Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Introduction to Shape-Memory Alloys Read chapter Read first chapter

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

5. Structural Responses: Single-Degree-of-Freedom (SDOF) Systems

Authors : Cheng Fang, Wei Wang

Published in: Shape Memory Alloys for Seismic Resilience

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Following the discussions of the working principle and behaviour of the various SMA elements and SMA-based members and devices, it is time to move on to understand how SMA-based structural systems respond to earthquake excitations. A good starting point is to examine the fundamental dynamic responses of single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems with varying parameters that characterise the basic hysteretic behaviour of the structural systems. This chapter starts with a comprehensive seismic evaluation of SDOF systems with a wide spectrum of structural parameters. The primary objective is to quantify the structural and non-structural performances of conventional and novel self-centring systems under both near-fault (NF) and far-field (FF) earthquakes. The analysis involves 5760 different SDOF models with more than 1.45 million statistical response results being processed. According to the available data, two sets of design models that provide the predictions of the inelastic displacement demand and residual displacement response for various systems are given. The results presented in this chapter can form the basis of the performance-based seismic design of SMA-based self-centring structures.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Self-centring Braces with SMA Elements
next chapter Structural Responses: Multi-storey Building Frames
Literature
Alavi B, Krawinkler H (2004) Strengthening of moment-resisting frame structures against near-fault ground motion effects. Earthq Eng Struct D 33(6):707–722CrossRef
Alhan C, Gazi H, Kurtuluş H (2016) Significance of stiffening of high damping rubber bearings on the response of base-isolated buildings under near-fault earthquakes. Mech Syst Signal Pr 79:297–313CrossRef
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2007) Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41-06, Reston, VA
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-10, Reston, VA
Baltzopoulos G, Vamvatsikos D, Iervolino I (2016) Analytical modelling of near-source pulse-like seismic demand for multi-linear backbone oscillators. Earthq Eng Struct D 45(11):1797–1815CrossRef
Bray JD, Rodriguez-Marek A (2004) Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24(11):815–828CrossRef
Christopoulos C, Pampanin S, Priestley MJN (2003) Performance-based seismic response of frame structures including residual deformations—part I: single-degree of freedom system. J Earthq Eng 7(1):97–118
Dimakopoulou V, Fragiadakis M, Constantine S (2013) Influence of modeling parameters on the response of degrading systems to near-field ground motions. Eng Struct 53:10–24CrossRef
Durucan C, Durucan AR (2016) Ap/Vp specific inelastic displacement ratio for the seismic response estimation of SDOF structures subjected to sequential near fault pulse type ground motion records. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 89:163–170CrossRef
Eatherton MR, Hajjar JF (2011) Residual drifts of self-centering systems including effects of ambient building resistance. Earthq Spectra 27(3):719–744CrossRef
Erochko J, Christopoulos C, Tremblay R, Choi H (2011) Residual drift response of SMRFs and BRB frames in steel buildings designed according to ASCE 7-05. J Struct Eng-ASCE 137(5):589–599CrossRef
European Committee for Standardization (CEN) (2004) EN 1998-1, Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Belgium, Brussels
Fang C, Zhong QM, Wang W, Hu SL, Qiu CX (2018) Peak and residual responses of steel moment-resisting and braced frames under pulse-like near-fault earthquakes. Eng Struct 177:579–597CrossRef
Fang C, Qiu CX, Huang LT (2019) Performance-based evaluation of seismic resilient systems under near-fault and far-field earthquakes. Eng Struct Under Rev
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings: rehabilitation requirements. FEMA 356, Washington, DC
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2005) Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. FEMA 440, prepared by Applied Technology Council for FEMA, Washington, DC
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2009) Quantification of building seismic performance factors. FEMA P695, prepared by the Applied Technology Council for the FEMA, Washington, DC
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2012) Seismic performance assessment of buildings, volume 1—methodology. FEMA P-58-1, prepared by the SAC Joint Venture for FEMA, Washington, DC
Gerami M, Abdollahzadeh D (2015) Vulnerability of steel moment-resisting frames under effects of forward directivity. Struct Des Tall Spec 24(2):97–122CrossRef
Hatzigeorgiou GD, Beskos DE (2009) Inelastic displacement ratios for SDOF structures subjected to repeated earthquakes. Eng Struct 31(11):2744–2755CrossRef
Hou HT, Qu B (2015) Duration effect of spectrally matched ground motions on seismic demands of elastic perfectly plastic SDOFS. Eng Struct 90:48–60CrossRef
Karavasilis TL, Ricles JM, Sause R, Chen C (2011) Experimental evaluation of the seismic performance of steel MRFs with compressed elastomer dampers using large-scale real-time hybrid simulation. Eng Struct 33(6):1859–1869CrossRef
Karavasilis TL, Seo CY (2011) Seismic structural and non-structural performance evaluation of highly damped self-centering and conventional systems. Eng Struct 33(8):2248–2258CrossRef
Kawashima K, Macrae R, Hoshikuma JI, Nagaya K (1998) Residual displacement response spectrum. J Struct Eng-ASCE 124(5):523–530CrossRef
Krawinkler H, Alavi B (1998) Development of improved design procedures for near-fault ground motions. In: SMIP 98: seminar on utilization of strong motion data, Oakland, CA
Loh CH, Wan S, Liao WI (2002) Effects of hysteretic model on seismic demands: consideration of near-fault ground motions. Struct Des Tall Buil 11(3):155–169CrossRef
MacRae GA, Kawashima K (1997) Post-earthquake residual displacements of bilinear oscillators. Earthq Eng Struct D 26(7):701–716CrossRef
MathWorks (2010) MATLAB 7.10.0. The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA
Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL (2006) Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees), OpenSees Command Language Manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley
McCormick J, Aburano H, Ikenaga M, Nakashima M (2008) Permissible residual deformation levels for building structures considering both safety and human elements. In: Proceedings of 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Seismological Press of China, Beijing
Moradi S, Alam MS, Asgarian B (2014) Incremental dynamic analysis of steel frames equipped with NiTi shape memory alloy braces. Struct Des Tall Spec 23:1406–1425CrossRef
Perry C, PhippsM, Hortacsu A (1994) Reducing the risks of nonstructural earthquake damage—a practical guide. In: ATC and SEI conference on improving the seismic performance of existing buildings and other structures
Ray-Chaudhuri S, Hutchinson TC (2011) Effect of nonlinearity of frame buildings on peak horizontal floor acceleration. J Earthq Eng 15(1):124–142CrossRef
Rodriguez-Marek A (2000) Near-fault seismic site response. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley
Tremblay R, Lacerte M, Christopoulos C (2008) Seismic response of multistory buildings with self-centering energy dissipative steel braces. J Struct Eng-ASCE 134(1):108–120CrossRef
Yadav KK, Gupta VK (2017) Near-fault fling-step ground motions: characteristics and simulation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 101:90–104CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Structural Responses: Single-Degree-of-Freedom (SDOF) Systems
Authors
Cheng Fang
Wei Wang
Copyright Year
2020
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Book
Shape Memory Alloys for Seismic Resilience

Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7039-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-13-7040-3

Copyright Year: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7040-3_5