Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Economics and Finance 1/2019

02-03-2018

Structural factors, global shocks and sovereign debt credit ratings

Authors: Carlos Uribe-Teran, Santiago Mosquera

Published in: Journal of Economics and Finance | Issue 1/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We analyse the role of fundamentals that reflect the sovereigns’ solvency (structural factors) and global shocks as determinants of sovereign debt credit ratings. By means of random effects ordered probit estimations, we show that structural features have short- and long-run effects that are robust to alternative specifications. The low variation of the structural variables and the world’s economic cycle captured by global shocks are key to obtain a higher proportion of correctly predicted downgrades and fewer mismatches between the estimated rating scale and the data. This also reduces the wrongly predicted upgrades to Investment Grade Status.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
We thank an anonymous referee for bringing to our attention this branch of the literature.
 
2
The limitations of the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimator in finding the determinants of credit ratings are well known, and the empirical strategies used in current literature have turned towards other alternatives such as linear panel data models (Afonso et al. 2011; Dimitrakopoulos and Kolossiatis 2016; Erdem and Varli 2014), or pooled non-linear models (Bissoondoyal-Bheenick 2005; Afonso et al. 2011; Ozturk 2014). There is another group of literature that looks at the dynamic structure of the data generated by credit ratings. See for example, Hill et al. (2010) or Dimitrakopoulos and Kolossiatis (2016).
 
3
When we talk about structural regressors we do not refer to the result of a structural estimation, as would be the case in the macroeconomic literature. Instead, we use the definition of structural variables adopted in the Credit Rating business environment. We do this to establish a clear mapping between our empirical strategy and the credit ratings’ methodologies that are publicly available.
 
4
Few papers have as many observations as we have. To the knowledge of the authors, the papers that study sovereign credit ratings with larger sample sizes are: Hill et al. (2010) that includes 1155 observations, Ozturk (2014) with 1008 observations, Dimitrakopoulos and Kolossiatis (2016) with 744 observations and Jaramillo et al. (2010) that considers 691 observations.
 
5
The Development Status corresponds to the IMF classification.
 
6
We also use linear random effects estimations and perform the Sargan-Hansen test, which is a generalisation of the classic Hausman specification test that allows clustered standard errors for the estimated coefficients, to check that the Random Effects estimation is preferred. Additionally, we also estimate non-linear models using random effects probit specifications to show that our results are independent of the assumption we make about the distribution of the latent variable. Both of these tables are available upon request.
 
7
We are aware that the calibration of the years since last default index can potentially have significant effects over our estimations. To tackle this worry, we re-estimate the model for 501 possible calibrations of the index and focus on the β associated to the index. The point estimate varies between –4.31 and –0.75, and the results of a Wald test shows that these variation is not statistically significant.
 
8
We also computed kernel estimations of the density function for the distribution of probabilities that we observe in the first three most likely outcomes. These results are available upon request.
 
9
There are some papers that concentrate the efforts in analysing only this transition. See for example Jaramillo et al. (2010) or Jaramillo and Tejada (2011).
 
Literature
go back to reference Afonso A, Gomes P, Rother P (2011) Short-and long-run determinants of sovereign debt credit ratings. Int J Financ Econ 16(1):1–15CrossRef Afonso A, Gomes P, Rother P (2011) Short-and long-run determinants of sovereign debt credit ratings. Int J Financ Econ 16(1):1–15CrossRef
go back to reference Almeida H, Cunha I, Ferreira MA, Restrepo F (2017) The real effects of credit ratings: the sovereign ceiling channel. J Financ 72(1):249–290CrossRef Almeida H, Cunha I, Ferreira MA, Restrepo F (2017) The real effects of credit ratings: the sovereign ceiling channel. J Financ 72(1):249–290CrossRef
go back to reference Altman EI, Rijken HA (2006) A point-in-time perspective on through-the-cycle ratings. Financ Anal J 62(1):54–70CrossRef Altman EI, Rijken HA (2006) A point-in-time perspective on through-the-cycle ratings. Financ Anal J 62(1):54–70CrossRef
go back to reference Bissoondoyal-Bheenick E (2005) An analysis of the determinants of sovereign ratings. Global Finance Journal 15(3):251–280CrossRef Bissoondoyal-Bheenick E (2005) An analysis of the determinants of sovereign ratings. Global Finance Journal 15(3):251–280CrossRef
go back to reference Borensztein E, Cowan K, Valenzuela P (2013) Sovereign ceilings âliteâ? the impact of sovereign ratings on corporate ratings. J Bank Financ 37(11):4014–4024CrossRef Borensztein E, Cowan K, Valenzuela P (2013) Sovereign ceilings âliteâ? the impact of sovereign ratings on corporate ratings. J Bank Financ 37(11):4014–4024CrossRef
go back to reference Cantor R (2004) An introduction to recent research on credit ratings. J Bank Financ 28(11):2565–2573CrossRef Cantor R (2004) An introduction to recent research on credit ratings. J Bank Financ 28(11):2565–2573CrossRef
go back to reference Cantor R, Packer F (1996) Determinants and impact of sovereign credit ratings. Economic Policy Review 2(2):37–53 Cantor R, Packer F (1996) Determinants and impact of sovereign credit ratings. Economic Policy Review 2(2):37–53
go back to reference Cheng M, Neamtiu M (2009) An empirical analysis of changes in credit rating properties: timeliness, accuracy and volatility. J Account Econ 47(1):108–130CrossRef Cheng M, Neamtiu M (2009) An empirical analysis of changes in credit rating properties: timeliness, accuracy and volatility. J Account Econ 47(1):108–130CrossRef
go back to reference Dasgupta P, Maskin E (2005) Uncertainty and hyperbolic discounting. Am Econ Rev 95(4):1290–1299CrossRef Dasgupta P, Maskin E (2005) Uncertainty and hyperbolic discounting. Am Econ Rev 95(4):1290–1299CrossRef
go back to reference Dimitrakopoulos S, Kolossiatis M (2016) State dependence and stickiness of sovereign credit ratings: evidence from a panel of countries. J Appl Econ 31(6):1065–1082CrossRef Dimitrakopoulos S, Kolossiatis M (2016) State dependence and stickiness of sovereign credit ratings: evidence from a panel of countries. J Appl Econ 31(6):1065–1082CrossRef
go back to reference Ellis DM (1998) Different sides of the same story: investors’ and issuers’ view of rating agancies. J Fixed Income 7(4):35–45CrossRef Ellis DM (1998) Different sides of the same story: investors’ and issuers’ view of rating agancies. J Fixed Income 7(4):35–45CrossRef
go back to reference Erdem O, Varli Y (2014) Understanding the sovereign credit ratings of emerging markets. Emerg Mark Rev 20:42–57CrossRef Erdem O, Varli Y (2014) Understanding the sovereign credit ratings of emerging markets. Emerg Mark Rev 20:42–57CrossRef
go back to reference Fitch Ratings (2014) Sovereign rating criteria. Master Criteria, New York Fitch Ratings (2014) Sovereign rating criteria. Master Criteria, New York
go back to reference Hand JR, Holthausen RW, Leftwich RW (1992) The effect of bond rating agency announcements on bond and stock prices. J Financ 47(2):733–752CrossRef Hand JR, Holthausen RW, Leftwich RW (1992) The effect of bond rating agency announcements on bond and stock prices. J Financ 47(2):733–752CrossRef
go back to reference Hill P, Brooks R, Faff R (2010) Variations in sovereign credit quality assessments across rating agencies. J Bank Financ 34(6):1327–1343CrossRef Hill P, Brooks R, Faff R (2010) Variations in sovereign credit quality assessments across rating agencies. J Bank Financ 34(6):1327–1343CrossRef
go back to reference Jaramillo L et al. (2010) Determinants of investment grade status in emerging markets. Technical report, International Monetary Fund Jaramillo L et al. (2010) Determinants of investment grade status in emerging markets. Technical report, International Monetary Fund
go back to reference Jaramillo L, Tejada M (2011) Sovereign credit ratings and spreads in emerging markets: does investment grade matter?. IMF Working Paper: Sovereign Credit Ratings and Spreads in Emerging Markets-Does Investment Grade Matter? 11(44):1–17CrossRef Jaramillo L, Tejada M (2011) Sovereign credit ratings and spreads in emerging markets: does investment grade matter?. IMF Working Paper: Sovereign Credit Ratings and Spreads in Emerging Markets-Does Investment Grade Matter? 11(44):1–17CrossRef
go back to reference Kirby KN, Maraković NN (1995) Modeling myopic decisions: Evidence for hyperbolic delay-discounting within subjects and amounts. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 64(1):22–30CrossRef Kirby KN, Maraković NN (1995) Modeling myopic decisions: Evidence for hyperbolic delay-discounting within subjects and amounts. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 64(1):22–30CrossRef
go back to reference Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q J Econ 112 (2):443–478CrossRef Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q J Econ 112 (2):443–478CrossRef
go back to reference Mellios C, Paget-Blanc E (2006) Which factors determine sovereign credit ratings? The European Journal of Finance 12(4):361–377CrossRef Mellios C, Paget-Blanc E (2006) Which factors determine sovereign credit ratings? The European Journal of Finance 12(4):361–377CrossRef
go back to reference Mulder MCB, Monfort B (2000) Using credit ratings for capital requirementson lending to emerging market economies: possible impact of a new basel accord. International Monetary Fund Mulder MCB, Monfort B (2000) Using credit ratings for capital requirementson lending to emerging market economies: possible impact of a new basel accord. International Monetary Fund
go back to reference Ozturk H (2014) The origin of bias in sovereign credit ratings: reconciling agency views with institutional quality. The Journal of Developing Areas 48(4):161–188CrossRef Ozturk H (2014) The origin of bias in sovereign credit ratings: reconciling agency views with institutional quality. The Journal of Developing Areas 48(4):161–188CrossRef
go back to reference Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge
Metadata
Title
Structural factors, global shocks and sovereign debt credit ratings
Authors
Carlos Uribe-Teran
Santiago Mosquera
Publication date
02-03-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Economics and Finance / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1055-0925
Electronic ISSN: 1938-9744
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-018-9435-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of Economics and Finance 1/2019 Go to the issue