Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Introduction: Of Numbers and Narratives—Indicators in Global Governance and the Rise of a Reflexive Indicator Culture Read chapter Read first chapter

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

5. The Creative Disorder of Measuring Governance and Stateness

Author : Debora Valentina Malito

Published in: The Palgrave Handbook of Indicators in Global Governance

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Measures of governance and stateness have grown substantially in number over the recent decade and gained greater importance in building public discourses and orienting decision-making. Yet there seems to be little agreement on what exactly these measures represent. This paper claims that the proliferation of metrics can only be understood against the conceptual hybridity and indeterminacy in which the notions of governance and stateness have in recent decades become increasingly entangled. In sum, the nébuleuse of governance metrics reflects the nébuleuse of governing actors and structures informing this process. To frame this “creative disorder”, the first part of the chapter introduces the current debate on measuring governance and stateness. It then explores the semantic fields of the two concepts, while the third one provides an overview on existing measures and methodological questions. The fourth part explores normative demands and policy prescriptions linked to this production. The fifth section analyses in depth three different measures: The Rule of Law Index (RoLI), the Sustainable Governance Indicators (SGIs), and the State Fragility Index (SFI). The sixth part concludes by summarising the relevance of exploring both conceptual and normative challenges in production of these measures.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Measuring Governance As If Institutions Matter: A Proposal
next chapter Sustainability, Sustainability Assessment, and the Place of Fiscal Sustainability
Footnotes
1
First published as EUI Working Paper, Malito, Debora Valentina. The Difficulty of Measuring Governance and Stateness. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Working Paper, no. 38 (2015). http://​cadmus.​eui.​eu/​handle/​1814/​36356. The working paper was originally prepared for the Workshop Global Governance by Indicators: Measuring Governance and Stateness held at the European University Institute (13-14 November 2014). In this final form, the chapter benefited from many insights and discussions. I thank the workshop participants, Nehal Bhuta and Gaby Umbach for their helpful comments.
 
2
This is the case of the World Bank, which conceptually emphasises the administrative and structural infrastructure of governance, but in practice, use performance indicators, to operationalise the Worldwide Governance Indicators.
 
3
The CPIA is based on 16 variables grouped in four clusters: (a) economic management; (b) structural policies; (c) policies for social inclusion and equity; and (d) public sector management and institutions.
 
4
Voice and Accountability, Political Stability/Absence of Violence, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory Quality, Rule of Law, Control of Corruption.
 
5
Since 2007, the WB has yet also introduced new “Actionable Governance Indicators”, based on mono-dimensional measures that, focusing on specific aspects each, are better designed to assist policymaking.
 
6
For instance, the Democracy Index, provided by Economist Intelligence Unit presents 60 indicators grouped into five pillars: electoral process and pluralism, civil liberties, functioning of government, political participation, and political culture. The Sustainable Governance Indicators compiled by Bertelsmann, aggregate three indices (Policy Performance, Governance, and Democracy).
 
7
The expression “with adjectives” is used here to recall the methodological concern advanced by Collier and Levitsky (1997), to differentiate between democracy and its sub-dimensions.
 
8
The Weberian monopoly on the legitimate use of force is the fundamental characteristic of the state. However, the term stateness has been used by political theorists like Evans (1997) and Nettl (1968) to indicate the institutional centrality of the state. As a result, the monopoly on the use of force is essential to define the state. But to define the institutionalisation of this monopoly, we have to consider other two categories—the organisational capacity and the institutional coherence.
 
9
For a wider discussion of the methodological issues raised by corruption indicators cfr. Malito 2014.
 
10
The Country performance rating is equal to (0.8 *CPIA + 0.2* PORT) * (GOV/3.5).
 
11
The four principles are: “(1) individuals and private entities are accountable under the law; (2) the laws are clear, publicized, stable, and just; are applied evenly; and protect fundamental rights, including the security of persons and property; (3) the process by which the laws are enacted, administered, and enforced is accessible, fair; (4) Justice is delivered timely by competent, ethical, and independent representatives and neutrals” (World Justice Project 2014, p. 4).
 
12
The constraints on government powers; absence of corruption; open government; fundamental rights; order and security; regulatory enforcement; civil justice; criminal justice; and informal justice (World Justice Project 2014, p. 4).
 
13
The Democracy Index is composed by 15 indicators grouped into four pillars (electoral process, access to information, civil rights and political liberties, Rule of Law). The Policy Performance Index is calculated on 16 variables grouped into three basic sectors (economic, social, and environmental policy). The Governance Index is composed by 12 indicators, grouped into two pillars (Executive Capacity and Accountability).
 
14
Major Episodes of Political Violence dataset, the Political Terror Scales, Polity IV Project, Leadership Duration; Elite Leadership Coups datasets, World Development Indicators, Human Development Report; Structure of Trade; US Energy Information Administration, US Census Bureau and US Political Instability Task Force, UNDP Human Development Report, Religious Fractionalization dataset (Marshall and Cole 2008).
 
Literature
Andrews, M. (2008). The Good Governance Agenda: Beyond Indicators Without Theory. Oxford Development Studies, 36(4), 379–407.CrossRef
Andrews, M. (2010). Good Government Means Different Things in Different Countries. Governance, 23(1), 7–35.CrossRef
Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Batley, R., & Mcloughlin, C. (2010). Engagement with Non-State Service Providers in Fragile States: Reconciling State-Building and Service Delivery. Development Policy Review, 28(2), 131–154.CrossRef
Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2008). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable? London: Earthscan.
Bhuta, N. (2012). Governmentalizing Sovereignty: Indexes of State Fragility and the Calculability of Political Order. In K. Davis, A. Fisher, B. Kingsbury, & S. E. Merry (Eds.), Governance by Indicators: Global Power Through Quantification and Rankings (pp. 132–164). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Börzel, T. A. (2005). European Governance–Markt, Hierarchie oder Netzwerk. In G. F. Schuppert, I. Pernice, & U. Haltern (Eds.), Europawissenschaft (pp. 613–641). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2003). Evaluating the Quality of Public Governance: Indicators, Models and Methodologies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(3), 313–328.CrossRef
Caplan, R. (2007). From Collapsing States to Neo-Trusteeship: The Limits to Solving the Problem of “Precarious Statehood” in the 21st century. Third World Quarterly, 28(2), 231–244.CrossRef
Carment, D., Samy, Y., & Prest, S. (2008). State Fragility and Implications for Aid Allocation: An Empirical Analysis. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(4), 349–373.CrossRef
Carment, D., Prest, S., & Samy, Y. (2009). Security, Development and the Fragile State: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Policy. London/New York: Routledge.
Chesterman, S., Ignatieff, M., & Thakur, R. C. (2005). Making States Work: State Failure and the Crisis of Governance. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Cox, R. W. (1980). The Crisis of World Order and the Problem of International Organization in the 1980s. International Journal, 35(2), 370–395.CrossRef
Cox, R. W. (1997). Democracy in Hard Times: Economic Globalization and the Limits to Liberal Democracy. In A. G. McGrew (Ed.), The Transformation of Democracy: Globalization and Territorial Democracy (Vol. 1, pp. 49–71). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Curtin, D., & Wessel, R. A., (Eds.). (2005). Good Governance and the European Union: Reflections on Concepts, Institutions and Substance (Ius Commune Europaeum Vol. 49). Antwerp: Intersentia.
Cutler, C. (2013). Legal Pluralism as the ‘Common Sense’ of Transnational Capitalism. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 3(4), 719–740.
Evans, P. (1997). The Eclipse of the State? Reflections on Stateness in an Era of Globalization. World Politics, 50(01), 62–87.CrossRef
Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (2004). Neotrusteeship and the Problem of Weak States. International Security, 28(4), 5–43.CrossRef
Fine, B. (2009). Development as Zombieconomics in the Age of Neoliberalism. Third World Quarterly, 30(5), 885–904.CrossRef
Finkelstein, L. S. (1995). What is Global Governance? Global Governance, 1(3), 367–372.
Galtung, F. (1998). Criteria for Sustainable Corruption Control. The European Journal of Development Research, 10(1), 105–128.CrossRef
Galtung, F. (2006). Measuring the Immeasurable: Boundaries and Functions of (Macro) Corruption Indices. In C. J. G. Sampford, A. Shacklock, C. Connors, & F. Galtung (Eds.), Measuring Corruption (pp. 119–156). Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Gehring, T. (1994). Dynamic International Regimes. Institutions for International Environmental Governance. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Halperin, M. H., & Lomasney, K. (1993). Toward a Global“ Guarantee Clause”. Journal of Democracy, 4(3), 60–69.CrossRef
Jachtenfuchs, M., & Kohler-Koch, B. (2004). Governance and Institutional Development. In A. Wiener & T. Diez (Eds.), European Integration Theory (pp. 97–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jessop, B. (1997). Capitalism and its Future: Remarks on Regulation, Government and Governance. Review of International Political Economy, 4(3), 561–581.CrossRef
Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K., & Zito, A. (2005). The Rise of “New” Policy Instruments in Comparative Perspective: Has Governance Eclipsed Government? Political Studies, 53(3), 477–496.CrossRef
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246.CrossRef
Knack, S., Kugler, M., & Manning, N. (2003). Second-Generation Governance Indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(3), 345–364.CrossRef
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. London: SAGE Publication.
Lambsdorff, J. G. (2007). The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Levi-Faur, D. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Lynn, L. E. J. (2013). The Many Faces of Governance: Adaptation? Transformation? Both? Neither? In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance (pp. 49–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Malito, D. V. (2011). Somalia and State-Building: State Capacity or State Autonomy? A Critical Review of How to Decolonize African Studies. Somaliland Journal of Peace and Development, 1(1), 56–74.
Menkhaus, K. J. (2010). State Fragility as a Wicked Problem. Prism, 1(2), 85–100.
Milliken, J., & Krause, K. (2002). State Failure, State Collapse, and State Reconstruction: Concepts, Lessons and Strategies. Development and Change, 33(5), 753–774.CrossRef
Murphy, C. N. (2000). Global Governance: Poorly Done and Poorly Understood. International Affairs, 76(4), 789–803.CrossRef
Nettl, J. P. (1968). The State as a Conceptual Variable. World Politics, 20(04), 559–592.CrossRef
Richards, D., & Smith, M. J. (2002). Governance and Public Policy in the United Kingdom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ringer, T. (2014). Development, Reform, and the Rule of Law: Some Prescriptions for a Common Understanding of the “Rule of Law” and its Place in Development Theory and Practice. Yale Human Rights and Development Journal, 10(1), 5.
Rosamond, B. (2000). Theories of European Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rosenau, J. N. (1995). Governance in the Twenty-First Century. Global Governance, 1(1), 179–209.
Rotberg, R. I. (2003). State Failure and State Weakness in a Time of Terror. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Sanín, F. G. (2011). Evaluating State Performance: A Critical View of State Failure and Fragility Indexes. European Journal of Development Research, 23(1), 20–42.CrossRef
Schmitter, P. C., & Karl, T. L. (1991). What Democracy Is... and Is Not. Journal of Democracy, 2(3), 75–88.CrossRef
Soederberg, S. (2004). The Politics of the New International Financial Architecture: Reimposing Neoliberal Domination in the Global South. London: Zed Books.
The Hertie School of Governance. (2014). The Governance Report 2014. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The World Bank. (2007b). World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
The World Justice Project. (2012a, May 9). Engagement. Retrieved July 17, 2014, from file://localhost/Users/bonis/Library/Application%20Support/Zotero/Profiles/p3g9sax9.default/zotero/storage/W3JXWSVC/programs-events.html
Thomas, M. A. (2010). What Do the Worldwide Governance Indicators Measure. European Journal of Development Research, 22(1), 31–54.CrossRef
Umbach, G. (2007). Intent and Reality of a New Mode of Governance: “Get together” or “Mind the Gap”? The Impact of the European Employment Strategy on the Europeanisation of National Employment Policy Co-ordination and Policies in the United Kingdom and Germany. PhD Thesis, University of Cologne.
Umbach, G. (2009). Intent and Reality of the European Employment Strategy: Europeanisation of National Employment Policies and Policy Making? Baden Baden: Nomos.
US Agency of International Development (USAID). (2005). Fragile States strategy. Washington, DC: USAID.
Weber, M. (1991). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (New ed.). London: Routledge.
Weiss, T. G. (2000). Governance, Good Governance and Global Governance: Conceptual and Actual Challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21(5), 795–814.CrossRef
Weiss, T. G., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). International Organization and Global Governance. New York: Routledge.
Wilkes, J. (2004). Corporate Governance and Measuring Performance. Measuring Business Excellence, 8(4), 13–16.CrossRef
Zanotti, L. (2005). Governmentalizing the Post–Cold War International Regime: The UN Debate on Democratization and Good Governance. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 30(4), 461–487.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Creative Disorder of Measuring Governance and Stateness
Author
Debora Valentina Malito
Copyright Year
2018
Book
The Palgrave Handbook of Indicators in Global Governance

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62706-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-62707-6

Copyright Year: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62707-6_5