Top

Quality of Life Research

Published in:

11-02-2019 | Review

The effect of nature exposure on the mental health of patients: a systematic review

Authors: C. H. Trøstrup, A. B. Christiansen, K. S. Stølen, P. K. Nielsen, R. Stelter

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 7/2019

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Background

The effect of nature-based interventions on self-reported mental well-being in patients with physical disease is gaining increasing attention. However, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials investigating this area. Due to the massive costs in health care systems, there is a need for new strategies to address these issues and an urgent need for attention to this field. Nature-based interventions are low cost, easy to implement, and should get attention within the health care field. Therefore, the objective was to find the impact of nature interventions on mental well-being in humans with a physical disease.

Methods

In four major databases (PubMed, Cinahl, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library), a systematic review of quantitative studies of nature’s impact on self-reported mental health in patients with physical disease was performed. A total of 1909 articles were retrieved but only five met the inclusion criteria and were summarized.

Results

All five studies were quantitative, with a control group and a nature-based intervention. A source of heterogeneity was identified: the patients in one of the five studies were psychosomatic. In the four studies with somatic patients, significant benefit of nature on self-reported mental health outcomes was found; the only study that failed to show a significant benefit was the one with psychosomatic patients.

Conclusion

A significant effect of nature on mental well-being of patients with somatic disease was found. The result in patients with psychosomatic disease is inconclusive, and more studies in this category are needed. Further research on the effect of nature on mental health is merited, with special attention to standardizing intervention type and dose as well as outcome measures within each medical discipline.

next article Patterns, trends and methodological associations in the measurement and valuation of childhood health utilities

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Kaplan, R. (1984). Wilderness perception and psychological benefits: An analysis of a continuing program. Leisure Sciences, 6(3), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408409513036.CrossRef

Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 169–182.CrossRef

Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., & Daily, G. C. (2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health: Nature experience, cognitive function, and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1249(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x.CrossRefPubMed

Maller, C. (2005). Healthy nature healthy people: “contact with nature” as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promotion International, 21(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dai032.CrossRefPubMed

Douglas, O., Lennon, M., & Scott, M. (2017). Green space benefits for health and well-being: A life-course approach for urban planning, design and management. Cities, 66, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.011.CrossRef

Nilsson, K. (Ed.). (2011). Forests, trees, and human health. New York: Springer.

Annerstedt, M., & Währborg, P. (2011). Nature-assisted therapy: Systematic review of controlled and observational studies. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39(4), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810396400.CrossRefPubMed

Bragg, R., & Atkins, G. (2016). A review of nature-based interventions for mental health care. London: Natural England.

Clatworthy, J., Hinds, J., & Camic, M., P (2013). Gardening as a mental health intervention: A review. Mental Health Review Journal, 18(4), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-02-2013-0007.CrossRef

10.

World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, & University of Melbourne. (2004). Promoting mental health: concepts, emerging evidence, practice: summary report. Geneva: World Health Organization.

11.

Collins, P. Y., Patel, V., Joestl, S. S., March, D., Insel, T. R., Daar, A. S., … Walport, M. (2011). Grand challenges in global mental health. Nature, 475(7354), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/475027a.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Ulrich, R. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420–421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6143402.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Buckley, R. C., & Brough, P. (2017). Nature, eco, and adventure therapies for mental health and chronic disease. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00220.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (n.d.). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement.

15.

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Zakowski, L., Seibert, C., & VanEyck, S. (2004). Evidence-based medicine: Answering questions of diagnosis. Clinical Medicine & Research, 2(1), 63–69.CrossRef

17.

Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

The Joanna Briggs Institute. (2017). Checklist for quasi-experimental studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute. Retrieved from http://joannabriggs.org/assets/docs/critical-appraisal-tools/JBI_Quasi-Experimental_Appraisal_Tool2017.pdf.

19.

Cimprich, B., & Ronis, D. L. (2003). An environmental intervention to restore attention in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Cancer Nursing, 26(4), 284–292 (Quiz 293–294).CrossRefPubMed

20.

Watzek, D., Mischler, E., Sonam, D., Gubler-Blum, B., Abbatiello, C., Radlinger, L., & Verra, M. L. (2016). Effectiveness and economic evaluation of therapeutic nordic walking in patients with psychosomatic disorders: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Journal of Psychology Research. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5542/2016.11.005.CrossRef

21.

Hitzig, S. L., Alton, C., Leong, N., & Gatt, K. (2012). The Evolution and evaluation of a therapeutic recreation cottage program for persons with spinal cord injury. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 46(3), 218–233.

22.

Raanaas, R. K., Patil, G. G., & Hartig, T. (2012). Health benefits of a view of nature through the window: A quasi-experimental study of patients in a residential rehabilitation center. Clinical Rehabilitation, 26(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215511412800.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Rosenberg, R. S., Lange, W., Zebrack, B., Moulton, S., & Kosslyn, S. (2014). An outdoor adventure program for young adults with cancer: Positive effects on body image and psychosocial functioning. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 32(5), 622–636.CrossRefPubMed

24.

WHO. (2002). Mental health: new understanding, new hope (repr.). Geneva: World Health Organization.

25.

Ahmadi, F., & Ahmadi, N. (2015). Nature as the most important coping strategy among cancer patients: A Swedish survey. Journal of Religion and Health, 54(4), 1177–1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-013-9810-2.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Blaschke, S., O’Callaghan, C. C., Schofield, P., & Salander, P. (2017). Cancer patients’ experiences with nature: Normalizing dichotomous realities. Social Science & Medicine, 172, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.024.CrossRef

27.

Shanahan, D. F., Bush, R., Gaston, K. J., Lin, B. B., Dean, J., Barber, E., & Fuller, R. A. (2016). Health benefits from nature experiences depend on dose. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28551.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2010). What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(10), 3947–3955. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903183r.CrossRef

29.

Holm, L. V., Hansen, D. G., Johansen, C., Vedsted, P., Larsen, P. V., Kragstrup, J., & Søndergaard, J. (2012). Participation in cancer rehabilitation and unmet needs: a population-based cohort study. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(11), 2913–2924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1420-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Thompson Coon, J., Boddy, K., Stein, K., Whear, R., Barton, J., & Depledge, M. H. (2011). Does participating in physical activity in outdoor natural environments have a greater effect on physical and mental wellbeing than physical activity indoors? A systematic review. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(5), 1761–1772. https://doi.org/10.1021/es102947t.CrossRef

31.

Harrison, J. D., Young, J. M., Price, M. A., Butow, P. N., & Solomon, M. J. (2009). What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review. Supportive Care in Cancer, 17(8), 1117–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0615-5.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Mikkelsen, S., Jensen, J., A. B., & Olesen, F. (2008). Cancer rehabilitation: Psychosocial rehabilitation needs after discharge from hospital? A qualitative interview study. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 26(4), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430802295610.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: The effect of nature exposure on the mental health of patients: a systematic review
Authors: C. H. Trøstrup
A. B. Christiansen
K. S. Stølen
P. K. Nielsen
R. Stelter
Publication date: 11-02-2019
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: Quality of Life Research / Issue 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02125-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 7/2019

Multidisciplinary obesity treatment program improved health-related quality of life and positively correlated with anthropometric and body composition but not with cardiorespiratory fitness parameters in adolescents

Associations between health-related quality of life and physical fitness in 4–7-year-old Spanish children: the MOVIKIDS study

Comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SPVU-5D for measuring quality of life in patients with venous leg ulcers in an Australian setting

Health-related quality of life in Switzerland: normative data for the SF-36v2 questionnaire

The humanistic burden of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Europe: a real-world survey linking patient clinical factors to patient and caregiver burden

Do 8- to 18-year-old children/adolescents with chronic physical health conditions have worse health-related quality of life than their healthy peers? a meta-analysis of studies using the KIDSCREEN questionnaires