Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 2/2013

01-06-2013

The dynamic adjustment of environment, strategy, structure, and resources on firm performance

Author: Fang Yi Lo

Published in: International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal | Issue 2/2013

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Under the uncertainty of external environment, how do the firms exploit resources, adjust organizational structures, and adopted proper strategies to gain the better performance is an important issue. Many theories have been proposed to explain this phenomenon. Structure-conduct-performance model suggest that industry structure influences the firm behavior and determines the performance of individual firms and of the industry as a whole. Strategy-structure-performance model suggest that strategy must dictate organizational structure, which in turn influences performance. The environmental perspective considers external environments. Resource-Based View suggests that management must focus on the values of resources to generate sustained competitive advantages and to improve performance. Dynamic adjustment among environment, strategy, structure, and resources can become primary causes of the firm performance. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the gaps between different theories and to complement the existing theories. This paper confirmed the measurement of the constructs first and competing models were used to examine dynamic adjustment among constructs and the relationships to firm performance. The results demonstrated that most of the relationships among constructs were supported and support the dynamic adjustment of the constructs. When facing uncertain environments, firms tend to use competition strategies as well as cooperation strategies; firms tend to formalize organizational structures and to amass resources. Firms which conduct cooperation strategies and possess more resources will attain better performance levels than those that do not. As to the theoretical models, the structure-conduct-performance model and the environmental perspective were supported. Practitioners should recognize the importance of the industrial and environmental factors.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Andrews, K.R. (1971). The Concept of Corporate Strategy.IL: Dow Jones Irwin, Homewood. Andrews, K.R. (1971). The Concept of Corporate Strategy.IL: Dow Jones Irwin, Homewood.
go back to reference Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall. Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.
go back to reference Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantages. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRef Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantages. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRef
go back to reference Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-Opetition: a revolution mindset that combines competition and cooperation: the game theory strategy that’s changing the game of business. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-Opetition: a revolution mindset that combines competition and cooperation: the game theory strategy that’s changing the game of business. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
go back to reference Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of American enterprise. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press. Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of American enterprise. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
go back to reference Chen, M. J. (1996). Competitor Analysis and Inter-firm Rivalry: Toward a Theoretical Integration. Academy of Management Review, 21, 100–134. Chen, M. J. (1996). Competitor Analysis and Inter-firm Rivalry: Toward a Theoretical Integration. Academy of Management Review, 21, 100–134.
go back to reference Gillies, R. R., Shortell, S. M., & Young, G. J. (1997). Best practices in managing organized delivery systems. Hospital & Health Services Administration, 42(3), 299–321. Gillies, R. R., Shortell, S. M., & Young, G. J. (1997). Best practices in managing organized delivery systems. Hospital & Health Services Administration, 42(3), 299–321.
go back to reference Govindarajam, V., Gupta, A.K. (1985). Linking control system to business unit strategy: impact on performance. Accounting Organizations and Society, 51–66. Govindarajam, V., Gupta, A.K. (1985). Linking control system to business unit strategy: impact on performance. Accounting Organizations and Society, 51–66.
go back to reference Grant, R. M. (1991). The resources-based theory of competitive advantage: Implication for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.CrossRef Grant, R. M. (1991). The resources-based theory of competitive advantage: Implication for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.CrossRef
go back to reference Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Publishing. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Publishing.
go back to reference Miles, R., & Snow, C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill. Miles, R., & Snow, C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Miller, K. D. (1993). Industry and country effects on managers’ perceptions of environmental uncertainties. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 693–714.CrossRef Miller, K. D. (1993). Industry and country effects on managers’ perceptions of environmental uncertainties. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 693–714.CrossRef
go back to reference Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations. NJ: Prentice-Hill, Englewood Cliffs. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations. NJ: Prentice-Hill, Englewood Cliffs.
go back to reference Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
go back to reference Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
go back to reference Pfeffer, J., & Salanick, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organization. New York: Harper and Row. Pfeffer, J., & Salanick, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organization. New York: Harper and Row.
go back to reference Porter, M. E. (1980). Industry structure and competitive strategy: keys to profitability. Financial Analysts Journal, 36(4), 30–41.CrossRef Porter, M. E. (1980). Industry structure and competitive strategy: keys to profitability. Financial Analysts Journal, 36(4), 30–41.CrossRef
go back to reference Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York: Harper and Row. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York: Harper and Row.
go back to reference Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRef Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRef
go back to reference Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 272–280.CrossRef Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 272–280.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The dynamic adjustment of environment, strategy, structure, and resources on firm performance
Author
Fang Yi Lo
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1554-7191
Electronic ISSN: 1555-1938
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-012-0222-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 2/2013 Go to the issue

Premium Partner