Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

System Dynamics Modeling: Validation for Quality Assurance

Authors : Markus Schwaninger, Stefan Groesser

Published in: System Dynamics

Publisher: Springer US

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

Model/model system
A model is an abstract representation of a concrete (“real”) system. Models can be descriptive or prescriptive (normative). Their functions can be to enable explanation, anticipation, or design. A distinction used in this contribution is between causal and noncausal models, with System Dynamics models being of the former type. The term model system is used to stress the systemic character of a model; this serves to identify it as an organized whole of variables and relationships, on the one hand, and to distinguish it from the real system which is to be modeled, on the other.
Model validity
A model’s property of reflecting adequately the system modeled. Validity is the main feature of model quality. It is a matter of degree, not a dichotomized property.
Model purpose
The goal for which a model is designed or the function it is supposed to fulfill. The model purpose adheres closely to the end-model user or model owner. Model purpose is the criterion for the choice of a model’s boundary and design.
Modeling process
The process involving phases such as problem articulation, boundary selection, development of a dynamic hypothesis, model formulation, model testing, policy formulation, and policy evaluation (Sterman 2000). The modeling process is followed by model use and implementation, i.e., the realization of actions designed or facilitated by the use of the model.
Validation process
Validation is the process by which model validity is enhanced systematically. It consists in gradually building confidence in the usefulness of a model by applying validation tests as outlined in this entry. In principle, validation pervades all phases of the modeling process and, in addition, reaches into the phases of model implementation and use.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Barlas Y (1990) An autocorrelation function test for output validation. Simulation 55(1):7–16 Barlas Y (1990) An autocorrelation function test for output validation. Simulation 55(1):7–16
go back to reference Barlas Y (1996) Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 12(3):183–210 Barlas Y (1996) Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 12(3):183–210
go back to reference Barlas Y (2006) Model validity and testing in system dynamics: two specific tools. Paper presented at the 24th international conference of the system dynamics society, Nijmegen Barlas Y (2006) Model validity and testing in system dynamics: two specific tools. Paper presented at the 24th international conference of the system dynamics society, Nijmegen
go back to reference Barlas Y, Carpenter S (1990) Philosophical roots of model validity – two paradigms. Syst Dyn Rev 6(2):148–166 Barlas Y, Carpenter S (1990) Philosophical roots of model validity – two paradigms. Syst Dyn Rev 6(2):148–166
go back to reference Coyle G, Exelby D (2000) The validation of commercial system dynamics models. Syst Dyn Rev 16(1):27–41 Coyle G, Exelby D (2000) The validation of commercial system dynamics models. Syst Dyn Rev 16(1):27–41
go back to reference Dangerfield B (2014) Systems thinking and system dynamics: a primer. In: Brailsford S, Churilov L et al (eds) Discrete-event simulation and system dynamics for management decision making. Wiley, Chichester, pp 26–51 Dangerfield B (2014) Systems thinking and system dynamics: a primer. In: Brailsford S, Churilov L et al (eds) Discrete-event simulation and system dynamics for management decision making. Wiley, Chichester, pp 26–51
go back to reference Feyerabend P (1993) Against method, 3rd edn. Verso, London Feyerabend P (1993) Against method, 3rd edn. Verso, London
go back to reference Forrester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Forrester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
go back to reference Forrester JW, Senge PM (1980) Test for building confidence in system dynamics models. In: Legasto AA Jr, Forrester JW, Lyneis JM (eds) System dynamics. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 209–228 Forrester JW, Senge PM (1980) Test for building confidence in system dynamics models. In: Legasto AA Jr, Forrester JW, Lyneis JM (eds) System dynamics. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 209–228
go back to reference Graham AK (1980) Parameter estimation in system dynamics. In: Randers J (ed) Elements of the system dynamics method. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 143–161 Graham AK (1980) Parameter estimation in system dynamics. In: Randers J (ed) Elements of the system dynamics method. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 143–161
go back to reference Groesser SN, Schwaninger M (2012) Contributions to model validation: hierarchy, process, and cessation. Syst Dyn Rev 28(2):157–181 Groesser SN, Schwaninger M (2012) Contributions to model validation: hierarchy, process, and cessation. Syst Dyn Rev 28(2):157–181
go back to reference Heracleous L (2006) Discourse, interpretation, organization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA Heracleous L (2006) Discourse, interpretation, organization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
go back to reference James W (1987) Writings 1902–1910. Library of America, New York James W (1987) Writings 1902–1910. Library of America, New York
go back to reference Kampmann CE, Oliva R (2018) System dynamics: analytical methods for structural dominance analysis. In: Encyclopaedia of complexity and systems science. Springer, New York/London/Berlin Kampmann CE, Oliva R (2018) System dynamics: analytical methods for structural dominance analysis. In: Encyclopaedia of complexity and systems science. Springer, New York/London/Berlin
go back to reference Kuhn T (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Kuhn T (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
go back to reference Lacey AR (1996) A dictionary of philosophy, 3rd edn. Barnes and Noble, New York Lacey AR (1996) A dictionary of philosophy, 3rd edn. Barnes and Noble, New York
go back to reference Lane DC (1995) The folding star: a comparative reframing and extension of validity concepts in system dynamics. In: Simada T, Saeed K (eds) Proceedings of 1995 international system dynamics conference, 30 July–4 Aug, vol I. System Dynamics Society, Lincoln, pp 111–130 Lane DC (1995) The folding star: a comparative reframing and extension of validity concepts in system dynamics. In: Simada T, Saeed K (eds) Proceedings of 1995 international system dynamics conference, 30 July–4 Aug, vol I. System Dynamics Society, Lincoln, pp 111–130
go back to reference Mass NJ (1975) Economic cycles: an analysis of underlying causes. Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA Mass NJ (1975) Economic cycles: an analysis of underlying causes. Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA
go back to reference Mattheij RMM, Rienstra SW, ten Thije Boonkkamp JHM (2005) Partial differential equations: modeling, analysis, computation. Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics (SIAM), EindhovenMATH Mattheij RMM, Rienstra SW, ten Thije Boonkkamp JHM (2005) Partial differential equations: modeling, analysis, computation. Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics (SIAM), EindhovenMATH
go back to reference Petersen DW, Eberlein RL (1994) Understanding models with Vensim. In: JDW M, Sterman JD (eds) Modeling for learning organiziations. Productivity Press, Portland, pp 339–358 Petersen DW, Eberlein RL (1994) Understanding models with Vensim. In: JDW M, Sterman JD (eds) Modeling for learning organiziations. Productivity Press, Portland, pp 339–358
go back to reference Phillips LD (2007) Decision conferencing. In: Edwards W, Miles RF, von Winterfeldt D (eds) Advances in decision analysis. From foundations to applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 375–399 Phillips LD (2007) Decision conferencing. In: Edwards W, Miles RF, von Winterfeldt D (eds) Advances in decision analysis. From foundations to applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 375–399
go back to reference Popper KR (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. Basic Books, New York (latest edition: 2002, Routledge, London)MATH Popper KR (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. Basic Books, New York (latest edition: 2002, Routledge, London)MATH
go back to reference Popper KR (1972) Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach. Clarendon Press, Oxford Popper KR (1972) Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach. Clarendon Press, Oxford
go back to reference Rapoport A (1954) Operational philosophy. Integrating knowledge and action. Harper, New York Rapoport A (1954) Operational philosophy. Integrating knowledge and action. Harper, New York
go back to reference Richardson GP (1995, originally published in 1984) Loop polarity, loop dominance, and the concept of dominant polarity. Syst Dyn Rev 11(1): 67–88 Richardson GP (1995, originally published in 1984) Loop polarity, loop dominance, and the concept of dominant polarity. Syst Dyn Rev 11(1): 67–88
go back to reference Schwaninger M (2010) Model-based management (MBM): a vital prerequisite for organizational viability. Kybernetes 39(9/10):1419–1428 Schwaninger M (2010) Model-based management (MBM): a vital prerequisite for organizational viability. Kybernetes 39(9/10):1419–1428
go back to reference Schwaninger M, Groesser SN (2008) Model-based theory-building with system dynamics. Syst Res Behav Sci 25:1–19 Schwaninger M, Groesser SN (2008) Model-based theory-building with system dynamics. Syst Res Behav Sci 25:1–19
go back to reference Seiffert H, Radnitzky G (1994) Handlexikon der Wissenschaftstheorie, 2nd edn. DTV Wissenschaft, Munich Seiffert H, Radnitzky G (1994) Handlexikon der Wissenschaftstheorie, 2nd edn. DTV Wissenschaft, Munich
go back to reference Smith VL (2008) Rationality in economics: constructivist and ecological forms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Smith VL (2008) Rationality in economics: constructivist and ecological forms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Snabe B, Grössler A (2006) System dynamics modelling for strategy implementation – case study and issues. Syst Res Behav Sci 23(4):467–481 Snabe B, Grössler A (2006) System dynamics modelling for strategy implementation – case study and issues. Syst Res Behav Sci 23(4):467–481
go back to reference Sterman JD (1984) Appropriate summary statistics for evaluating the historical fit of system dynamics models. Dynamica 10(2):51–66 Sterman JD (1984) Appropriate summary statistics for evaluating the historical fit of system dynamics models. Dynamica 10(2):51–66
go back to reference Sterman JD (1989) Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 43(3):301–335 Sterman JD (1989) Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 43(3):301–335
go back to reference Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics. Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics. Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston
go back to reference Struben J, Sterman J, Keith D (2015) Parameter estimation through maximum likelihood and bootstrapping methods. In: Rahmandad H, Oliva R, Osgood ND (eds) Analytical methods for dynamic modelers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 3–38 Struben J, Sterman J, Keith D (2015) Parameter estimation through maximum likelihood and bootstrapping methods. In: Rahmandad H, Oliva R, Osgood ND (eds) Analytical methods for dynamic modelers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 3–38
go back to reference Taleb NN (2007) The black swan. The impact of the highly improbable. Random House, New York Taleb NN (2007) The black swan. The impact of the highly improbable. Random House, New York
go back to reference Vennix JAM (1996) Group model building: facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Wiley, Chichester Vennix JAM (1996) Group model building: facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Wiley, Chichester
go back to reference von Foerster H (1984) Observing systems, 2nd edn. Intersystems Publications, Seaside von Foerster H (1984) Observing systems, 2nd edn. Intersystems Publications, Seaside
go back to reference von Glasersfeld E (1991) Abschied von der Objektivität. In: Watzlawick P, Krieg P (eds) Das Auge des Betrachters. Piper, Munich, pp 17–30 von Glasersfeld E (1991) Abschied von der Objektivität. In: Watzlawick P, Krieg P (eds) Das Auge des Betrachters. Piper, Munich, pp 17–30
go back to reference Finlay PN (1997) Validity of decision support systems: towards a validation methodology. Syst Res Behav Sci 14(3):169–182 Finlay PN (1997) Validity of decision support systems: towards a validation methodology. Syst Res Behav Sci 14(3):169–182
go back to reference Forrester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA Forrester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
go back to reference Law AM (2007) Simulation modeling and analysis, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York Law AM (2007) Simulation modeling and analysis, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
go back to reference Legasto AA, Forrester JW, Lyneis JM (eds) (1980) System dynamics. North-Holland, Amsterdam Legasto AA, Forrester JW, Lyneis JM (eds) (1980) System dynamics. North-Holland, Amsterdam
go back to reference Morecroft J (2007) Strategic modelling and business dynamics: a feedback systems approach. Wiley, Chichester Morecroft J (2007) Strategic modelling and business dynamics: a feedback systems approach. Wiley, Chichester
go back to reference Sargent RG (2004) Validation and verification of simulation models. In: Ingalls RG, Rossetti MD, Smith JS, Peters BA (eds) Proceedings of the 2004 winter simulation conference. ACM-Association for Computing Machinery, Washington, DC, pp 17–28 Sargent RG (2004) Validation and verification of simulation models. In: Ingalls RG, Rossetti MD, Smith JS, Peters BA (eds) Proceedings of the 2004 winter simulation conference. ACM-Association for Computing Machinery, Washington, DC, pp 17–28
go back to reference Schwaninger M (2011) System dynamics in the evolution of the systems approach. In: Meyers RA (ed) Complex systems in finance and econometrics, vol 2. Springer, New York, pp 753–766 Schwaninger M (2011) System dynamics in the evolution of the systems approach. In: Meyers RA (ed) Complex systems in finance and econometrics, vol 2. Springer, New York, pp 753–766
go back to reference Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics. Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwing/Mc Graw-Hill, Boston Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics. Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwing/Mc Graw-Hill, Boston
go back to reference Warren K (2008) Strategic management dynamics. Wiley, Chichester Warren K (2008) Strategic management dynamics. Wiley, Chichester
Metadata
Title
System Dynamics Modeling: Validation for Quality Assurance
Authors
Markus Schwaninger
Stefan Groesser
Copyright Year
2020
Publisher
Springer US
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8790-0_540