Top

International Journal of Social Robotics

Published in:

27-05-2020

Socially Assistive Robots, Older Adults and Research Ethics: The Case for Case-Based Ethics Training

Authors: Linda Battistuzzi, Chris Papadopoulos, Tetiana Hill, Nina Castro, Barbara Bruno, Antonio Sgorbissa

Published in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Issue 4/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Most studies on socially assistive robots (SARs) in elder care are conducted in care homes and recruit participants with some degree of cognitive impairment. The ethical dimension in these studies thus requires careful attention, suggesting that the researchers involved should be offered specific research ethics training. To meet this need in CARESSES—an international multidisciplinary project that aims to design and evaluate the first culturally competent SAR for the care of older adults—a research ethics training module for the project researchers was developed. The training module is largely based on case-based learning (CBL), a widely recognized approach to learning and instruction that is regarded as highly effective across multiple disciplines. In this paper, we argue that research ethics training should be offered to robotics investigators involved in research on SARs in elder care, and we provide an overview of the ethical issues involved in conducting research with SARs and older adults in care homes. Finally, we show how CBL can be used for research ethics training in this context.

previous article Trust in and Ethical Design of Carebots: The Case for Ethics of Care

next article Inference of Other’s Minds with Limited Information in Evolutionary Robotics

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Ethical sensitivity refers to the ability to identify an ethical issue and understand the consequences of decisions made to solve or manage that issue.

The project involves researchers from Italy, the UK, France, Sweden and Japan, caressesrobot.org.

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs PD (2019) World Population Prospects 2019

Feil-Seifer D, Mataric MJ (2005) Defining socially assistive robotics. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th international conference on rehabilitation robotics Chicago, IL, USA

Lehmann H, Syrdal D, Dautenhahn K et al (2013) What should a robot do for you ? Evaluating the needs of the elderly in the UK. In: ACHI 2013—the sixth international conference on advances in computer–human interactions, pp 83–88

Abdi J, Al-Hindawi A, Ng T, Vizcaychipi MP (2018) Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018815CrossRef

Lingler J, Jablonski R, Bourbonniere M, Kolanowski A (2009) Informed consent to research in long-term care settings. Res Gerontol Nurs 2:153–161. https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20090428-03CrossRef

Maas ML, Kelley LS, Park M, Specht JP (2002) Issues in conducting research in nursing homes. West J Nurs Res 24:373–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/01945902024004006CrossRef

Bruno B, Chong NY, Kamide H et al (2017) Paving the way for culturally competent robots : a position paper. In: 2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN) Lisbon, Portugal

Bruno B, Chong NY, Kamide H et al (2019) The CARESSES EU-Japan project: making assistive robots culturally competent. Lect Not Electr Eng 540:151–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04672-9_10CrossRef

Pandey AK, Gelin R (2018) A mass-produced sociable humanoid robot: pepper: the first machine of its kind. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 25:40–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2018.2833157CrossRef

10.

Papadopoulos C, Hill T, Battistuzzi L et al (2020) The CARESSES study protocol: testing and evaluating culturally competent socially assistive robots among older adults residing in long term care homes through a controlled experimental trial. Arch Public Heal. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-020-00409-yCrossRef

11.

Bagdasarov Z, Thiel CE, Johnson JF et al (2013) Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making. Sci Eng Ethics 19:1305–1322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9414-3CrossRef

12.

Falkenberg L, Woiceshyn J (2008) Enhancing business ethics: using cases to reach moral reasoning. J Bus Ethics 79:213–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9381-9CrossRef

13.

Kolodner JL (1997) Educational implications of analogy: a view from case-based reasoning. Am Psychol 52:57CrossRef

14.

Kalichman M (2009) Evidence-based research ethics. Am J Bioeth 9:85–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160902923457CrossRef

15.

World Medical Association (2013) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Med Assoc 310:2191–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053CrossRef

16.

European Commission (2010) European textbook on ethics in research

17.

College SN Required Education in Protecting Human Research Participants. https://www.snc.edu/irb/humansubjects.html

18.

Kalichman M (2014) Rescuing responsible conduct of research (RCR) education. Acc Res 21:68–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2013.822271CrossRef

19.

Sedenberg E, Chuang J, Mulligan D (2016) Designing commercial therapeutic robots for privacy preserving systems and ethical research practices within the home. Int J Soc Robot 8:575–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0362-yCrossRef

20.

Lam HR, Chow S, Taylor K et al (2018) Challenges of conducting research in long-term care facilities: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 18:242. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0934-9CrossRef

21.

Ramos L, van den Hoven E (2015) Balancing ethics in research with older adults and persons with dementia. Paper presented at the OzCHI 2015 workshop on ethical encounters: HCI research in sensitive and complex settings, pp 1–3

22.

Mody L, Miller DK, McGloin JM et al (2008) Recruitment and retention of older adults in aging research. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:2340–2348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02015.x.RecruitmentCrossRef

23.

Begun AL, Otto-Salaj LL, Berger L (2018) Participant recruitment and retention in intervention and evaluation research. Oxford University Press, New York

24.

Glesne C (1989) Rapport and friendship in ethnographic research. Int J Qual Stud Educ 2:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839890020105CrossRef

25.

Berkman BE, Chandros Hull S, Eckstein L (2014) The unintended implications of blurring the line between research and clinical care in a genomic age. Person Med 11:285–295CrossRef

26.

McGuire J (2009) Ethical considerations when working with older adults in psychology. Int J Aviat Psychol 19:112–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420902772702CrossRef

27.

Bonnie RJ, Wallace RB (2003) Elder mistreatment abuse, neglect and exploitation in an aging America. The National Academies Press, Washington

28.

Resnik DB, Randall D (2018) Reporting suspected abuse or neglect in research involving children. J Med Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2017-104452CrossRef

29.

Ragan A, Bowen A (2001) Improving attitudes regarding the elderly population: the effects of information and reinforcement for change. Gerontologist 41:511–515CrossRef

30.

van Wynsberghe A (2013) Designing robots for care: care centered value-sensitive design. Sci Eng Ethics 19:407–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6CrossRef

31.

van Wynsberghe A (2016) Healthcare robots: ethics, design and implementation, 1st edn. Routledge, LondonCrossRef

32.

Fosch-Villaronga E (2019) Robots, healthcare, and the law: regulating automation in personal care, 1st edn. Routledge, LondonCrossRef

33.

Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2012) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol 14:27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6CrossRef

34.

Sharkey AJ (2015) Robots and human dignity: a consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people. Ethics Inf Technol 14:27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9338-5CrossRef

35.

Vallor S (2011) Carebots and caregivers: sustaining the ethical ideal of care in the twenty-first century. Philos Technol 24:251–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-011-0015-xCrossRef

36.

Battistuzzi L, Sgorbissa A, Papadopoulos C et al (2018) Embedding ethics in the design of culturally competent socially assistive robots. In: IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems

37.

Alzheimer Europe (2010) The ethical issues linked to the use of assistive technology in dementia care—ethical issues in practice—ethics—Alzheimer Europe. In: Alzheimer Eur. http://www.alzheimer-europe.org/Ethics/Ethical-issues-in-practice/2010-The-ethical-issues-linked-to-the-use-of-assistive-technology-in-dementia-care. Accessed 19 Feb 2019

38.

Turkle S (2007) Authenticity in the age of digital companions. Interact Stud 8:501–517CrossRef

39.

Annas GJ (2003) HIPAA regulations—a new era of medical-record privacy? N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmlim035027CrossRef

40.

EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data

41.

Alvseike H, Brønnick K (2012) Feasibility of the iPad as a hub for smart house technology in the elderly; effects of cognition, self-efficacy, and technology experience. J Multidiscip Healthc 5:299–306. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S35344CrossRef

42.

Draucker CB, Martsolf DS, Poole C (2009) Developing distress protocols for research on sensitive topics. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 23:343–350CrossRef

43.

Fraser SA, Kenyon V, Lagacé M et al (2016) Stereotypes associated with age-related conditions and assistive device use in Canadian media. Gerontologist 56:1023–1032. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv094CrossRef

44.

Werhane PH (2002) Moral imagination and systems thinking. J Bus Ethics 38:33–42CrossRef

45.

Kolodner JL (2014) Case-based reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington

46.

Kolodner J, Owensby J, Guzdial M (2004) Case-based learning aids. In: Jonassen D (ed) Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 829–861

47.

Kim S, Phillips WR, Pinsky L et al (2006) A conceptual framework for developing teaching cases: a review and synthesis of the literature across disciplines. Med Educ 40:867–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02544.xCrossRef

48.

Johnson JF, Bagdasarov Z, Connelly S et al (2012) Case-based ethics education: the impact of cause complexity and outcome favorability on ethicality. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 7:63–77. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.63CrossRef

49.

Menzel DC (2009) Teaching and learning ethical reasoning with cases. Public Integr 11:239–250. https://doi.org/10.2753/pin1099-9922110303CrossRef

50.

Harkrider LN, MacDougall AE, Bagdasarov Z et al (2013) Structuring case-based ethics training: how comparing cases and structured prompts influence training effectiveness. Ethics Behav 23:179–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2012.728470CrossRef

51.

Plinio AJ, Young JM, McCormick Lavery L (2010) The state of ethics in our society: a clear call for action. Int J Discl Gov 7:172–197CrossRef

52.

Atkinson TN (2008) Using creative writing techniques to enhance the case study method in research integrity and ethics courses. J Acad Ethics 6:33–50MathSciNetCrossRef

53.

Currie G (2008) Moving towards reflexive use of teaching cases. Int J Manag Educ 7:41–50. https://doi.org/10.3794/ijme.71.205CrossRef

54.

Herreid CF (1998) Sorting potatoes for Miss Bonner. J Coll Sci Teach 27:236–239

55.

Watts LL, Medeiros KE, Mulhearn TJ et al (2017) Are ethics training programs improving? A meta-analytic review of past and present ethics instruction in the sciences. Ethics Behav 27:351–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2016.1182025CrossRef

56.

Antes A, Murphy S, Waples E et al (2009) meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics Behav 19:379–402CrossRef

57.

Velasquez M, Moberg D, Meyer MJ, Shanks T, McLean MR, DeCosse D, André C, Hanson KO (2009) A framework for thinking ethically. Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University. http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/decision/framework.html

58.

Nimon K (2014) Explaining differences between retrospective and traditional pretest self-assessments: competing theories and empirical evidence. Int J Res Method Educ 37:256–269CrossRef

59.

Geldhof GJ, Warner DA, Finders JK et al (2018) Revisiting the utility of retrospective pre-post designs: the need for mixed-method pilot data. Eval Program Plann 70:83–89CrossRef

60.

Schiekirka S, Anders S, Raupach T (2014) Assessment of two different types of bias affecting the results of outcome-based evaluation in undergraduate medical education. BMC Med Educ 14:149CrossRef

61.

Carsten B, Coeckelbergh M (2016) Ethics of healthcare robotics: towards responsible research and innovation ethics of healthcare robotics: towards responsible research and innovation. Rob Auton Syst 86:152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.018CrossRef

Title: Socially Assistive Robots, Older Adults and Research Ethics: The Case for Case-Based Ethics Training
Authors: Linda Battistuzzi
Chris Papadopoulos
Tetiana Hill
Nina Castro
Barbara Bruno
Antonio Sgorbissa
Publication date: 27-05-2020
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: International Journal of Social Robotics / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Electronic ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00652-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

A Taxonomy to Structure and Analyze Human–Robot Interaction

Experimental Studies of Human–Robot Interaction: Threats to Valid Interpretation from Methodological Constraints Associated with Experimental Manipulations

Ethics, Human Rights, the Intelligent Robot, and its Subsystem for Moral Beliefs

Competing with or Against Cozmo, the Robot: Influence of Interaction Context and Outcome on Mind Perception

Blessing Robot BlessU2: A Discursive Design Study to Understand the Implications of Social Robots in Religious Contexts

Development of Active Lower Limb Robotic-Based Orthosis and Exoskeleton Devices: A Systematic Review

Premium Partners