators and threaten dissidents, making it more difficult to enhance the public sphere and promote democracy.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Chapter 4 discusses in more detail whether the new communications techniques can overcome the perception of a democratic deficit that has affected modern politics, and contends that Bang’s and Keane’s approaches provide a partial analysis of the true worth of Internet politics. It demonstrates how Obama’s 2008 Democratic presidential campaign directly interacted with everyday makers through the innovative use of new information communication technologies. Similarly, it looks into how Keane’s ‘monitory democracy’ occurred in the UK 2010 general election prime ministerial debates, which brought a heightened level of consumer-led scrutiny to the election, as they placed a focus on political leadership.
 
2
A social network can be described as a set of actors (individuals, organisations, families, neighbourhoods, etc.) and relations that hold the actors together (maintain a tie) (Haythornthwaite 2002). The study of social networks can be perceived as a disciplinary enquiry into patterning of relations between social actors. The core premise of the study of social networks is that network structure and position have important behavioural, perceptual and attitudinal implications for the individuals and the social system (Emirbayer 1997).
 
3
This and other ‘-gate’ scandals show that, even in an era when print and limited-spectrum audiovisual media were much more closely aligned with political parties, investigative journalism exposed and brought into public scrutiny dirty political actions and controversies regarding secret power.
 
4
Polish-British sociologist Zygmunt Bauman argued that late modernity (or ‘liquid modernity’ as he terms it) is marked by the global capitalist economies, the process of increasing privatisation of services and the information revolution. In his Liquid Modernity, Bauman (2000) investigates how we have moved away from a ‘heavy’ and ‘solid’ hardware-focused modernity to a ‘light’ and ‘liquid’ software-based modernity.
 
Literature
go back to reference Bauman Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity. Bauman Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
go back to reference Bourdieu P., and J.D. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago. Bourdieu P., and J.D. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago.
go back to reference Castells M. 2007. “Communication, Power and Counter-power in the Network Society”. International Journal of Communication 8: 238–266. Castells M. 2007. “Communication, Power and Counter-power in the Network Society”. International Journal of Communication 8: 238–266.
go back to reference Castells M. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity. Castells M. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity.
go back to reference Coleman J.S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”. The American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–S120.CrossRef Coleman J.S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”. The American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–S120.CrossRef
go back to reference Coleman J.S. 1999. “Cutting Out the Middle Man: From Virtual Representation to Direct Deliberation”. In Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision-Making in the Information Age, eds. B.N. Hague, and B.D. Loader, 195–210. London: Routledge. Coleman J.S. 1999. “Cutting Out the Middle Man: From Virtual Representation to Direct Deliberation”. In Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision-Making in the Information Age, eds. B.N. Hague, and B.D. Loader, 195–210. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Coleman S., and J. Blumler. 2009. The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Coleman S., and J. Blumler. 2009. The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Curran J., N. Fenton, and D. Freedman. 2012. Misunderstanding the Internet. London: Routledge. Curran J., N. Fenton, and D. Freedman. 2012. Misunderstanding the Internet. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Dahlberg L. 2007. “Rethinking the Fragmentation of the Cyberpublic: From Consensus to Contestation”. New Media and Society 9(5): 827–847. Dahlberg L. 2007. “Rethinking the Fragmentation of the Cyberpublic: From Consensus to Contestation”. New Media and Society 9(5): 827–847.
go back to reference Danziger, J.N. et al. 1982. Information Technology Management in Developing Countries (USA: IRM Press). Danziger, J.N. et al. 1982. Information Technology Management in Developing Countries (USA: IRM Press).
go back to reference De Sola Pool 1983. Technologies of Freedom (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press). De Sola Pool 1983. Technologies of Freedom (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).
go back to reference Emirbayer M. 1997. “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology”. The American Journal of Sociology 103(2): 281–317.CrossRef Emirbayer M. 1997. “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology”. The American Journal of Sociology 103(2): 281–317.CrossRef
go back to reference European Union (EU). 2002. The Electronic Commerce Directive (00/31/EC) and the Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002 (SI 2002 No. 2013). European Union (EU). 2002. The Electronic Commerce Directive (00/31/EC) and the Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002 (SI 2002 No. 2013).
go back to reference Ferguson M., ed. 1986. New Communication Technologies and the Public Interest. London: Sage. Ferguson M., ed. 1986. New Communication Technologies and the Public Interest. London: Sage.
go back to reference Fuchs C. 2011a. Foundations of Critical Media and Information Studies. New York: Routledge. Fuchs C. 2011a. Foundations of Critical Media and Information Studies. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Fuchs C. 2013. “Social Media and Capitalism: In Producing the Internet”. In Critical Perspectives of Social Media, ed. T. Olsson, 25–44. Göteborg: Nordicom. Fuchs C. 2013. “Social Media and Capitalism: In Producing the Internet”. In Critical Perspectives of Social Media, ed. T. Olsson, 25–44. Göteborg: Nordicom.
go back to reference Furlong A., and F. Cartmel. 2012. “Social Change and Political Engagement among Young People: Generation and the 2009/2010 British Election Survey”. Parliamentary Affairs 65(1): 13–28.CrossRef Furlong A., and F. Cartmel. 2012. “Social Change and Political Engagement among Young People: Generation and the 2009/2010 British Election Survey”. Parliamentary Affairs 65(1): 13–28.CrossRef
go back to reference Gandy O.H. 1993a. “Toward a Political Economy of Personal Information”. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 10(1): 70–97.CrossRef Gandy O.H. 1993a. “Toward a Political Economy of Personal Information”. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 10(1): 70–97.CrossRef
go back to reference Gandy O.H. 1993b. The Panoptic Sort. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Gandy O.H. 1993b. The Panoptic Sort. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
go back to reference Habermas, J. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press. Original Work Published 1962. Habermas, J. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press. Original Work Published 1962.
go back to reference Halpern D. 2005. Social Capital. Cambridge: Policy Press. Halpern D. 2005. Social Capital. Cambridge: Policy Press.
go back to reference Haythornthwaite C. 2002. “Strong, Weak and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media”. The Information Society 18(5): 385–401.CrossRef Haythornthwaite C. 2002. “Strong, Weak and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media”. The Information Society 18(5): 385–401.CrossRef
go back to reference Iosifidis P. 2010. Reinventing Public Service Communication: European Broadcasters and Beyond. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Iosifidis P. 2010. Reinventing Public Service Communication: European Broadcasters and Beyond. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Iosifidis, P. 2011a. Global Media and Communication Policy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan). Iosifidis, P. 2011a. Global Media and Communication Policy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
go back to reference Kaitatzi-Whitlock, S. 2005. Europe’s Political Communication Deficit (Arima: Bury St Edmunds). Kaitatzi-Whitlock, S. 2005. Europe’s Political Communication Deficit (Arima: Bury St Edmunds).
go back to reference Katz E., and Paul F. Lazarsfeld. 1970. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Katz E., and Paul F. Lazarsfeld. 1970. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
go back to reference Loader B., and D. Mercea. 2011. “NETWORKING DEMOCRACY? Social Media Innovations and Participatory Politics”. Information Communication and Society 14(6): 757–769.CrossRef Loader B., and D. Mercea. 2011. “NETWORKING DEMOCRACY? Social Media Innovations and Participatory Politics”. Information Communication and Society 14(6): 757–769.CrossRef
go back to reference Murdock, G. 2004. ‘Building the Digital Commons: Public Broadcasting in the Age of the Internet’, Speech, Spry Memorial Lecture, University of Montreal, 22 November. At https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/type/www/116/Theory_OtherTexts/Theory/Murdock_BuildingDigitalCommons.pdf (accessed 5 March 2016). Murdock, G. 2004. ‘Building the Digital Commons: Public Broadcasting in the Age of the Internet’, Speech, Spry Memorial Lecture, University of Montreal, 22 November. At https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/type/www/116/Theory_OtherTexts/Theory/Murdock_BuildingDigitalCommons.pdf (accessed 5 March 2016).
go back to reference Morozov, E. 2012. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. Public Affairs. Morozov, E. 2012. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. Public Affairs.
go back to reference Nieminen H. 2009. “Media in Crisis? Social, Economic and Epistemic Dimensions”. In Communicative Approaches to Politics and Ethics in Europe, eds. N. Carpentier et al., 31–43. Estonia: Tartu University Press. Nieminen H. 2009. “Media in Crisis? Social, Economic and Epistemic Dimensions”. In Communicative Approaches to Politics and Ethics in Europe, eds. N. Carpentier et al., 31–43. Estonia: Tartu University Press.
go back to reference Pippa, N. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post-industrial Societies. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Pippa, N. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post-industrial Societies. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
go back to reference Pippa, N. 2001. Digital Divide: Civil Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Pippa, N. 2001. Digital Divide: Civil Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
go back to reference Pippa, N. 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Pippa, N. 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
go back to reference Putnam R.D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civil Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Putnam R.D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civil Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Sen A. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books. Sen A. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
go back to reference Shing, K., and K. Chung. 2011. An Empirical Analysis of Online Social Network Structure to Understand Citizen Engagement in Public Policy and Community Building, International Journal of Electronic Governance, special issue on (Re)Creating Public Sphere, Civic Culture and Civic Engagement: Public Service Media vs. Online Social Networks. Shing, K., and K. Chung. 2011. An Empirical Analysis of Online Social Network Structure to Understand Citizen Engagement in Public Policy and Community Building, International Journal of Electronic Governance, special issue on (Re)Creating Public Sphere, Civic Culture and Civic Engagement: Public Service Media vs. Online Social Networks.
go back to reference Singer J.B. 2014. “User-generated Visibility: Secondary Gatekeeping in a Shared Media Space”. New Media & Society 16(1): 55–73.CrossRef Singer J.B. 2014. “User-generated Visibility: Secondary Gatekeeping in a Shared Media Space”. New Media & Society 16(1): 55–73.CrossRef
go back to reference Sussman L.R. 2001. Press Freedom in Our Genes. Reston, VA: World Press Freedom Committee. Sussman L.R. 2001. Press Freedom in Our Genes. Reston, VA: World Press Freedom Committee.
go back to reference Wilhelm A.G. 1999. “Virtual Sounding Boards: How Deliberative is Online Political Discussion?”. In Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision-Making in the Information Age, eds. B.N. Hague, and B.D. Loader, 154–178. London: Routledge. Wilhelm A.G. 1999. “Virtual Sounding Boards: How Deliberative is Online Political Discussion?”. In Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision-Making in the Information Age, eds. B.N. Hague, and B.D. Loader, 154–178. London: Routledge.
Metadata
Title
Social Media, Public Sphere and Democracy
Authors
Petros Iosifidis
Mark Wheeler
Copyright Year
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41030-6_2