Skip to main content
Top

2010 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

4. Strategic Options Development and Analysis

Authors : Fran Ackermann, Colin Eden

Published in: Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide

Publisher: Springer London

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA) enables a group or individual to construct a graphical representation of a problematic situation, and thus explore options and their ramifications with respect to a complex system of goals or objectives. In addition the method aims to help groups arrive at a negotiated agreement about how to act to resolve the situation. It is based upon the use of causal mapping – a formally constructed means-ends network – as representation form. Because the picture has been constructed using the natural language of the problem owners it becomes a model of the situation that is ‘owned’ by those who define the problem. The use of formalities for the construction of the model makes it amenable to a range of analyses as well as encouraging reflection and a deeper understanding. These analyses can be used in a ‘rough and ready’ manner by visual inspection or through the use of specialist causal mapping software (Decision Explorer). Each of the analyses helps a group or individual discover important features of the problem situation, and these features facilitate agreeing agood solution. The SODA process is aimed at helping a group learn about the situation they face before they reach agreements. Most significantly the exploration through the causal map leads to a higher probability of more creative solutions and promotes solutions that are more likely to be implemented because the problem construction process is wider and more likely to include richer social dimensions about the blockages to action and organizational change. The basic theories that inform SODA derive from cognitive psychology and social negotiation, where the model acts as a continuously changing representation of the problematic situation – changing as the views of a person or group shift through learning and exploration. This chapter, jointly written by two leading practitioner academics and the original developers of SODA, Colin Eden and Fran Ackermann, describes the SODA techniques as they are applied in practice.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Ackermann, F. 1996. Participants Perceptions on the Role of Facilitators using Group Decision Support Systems. Group Decision and Negotiation, 5: 93-112. Ackermann, F. 1996. Participants Perceptions on the Role of Facilitators using Group Decision Support Systems. Group Decision and Negotiation, 5: 93-112.
go back to reference Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. 1994. Issues in Computer and Non-Computer Supported GDSSs. International Journal of Decision Support Systems, 12: 381-390.CrossRef Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. 1994. Issues in Computer and Non-Computer Supported GDSSs. International Journal of Decision Support Systems, 12: 381-390.CrossRef
go back to reference Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. 1997. Contrasting GDSSs and GSSs in the Context of Strategic Change: Implications for Facilitation. Journal of Decision Systems, 6: 221-250.CrossRef Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. 1997. Contrasting GDSSs and GSSs in the Context of Strategic Change: Implications for Facilitation. Journal of Decision Systems, 6: 221-250.CrossRef
go back to reference Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. 2001a. Contrasting Single User and Networked Group Decision Support Systems for Strategy Making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10: 47-66.CrossRef Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. 2001a. Contrasting Single User and Networked Group Decision Support Systems for Strategy Making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10: 47-66.CrossRef
go back to reference Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. 2001b. SODA – Journey Making and Mapping in Practice. In Rosenhead, J. and Mingers, J. (Eds.), Rational Analysis in a Problematic World Revisited: 43-60. London: Wiley. Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. 2001b. SODA – Journey Making and Mapping in Practice. In Rosenhead, J. and Mingers, J. (Eds.), Rational Analysis in a Problematic World Revisited: 43-60. London: Wiley.
go back to reference Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. 2004. Using Causal mapping: individual and group; traditional and new. In Pidd, M. (Eds.), Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice: 127-145. Chichester: Wiley. Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. 2004. Using Causal mapping: individual and group; traditional and new. In Pidd, M. (Eds.), Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice: 127-145. Chichester: Wiley.
go back to reference Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. 2010a. Strategic Management of Stakeholders: theory and practice. Long Range Planning, forthcoming. Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. 2010a. Strategic Management of Stakeholders: theory and practice. Long Range Planning, forthcoming.
go back to reference Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. 2010b. Negotiation in Strategy Making Teams: Group Support Systems and the Process of Cognitive Change. Group Decision and Negotiation, forthcoming. Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. 2010b. Negotiation in Strategy Making Teams: Group Support Systems and the Process of Cognitive Change. Group Decision and Negotiation, forthcoming.
go back to reference Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. 2010c. The Role of Group Decision Support Systems: negotiating safe energy. In Kilgour, M. and Eden, C. (Eds.), Handbook for Group Decision and Negotiation: Dordrecht: Springer. Ackermann, F. and Eden, C. 2010c. The Role of Group Decision Support Systems: negotiating safe energy. In Kilgour, M. and Eden, C. (Eds.), Handbook for Group Decision and Negotiation: Dordrecht: Springer.
go back to reference Ackermann, F., Eden, C., and Williams, T. 1997. Modeling for Litigation: Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Interfaces, 27: 48-65.CrossRef Ackermann, F., Eden, C., and Williams, T. 1997. Modeling for Litigation: Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Interfaces, 27: 48-65.CrossRef
go back to reference Ackermann, F., Eden, C., with Brown, I. 2005. The Practice of Making Strategy: A Step by Step Guide. London: Sage. Ackermann, F., Eden, C., with Brown, I. 2005. The Practice of Making Strategy: A Step by Step Guide. London: Sage.
go back to reference Ackoff, R. L. 1981. Creating the Corporate Future. New York: Wiley. Ackoff, R. L. 1981. Creating the Corporate Future. New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Andersen, D., Richardson, G. P., Ackermann, F., and Eden, C. Using the Group Explorer Group Support System to Add Value to Group Model Building. System Dynamics Review, Forthcoming. Andersen, D., Richardson, G. P., Ackermann, F., and Eden, C. Using the Group Explorer Group Support System to Add Value to Group Model Building. System Dynamics Review, Forthcoming.
go back to reference Belton, V., Ackermann, F., and Shepherd, I. 1997. Integrated Support from Problem Structuring through to Alternative Evaluation Using COPE and V.I.S.A. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6: 115-130.MATHCrossRef Belton, V., Ackermann, F., and Shepherd, I. 1997. Integrated Support from Problem Structuring through to Alternative Evaluation Using COPE and V.I.S.A. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6: 115-130.MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Bougon, M., Weick, K., and Binkhorst, D. 1977. Cognition in organizations: analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22: 609-632. Bougon, M., Weick, K., and Binkhorst, D. 1977. Cognition in organizations: analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22: 609-632.
go back to reference Bryson, J. B., Ackermann, F., Eden, C., and Finn, C. 2004a. The Oval Mapping Process: Identifying Strategic Issues and Formulating Effective Strategies. In Strategic Planning for Public and Non-Profit Organisations: 355-376. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Bryson, J. B., Ackermann, F., Eden, C., and Finn, C. 2004a. The Oval Mapping Process: Identifying Strategic Issues and Formulating Effective Strategies. In Strategic Planning for Public and Non-Profit Organisations: 355-376. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
go back to reference Bryson, J., Ackermann, F., Eden, C., and Finn, C. 2004b. Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping for Practical Business Results. Chichester: Wiley. Bryson, J., Ackermann, F., Eden, C., and Finn, C. 2004b. Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping for Practical Business Results. Chichester: Wiley.
go back to reference Bryson, J. M., Ackermann, F., and Eden, C. 2007. Putting the Resource-Based View of Strategy and Distinctive Competencies To Work in Public Organizations. Public Administration Review, July. Bryson, J. M., Ackermann, F., and Eden, C. 2007. Putting the Resource-Based View of Strategy and Distinctive Competencies To Work in Public Organizations. Public Administration Review, July.
go back to reference Buzan, T. and Buzan, B. 1993. The mind map book. London: BBC Books. Buzan, T. and Buzan, B. 1993. The mind map book. London: BBC Books.
go back to reference Eden, C. 1987. Problem Solving or Problem Finishing? In Jackson, M. C. Keys P. (Eds.), New Directions in Management Science: 97-107. Hants: Gower. Eden, C. 1987. Problem Solving or Problem Finishing? In Jackson, M. C. Keys P. (Eds.), New Directions in Management Science: 97-107. Hants: Gower.
go back to reference Eden, C. 1988. Cognitive Mapping: a review. European Journal of Operational Research, 36: 1-13.CrossRef Eden, C. 1988. Cognitive Mapping: a review. European Journal of Operational Research, 36: 1-13.CrossRef
go back to reference Eden, C. 1990. The Unfolding Nature of Group Decision Support. In Eden, C. and Radford, J. (Eds.), Tackling Strategic Problems: the role of group decision support: 48-52. London: Sage. Eden, C. 1990. The Unfolding Nature of Group Decision Support. In Eden, C. and Radford, J. (Eds.), Tackling Strategic Problems: the role of group decision support: 48-52. London: Sage.
go back to reference Eden, C. 2004. Analyzing Cognitive Maps to Help Structure Issues or Problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 159: 673-686.MATHCrossRef Eden, C. 2004. Analyzing Cognitive Maps to Help Structure Issues or Problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 159: 673-686.MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. 1998. Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. London: Sage. Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. 1998. Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. London: Sage.
go back to reference Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. 2000. Mapping distinctive competencies: a systemic approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51: 12-20.MATH Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. 2000. Mapping distinctive competencies: a systemic approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51: 12-20.MATH
go back to reference Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. 2001. A Mapping Framework for Strategy Making. In Huff, A. and Jenkins, M. (Eds.), Mapping Strategy: 173-195. London: Wiley. Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. 2001. A Mapping Framework for Strategy Making. In Huff, A. and Jenkins, M. (Eds.), Mapping Strategy: 173-195. London: Wiley.
go back to reference Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. 2004a. Cognitive Mapping Expert Views for Policy Analysis in the Public Sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 152: 615-630.MATHCrossRef Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. 2004a. Cognitive Mapping Expert Views for Policy Analysis in the Public Sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 152: 615-630.MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. 2004b. Use of ‘soft-OR’ models by clients – what do they want from them? In Pidd, M. (Eds.), Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice: 146-163. Chichester: Wiley. Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. 2004b. Use of ‘soft-OR’ models by clients – what do they want from them? In Pidd, M. (Eds.), Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice: 146-163. Chichester: Wiley.
go back to reference Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. 2007. The Resource Based View: theory and practice. Presented to Academy of Management Conference Philadelphia. Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. 2007. The Resource Based View: theory and practice. Presented to Academy of Management Conference Philadelphia.
go back to reference Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. 2010. Competences, Distinctive Competences, and Core Competences. In Sanchez, R. and Heene, A. (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Competence-Based Management, Advances in Applied Business Strategy, Volume 12: Bingley: Emerald Group. Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. 2010. Competences, Distinctive Competences, and Core Competences. In Sanchez, R. and Heene, A. (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Competence-Based Management, Advances in Applied Business Strategy, Volume 12: Bingley: Emerald Group.
go back to reference Eden, C. and Galer, G. 1990. A Client’s perspective. Long Range Planning, 23: 42-43.CrossRef Eden, C. and Galer, G. 1990. A Client’s perspective. Long Range Planning, 23: 42-43.CrossRef
go back to reference Eden, C., Jones, S., and Sims, D. 1979. Thinking in Organisations. London: Macmillan. Eden, C., Jones, S., and Sims, D. 1979. Thinking in Organisations. London: Macmillan.
go back to reference Eden, C., Jones, S., and Sims, D. 1983. Messing about in problems; an informal structured approach to their identification and management, Oxford: Pergamon. Eden, C., Jones, S., and Sims, D. 1983. Messing about in problems; an informal structured approach to their identification and management, Oxford: Pergamon.
go back to reference Eden, C., Jones, S., and Sims, D. 1994. Misunderstandings: understanding problems and the problems of misunderstanding. In Armson, R. and Paton, R. (Eds.), Organizations: cases, issues, concepts: London: Paul Chapman Publishing. Eden, C., Jones, S., and Sims, D. 1994. Misunderstandings: understanding problems and the problems of misunderstanding. In Armson, R. and Paton, R. (Eds.), Organizations: cases, issues, concepts: London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
go back to reference Eden, C., Ackermann, F., Bryson, J., Richardson, G., Andersen, D., and Finn, C. 2009. Integrating Modes of Policy Analysis and Strategic Management Practice: Requisite Elements and Dilemmas. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60: 2-13.MATHCrossRef Eden, C., Ackermann, F., Bryson, J., Richardson, G., Andersen, D., and Finn, C. 2009. Integrating Modes of Policy Analysis and Strategic Management Practice: Requisite Elements and Dilemmas. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60: 2-13.MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Friend, J. and Hickling, A. 1987. Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach. Oxford: Pergamon. Friend, J. and Hickling, A. 1987. Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach. Oxford: Pergamon.
go back to reference Harvey, J. 1988. The Abilene Paradox: the management of agreement. Organizational Dynamics, Summer: 17-34. Harvey, J. 1988. The Abilene Paradox: the management of agreement. Organizational Dynamics, Summer: 17-34.
go back to reference Hickling, A. 1990. ‘Decision Spaces’: A Scenario about Designing Appropriate Rooms for Group Decision Management. Tackling Strategic Problems: the role of group decision support, 169-177. Hickling, A. 1990. ‘Decision Spaces’: A Scenario about Designing Appropriate Rooms for Group Decision Management. Tackling Strategic Problems: the role of group decision support, 169-177.
go back to reference Hofstede, G. 1980. Cultures Consequences. London: Sage. Hofstede, G. 1980. Cultures Consequences. London: Sage.
go back to reference Howick, S., Eden, C., Ackermann, F., and Williams, T. 2008. Building Confidence in Models for Multiple Audiences: the Modelling Cascade. European Journal of Operational Research, 186: 1068-1083.MATHCrossRef Howick, S., Eden, C., Ackermann, F., and Williams, T. 2008. Building Confidence in Models for Multiple Audiences: the Modelling Cascade. European Journal of Operational Research, 186: 1068-1083.MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Huff A. (Editor) 1990. Mapping Strategic Thought. New York: Wiley. Huff A. (Editor) 1990. Mapping Strategic Thought. New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Huff, A. and Jenkins, M. 2002. Mapping Strategic Knowledge. London: Sage. Huff, A. and Jenkins, M. 2002. Mapping Strategic Knowledge. London: Sage.
go back to reference Janis, I. L. 1972. Victims of Group Think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Janis, I. L. 1972. Victims of Group Think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
go back to reference Kelly, G. A. 1955. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton. Kelly, G. A. 1955. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton.
go back to reference Kim, W. C. and Mauborgne, R. A. 1995. A Procedural Justice Model of Strategic Decision Making. Organization Science, 6: 44-61.CrossRef Kim, W. C. and Mauborgne, R. A. 1995. A Procedural Justice Model of Strategic Decision Making. Organization Science, 6: 44-61.CrossRef
go back to reference Langfield-Smith, K. and Wirth, A. 1992. Measuring Differences between Cognitive Maps. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43: 1135-1150. Langfield-Smith, K. and Wirth, A. 1992. Measuring Differences between Cognitive Maps. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43: 1135-1150.
go back to reference Laukannen, M. 1998. Conducting Causal Mapping Research: Opportunities and Challenges. In Eden, C. Spender J. C. (Eds.), Managerial and Organizational Cognition: London: Sage. Laukannen, M. 1998. Conducting Causal Mapping Research: Opportunities and Challenges. In Eden, C. Spender J. C. (Eds.), Managerial and Organizational Cognition: London: Sage.
go back to reference Lindblom, C. E. 1959. The Science of Muddling Through. Public Administration Review, 19: 79-88.CrossRef Lindblom, C. E. 1959. The Science of Muddling Through. Public Administration Review, 19: 79-88.CrossRef
go back to reference McFadzean, E. S. and Nelson, T. 1998. Facilitating Problem Solving Groups: A Conceptual Model. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 19: 6-13.CrossRef McFadzean, E. S. and Nelson, T. 1998. Facilitating Problem Solving Groups: A Conceptual Model. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 19: 6-13.CrossRef
go back to reference Nutt, P. C. 2002. Why Decisions Fail: Avoiding the Blunders and Traps that lead to debacles. San Franscisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc. Nutt, P. C. 2002. Why Decisions Fail: Avoiding the Blunders and Traps that lead to debacles. San Franscisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
go back to reference Phillips, L. and Phillips, M. C. 1993. Facilitated Work Groups: Theory and Practice. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44. Phillips, L. and Phillips, M. C. 1993. Facilitated Work Groups: Theory and Practice. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44.
go back to reference Pidd, M. 2003. Tools for Thinking: Modelling in Management Science. Chicester: Wiley. Pidd, M. 2003. Tools for Thinking: Modelling in Management Science. Chicester: Wiley.
go back to reference Richardson, G. and Pugh, A. L. III 1981. Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling. Boston, MA: Productivity Press. Richardson, G. and Pugh, A. L. III 1981. Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling. Boston, MA: Productivity Press.
go back to reference Rittel, H. W. J. and Webber, M. M. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4: 155-169.CrossRef Rittel, H. W. J. and Webber, M. M. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4: 155-169.CrossRef
go back to reference Shaw, D. 2003. Evaluating electronic workshops through analysing the ‘brainstormed’ ideas. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54: 692-705.MATHCrossRef Shaw, D. 2003. Evaluating electronic workshops through analysing the ‘brainstormed’ ideas. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54: 692-705.MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Simon, H. A. 1976. From substantive to procedural rationality. In Latsis, S. J. (Eds.), Method and Appraisal in Economics: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Simon, H. A. 1976. From substantive to procedural rationality. In Latsis, S. J. (Eds.), Method and Appraisal in Economics: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Stasser, G. and Titus, W. 2003. Hidden Profiles: A Brief History. Psychological Inquiry, 14: 304-313. Stasser, G. and Titus, W. 2003. Hidden Profiles: A Brief History. Psychological Inquiry, 14: 304-313.
go back to reference Thomas, W. I. and Thomas, D. S. 1928. The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. NewYork: Knopf. Thomas, W. I. and Thomas, D. S. 1928. The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. NewYork: Knopf.
go back to reference van der Heijden, K. 1996. Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation. Chichester: Wiley. van der Heijden, K. 1996. Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation. Chichester: Wiley.
go back to reference Weick, K. E. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Weick, K. E. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Metadata
Title
Strategic Options Development and Analysis
Authors
Fran Ackermann
Colin Eden
Copyright Year
2010
Publisher
Springer London
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-809-4_4

Premium Partner