Skip to main content
Top

2012 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. Solo Entrepreneur vs. Entrepreneurial Teams: Structural/Cultural Embeddedness and Innovation

Authors : Manlio Del Giudice, Elias G. Carayannis, Maria Rosaria Della Peruta

Published in: Cross-Cultural Knowledge Management

Publisher: Springer New York

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter shines a light on the dynamic interaction between creative behavior and preexisting structuring of organizations in cross-cultural knowledge management.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
 Structuration theory views the subjectivity and objectivity of social realities as equally important. According to structuration theory, cultural context is generated and regenerated through the interplay of action and structure. It recognizes that “man actively shapes the world he lives in at the same time as it shapes him” (Giddens 1986).
 
2
 Structuration theory and the concept of the duality of structure allow us to think about society from both a structural and a behavioral perspective without reducing the analysis to either the institutional level or to the level of everyday life (behavioral). It allows us to do our analysis on one level while we set aside the other level. It allows us to see how the two levels are connected both in theory and in social reality. Finally, it allows us to appreciate the fact that the individual actors and social groups are not simply products of their social circumstances, but they are also the producers and reproducers of these social relations and circumstances.
 
3
 As Schumpeter pointed out, “…the entrepreneurial function need not be embodied in a physical person and in particular in a single physical person” (Schumpeter 1949, p. 255).
 
4
 Shane (2000) pointed out that the same licensable invention was exploited by eight different teams. Training and expertise were distinguishing elements for the members of every team. The consequence was that everyone perceived in a different way the possible exploitation of the licensable invention and carried out extremely different innovations despite having the same basis. It is not a surprise that they were not all as successful as their promoters had imagined. In such example, simple teams are taken into account: their routines could be associated with individuals. The different training and experience of the various members of the teams generated different routines and this led to the development of different innovations starting from the same technology. In the same way, the integration of different scientific and technical disciplines was made easier by the internal governance structure. For example, in Hounshell’s and Smith’s thorough account of DuPont’s research laboratories, DuPont’s interaction with external partners or cooperators is only just mentioned. Nevertheless, there is a significant evidence of interdisciplinary integration, such as the one between engineering and chemistry.
 
5
 This also enables us to make a contribution to the literature on organizational design (Ancona and Caldwell 1992). Sociotechnical systems theorists (e.g., Trist 1981; Beekun 1989) have long argued for the use of teams as building blocks of flexible and creative organizations and have described and experimented with different organizational designs to optimize the effectiveness of these teams.
 
6
 The creation of scientific knowledge is a cultural practice. In fact, as argued by Lenoir (1995), knowledge implies productive commitments with the world and the social and economic interests of the parties involved. Therefore, for a complete comprehension of the processes of knowledge creation, which influence knowledge paths, it is essential that the cultural practice of scientists in firms is fully understood.
 
7
 Social identity is “that part of an individual’s self-concept which derives from his knowledge of his membership in a social group (or groups) together with the value and emotional significance attached to that membership” (Tajfel 1981, p. 255). Social Identity Theory was developed by Tajfel and Turner in 1979. The theory was originally developed to understand the psychological basis of intergroup discrimination. Tajfel et al. (1971) attempted to identify the minimal conditions that would lead members of one group to discriminate in favor of the ingroup to which they belonged and against another outgroup. In the Social Identity Theory, a person has not one, “personal self,” but rather several selves that correspond to widening circles of group membership. Different social contexts may trigger an individual to think, feel, and act on basis of his personal, family, or national “level of self” (Turner et al. 1987). Apart from the “level of self,” an individual has multiple “social identities.” Social identity is the individual’s self-concept derived from perceived membership of social groups (Hogg and Vaughan 2002). In other words, it is an individual-based perception of what defines the “us” associated with any internalized group membership. This can be distinguished from the notion of personal identity, which refers to self-knowledge that derives from the individual’s unique attributes. Social Identity Theory asserts that group membership creates ingroup/self-categorization and enhancement in ways that favor the ingroup at the expense of the outgroup. The examples (minimal group studies) of Turner and Tajfel (1986) showed that the mere act of individuals categorizing themselves as group members was sufficient to lead them to display ingroup favoritism. After being categorized of a group membership, individuals seek to achieve positive self-esteem by positively differentiating their ingroup from a comparison outgroup on some valued dimension. This quest for positive distinctiveness means that people’s sense of who they are is defined in terms of “we” rather than “I.” Tajfel and Turner (1979) identify three variables whose contribution to the emergence of ingroup favoritism is particularly important. (1) The extent to which individuals identify with an ingroup to internalize that group membership as an aspect of their self-concept. (2) The extent to which the prevailing context provides ground for comparison between groups. (3) The perceived relevance of the comparison group, which itself will be shaped by the relative and absolute status of the ingroup. Individuals are likely to display favoritism when an ingroup is central to their self-definition and a given comparison is meaningful or the outcome is contestable.
 
Literature
go back to reference Aldrich HE, Kenworthy AL (1999) The Accidental Entrepreneur: Campbellian Antinomies and Organizational Foundings. In: Baum JAC, McKelvey B (ed.), Variations in Organization Science, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, pp. 19–33 Aldrich HE, Kenworthy AL (1999) The Accidental Entrepreneur: Campbellian Antinomies and Organizational Foundings. In: Baum JAC, McKelvey B (ed.), Variations in Organization Science, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, pp. 19–33
go back to reference Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance, Organization Science 3: 321–341CrossRef Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance, Organization Science 3: 321–341CrossRef
go back to reference Antonelli C, Franzoni C, Geuna A (2011) The Organization, Economics and Policy of Scientific Research. Industrial and Corporate Change 20: 201–213CrossRef Antonelli C, Franzoni C, Geuna A (2011) The Organization, Economics and Policy of Scientific Research. Industrial and Corporate Change 20: 201–213CrossRef
go back to reference Beekun RI (1989) Assessing the Effectiveness of Sociotechnical Interventions - Antidote Or Fad, Human Relations, 42(10): 877–897CrossRef Beekun RI (1989) Assessing the Effectiveness of Sociotechnical Interventions - Antidote Or Fad, Human Relations, 42(10): 877–897CrossRef
go back to reference Blanck P (1993) Interpersonal Expectations: Theory, Research, and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Blanck P (1993) Interpersonal Expectations: Theory, Research, and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
go back to reference Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective, Organization Science, 12: 198–213 Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective, Organization Science, 12: 198–213
go back to reference Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 1–34 Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 1–34
go back to reference Burgelman RA (1994) Fading Memories: a Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1): 24–56 Burgelman RA (1994) Fading Memories: a Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1): 24–56
go back to reference Burt R (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press Burt R (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press
go back to reference Child J (1982) Professionals in the Corporate World: Values, Interests and Control. In: Dunkerley D, Salaman G (ed.), The International Yearbook of Organization Studies 1981, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 212–241 Child J (1982) Professionals in the Corporate World: Values, Interests and Control. In: Dunkerley D, Salaman G (ed.), The International Yearbook of Organization Studies 1981, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 212–241
go back to reference Child J, Loveridge R (1990) Information Technology in European Services. Oxford: Blackwell. Child J, Loveridge R (1990) Information Technology in European Services. Oxford: Blackwell.
go back to reference Coopey J (1996) Crucial Gaps in “the Learning Organization”: Power, Politics, and Ideology. In: Starkey K (ed.), How Organization Learn, London, International Thomson Business Press, pp. 348–367 Coopey J (1996) Crucial Gaps in “the Learning Organization”: Power, Politics, and Ideology. In: Starkey K (ed.), How Organization Learn, London, International Thomson Business Press, pp. 348–367
go back to reference Coser LA (1964) The Termination of Conflict. In: Gore WJ, Dyson WJ (ed.), The Making of Decisions, New York, Free Press, pp. 403–410 Coser LA (1964) The Termination of Conflict. In: Gore WJ, Dyson WJ (ed.), The Making of Decisions, New York, Free Press, pp. 403–410
go back to reference Crane D (1968) Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: a Test of the “Invisible College” Hypothesis, American Sociological Review 34: 335–352CrossRef Crane D (1968) Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: a Test of the “Invisible College” Hypothesis, American Sociological Review 34: 335–352CrossRef
go back to reference de Chadarevian S (2002) Designs for Life: Molecular Biology After World War II. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press de Chadarevian S (2002) Designs for Life: Molecular Biology After World War II. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
go back to reference Etzkowitz H (2002) MIT and The Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. London: RoutledgeCrossRef Etzkowitz H (2002) MIT and The Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. London: RoutledgeCrossRef
go back to reference Giddens A (1986) Sociology: A Brief But Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press Giddens A (1986) Sociology: A Brief But Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press
go back to reference Granovetter M (1985) Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal Sociology 91: 481–510CrossRef Granovetter M (1985) Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal Sociology 91: 481–510CrossRef
go back to reference Guzzo R (1995) Introduction: at the Intersection of Team Effectiveness and Decision Making, In: Guzzo R, Salas E, Associates (eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, pp. 1–8CrossRef Guzzo R (1995) Introduction: at the Intersection of Team Effectiveness and Decision Making, In: Guzzo R, Salas E, Associates (eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, pp. 1–8CrossRef
go back to reference Hannan M, Freeman J (1984) Structural Inertia and Organizational Change, American Sociological Review 49: 149–164CrossRef Hannan M, Freeman J (1984) Structural Inertia and Organizational Change, American Sociological Review 49: 149–164CrossRef
go back to reference Hedberg BLT (1981) How Organizations Learn and Unlearn. In: Nystrom PC, Starbuck WH (ed.), Handobook of Organizational Design: Adapting Organizations to Their Environments, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 3–27 Hedberg BLT (1981) How Organizations Learn and Unlearn. In: Nystrom PC, Starbuck WH (ed.), Handobook of Organizational Design: Adapting Organizations to Their Environments, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 3–27
go back to reference Herriot SR, Levinthal DA, Marcj JG (1985) Learning from Experience in Organizations. American Economic Review 75: 298–302 Herriot SR, Levinthal DA, Marcj JG (1985) Learning from Experience in Organizations. American Economic Review 75: 298–302
go back to reference Hollingsworth R, Hollingsworth EJ (2000) Major Discoveries and Biomedical Research Organizations: Perspectives on Interdisciplinary, Nurturing Leadership, and Integrated Structure and Cultures. In: Weingart P, Stehr N (ed.), Practicing Interdisciplinarity, Toronto, Toronto University Press, pp. 215–244 Hollingsworth R, Hollingsworth EJ (2000) Major Discoveries and Biomedical Research Organizations: Perspectives on Interdisciplinary, Nurturing Leadership, and Integrated Structure and Cultures. In: Weingart P, Stehr N (ed.), Practicing Interdisciplinarity, Toronto, Toronto University Press, pp. 215–244
go back to reference Hogg M, Vaughan G (2002) Social Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall Hogg M, Vaughan G (2002) Social Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall
go back to reference Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston, Harvard Business School Press Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston, Harvard Business School Press
go back to reference Lenoir T (1995) Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press Lenoir T (1995) Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press
go back to reference March JG (1991) Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning, Organization Science 2: 71–87CrossRef March JG (1991) Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning, Organization Science 2: 71–87CrossRef
go back to reference Merton RK (1973) The Sociology of Sciences: Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Chicago, University of Chicago Press Merton RK (1973) The Sociology of Sciences: Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Chicago, University of Chicago Press
go back to reference Mueller F, Dyerson R (1999) Expert Humans or Expert Organizations?, Organization Studies, 20:225–256CrossRef Mueller F, Dyerson R (1999) Expert Humans or Expert Organizations?, Organization Studies, 20:225–256CrossRef
go back to reference Popper KR (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books Popper KR (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books
go back to reference Scarbrough H (1996) Strategic Change in Financial Service: The Social Construction of Strategic IS. In: Orlikowski WJ, Walsham G, Jones MR, DeGross JI (ed.), Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work, London, Chapman & Hall, pp. 197–212 Scarbrough H (1996) Strategic Change in Financial Service: The Social Construction of Strategic IS. In: Orlikowski WJ, Walsham G, Jones MR, DeGross JI (ed.), Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work, London, Chapman & Hall, pp. 197–212
go back to reference Schumpeter J (1949) Economic Theory and Entrepreneurial History. In: Schumpeter JA (ed), Essays on Economic, Port Washington, NY, Kennikat Press, p.255 Schumpeter J (1949) Economic Theory and Entrepreneurial History. In: Schumpeter JA (ed), Essays on Economic, Port Washington, NY, Kennikat Press, p.255
go back to reference Sewell WF (1992) A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation, The American Journal of Sociology 98: 1–29CrossRef Sewell WF (1992) A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation, The American Journal of Sociology 98: 1–29CrossRef
go back to reference Shane S (2000) Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities, Organization Science 11(4): 448–469CrossRef Shane S (2000) Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities, Organization Science 11(4): 448–469CrossRef
go back to reference Tajfel H, Billig M, Bundy R, Flament C (1971) Social Categorization in Intergroup Behaviour, European Journal of Social Psychology 1: 149–178 Tajfel H, Billig M, Bundy R, Flament C (1971) Social Categorization in Intergroup Behaviour, European Journal of Social Psychology 1: 149–178
go back to reference Tajfel H, Turner J (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict, In: Austin W, Worchel S (eds.), The social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Tajfel H, Turner J (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict, In: Austin W, Worchel S (eds.), The social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole
go back to reference Tajfel H (1981) Social identity and intergroup relations. London, Cambridge University Press Tajfel H (1981) Social identity and intergroup relations. London, Cambridge University Press
go back to reference Trist E (1981) The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems: A Conceptual Framework and Action Research program. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Labour Trist E (1981) The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems: A Conceptual Framework and Action Research program. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Labour
go back to reference Turner JC, Tajfel H (1986) The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin W (eds.), Psychology of intergroup relation, Nelson-Hall, Chicago, IL, pp. 7–24 Turner JC, Tajfel H (1986) The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin W (eds.), Psychology of intergroup relation, Nelson-Hall, Chicago, IL, pp. 7–24
go back to reference Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell
Metadata
Title
Solo Entrepreneur vs. Entrepreneurial Teams: Structural/Cultural Embeddedness and Innovation
Authors
Manlio Del Giudice
Elias G. Carayannis
Maria Rosaria Della Peruta
Copyright Year
2012
Publisher
Springer New York
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2089-7_3

Premium Partner