Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Information Systems Frontiers 3/2012

01-07-2012

Study of the digital divide evaluation model for government agencies–a Taiwanese local government’s perspective

Authors: She-I Chang, David C. Yen, I-Cheng Chang, Jung-Chu Chou

Published in: Information Systems Frontiers | Issue 3/2012

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Many countries have devoted increasing attention to information infrastructures. However, a gap in digitalization exists among different government agencies, causing unequal opportunities for accessing infrastructures, information, and communication technologies. This paper, based on Gowin’s Vee structure, is an empirical study of the digital divide in the context of local governments in Taiwan. A model for identifying and measuring aforementioned digital divide is constructed in this paper. We first refer to the grounded theory to draft a framework for measuring the digital divide in local governments. Then, through the use of a questionnaire distributed to experts implemented alongside the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), we generate five dimensions (including ICT infrastructure, human resources, external environment, internals of organization, and information) and 42 measures. Finally, we measure the actual levels of the digital divide in local governments with the resulting digital divide evaluation model. This paper aims to generate results that can serve as a reference for government agencies (at all levels) in the formulation of their digitalization strategies. Moreover, the digital divide evaluation model constructed in this study goes beyond existing measures and may serve as a reference for academics in the examination of methods to narrow the digital divide in various levels of governmental bodies. Taken together, the features of integration, comprehensiveness, and wide applicability of this proposed model can be considered the theoretical contributions to digital divide and local government hierarchy research.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Akmana, Ib, Yazicib, A., Mishraa, A., & Arifoglu, A. (2005). E-Government: a global view and an empirical evaluation of some attributes of citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 239–257.CrossRef Akmana, Ib, Yazicib, A., Mishraa, A., & Arifoglu, A. (2005). E-Government: a global view and an empirical evaluation of some attributes of citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 239–257.CrossRef
go back to reference Allen, B. A., Juillet, L., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001). E-governance and government on-line in Canada: partnerships, people and prospects. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 93–104.CrossRef Allen, B. A., Juillet, L., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001). E-governance and government on-line in Canada: partnerships, people and prospects. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 93–104.CrossRef
go back to reference Andonova, V. (2006). Mobile phones, the Internet and the institutional environment. Telecommunications Policy, 30, 29–45.CrossRef Andonova, V. (2006). Mobile phones, the Internet and the institutional environment. Telecommunications Policy, 30, 29–45.CrossRef
go back to reference Apostolou, B., & Hassell, J. M. (1993). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its use in accounting research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 12, 1–28. Apostolou, B., & Hassell, J. M. (1993). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its use in accounting research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 12, 1–28.
go back to reference Billon, M., Marco, R., & Lera-Lopez, F. (2009). Disparities in ICT adoption: a multidimensional approach to study the cross-country digital divide. Telecommunications Policy, 33, 596–610.CrossRef Billon, M., Marco, R., & Lera-Lopez, F. (2009). Disparities in ICT adoption: a multidimensional approach to study the cross-country digital divide. Telecommunications Policy, 33, 596–610.CrossRef
go back to reference Brooks, S., Donovan, P., & Rumble, C. (2005). Developing nations, the digital divide and research databases. Serials Review, 31, 270–278.CrossRef Brooks, S., Donovan, P., & Rumble, C. (2005). Developing nations, the digital divide and research databases. Serials Review, 31, 270–278.CrossRef
go back to reference Brugha, C. M. (2004). Phased multicriteria preference finding. European Journal of Operational Research, 158, 308–316.CrossRef Brugha, C. M. (2004). Phased multicriteria preference finding. European Journal of Operational Research, 158, 308–316.CrossRef
go back to reference Bui, T. X., Sankaran, S., & Sebastian, I. M. (2003). A framework for measuring national e-readiness. Electronic Business, 1, 3–21.CrossRef Bui, T. X., Sankaran, S., & Sebastian, I. M. (2003). A framework for measuring national e-readiness. Electronic Business, 1, 3–21.CrossRef
go back to reference Chang, B. L., Bakken, S., Brown, S. S., Houston, T. K., Kreps, G. L., Kukafka, R., et al. (2004). Bridging the digital divide: reaching vulnerable populations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11, 448–457.CrossRef Chang, B. L., Bakken, S., Brown, S. S., Houston, T. K., Kreps, G. L., Kukafka, R., et al. (2004). Bridging the digital divide: reaching vulnerable populations. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11, 448–457.CrossRef
go back to reference Chen, C. J., & Huang, C. C. (2004). A multiple criteria evaluation of high-tech industries for the science-based industrial park in Taiwan. Information Management, 41, 839–851.CrossRef Chen, C. J., & Huang, C. C. (2004). A multiple criteria evaluation of high-tech industries for the science-based industrial park in Taiwan. Information Management, 41, 839–851.CrossRef
go back to reference Chen, W., & Wellman, B. (2004). The global digital divide –Within and between countries. IT & Society, 1, 39–45. Chen, W., & Wellman, B. (2004). The global digital divide –Within and between countries. IT & Society, 1, 39–45.
go back to reference Chinn, M. D., & Fairlie, R. W. (2004). The determinants of the global digital divide. Choice, 42, 7–17. Chinn, M. D., & Fairlie, R. W. (2004). The determinants of the global digital divide. Choice, 42, 7–17.
go back to reference Çilan, Ç., Bolat, B., & Coşkun, E. (2009). Analyzing digital divide within and between member and candidate countries of European Union. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 98–105.CrossRef Çilan, Ç., Bolat, B., & Coşkun, E. (2009). Analyzing digital divide within and between member and candidate countries of European Union. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 98–105.CrossRef
go back to reference Crenshaw, E. M., & Robinson, K. K. (2006). Globalization and the digital divide: the roles of structural conduciveness and global connection in Internet diffusion. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 190–207.CrossRef Crenshaw, E. M., & Robinson, K. K. (2006). Globalization and the digital divide: the roles of structural conduciveness and global connection in Internet diffusion. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 190–207.CrossRef
go back to reference Cuervo, M., & Menéndez, A. (2006). A multivariate framework for the analysis of the digital divide: evidence for the European Union-15. Information Management, 43, 756–766.CrossRef Cuervo, M., & Menéndez, A. (2006). A multivariate framework for the analysis of the digital divide: evidence for the European Union-15. Information Management, 43, 756–766.CrossRef
go back to reference Dalton, M. S. (2000). Old values for the new information age. Library Journal, 125, 43–46. Dalton, M. S. (2000). Old values for the new information age. Library Journal, 125, 43–46.
go back to reference DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). Social implications of the internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 307–336.CrossRef DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). Social implications of the internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 307–336.CrossRef
go back to reference Ebrahim, Z., & Irani, Z. (2005). E-government adoption: architecture and barriers. Business Process Management Journal, 11, 589–611.CrossRef Ebrahim, Z., & Irani, Z. (2005). E-government adoption: architecture and barriers. Business Process Management Journal, 11, 589–611.CrossRef
go back to reference Evansa, D., & Yen, D. C. (2005). E-government: an analysis for implementation: framework for understanding cultural and social impact. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 354–373.CrossRef Evansa, D., & Yen, D. C. (2005). E-government: an analysis for implementation: framework for understanding cultural and social impact. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 354–373.CrossRef
go back to reference Forman, E. H. (1990). AHP is intended for more than expected value calculations. Decision Science, 21, 670–672.CrossRef Forman, E. H. (1990). AHP is intended for more than expected value calculations. Decision Science, 21, 670–672.CrossRef
go back to reference Forman, E. H., & Gass, S. I. (2001). The analytic hierarchy process- An exposition. Operations Research, 49, 469–486.CrossRef Forman, E. H., & Gass, S. I. (2001). The analytic hierarchy process- An exposition. Operations Research, 49, 469–486.CrossRef
go back to reference Fuchs, C., & Horak, E. (2008). Africa and the digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 25, 99–116.CrossRef Fuchs, C., & Horak, E. (2008). Africa and the digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 25, 99–116.CrossRef
go back to reference Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Press. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Press.
go back to reference Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
go back to reference Guasch, J. S., & Ugas, L. (2007). The digital gap in Maracaibo city in Venezuela. Telematics and Informatics, 24, 41–47.CrossRef Guasch, J. S., & Ugas, L. (2007). The digital gap in Maracaibo city in Venezuela. Telematics and Informatics, 24, 41–47.CrossRef
go back to reference Gupta, M. P., & Jana, D. (2003). E-government evaluation: a framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 365–387.CrossRef Gupta, M. P., & Jana, D. (2003). E-government evaluation: a framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 365–387.CrossRef
go back to reference Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7, 1–20. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7, 1–20.
go back to reference Huang, Z. (2006). E-government practices at local levels: an analysis of U.S. counties’ websites. Information Systems Journal, 7, 165–170. Huang, Z. (2006). E-government practices at local levels: an analysis of U.S. counties’ websites. Information Systems Journal, 7, 165–170.
go back to reference James, J. (2007). From origins to implications: key aspects in the debate over the digital divide. Journal of Information Technology, 22, 284–295.CrossRef James, J. (2007). From origins to implications: key aspects in the debate over the digital divide. Journal of Information Technology, 22, 284–295.CrossRef
go back to reference Jukic, T., & Vintar, M. (2006). E-government: the state in Slovenian local self-government. Organizacija, 39, 176–183. Jukic, T., & Vintar, M. (2006). E-government: the state in Slovenian local self-government. Organizacija, 39, 176–183.
go back to reference Kiiski, S., & Pohjola, M. (2002). Cross-country diffusion of the Internet. Information Economics and Policy, 14, 297–310.CrossRef Kiiski, S., & Pohjola, M. (2002). Cross-country diffusion of the Internet. Information Economics and Policy, 14, 297–310.CrossRef
go back to reference Kuk, G. (2002). The digital divide and the quality of electronic service delivery in local government in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 353–363.CrossRef Kuk, G. (2002). The digital divide and the quality of electronic service delivery in local government in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 353–363.CrossRef
go back to reference Lane, E. F., & Verdini, W. A. (1989). A consistency test for AHP decision makers. Decision Science, 20, 575–590.CrossRef Lane, E. F., & Verdini, W. A. (1989). A consistency test for AHP decision makers. Decision Science, 20, 575–590.CrossRef
go back to reference Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 564–575.CrossRef Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 564–575.CrossRef
go back to reference Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2007). Grounded theory analysis of e-government initiatives: exploring perceptions of government authorities. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 135–147.CrossRef Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2007). Grounded theory analysis of e-government initiatives: exploring perceptions of government authorities. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 135–147.CrossRef
go back to reference Lentz, R. G., & Oden, M. D. (2001). Digital divide or digital opportunity in the Mississippi Delta region of the US. Telecommunications Policy, 25, 291–313.CrossRef Lentz, R. G., & Oden, M. D. (2001). Digital divide or digital opportunity in the Mississippi Delta region of the US. Telecommunications Policy, 25, 291–313.CrossRef
go back to reference Liu, M., & San, G. (2006). Social learning and digital divides: a case study of Internet technology diffusion. Kyklos, 59, 307–321.CrossRef Liu, M., & San, G. (2006). Social learning and digital divides: a case study of Internet technology diffusion. Kyklos, 59, 307–321.CrossRef
go back to reference Luyt, B. (2006). Defining the digital divide: the role of e-readiness indicators. Aslib Proceedings, 58, 276–291.CrossRef Luyt, B. (2006). Defining the digital divide: the role of e-readiness indicators. Aslib Proceedings, 58, 276–291.CrossRef
go back to reference McGregora, M. A., & Holman, J. (2004). Communication technology at the federal communications commission: e-government in the public interest? Government Information Quarterly, 21, 268–283.CrossRef McGregora, M. A., & Holman, J. (2004). Communication technology at the federal communications commission: e-government in the public interest? Government Information Quarterly, 21, 268–283.CrossRef
go back to reference Metaxiotis, K., & Psarras, J. (2005). A conceptual analysis of knowledge management in e-government. Electronic Government, 2, 77–86.CrossRef Metaxiotis, K., & Psarras, J. (2005). A conceptual analysis of knowledge management in e-government. Electronic Government, 2, 77–86.CrossRef
go back to reference Moreir, A. G. (2003). E- government in local level in Portugal. Proceeding of the Planning Research Conference Oxford Brookes University. Moreir, A. G. (2003). E- government in local level in Portugal. Proceeding of the Planning Research Conference Oxford Brookes University.
go back to reference Mutula, S. M., & van Brakel, P. (2006). An evaluation of e-readiness assessment tools with respect to information access: towards an integrated information rich tool. International Journal of Information Management, 26, 212–223.CrossRef Mutula, S. M., & van Brakel, P. (2006). An evaluation of e-readiness assessment tools with respect to information access: towards an integrated information rich tool. International Journal of Information Management, 26, 212–223.CrossRef
go back to reference National Research Development and Evaluation Commission (2006). 2006 digital application survey of local government. Taiwan Executive Yuan, Taiwan. National Research Development and Evaluation Commission (2006). 2006 digital application survey of local government. Taiwan Executive Yuan, Taiwan.
go back to reference Nia, A. Y., & Ho, A. T. K. (2005). Challenges in e-government development: lessons from two information kiosk projects. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 58–74.CrossRef Nia, A. Y., & Ho, A. T. K. (2005). Challenges in e-government development: lessons from two information kiosk projects. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 58–74.CrossRef
go back to reference Norris, P., Bennett, W. L., & Entman, R. M. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Norris, P., Bennett, W. L., & Entman, R. M. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1989). Learning how to learn. NY: Cambridge University Press. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1989). Learning how to learn. NY: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference O. E. C. D. (2002). The Digital Divide: Diffusion and Use ICTs, OECD, Paris. O. E. C. D. (2002). The Digital Divide: Diffusion and Use ICTs, OECD, Paris.
go back to reference O. E. C. D. (2008). The Seoul Declaration for the future of the Internet Economy. OECD Ministerial Meeting, Seoul, Korea, June 17–18. O. E. C. D. (2008). The Seoul Declaration for the future of the Internet Economy. OECD Ministerial Meeting, Seoul, Korea, June 17–18.
go back to reference Parent, M., vandebeek, C. A., & Gemino, A. C. (2005). Building citizen trust through e-government. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 720–736.CrossRef Parent, M., vandebeek, C. A., & Gemino, A. C. (2005). Building citizen trust through e-government. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 720–736.CrossRef
go back to reference Parker, E. B. (2000). Closing the digital divide in rural America. Telecommunications Policy, 24, 281–290.CrossRef Parker, E. B. (2000). Closing the digital divide in rural America. Telecommunications Policy, 24, 281–290.CrossRef
go back to reference Rao, S. S. (2005). Bridging digital divide: efforts in India. Telematics and Informatics, 22, 361–375.CrossRef Rao, S. S. (2005). Bridging digital divide: efforts in India. Telematics and Informatics, 22, 361–375.CrossRef
go back to reference Rose, M. (2004). Democratizing information and communication by implementing e-government in Indonesian regional government. The International Information & Library Review, 36, 219–226.CrossRef Rose, M. (2004). Democratizing information and communication by implementing e-government in Indonesian regional government. The International Information & Library Review, 36, 219–226.CrossRef
go back to reference Roy, J. (2006). E-government And Local Governance in Canada: an examination of front line challenges and federal tensions. Public Administration and Management, 7, 306–350. Roy, J. (2006). E-government And Local Governance in Canada: an examination of front line challenges and federal tensions. Public Administration and Management, 7, 306–350.
go back to reference Ruikar, K., & Carrillo, P. M. (2006). Verdict-An e-readiness assessment application for construction companies. Automation in Construction, 15, 98–110.CrossRef Ruikar, K., & Carrillo, P. M. (2006). Verdict-An e-readiness assessment application for construction companies. Automation in Construction, 15, 98–110.CrossRef
go back to reference Saaty, T. L. (1971). The analytic hierarchy process. NY: McGraw-Hill. Saaty, T. L. (1971). The analytic hierarchy process. NY: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. NY: McGraw-Hill. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. NY: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Saaty, T. L. (1986). Absolute and relative measurement with the AHP: the most livable cities in the United States. Socio-Economic Planning Science, 20, 327–331.CrossRef Saaty, T. L. (1986). Absolute and relative measurement with the AHP: the most livable cities in the United States. Socio-Economic Planning Science, 20, 327–331.CrossRef
go back to reference Singh, A. K., & Sahu, R. (2007). Integrating Internet, telephones, and call centers for delivering better quality e-governance to all citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 477–490.CrossRef Singh, A. K., & Sahu, R. (2007). Integrating Internet, telephones, and call centers for delivering better quality e-governance to all citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 477–490.CrossRef
go back to reference Sprecher, M. H. (2000). Racing to e-government: using the internet for citizen service delivery. Government Finance Review, 16, 21–22. Sprecher, M. H. (2000). Racing to e-government: using the internet for citizen service delivery. Government Finance Review, 16, 21–22.
go back to reference Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. CA: Sage. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. CA: Sage.
go back to reference Sun, Y., He, S., & Leu, J. Y. (2007). Syndicating web services: a QoS and user-driven approach. Decision Support Systems, 43, 243–255.CrossRef Sun, Y., He, S., & Leu, J. Y. (2007). Syndicating web services: a QoS and user-driven approach. Decision Support Systems, 43, 243–255.CrossRef
go back to reference Vargas, L. G. (1990). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and it applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 2–8.CrossRef Vargas, L. G. (1990). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and it applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 2–8.CrossRef
go back to reference Vehovar, V., Sicherl, P., Hüsing, T., & Dolnicar, V. (2006). Methodological challenges of digital divide measurements. The Information Society, 22, 279–290.CrossRef Vehovar, V., Sicherl, P., Hüsing, T., & Dolnicar, V. (2006). Methodological challenges of digital divide measurements. The Information Society, 22, 279–290.CrossRef
go back to reference Wacker, J. G. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16, 361–385.CrossRef Wacker, J. G. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16, 361–385.CrossRef
go back to reference Wacker, J. G. (2008). A conceptual understanding of requirements for theory-building research: guidelines for scientific theory building. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44, 5–15.CrossRef Wacker, J. G. (2008). A conceptual understanding of requirements for theory-building research: guidelines for scientific theory building. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44, 5–15.CrossRef
go back to reference Weerasinghe, S. (2004). Revolution within the revolution: the Sri Lankan attempt to bridge the digital divide through e-governance. The International Information & Library Review, 36, 319–327.CrossRef Weerasinghe, S. (2004). Revolution within the revolution: the Sri Lankan attempt to bridge the digital divide through e-governance. The International Information & Library Review, 36, 319–327.CrossRef
go back to reference West, D. M. (2002). Assessing E-Government: The internet, democracy, and service delivery by state and federal governments. The Genesis Institute. West, D. M. (2002). Assessing E-Government: The internet, democracy, and service delivery by state and federal governments. The Genesis Institute.
go back to reference Wolcott, L. P., Mchenry, W., Goodman, S., & Foster, W. (2001). A framework for assessing the global diffusion of the internet. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2, 9–21. Wolcott, L. P., Mchenry, W., Goodman, S., & Foster, W. (2001). A framework for assessing the global diffusion of the internet. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2, 9–21.
go back to reference World Bank. (2006). Information technologies and development. Geneva: World Bank. World Bank. (2006). Information technologies and development. Geneva: World Bank.
go back to reference Yang, J., & Paul, S. (2003). Current stage of local E-government application—an empirical study. Communications of IIMA, 3, 49–60. Yang, J., & Paul, S. (2003). Current stage of local E-government application—an empirical study. Communications of IIMA, 3, 49–60.
go back to reference Zarei, B., & Ghapanchi, A. (2008). Guidelines for government-to-government initiative architecture in developing countries. International Journal of Information Management, 28, 277–284.CrossRef Zarei, B., & Ghapanchi, A. (2008). Guidelines for government-to-government initiative architecture in developing countries. International Journal of Information Management, 28, 277–284.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhao, H., Kim, S., Suh, T., & Du, J. (2007). Social institutional explanations of global Internet diffusion: across-country analysis. Journal of Global Information Management, 15, 28–55.CrossRef Zhao, H., Kim, S., Suh, T., & Du, J. (2007). Social institutional explanations of global Internet diffusion: across-country analysis. Journal of Global Information Management, 15, 28–55.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Study of the digital divide evaluation model for government agencies–a Taiwanese local government’s perspective
Authors
She-I Chang
David C. Yen
I-Cheng Chang
Jung-Chu Chou
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Information Systems Frontiers / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1387-3326
Electronic ISSN: 1572-9419
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-011-9297-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Information Systems Frontiers 3/2012 Go to the issue

Premium Partner