Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Materials Science 18/2021

Open Access 09-03-2021 | Metals & corrosion

Synthesis and stability of quasicrystalline phase in Al-Cu-Fe-Si mechanically alloyed powders

Authors: Mikołaj Mitka, Anna Góral, Lidia Lityńska-Dobrzyńska

Published in: Journal of Materials Science | Issue 18/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
download
DOWNLOAD
print
PRINT
insite
SEARCH
loading …

Abstract

The effect of Si addition on a quasicrystalline phase formation in Al-Cu-Fe-Si alloys prepared by mechanical alloying has been investigated using X-ray diffraction and scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Two compositions containing 10 at.% of Si were selected to verify the influence of the e/a ratio on a sequence of phase formation during milling: Al58.5Cu18Fe13.5Si10 (e/a = 1.98) and Al53.5Cu19.5Fe17Si10 (e/a = 1.75). A quasicrystalline icosahedral phase (i-phase) was found in both alloys after 10 h of milling in the form of nano-quasicrystallites with the size of 10–20 nm. Addition of Si stabilized the quasicrystalline phase being dominant after prolonged milling time, contrary to the reference ternary Al65Cu20Fe15 powder, which apart of the quasicrystalline phase contained the cubic β-Al(Cu, Fe) phase. Thermal stability of the quasicrystalline phase in the powders milled for 10 h was examined after annealing at 800 °C for 4 h. The i-phase was preserved partially in Al53.5Cu19.5Fe17Si10 and reference Al65Cu20Fe15 powders (both with a ratio e/a = 1.75), which coexisted with β-Al(Cu, Fe) and Al13Fe4 phase or α-Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12 and Al2Fe3Si3 phases in Al65Cu20Fe15 and Al53.5Cu19.5Fe17Si10, respectively. For the Al58.5Cu18Fe13.5Si10 powders (e/a = 1.98), the annealing led to complete transformation of the i-phase to the cubic α-Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12.5 approximant, forming crystallites with a size of 100–300 nm.

Graphical abstract

Notes
Handling Editor: Sophie Primig.

Supplementary Information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

The stable quasicrystalline phase in the Al-Cu-Fe system was first identified in 1987 by Tsai et al. [1] in the massive Al65Cu20Fe15 alloy cast by a conventional method and then annealed. This ternary alloy, characterized by low cost, easily accessible, recyclable and non-toxic constituent elements, has been extensively studied in the following years due to possibility of a number of applications [25]. In the Al-Cu-Fe system, the thermodynamically stable icosahedral phase exists in a narrow temperature range (750–850 °C) with composition near Al62Cu25.5Fe12.5 and is usually accompanied by other crystalline phases [68]. It has been reported that the addition of a fourth alloying component has resulted in modification of the microstructure and forming a single-phase quasicrystalline alloy. In the quaternary Al65Cu20Fe12M3 alloys, in which iron atoms were partially replaced with other elements: Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Si, Ge, Zr, Nb, only alloys containing Mn, Co and Si were characterized by a single-phase icosahedral structure [9].
The effect of addition of Si depends on the amount of element added, the content of other components and the method of preparation [1013]. In the conventionally cast alloys, the volume fraction of the icosahedral phase decreased when silicon atoms replaced aluminum by up to 10 at.% [10, 11]. On the other hand, the research conducted by Sukhova et.al. [14] showed that Al substitution by 4–7 at.% of Si in the Al60Cu25Fe12 can promote the formability of i-phase, especially in the slow cooled alloys. It was also found that when the Si content increased up to 15 at.%, the icosahedral phase was replaced by the cubic approximant of AlCuFeSi [10]. This α-Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12.5 phase with a cubic structure, a lattice constant a = 12.330 Å and the Pm-3 point group contains 135 atoms in the unit cell [1517]. The formation of the α-Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12.5 approximant can be supported by increasing the cooling rate during casting: moderate rate of solidification can improve the thermal stability of the quasicrystalline phase in the melt spun ribbon, while the higher quenching rates instigate the transformation of the quasicrystal into the cubic approximant [11]. Karaköse and Keskin [18] reported an increase of microhardness and reduction of the number of phases in the rapidly solidified Al64Cu20Fe12Si4 ribbons compared to the conventionally cast alloys.
Mechanical alloying, one-step procedure to obtain material in the form of powder, can lead to formation of a quasicrystalline phase in ternary Al-Cu-Fe alloys [1924] and extends its composition range compared to the other methods. It was reported that substitution of 5 at.% of Fe by Si increases the stability of the i-phase and the cubic approximant in the mechanically alloyed and annealed Al65Cu20Fe15 powder [12]. Murty et al. [13] showed that mechanical alloying of (Al60Cu25Fe12)100-xSix alloys improves the quasicrystalline phase forming ability (QFA) in comparison to rapid solidification processing by extending the range of e/a ratio, over which the icosahedral phase can be obtained. It was found also that thermal stability of the quasicrystalline phase in Si-containing alloys increases up to 1223 K.
In the present study, the influence of Si addition on the formation of the quasicrystalline phase in Al-Cu-Fe-Si alloys prepared by mechanical alloying has been investigated. To verify the effect of ratio of the number of valence electrons to number of atoms in unit cell (e/a), an important parameter for the formation of quasicrystalline phases [25, 26], on the sequence of phase formation during milling process two alloy compositions (both containing 10 at.% of Si) were selected. The first composition with e/a ratio close to 2 corresponded to the alloy described by Murty et al. [13]; the second one with e/a equal 1.75 was identical as for the ternary Al65Cu20Fe15 alloy. Parameters of milling process were chosen based on our previous examination, where the single icosahedral phase formed in the Al65Cu20Fe15 powder directly after 10 h of milling at the speed of 350 rpm (revolution per minute) [24]. Additionally, the structural evolution induced by a subsequent annealing and thermal stability of the quasicrystalline phase was studied and compared to the reference ternary composition.

Materials and methods

Elemental powders of aluminum, copper, iron and silicon (of purity at least 99.2% and the particle size in the range of 7–15 μm, supplied by Alfa Aesar) were mechanically alloyed in a planetary high-energy ball mill Fritsch P5. Mixture of pure elements powder, corresponding to the compositions presented in Table 1, was milled in tungsten carbide (WC) vials together with WC balls under argon atmosphere (the ball to powder ratio was 10:1). Hexane was added as a process control agent to prevent oxidation and eliminates tendency to ignite of the powder during milling. Milling was performed at a rotation speed 350 rpm (revolution per minute) up to 20 h with intervals to cool down milled powders. The parameters of the milling process were chosen based on our experience in preparation of the ternary Al-Cu-Fe quasicrystalline powders [23, 24]. After milling, the selected powders were annealed at 800 °C for 4 h in quartz ampoules in vacuum. For the calculation of e/a, the nominal compositions were accepted, due to the results of the EDX microanalysis carried out in TEM showed similar chemical compositions of the milled powders as the initial values (see supplementary material).
Table 1
Nominal composition (in at.%) of the investigated powders
Alloy designation
Composition of the alloy
e/a ratio
Al
Cu
Fe
Si
Si0
65
20
15
1.75
Si1
58.5
18
13.5
10
1.98
Si2
53.5
19.5
17
10
1.75
The microstructure of the milled and heat treated powders was examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using D8 Discover Bruker diffractometer with Co Kα filtered radiation (λ = 0.17903 nm), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using E-SEM XL and analytical transmission electron microscope (TEM) using FEI Tecnai G2 microscope at 200 kV equipped with high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy detector (HAADF-STEM) combined with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) EDAX microanalysis. For X-ray examination, powders were compacted in the mold to cylindrical form. Powders selected for SEM investigations were embedded in an epoxy resin, polished, and then, the specimen surface was coated with a conductive layer of carbon before examination. The TEM observations were made for the transparent region near the thin edge of the powder particles, which were placed on a carbon film supported by a nickel grid. The “ProcessDiffraction V-7.3.2Q” software developed by Labar [27] has been applied to measure interplanar spacing in the electron diffraction ring patterns.

Results

The phase evolution during the milling process was investigated by XRD measurements. Initial powders contained the mixture of constituent elements: Al, Cu, Fe and additionally Si in Si1 and Si2 powders. At the first stage of milling (after 3 h), apart from the reflections of pure elements, Al-base phases started to form. For Si0 powder, the reflections of the cubic β-Al(Cu, Fe) phase were observed, while weak reflections of the θ-Al2Cu phase appeared in the quaternary compositions.
The sets of XRD patterns after 6, 10 and 20 h of milling for the examined compositions are presented in Fig. 1. After 6 h of milling, the reflections of constituent elements disappeared completely in the Si0 powder with simultaneous increase in the intensity of reflections of β-Al(Cu, Fe) phase (Fig. 1a). The absence of (100) reflection indicates that the formed β-Al(Cu, Fe) phase is disordered. For Si1 powder, the θ-Al2Cu phase coexists with γ-Al4Cu9 phase, but the reflections of pure elements Si and Fe are still visible (Fig. 1b). The quasicrystalline i-phase dominates in the Si2 powder, accompanied by small amount of the γ-Al4Cu9 phase and Si (Fig. 1c). Ten hours of milling resulted in the formation of i-phase in all powders, although for the Si1 powder the small amount of Si was also detected (Fig. 1b). The diffraction peaks of the i-phase were indexed using Cahn’s scheme as a face-centered icosahedral quasicrystal (the superlattice reflection (7,11) is visible) [36, 37]. It can be seen that reflections of the i-phase in both Si-containing powders exhibit higher intensity compared to reference Si0 powder. Extending the milling time to 20 h led to reduction of the phase fraction of the i-phase and the formation of a disordered β-Al(Cu, Fe) phase in Si0 powder (Fig. 1a), while the i-phase was still dominant in the Si1 and Si2 with only a trace amount of the hexagonal τ5-Al7.4Fe2Si phase (Fig. 1b, c). The identified phases and their lattice parameters are presented in Table 2. The powders after 10 h of milling were selected for further microstructural investigations and subsequent heat treatment because of the i-phase presence in all the examined compositions.
Table 2
The phases identified in the Si0, Si1 and Si2 powders after milling and after annealing
Phase
Structure, space group
Lattice parameters [nm, deg]
Reference
(Al)
Cubic, Fm-3 m
a = 0.4049
[28]
(Cu)
Cubic, Fm-3 m
a = 0.3614
[28]
α-Fe
Cubic, Im-3 m
a = 0.2866
[28]
(Si)
Cubic, Fd-3 m
a = 0.5431
[28]
β-Al(Cu, Fe)
Cubic, Pm3m
a = 0.2941
[29]
θ-Al2Cu
Tetragonal, I4/mcm
a = 0.6067, c = 0.4877
[30]
γ-Al4Cu9
Cubic, P-43 m
a = 0.8703
[31]
i-Al65Cu20Fe15
Icosahedral phase
[32]
τ5-Al7.4Fe2Si
hexagonal
a = 1.234 nm, c = 2.621 nm
[33]
λ-Al13Fe4
Monoclinic, C2/m
a = 1.5492, b = 0.8078, c = 1.2471, β = 107.69°
[34]
τ1-Al2Fe3Si3
Triclinic, P-1
a = 0.4651, b = 0.6326, c = 0.7499, α = 101.37, β = 105.92, γ = 101.24
[35]
α-Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12.5
Cubic, Pm-3 1/1 approximant
a = 1.2321
[17]
The SEM-BSE microstructures of the cross sections of the powders after 10 h of milling are given in Fig. 2. All powders contained particles with maximum dimension below 100 µm; however, most of the particles had a size of 10–20 µm. The defragmentation of the particles was not finished and a lot of cracks can be seen at higher magnification in Fig. 2d–f. The cross sections of particles did not show differences in contrast, which may indicate their almost homogeneous structure.
The presence of the i-phase in the form of small crystallites was observed by TEM in all investigated powders. As an example, the bright (BF) and dark (DF) field images of the Si2 powder are shown in Fig. 3. The nanocrystallites of the i-phase with a diameter of the 10–20 nm are clearly visible in the DF microstructure. The selected area electron diffraction pattern (SADP) obtained from the area presented in Fig. 3a, b contains reflections lying along Debye–Scherrer rings; measured d-spacing values were indexed as the quasicrystalline i-phase (unlike the XRD diffraction, and the superlattice reflection (7,11) was not detected may be due to the local disordering of the i-phase).
The stability of the quasicrystalline phase during annealing at 800 °C for 4 h in the powders milled for 10 h was examined by X-ray diffraction (Fig. 4). For the Si0 powder, in addition to the quasicrystalline phase, which was present in the as-milled powder, the ordered β-Al(Cu, Fe) and λ-Al13Fe4 phases were identified. In the case of Si1 powder, i-phase transformed completely during annealing into the cubic α-Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12.5 approximant. The Si2 powder contained the mixture of the i-phase and the ordered β-Al(Cu, Fe) as dominant phases, and traces of triclinic τ1-Al2Fe3Si3 phase and the α-Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12.5 approximant.
The Si1 powder particles consisted of randomly distributed crystallites of 100–300 nm, what means that the size of the crystallites after annealing increased significantly (Fig. 5). The corresponding SADP was in the form of rings that can be identified as the α-Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12.5 approximant, confirming the XRD results.
In the Si2 powder, the growth of the crystallites during annealing was not as significant as in the case of the Si1 powder. Grain growth up to about 100 nm could be seen in the TEM bright- and dark-field microstructures presented in Fig. 6a, b. The corresponding SADP (Fig. 6c) contains reflections of the ordered β-Al(Cu, Fe), which was identified in the XRD pattern as one of the prevailing phases (Fig. 4). The weaker reflections of the i-phase, which overlap with or lie close to reflections of β-Al(Cu, Fe) phase, are also visible in the presented SADP.

Discussion

The presented studies have shown that mechanical alloying is a method that can lead to the formation of face-centered icosahedral quasicrystalline phase for all investigated powder compositions. In the case of ternary Al-Cu-Fe powder, the i-phase has been observed in milled powders of similar composition [2123, 3840]. It was also revealed, as in our research, that the i-phase after a longer milling time transformed into the disordered cubic β-Al(Cu, Fe) phase. The same transition was also found in the Al-Cu-Fe [41, 42] and Sn reinforced Al-Cu-Fe [43] powders during ball milling of a cast, annealed and crushed alloy containing the stable i-phase, which after milling, transformed into the cubic β-Al(Cu, Fe) phase. The transition was explained by occurrence of a quasilattice strain introduced during milling (phase distortion and phonon distortion component), when the grain size of the quasicrystalline phase decreased to ~ 10 nm.
In both quaternary Al-Cu-Fe-Si powders, despite the identical silicon amount of 10 at.%, the formation of a quasicrystalline phase during milling took place in a different way. The i-phase started to form in the Si2-Al53.5Cu19.5Fe17Si10 powder (e/a = 1.75) faster than for the Si1-Al58.5Cu18Fe13.5Si10 powder (e/a = 1.98) and pronounced reflections of this phase coexists with small amount of silicon and Al4Cu9 phase after 6 h of milling. After the same milling time, the Si1 powder contained, apart from pure elements Si and Fe, the Al2Cu and Al4Cu9 phases, while the i-phase was not observed. The formation of binary phases containing Al and Cu at initial stage of milling is related to the higher diffusion coefficient of Cu in aluminum compared to Si and Fe.
A quasicrystalline structure has been observed after 10 h of milling in both Si1 and Si2 compositions. For the Si2 powder, the i-phase was detected as a single phase, while for the Si1, it was accompanied by a small amount of silicon. This can be explained by the fact that Al content in Si1 powder was higher than that in Si2, and since Si atoms replaced Al atoms, only a part of Si was consumed to form the quasicrystalline phase for this composition (the Al: Cu: Fe ratio in Si1 corresponds to the i-phase). It was also found that the i-phase in the Si1 powder appeared after a shorter milling time compared to the results obtained by Murty et.al. [13], where 30 h was needed to form the quasicrystalline phase (together with β-Al(Cu, Fe)) for the same powder composition. This may be due to differences in milling conditions, in particular high milling speed and using WC milling media in our experiments, which led to an increase in the total energy transferred to the powder during milling process.
SEM and TEM observations have shown that the i-phase was visible in the form of small crystallites in all investigated powders after 10 h of milling. Similar size and distribution of the crystallites of the i-phase inside the powder particles was reported by Murty et al. [13] in the sample after 40 h of milling for composition analogous to Si1. Nanocrystallites of the i-phase are also observed in the previous studies of the mechanically milled powder [11, 24, 44, 45].
The quasicrystalline phase is not stable and prolonged milling resulted in its partial transformation. In contrast to the Si0 alloy, where the β-Al (Cu, Fe) single phase appeared, a small fraction of τ5-Al7.4Fe2Si phase except dominated the i-phase was identified in both Si-containing alloys. It should be noted that the face-centered icosahedral quasicrystalline phase was detected through the whole milling process. The traces of the τ5-Al7.4Fe2Si phase, one of a ternary τ-type phases enriched in Fe and Si [46], has been observed in multilayered Al/Cu/Fe thin films deposited onto Si substrate in the Al-deficient samples, together with the dominating α-Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12.5 approximant [47].
The quasicrystalline i-phase identified in all investigated powders milled for 10 h underwent different transformations during annealing at 800 °C for 4 h to form various phases. For the ternary Si0-Al65Cu20Fe15 powder, the dominant ordered β-Al(Cu, Fe) phase is accompanied by the i-phase and small amount of the λ-Al13Fe4. In the XRD pattern, the strong and sharp reflections of the both main phases are clearly visible, due to the increased size of the crystallites compared to the as-milled state. This result is consistent with our previous experiments for an annealed Al-Cu-Fe powder, which also contained the β-Al(Cu, Fe) and the i-phase, regardless of the phases identified in the powders after milling [24]. Similar, two-phase microstructure of annealed Al-Cu-Fe powders has also been reported by other researchers, e.g., [44, 48, 49].
The conditions of the milling process and the milling time influence the phase composition of as-milled powders, and thus are of decisive importance for the formation of the quasicrystalline phase after annealing. The synthesis of a powder with a high volume fraction of the quasicrystal phase could be achieved by combination of a short milling time and subsequent annealing [19, 44, 4951]. The formation of the quasicrystalline phase in Al-Cu-Fe powders containing β and θ phases in as-milled state after non-isothermal annealing above 750 °C was reported by Nicula et al. [50]. Salimon et al. [51] showed that the as-milled powder consisting of a mixture of solid solutions of starting elements and the Al2Cu phase transformed into an almost single icosahedral quasicrystalline phase after annealing at 700 °C. Ali et al. [52] studied the phase evolution during milling and subsequent annealing of the quasicrystalline phase and concluded that the formation of the ordered β-Al(Cu, Fe) phase was promoted with increasing milling time. The stored internal energy reduced the activation barrier for nucleation of the crystalline β-Al(Cu, Fe) phase in the icosahedral structure (samples milled for longer time require lower thermal energy for transformation).
The i-phase was partially preserved also in Si2-Al53.5Cu19.5Fe17Si10 powder, although the volume fraction of the ordered β-Al(Cu, Fe) was lower compared to the Si0. It should be noted that the calculated e/a ratio for both powders is identical and equal 1.75, what may be the reason for similar phase composition after annealing (Si-containing phases, α-Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12.5 approximant and Al2Fe3Si3 phase, replaced λ-Al13Fe4 phase in Si2 powder). In the case of the Si1-Al58.5Cu18Fe13.5Si10 powder, the i-phase completely transforms during annealing to the cubic α-Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12.5 approximant, which is associated with significant increase of the grain size up to about 300 nm. The transformation of the quasicrystalline phase into the cubic approximant was also found in the gas atomized powder of a similar composition (Al57Cu17.75Fe14.75 Si10.5) after heating to a temperature above 600 °C [53]. A different result for the powder of identical composition was obtained by Murty et.al. [13], wherein a mixture of the i-phase and the β-Al(Cu, Fe) was obtained during annealing at 600 °C (it should be mentioned that the as-milled powder before annealing also contained these phases). The different phase composition obtained after milling as well as after annealing can be caused by different parameters used during milling, as well as different annealing temperature.
Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded, that addition of 10 at.% of Si, irrespective of the mutual content of other components and the e/a ratio, has a positive effect on the formation of the icosahedral phase in Al-Cu-Fe powders produced by mechanical alloying. The quasicrystalline phase in both Si1 and Si2 powders was more stable and retained after a longer milling time as compared to the reduced volume fraction of this phase in favor of the β-Al(Cu, Fe) phase in the reference ternary Si0 alloy. These results may be important for application of the powders with a quasicrystalline structure. Due to their high hardness and brittleness, these powdered materials can be used, for example, as a reinforcement in composites. The stability of the quasicrystalline phase is highly dependent on the e/a ratio in the powders during annealing. It was found that i-phase in the Si2 and Si0 powders, with the e/a ratio equal to 1.75, is partially preserved, while the Si1 powder with e/a = 1.98 was completely transformed to the cubic approximant.

Conclusions

The quasicrystalline icosahedral i-phase formed in the Al58.5Cu18Fe13.5Si10, Al53.5Cu19.5Fe17Si10 and the reference Al65Cu20Fe15 mechanically alloyed powders after 10 h of milling at the speed of 350 rpm and using WC milling media. Particles of the powder consisted the fine 10–20 nm crystallites of the i-phase for all investigated compositions. Addition of Si stabilized the quasicrystalline phase being dominant after extended milling time, contrary to the reference ternary powder, which apart of quasicrystalline phase contained the cubic β-Al(Cu, Fe).
Annealing of the powders milled 10 h at 800 °C for 4 h maintained partially the i-phase in Al65Cu20Fe15 and Al53.5Cu19.5Fe17Si10 powders (e/a ratio was 1.75 for both compositions) accompanied by an increase of crystallites sizes up to 100 nm. The i-phase coexisted with β-Al(Cu, Fe) and small fraction of Al13Fe4 or α-Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12.5 and τ1-Al2Fe3Si3 phases in Al65Cu20Fe15 and Al53.5Cu19.5Fe17Si10, respectively. For the Al58.5Cu18Fe13.5Si10 powders (e/a = 1.98) the annealing led to the complete i-phase transformation to the cubic α-Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12.5 approximant in the form of 100–300 nm crystals.

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Polish National Science Centre NCN, research projects no 2015/19/N/ST8/01036 is gratefully acknowledged. Samples were examined in the Accredited Testing Laboratories at the Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Cracow.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix

Supplementary Information

Literature
1.
go back to reference Tsai AP, Inoue A, Masumoto T (1987) A stable quasicrystal in Al–Cu–Fe system. Jpn J Appl Phys 26:L1505–L1507CrossRef Tsai AP, Inoue A, Masumoto T (1987) A stable quasicrystal in Al–Cu–Fe system. Jpn J Appl Phys 26:L1505–L1507CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Huttunen-Saarivirta E (2004) Microstructure, fabrication and properties of quasicrystalline Al–Cu–Fe alloys: a review. J Alloys Compd 363:150–174CrossRef Huttunen-Saarivirta E (2004) Microstructure, fabrication and properties of quasicrystalline Al–Cu–Fe alloys: a review. J Alloys Compd 363:150–174CrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Barthes-Labrousse MG, Dubois JM (2008) Quasicrystals and complex metallic alloys: trends for potential applications. Philos Mag 88:2217–2225CrossRef Barthes-Labrousse MG, Dubois JM (2008) Quasicrystals and complex metallic alloys: trends for potential applications. Philos Mag 88:2217–2225CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dubois JM (2012) Properties- and applications of quasicrystals and complex metallic alloys. Chem Soc Rev 41:6760–6777CrossRef Dubois JM (2012) Properties- and applications of quasicrystals and complex metallic alloys. Chem Soc Rev 41:6760–6777CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Raghavan V (2005) Al-Cu-Fe (Aluminum–Copper-Iron). J Phase Equilib Diffus 26:59–64CrossRef Raghavan V (2005) Al-Cu-Fe (Aluminum–Copper-Iron). J Phase Equilib Diffus 26:59–64CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Raghavan V (2010) Al-Cu-Fe (Aluminum–Copper-Iron). J Phase Equilib Diffus 31:449–452CrossRef Raghavan V (2010) Al-Cu-Fe (Aluminum–Copper-Iron). J Phase Equilib Diffus 31:449–452CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zhu L, Soto-Medina S, Cuadrado-Castillo W, Hennig RG, Manuel MV (2019) New experimental studies on the phase diagram of the Al–Cu–Fe quasicrystal-forming system. Mater Des 185:108186CrossRef Zhu L, Soto-Medina S, Cuadrado-Castillo W, Hennig RG, Manuel MV (2019) New experimental studies on the phase diagram of the Al–Cu–Fe quasicrystal-forming system. Mater Des 185:108186CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tsai AP, Inoue A, Masumoto T (1989) Effects of preparation conditions and additional elements on phason strains in stable icosahedral quasicrystals in Al–Cu–Fe systems. J Mater Sci Lett 8:470–472CrossRef Tsai AP, Inoue A, Masumoto T (1989) Effects of preparation conditions and additional elements on phason strains in stable icosahedral quasicrystals in Al–Cu–Fe systems. J Mater Sci Lett 8:470–472CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lee SM, Kim BH, Kim SH, Fleury E, Kim WT, Kim DH (2000) Effect of Si addition on the formability of the icosahedral quasicrystalline phase in an Al65Cu20Fe15 alloy. Mater Sci Eng 294–296:93–98CrossRef Lee SM, Kim BH, Kim SH, Fleury E, Kim WT, Kim DH (2000) Effect of Si addition on the formability of the icosahedral quasicrystalline phase in an Al65Cu20Fe15 alloy. Mater Sci Eng 294–296:93–98CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wang Y, Zhang Z, Geng H, Yang Z (2006) Formation of the icosahedral quasicrystalline phase in a rapidly solidified Al52Cu25.5Fe12.5Si10 alloy. Mater Charact 56:200–207CrossRef Wang Y, Zhang Z, Geng H, Yang Z (2006) Formation of the icosahedral quasicrystalline phase in a rapidly solidified Al52Cu25.5Fe12.5Si10 alloy. Mater Charact 56:200–207CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kim KB, Kim SH, Kim WT, Kim DH, Hong KT (2001) Structural evolution during heat treatment of mechanically alloyed Al–Cu–Fe– (Si) alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 304–306:822–829CrossRef Kim KB, Kim SH, Kim WT, Kim DH, Hong KT (2001) Structural evolution during heat treatment of mechanically alloyed Al–Cu–Fe– (Si) alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 304–306:822–829CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Murty BS, Barua P, Srinivas V, Schurack F, Eckert J (2004) Synthesis of (Al65Cu20Fe15)100-xSix quasicrystalline alloys by mechanical alloying. J Non-Cryst Solids 334–335:44–47CrossRef Murty BS, Barua P, Srinivas V, Schurack F, Eckert J (2004) Synthesis of (Al65Cu20Fe15)100-xSix quasicrystalline alloys by mechanical alloying. J Non-Cryst Solids 334–335:44–47CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sukhova OV, Ustinova KV (2019) The effect of cooling rates on phase composition of quasicrystalline Al–Cu–Fe alloys doped with Si and B. Funct Mater 26:495–506 Sukhova OV, Ustinova KV (2019) The effect of cooling rates on phase composition of quasicrystalline Al–Cu–Fe alloys doped with Si and B. Funct Mater 26:495–506
15.
go back to reference Quivy A, Quiquandon M, Calvayrac Y, Faudot F, Gratias D, Berger C, Brand RA, Simonet V, Hippert F (1996) A cubic approximant of the icosahedral phase in the (Al–Si)–Cu–Fe system. J Phys Cond Mat 8:4223–4234CrossRef Quivy A, Quiquandon M, Calvayrac Y, Faudot F, Gratias D, Berger C, Brand RA, Simonet V, Hippert F (1996) A cubic approximant of the icosahedral phase in the (Al–Si)–Cu–Fe system. J Phys Cond Mat 8:4223–4234CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Takeuchi T, Yamada H, Takata M, Nakata T, Tanaka N, Mizutani U (2000) Atomic structure of the Al–Cu–Fe–Si 1/1–cubic approximant. Mater Sci Eng 294–296:340–344CrossRef Takeuchi T, Yamada H, Takata M, Nakata T, Tanaka N, Mizutani U (2000) Atomic structure of the Al–Cu–Fe–Si 1/1–cubic approximant. Mater Sci Eng 294–296:340–344CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stadnik ZM, Takeuchi T, Tanaka N, Mizutani U (2003) Structural, Mossbauer, and transport studies of the icosahedral quasicrystals Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12.5, Al62.5Cu24.5Fe13 and the crystalline 1/1 approximant Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12.5. J Phys Condens Matter 15:6365–6380CrossRef Stadnik ZM, Takeuchi T, Tanaka N, Mizutani U (2003) Structural, Mossbauer, and transport studies of the icosahedral quasicrystals Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12.5, Al62.5Cu24.5Fe13 and the crystalline 1/1 approximant Al55Si7Cu25.5Fe12.5. J Phys Condens Matter 15:6365–6380CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Karaköse E, Keskin M (2012) Microstructure properties and microhardness of rapidly solidified Al64Cu20Fe12Si4 quasicrystal alloy. Met Mater Int 18:257–263CrossRef Karaköse E, Keskin M (2012) Microstructure properties and microhardness of rapidly solidified Al64Cu20Fe12Si4 quasicrystal alloy. Met Mater Int 18:257–263CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Salimon AI, Korsunsky AM, Shelekhov EV, Sviridova TA, Kaloshkin SA, Tcherdyntsev VS, Baldokhin YV (2001) Crystallochemical aspects of solid state reactions in mechanically alloyed Al–Cu–Fe quasicrystalline powders. Acta Mater 49:1821–1833CrossRef Salimon AI, Korsunsky AM, Shelekhov EV, Sviridova TA, Kaloshkin SA, Tcherdyntsev VS, Baldokhin YV (2001) Crystallochemical aspects of solid state reactions in mechanically alloyed Al–Cu–Fe quasicrystalline powders. Acta Mater 49:1821–1833CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Schurack F, Eckert J, Schultz L (2003) Synthesis and mechanical properties of mechanically alloyed Al–Cu–Fe quasicrystalline composites. Phil Mag 83:1287–1305CrossRef Schurack F, Eckert J, Schultz L (2003) Synthesis and mechanical properties of mechanically alloyed Al–Cu–Fe quasicrystalline composites. Phil Mag 83:1287–1305CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bokhonov BB (2008) Mechanical alloying and self-propagating high-temperature synthesis of stable icosahedral quasicrystals. J Alloys Compd 461:150–153CrossRef Bokhonov BB (2008) Mechanical alloying and self-propagating high-temperature synthesis of stable icosahedral quasicrystals. J Alloys Compd 461:150–153CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Novák P, Kubatík T, Vystrcil J, Hendrych R, Kríz J, Mlynár J, Vojtech D (2014) Powder metallurgy preparation of Al-Cu-Fe quasicrystals using mechanical alloying and Spark Plasma Sintering. Intermetallics 52:131–137CrossRef Novák P, Kubatík T, Vystrcil J, Hendrych R, Kríz J, Mlynár J, Vojtech D (2014) Powder metallurgy preparation of Al-Cu-Fe quasicrystals using mechanical alloying and Spark Plasma Sintering. Intermetallics 52:131–137CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mitka M, Lityńska-Dobrzyńska L, Góral A, Maziarz W (2014) Influence of mechanical alloying parameters on phase formation in Al–Cu–Fe powder. Acta Phys Polonica A 126(2014):894–897 Mitka M, Lityńska-Dobrzyńska L, Góral A, Maziarz W (2014) Influence of mechanical alloying parameters on phase formation in Al–Cu–Fe powder. Acta Phys Polonica A 126(2014):894–897
24.
go back to reference Mitka M, Góral A, Rogal Ł, Lityńska-Dobrzynska L (2015) Microstructure of mechanically alloyed and annealed Al62Cu25.5Fe12.5 powder. J Alloys Compd 653:47–53CrossRef Mitka M, Góral A, Rogal Ł, Lityńska-Dobrzynska L (2015) Microstructure of mechanically alloyed and annealed Al62Cu25.5Fe12.5 powder. J Alloys Compd 653:47–53CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tsai AP, Inoue A, Masumoto T (1989) Icosahedral, decagonal and amorphous phases in Al-Cu-M (M=Transition Metal) system. Mater Trans 30:666–676CrossRef Tsai AP, Inoue A, Masumoto T (1989) Icosahedral, decagonal and amorphous phases in Al-Cu-M (M=Transition Metal) system. Mater Trans 30:666–676CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Trambly de Laissardière G, Nguyen-Manh D, Mayou D (2005) Electronic structure of complex Hume-Rothery phases and quasicrystals in transition metal aluminides. Prog Mater Sci 50:679–788CrossRef Trambly de Laissardière G, Nguyen-Manh D, Mayou D (2005) Electronic structure of complex Hume-Rothery phases and quasicrystals in transition metal aluminides. Prog Mater Sci 50:679–788CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lábár JL (2008) Electron diffraction based analysis of phase fractions and textures in nanocrystalline thin films; Part I: principles. Microsc Microanal 14:287–295CrossRef Lábár JL (2008) Electron diffraction based analysis of phase fractions and textures in nanocrystalline thin films; Part I: principles. Microsc Microanal 14:287–295CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Villars P, Calvert LD (1991) Pearson’s handbook of crystallographic data for intermediate phases, 2nd edn. ASM International, Materials Park, OH Villars P, Calvert LD (1991) Pearson’s handbook of crystallographic data for intermediate phases, 2nd edn. ASM International, Materials Park, OH
29.
go back to reference Chen HL, Du Y, Xu H, Xiong W (2009) Experimental investigation and thermodynamic modeling of the ternary Al–Cu–Fe system. J Mater Res 24:3154–3164CrossRef Chen HL, Du Y, Xu H, Xiong W (2009) Experimental investigation and thermodynamic modeling of the ternary Al–Cu–Fe system. J Mater Res 24:3154–3164CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Meetsma A, De Boer JL, Van Smaalen S (1989) Refinement of the crystal structure of tetragonal Al2Cu. J Solid State Chem 83:370–372CrossRef Meetsma A, De Boer JL, Van Smaalen S (1989) Refinement of the crystal structure of tetragonal Al2Cu. J Solid State Chem 83:370–372CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kisi EH, Browne JD (1991) Ordering and structural vacancies in non-stoichiometric Cu–Al γ brasses. Acta Crystallogr B 47:835–843CrossRef Kisi EH, Browne JD (1991) Ordering and structural vacancies in non-stoichiometric Cu–Al γ brasses. Acta Crystallogr B 47:835–843CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Ishimasa T, Fukano Y, Tsuchimori M (1988) Quasicrystal structure in Al–Cu–Fe annealed alloy. Philos Mag 58:157–165 Ishimasa T, Fukano Y, Tsuchimori M (1988) Quasicrystal structure in Al–Cu–Fe annealed alloy. Philos Mag 58:157–165
33.
go back to reference Roger J, Bosselet F, Viala J (2011) X-rays structural analysis and thermal stability studies of the ternary compound α-AlFeSi. J Solid State Chem 184:1120–1128CrossRef Roger J, Bosselet F, Viala J (2011) X-rays structural analysis and thermal stability studies of the ternary compound α-AlFeSi. J Solid State Chem 184:1120–1128CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ellner M (1995) Polymorphic phase transformation of Fe4Al13 causing multiple twinning with decagonal pseudo–symmetry. Acta Crystallogr B 51:31–36CrossRef Ellner M (1995) Polymorphic phase transformation of Fe4Al13 causing multiple twinning with decagonal pseudo–symmetry. Acta Crystallogr B 51:31–36CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Yanson TI, Manyako MB, Bodak OI, German NV, Zarechnyuk OS, Cerny R, Pacheco JV, Yvon K (1996) Triclinic Fe3Al2Si3 and orthorhombic Fe3Al2Si4 with new structure types. Acta Crystallogr C 52:2964–2967CrossRef Yanson TI, Manyako MB, Bodak OI, German NV, Zarechnyuk OS, Cerny R, Pacheco JV, Yvon K (1996) Triclinic Fe3Al2Si3 and orthorhombic Fe3Al2Si4 with new structure types. Acta Crystallogr C 52:2964–2967CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Cahn JW, Shechtman D, Gratias D (1986) Indexing of icosahedral quasiperiodic crystals. J Mater Res 1:13–26CrossRef Cahn JW, Shechtman D, Gratias D (1986) Indexing of icosahedral quasiperiodic crystals. J Mater Res 1:13–26CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Calvayrac Y, Quivy A, Bessière M, Lefebvre S, Cornier-Quiquandon M, Gratias D (1990) Icosahedral AlCuFe alloys: towards ideal quasicrystals. J Phys France 51:417–431CrossRef Calvayrac Y, Quivy A, Bessière M, Lefebvre S, Cornier-Quiquandon M, Gratias D (1990) Icosahedral AlCuFe alloys: towards ideal quasicrystals. J Phys France 51:417–431CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Asahi N, Maki T, Matsumoto S, Sawai T (1994) Quasicrystallization characteristics of mechanically alloyed A165Cu20Fe15 powder. Mater Sci Eng A 181(182):841–844CrossRef Asahi N, Maki T, Matsumoto S, Sawai T (1994) Quasicrystallization characteristics of mechanically alloyed A165Cu20Fe15 powder. Mater Sci Eng A 181(182):841–844CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Barua P, Murty BS, Srinivas V (2001) Mechanical alloying of Al-Cu-Fe elemental powders. Mater Sci Eng A 304–306:863–866CrossRef Barua P, Murty BS, Srinivas V (2001) Mechanical alloying of Al-Cu-Fe elemental powders. Mater Sci Eng A 304–306:863–866CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Murty BS, Koteswara Rao RV, Mukhopadhyay NK (2004) Stability of quasicrystalline phase in Al–Cu–Fe, Al–Cu–Co and Al–Pd–Mn systems by high energy ball milling. J Non-Cryst Solids 334 & 335:48–51CrossRef Murty BS, Koteswara Rao RV, Mukhopadhyay NK (2004) Stability of quasicrystalline phase in Al–Cu–Fe, Al–Cu–Co and Al–Pd–Mn systems by high energy ball milling. J Non-Cryst Solids 334 & 335:48–51CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Mukhopadhyay NK, Ali F, Srivastava VC, Yadav TP, Sakaliyska M, Surreddi KB, Scudino S, Uhlenwinkel V, Eckert J (2011) Strain-induced structural transformation of single-phase Al–Cu–Fe icosahedral quasicrystal during mechanical milling. Philos Mag 91:2482–2490CrossRef Mukhopadhyay NK, Ali F, Srivastava VC, Yadav TP, Sakaliyska M, Surreddi KB, Scudino S, Uhlenwinkel V, Eckert J (2011) Strain-induced structural transformation of single-phase Al–Cu–Fe icosahedral quasicrystal during mechanical milling. Philos Mag 91:2482–2490CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Ali F, Scudino S, Gorantla SM, Srivastava VC, Shahid HR, Uhlenwinkel V, Stoica M, Vaughan G, Mukhopadhyay NK, Eckert J (2013) Mechanically driven phase transformation in single phase Al62.5Cu25Fe12.5 quasi-crystals: effect of milling intensity. Acta Mater 61:3819–3830CrossRef Ali F, Scudino S, Gorantla SM, Srivastava VC, Shahid HR, Uhlenwinkel V, Stoica M, Vaughan G, Mukhopadhyay NK, Eckert J (2013) Mechanically driven phase transformation in single phase Al62.5Cu25Fe12.5 quasi-crystals: effect of milling intensity. Acta Mater 61:3819–3830CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Shadangi Y, Shivam V, Singh MK, Chattopadhyay K, Basu J, Mukhopadhyay NK (2019) Synthesis and characterization of Sn reinforced Al-Cu-Fe quasicrystalline matrix nanocomposite by mechanical milling. J Alloys Comp 797:1280–1287CrossRef Shadangi Y, Shivam V, Singh MK, Chattopadhyay K, Basu J, Mukhopadhyay NK (2019) Synthesis and characterization of Sn reinforced Al-Cu-Fe quasicrystalline matrix nanocomposite by mechanical milling. J Alloys Comp 797:1280–1287CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Yong X, Chang IT, Jones IP (2005) Formation of a quasicrystalline phase in mechanically alloyed Al65Cu25Fe15. J Alloy Compd 387:128–133CrossRef Yong X, Chang IT, Jones IP (2005) Formation of a quasicrystalline phase in mechanically alloyed Al65Cu25Fe15. J Alloy Compd 387:128–133CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Tiwari RS, Yadav TP, Mukhopadhyay NK, Shaz MA, Srivastava ON (2009) Nanocrystallization and structural correlation in quasicrystalline and crystalline phases during mechanical milling. Z Kristallogr 224:26–30CrossRef Tiwari RS, Yadav TP, Mukhopadhyay NK, Shaz MA, Srivastava ON (2009) Nanocrystallization and structural correlation in quasicrystalline and crystalline phases during mechanical milling. Z Kristallogr 224:26–30CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Krendelsberger N, Weitzer F, Schuster JC (2007) On the reactions and liquidus surface in the ternary system Al-Fe-Si. Metall Mater Trans A 38A:1681–1691CrossRef Krendelsberger N, Weitzer F, Schuster JC (2007) On the reactions and liquidus surface in the ternary system Al-Fe-Si. Metall Mater Trans A 38A:1681–1691CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Olsson S, Eriksson F, Birch J, Hultman L (2012) Formation of α-approximant and quasicrystalline Al–Cu–Fe thin films. Thin Solid Films 526:74–80CrossRef Olsson S, Eriksson F, Birch J, Hultman L (2012) Formation of α-approximant and quasicrystalline Al–Cu–Fe thin films. Thin Solid Films 526:74–80CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Barua P, Srinivas V, Murty BS (2000) Synthesis of quasicrystalline phase by mechanical alloying of Al70Cu20Fe10. Philos Mag 80:1207–1217CrossRef Barua P, Srinivas V, Murty BS (2000) Synthesis of quasicrystalline phase by mechanical alloying of Al70Cu20Fe10. Philos Mag 80:1207–1217CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Avar B, Gogebakan M (2009) Synthesis of the quasi-crystalline phase in Al63Cu25Fe12 powders prepared by mechanical alloying. J Optoelectr Adv Mater 11:460–1463 Avar B, Gogebakan M (2009) Synthesis of the quasi-crystalline phase in Al63Cu25Fe12 powders prepared by mechanical alloying. J Optoelectr Adv Mater 11:460–1463
50.
go back to reference Nicula R, Turqier F, Stir M, Kodash VY, Groza JR, Burkel E (2007) Quasicrystal phase formation in Al–Cu–Fe nanopowders during field activated sintering (FAST). J Alloys Comp 434–435:319–323CrossRef Nicula R, Turqier F, Stir M, Kodash VY, Groza JR, Burkel E (2007) Quasicrystal phase formation in Al–Cu–Fe nanopowders during field activated sintering (FAST). J Alloys Comp 434–435:319–323CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Salimon AI, Shevchukov AP, Stepashkin AA, Tcherdyntsev VV, Olifirov LK, Kaloshkin SD (2017) Mechanical alloying as a solid state route for fabrication of Al-Cu-M(=Fe, Cr) quasicrystalline phases. J Alloys Comp 707:315–320CrossRef Salimon AI, Shevchukov AP, Stepashkin AA, Tcherdyntsev VV, Olifirov LK, Kaloshkin SD (2017) Mechanical alloying as a solid state route for fabrication of Al-Cu-M(=Fe, Cr) quasicrystalline phases. J Alloys Comp 707:315–320CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Ali R, Akhtar MU, Zahoor A, Ali F, Scudino S, Shahid RN, Tariq NH, Srivastava VC, Uhlenwinkel V, Hasa A, Eckert J (2020) Study of thermal and structure characteristic of mechanically milled nanostructured Al–Cu–Fe quasicrystals. Mater Chem Phys 251:123071CrossRef Ali R, Akhtar MU, Zahoor A, Ali F, Scudino S, Shahid RN, Tariq NH, Srivastava VC, Uhlenwinkel V, Hasa A, Eckert J (2020) Study of thermal and structure characteristic of mechanically milled nanostructured Al–Cu–Fe quasicrystals. Mater Chem Phys 251:123071CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Fleury E, Lee JH, Kim SH, Kim WT, Kim JS, Kim DH (2003) Spark plasma sintering of Al–Si–Cu–Fe quasi-crystalline powder. Metall Mater Trans A 34A:841–849CrossRef Fleury E, Lee JH, Kim SH, Kim WT, Kim JS, Kim DH (2003) Spark plasma sintering of Al–Si–Cu–Fe quasi-crystalline powder. Metall Mater Trans A 34A:841–849CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Synthesis and stability of quasicrystalline phase in Al-Cu-Fe-Si mechanically alloyed powders
Authors
Mikołaj Mitka
Anna Góral
Lidia Lityńska-Dobrzyńska
Publication date
09-03-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Materials Science / Issue 18/2021
Print ISSN: 0022-2461
Electronic ISSN: 1573-4803
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-05963-6

Other articles of this Issue 18/2021

Journal of Materials Science 18/2021 Go to the issue

Premium Partners