Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Actuarial Journal 1/2011

01-07-2011 | Original Research Paper

Stochastic mortality: experience-based modeling and application issues consistent with Solvency 2

Author: Annamaria Olivieri

Published in: European Actuarial Journal | Special Issue 1/2011

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper is motivated by the need to have appropriate tools for the valuation of mortality/longevity risks when carrying out an internal assessment of the insurance business, such as a portfolio valuation or a solvency investigation based on internal models. The case of life annuities is in particular addressed, due to the importance of mortality/longevity on the cost of living benefits for the elderly. Our aim is to describe a stochastic mortality model calibrated on the best-estimate life table available to the insurer and to the mortality experienced in the insurer’s portfolio. As we address life annuities, uncertainty of future mortality improvements, i.e. the aggregate mortality/longevity risk, needs in particular to be accounted for. Following Olivieri and Pitacco (ASTIN Bull 39(2):541–563, 2009), we extend some classical results about the modeling of the number of deaths joint to the modeling of parameter uncertainty. We explore the features of two alternative approaches: a Beta-Binomial and a Poisson-Gamma setting; we then focus on the latter only. Thanks to a Bayesian inferential procedure, the parameters, initially assigned referring to the best-estimate life table, are updated according to the mortality experienced in the portfolio. Extending a traditional tool-kit, the framework we define is in particular suitable for practical work. Due to calibration, clearly the scope of the model is within internal assessments. To provide an example of application of the model, we perform a capital assessment. Solvency rules which could be adopted as an alternative to a standard, regulatory requirement are tested. The Solvency 2 requirement for longevity risk is referred to for the design of an internal rule which could get validation for replacing the standard one.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
3.
go back to reference Brémaud P (1981) Point processes and queues. Martingale dynamics. Springer, BerlinMATH Brémaud P (1981) Point processes and queues. Martingale dynamics. Springer, BerlinMATH
4.
go back to reference Bühlmann H (1970) Mathematical methods in risk theory. Springer, New YorkMATH Bühlmann H (1970) Mathematical methods in risk theory. Springer, New YorkMATH
5.
go back to reference Cairns A, Blake D, Dowd K (2006) Pricing death: frameworks for the valuation and securitization of mortality risk. ASTIN Bull 36(1):79–120MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Cairns A, Blake D, Dowd K (2006) Pricing death: frameworks for the valuation and securitization of mortality risk. ASTIN Bull 36(1):79–120MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Carlin B, Louis T (2000) Bayes and empirical Bayes methods for data analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton Carlin B, Louis T (2000) Bayes and empirical Bayes methods for data analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
7.
go back to reference CEIOPS (2009) Consultation paper no. 39–62 CEIOPS (2009) Consultation paper no. 39–62
8.
go back to reference CMI: An interim basis for adjusting the “92” series mortality projections for cohort effects (2002) Working paper 1, The Faculty of Actuaries and Institute of Actuaries CMI: An interim basis for adjusting the “92” series mortality projections for cohort effects (2002) Working paper 1, The Faculty of Actuaries and Institute of Actuaries
9.
go back to reference CMI: Stochastic projection methodologies: Further progress and P-Spline model features, example results and implications (2006) Working paper 20, The Faculty of Actuaries and Institute of Actuaries CMI: Stochastic projection methodologies: Further progress and P-Spline model features, example results and implications (2006) Working paper 20, The Faculty of Actuaries and Institute of Actuaries
10.
go back to reference Dahl M (2004) Stochastic mortality in life insurance. Market reserves and mortality-linked insurance contracts. Insur Math Econ 35(1):113–136MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Dahl M (2004) Stochastic mortality in life insurance. Market reserves and mortality-linked insurance contracts. Insur Math Econ 35(1):113–136MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dahl M, Møller T (2006) Valuation and hedging of life insurance liabilities with systematic mortality risk. Insur Math Econ 39(2):193–217MATHCrossRef Dahl M, Møller T (2006) Valuation and hedging of life insurance liabilities with systematic mortality risk. Insur Math Econ 39(2):193–217MATHCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gerber H (1995) Life insurance mathematics. Springer, BerlinMATH Gerber H (1995) Life insurance mathematics. Springer, BerlinMATH
13.
go back to reference Haberman S, Olivieri A (2008) Risk classification/life. In: Melnick E, Everitt B (eds) The Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Assessment and Analysis. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1535–1540 Haberman S, Olivieri A (2008) Risk classification/life. In: Melnick E, Everitt B (eds) The Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Assessment and Analysis. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1535–1540
14.
go back to reference Lin Y, Cox S (2008) Securitization of catastrophe mortality risks. Insur Math Econ 42(2):628–637MATHCrossRef Lin Y, Cox S (2008) Securitization of catastrophe mortality risks. Insur Math Econ 42(2):628–637MATHCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Marocco P, Pitacco E (1998) Longevity risk and life annuity reinsurance. In: Transactions of the 26th international congress of actuaries, Birmingham, vol 6, pp 453–479 Marocco P, Pitacco E (1998) Longevity risk and life annuity reinsurance. In: Transactions of the 26th international congress of actuaries, Birmingham, vol 6, pp 453–479
17.
go back to reference Olivieri A (2006) Heterogeneity in survival models. applications to pensions and life annuities. Belgian Actuar Bull 6:23–39 Olivieri A (2006) Heterogeneity in survival models. applications to pensions and life annuities. Belgian Actuar Bull 6:23–39
18.
go back to reference Olivieri A, Pitacco E (2002) Inference about mortality improvements in life annuity portfolios. In: Transactions of the 27th international congress of actuaries, Cancun (Mexico) Olivieri A, Pitacco E (2002) Inference about mortality improvements in life annuity portfolios. In: Transactions of the 27th international congress of actuaries, Cancun (Mexico)
20.
go back to reference Panjer H, Willmot G (1992) Insurance risk models. The Society of Actuaries Panjer H, Willmot G (1992) Insurance risk models. The Society of Actuaries
21.
go back to reference Robert C, Casella G (2004) Monte Carlo statistical methods. Springer, BerlinMATH Robert C, Casella G (2004) Monte Carlo statistical methods. Springer, BerlinMATH
22.
go back to reference Sandström A (2006) Solvency. Models, assessment and regulation. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca RatonMATH Sandström A (2006) Solvency. Models, assessment and regulation. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca RatonMATH
23.
go back to reference Vaupel J, Manton K, Stallard E (1979) The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography 16(3):439–454CrossRef Vaupel J, Manton K, Stallard E (1979) The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography 16(3):439–454CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Willets RC (2004) The cohort effect: insights and explanations. Br Actuar J 10:833–877CrossRef Willets RC (2004) The cohort effect: insights and explanations. Br Actuar J 10:833–877CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Stochastic mortality: experience-based modeling and application issues consistent with Solvency 2
Author
Annamaria Olivieri
Publication date
01-07-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Actuarial Journal / Issue Special Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 2190-9733
Electronic ISSN: 2190-9741
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-011-0013-5

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2011

European Actuarial Journal 1/2011 Go to the issue

Abstracts

Abstracts