Skip to main content
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

2013 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

1. Strategies for Business Model Innovation: Challenges and Visual Solutions for Strategic Business Model Innovation

Authors : Martin J. Eppler, Friederike Hoffmann

Published in: Strategy and Communication for Innovation

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Business model innovation is a key task of an organization’s senior management team. Little is known, however, about business model innovation challenges that need to be addressed and how managers can structure the task of developing novel and commercially viable business models. This chapter analyzes the challenges an organization faces when changing the current business model and proposes visual solutions to overcome these challenges and develop new business models in existing firms. The argument supporting this proposition is developed in three stages: First, based on the existing management literature on business models, this chapter derives a set of challenges for business model innovation. Second, leveraging current visualization research, the chapter discusses several visual solutions to these specific challenges. Finally, we discuss how the characteristics of visual tools can practically support senior management teams in meeting the challenges of business model innovation.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
For readers interested in exploring the strategic use of visualization tools, we provide an interactive overview at: http://​www.​visual-literacy.​org/​periodic_​table/​periodic_​table.​html. We have also made available an interactive toolkit of interactive visual methods for business model innovation at lets-focus.com for downloading.
 
Literature
go back to reference Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 493.CrossRef Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 493.CrossRef
go back to reference Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339.CrossRef Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339.CrossRef
go back to reference Bartel, C. A., & Garud, R. (2009). The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation. Organization Science, 20(1), 107–117.CrossRef Bartel, C. A., & Garud, R. (2009). The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation. Organization Science, 20(1), 107–117.CrossRef
go back to reference Bettis, R. A., & Prahalad, C. K. (1995). The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 5–14.CrossRef Bettis, R. A., & Prahalad, C. K. (1995). The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 5–14.CrossRef
go back to reference Blackwell, A., Phaal, R., Eppler, M. J., & Crilly, N. (2008). Strategy roadmaps: New forms, new practices. Paper presented at the Diagrams 2008, 5th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Diagrams, Munich. Blackwell, A., Phaal, R., Eppler, M. J., & Crilly, N. (2008). Strategy roadmaps: New forms, new practices. Paper presented at the Diagrams 2008, 5th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Diagrams, Munich.
go back to reference Bresciani, S., & Eppler, M. J. (2009). The benefits of synchronous collaborative information visualization: Evidence from an experimental evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15(6), 1073–1080.CrossRef Bresciani, S., & Eppler, M. J. (2009). The benefits of synchronous collaborative information visualization: Evidence from an experimental evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15(6), 1073–1080.CrossRef
go back to reference Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455.CrossRef Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455.CrossRef
go back to reference Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555.CrossRef Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555.CrossRef
go back to reference Chao-Tung, W., & Yi-Wen, C. (2007). The innovation process of entrepreneurial teams in dynamic business plan competition: From sense-making perspective. International Journal of Technology Management, 39(3/4), 346–363.CrossRef Chao-Tung, W., & Yi-Wen, C. (2007). The innovation process of entrepreneurial teams in dynamic business plan competition: From sense-making perspective. International Journal of Technology Management, 39(3/4), 346–363.CrossRef
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. W. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 354–363.CrossRef Chesbrough, H. W. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 354–363.CrossRef
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. W., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from xerox corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.CrossRef Chesbrough, H. W., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from xerox corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.CrossRef
go back to reference Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press. Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Christensen, C., & Raynor, M. E. (2000). Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 66. Christensen, C., & Raynor, M. E. (2000). Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 66.
go back to reference Christensen, C., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator′s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Christensen, C., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator′s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Coombs, R., & Hull, R. (1998). Knowledge management practices and path-dependency in innovation. Research Policy, 27, 237–253.CrossRef Coombs, R., & Hull, R. (1998). Knowledge management practices and path-dependency in innovation. Research Policy, 27, 237–253.CrossRef
go back to reference Craig, M. (2000). Thinking visually. Business applications of fourteen core diagrams: Business applications of 14 core diagrams. London: Continuum. Craig, M. (2000). Thinking visually. Business applications of fourteen core diagrams: Business applications of 14 core diagrams. London: Continuum.
go back to reference Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5), 693–716.CrossRef Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5), 693–716.CrossRef
go back to reference Doganova, L., & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009). What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38(10), 1559–1570.CrossRef Doganova, L., & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009). What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38(10), 1559–1570.CrossRef
go back to reference Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179–202.CrossRef Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179–202.CrossRef
go back to reference Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 370–382.CrossRef Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 370–382.CrossRef
go back to reference Eppler, M. J., & Platts, K. W. (2009). Visual strategizing: The systematic use of visualization in the strategic-planning process. Long Range Planning, 42(1), 42–74.CrossRef Eppler, M. J., & Platts, K. W. (2009). Visual strategizing: The systematic use of visualization in the strategic-planning process. Long Range Planning, 42(1), 42–74.CrossRef
go back to reference Erikkson, H., & Penker, M. (2000). Business modeling with UML—Business patterns at work. New York: Wiley. Erikkson, H., & Penker, M. (2000). Business modeling with UML—Business patterns at work. New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Ewenstein, B., & Whyte, J. (2007). Beyond words: Aesthetic knowledge and knowing in organizations. Organization Studies (01708406), 28(5), 689–708. Ewenstein, B., & Whyte, J. (2007). Beyond words: Aesthetic knowledge and knowing in organizations. Organization Studies (01708406), 28(5), 689–708.
go back to reference Fiol, C. M., & Huff, A. S. (1992). Maps for managers: Where are we? Where do we go from here? Journal of Management Studies, 29(3), 267–285.CrossRef Fiol, C. M., & Huff, A. S. (1992). Maps for managers: Where are we? Where do we go from here? Journal of Management Studies, 29(3), 267–285.CrossRef
go back to reference Garud, R., & Karnoe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277.CrossRef Garud, R., & Karnoe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277.CrossRef
go back to reference Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 113–137.CrossRef Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 113–137.CrossRef
go back to reference Harris, E., & Woolley, R. (2009). Facilitating innovation through cognitive mapping of uncertainty. International Studies of Management & Organization, 39(1), 70–100.CrossRef Harris, E., & Woolley, R. (2009). Facilitating innovation through cognitive mapping of uncertainty. International Studies of Management & Organization, 39(1), 70–100.CrossRef
go back to reference Henderson, K. (1991). Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Science, Technology and Human Values, 16(4), 448–473.CrossRef Henderson, K. (1991). Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Science, Technology and Human Values, 16(4), 448–473.CrossRef
go back to reference Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model (cover story). Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 50–59. Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model (cover story). Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 50–59.
go back to reference Jonda, M. (2007). Innovation “Geschäftsmodell”. Analyse- und planungsprozesse der strategischen unternehmensführung. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller. Jonda, M. (2007). Innovation “Geschäftsmodell”. Analyse- und planungsprozesse der strategischen unternehmensführung. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
go back to reference Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Klein, J., Gee, D., & Jones, H. (1998). Analysing clusters of skills in R&D—Core competencies, metaphors, visualization, and the role of it. R&D Management, 28(1), 37.CrossRef Klein, J., Gee, D., & Jones, H. (1998). Analysing clusters of skills in R&D—Core competencies, metaphors, visualization, and the role of it. R&D Management, 28(1), 37.CrossRef
go back to reference Lambert, S. (2006). A business model research schema. Paper presented at the BLED 2006 Proceedings, Paper 43. Lambert, S. (2006). A business model research schema. Paper presented at the BLED 2006 Proceedings, Paper 43.
go back to reference Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111.CrossRef Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111.CrossRef
go back to reference Lundberg, O., & Richards, M. D. (1972). A relationship between cognitive style and complex decision making; implications for business policy. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings (00650668). Lundberg, O., & Richards, M. D. (1972). A relationship between cognitive style and complex decision making; implications for business policy. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings (00650668).
go back to reference Magretta, J. (2002). Why business model matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 86–92. Magretta, J. (2002). Why business model matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 86–92.
go back to reference Malhotra, Y. (2000). Knowledge management and virtual organizations. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRef Malhotra, Y. (2000). Knowledge management and virtual organizations. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.CrossRef
go back to reference Mayer, C. (2008). Hieroglyphen der psyche: Mit patientenskizzen zum kern der psychosomatik. Stuttgart: Schattauer. Mayer, C. (2008). Hieroglyphen der psyche: Mit patientenskizzen zum kern der psychosomatik. Stuttgart: Schattauer.
go back to reference Meehan, S., & Baschera, P. (2002). Lessons from Hilti: How customer and employee contact improves strategy implementation. Business Strategy Review, 13(2), 31.CrossRef Meehan, S., & Baschera, P. (2002). Lessons from Hilti: How customer and employee contact improves strategy implementation. Business Strategy Review, 13(2), 31.CrossRef
go back to reference Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, J., & Lampel, J. (2007). Strategy safari. London: Prentice Hall. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, J., & Lampel, J. (2007). Strategy safari. London: Prentice Hall.
go back to reference Mintzberg, H., & Van der Heyden, L. (1999). Organigraphs: Drawing how companies really work. Harvard Business Review, 77(5), 87–94. Mintzberg, H., & Van der Heyden, L. (1999). Organigraphs: Drawing how companies really work. Harvard Business Review, 77(5), 87–94.
go back to reference Nonaka, I. (1999). Building a concept of knowledge creation. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. Nonaka, I. (1999). Building a concept of knowledge creation. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
go back to reference Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2002). An ebusiness model ontology for modeling ebusiness. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2002). An ebusiness model ontology for modeling ebusiness.
go back to reference Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2009). Business model generation. Handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. OSF. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2009). Business model generation. Handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. OSF.
go back to reference Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (CAIS), 16(1), 1–25. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (CAIS), 16(1), 1–25.
go back to reference Pateli, A. G., & Giaglis, G. M. (2004). A research framework for analysing ebusiness models. European Journal of Information Systems, 13(4), 302–314.CrossRef Pateli, A. G., & Giaglis, G. M. (2004). A research framework for analysing ebusiness models. European Journal of Information Systems, 13(4), 302–314.CrossRef
go back to reference Pateli, A. G., & Giaglis, G. M. (2005). Technology innovation-induced business model change: A contingency approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(2), 167–183.CrossRef Pateli, A. G., & Giaglis, G. M. (2005). Technology innovation-induced business model change: A contingency approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(2), 167–183.CrossRef
go back to reference Peterovic, O., Kittl, C., & Teksten, R. (2001). Developing business models for ebusiness. International Conference on Electronic Commerce 2001. Peterovic, O., Kittl, C., & Teksten, R. (2001). Developing business models for ebusiness. International Conference on Electronic Commerce 2001.
go back to reference Platts, K., & Kim Hua, T. (2004). Strategy visualisation: Knowing, understanding, and formulating. Management Decision, 42(5), 667–676.CrossRef Platts, K., & Kim Hua, T. (2004). Strategy visualisation: Knowing, understanding, and formulating. Management Decision, 42(5), 667–676.CrossRef
go back to reference Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
go back to reference Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. (1986). The dominant logic—a new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(6), 485–501.CrossRef Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. (1986). The dominant logic—a new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(6), 485–501.CrossRef
go back to reference Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.CrossRef Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.CrossRef
go back to reference Tufte, E. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire: Graphics Press. Tufte, E. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire: Graphics Press.
go back to reference Voelpel, S., Leibold, M., Tekie, E., & Von Krogh, G. (2005). Escaping the red queen effect in competitive strategy: Sense-testing business models. European Management Journal, 23(1), 37–49.CrossRef Voelpel, S., Leibold, M., Tekie, E., & Von Krogh, G. (2005). Escaping the red queen effect in competitive strategy: Sense-testing business models. European Management Journal, 23(1), 37–49.CrossRef
go back to reference von Krogh, G., Erat, P., & Macus, M. (2000). Exploring the link between dominant logic and company performance. Creativity & Innovation Management, 9(2), 82.CrossRef von Krogh, G., Erat, P., & Macus, M. (2000). Exploring the link between dominant logic and company performance. Creativity & Innovation Management, 9(2), 82.CrossRef
go back to reference Wall, B., Jagdev, H., & Browne, J. (2007). A review of ebusiness and digital business—Applications, models and trends. Production Planning & Control, 18(3), 239–260.CrossRef Wall, B., Jagdev, H., & Browne, J. (2007). A review of ebusiness and digital business—Applications, models and trends. Production Planning & Control, 18(3), 239–260.CrossRef
go back to reference Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 216–226.CrossRef Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 216–226.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Strategies for Business Model Innovation: Challenges and Visual Solutions for Strategic Business Model Innovation
Authors
Martin J. Eppler
Friederike Hoffmann
Copyright Year
2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41479-4_1