Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

“The EU Should…!”; “India Needs…!”: Parapublic Underpinnings to Realise Global IR in Policy Analysis of EU–India Relations

Author : Timo Lowinger

Published in: EU-India Relations

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The EU–India relationship is a playground for policy analysts—numerous policy recommendations are addressed to both India and the EU. Policy analysis influences the European and Indian political practitioners and also the public with their constructions of possible future relations. Because the scientists’ impact carries such weight, it is necessary to engage with the fundamental research principles that underlie the production of policy analysis. The assumption of this contribution is that an examination of supposedly abstract theoretical debates using the disciplines of International Relations (IR) and policy research helps to critically reflect on the role of policy analysts. On the basis of the critical hints identified in the theoretical discussions, a possible way forward will be proposed to advance research on the relationship between the two largest democracies in the world. By adapting the so-called Global IR paradigm, a practical proposal will be developed to put the scientific cooperation of the EU–India relations in general and the cooperation in policy-oriented research in particular on a broader basis: The idea of parapublic underpinnings (Krotz 2007) can help to substantially improve relations between India and the EU to establish the basis for research on an equal footing.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
This question was raised in panels at ISA 2012 and BISA 2012. A special issue in the European Journal of International Relations on this topic summarises the different positions taken in this debate, see Dunne et al. (2013).
 
2
Exceptions among others are Malhotra (2015) exploring the EU–India with a soft power approach.
 
3
A very well-used and profound exception inspired by poststructuralism is Moraes y Blanco (2015).
 
4
There is a sequence of debates commonly used within IR: The so-called First Debate of IR emerged in the 1930s and 1940s and was described as the controversy between realists and idealists. The Second Debate was the academic discussion between traditionalists and behaviouralists in the 1950s and 1960s. However, there is also criticism of this sequence of debates (cf. Navon 2001).
 
5
Based on Global Go To Think Tank Index Report of the year 2019, see McGann (2020: 59).
 
6
Regarding the perception of the EU, see the contribution by Kugiel in this volume.
 
Literature
go back to reference Aliberti, Marco. 2018. India in space: Between utility and geopolitics. Cham: Springer.CrossRef Aliberti, Marco. 2018. India in space: Between utility and geopolitics. Cham: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Basile, Elisabetta, and Philippe Régnier. 2012. Review of the S&T cooperation agreement between the European Union and the government of the Republic of India 2007–2011. A report by independent experts: Elisabetta Basile and Philippe Régnier. EUR 25505 EN. Brussels. Basile, Elisabetta, and Philippe Régnier. 2012. Review of the S&T cooperation agreement between the European Union and the government of the Republic of India 2007–2011. A report by independent experts: Elisabetta Basile and Philippe Régnier. EUR 25505 EN. Brussels.
go back to reference Biersteker, Thomas J. 1989. Critical reflections on post-positivism in international relations. International Studies Quarterly 33 (3): 263–267.CrossRef Biersteker, Thomas J. 1989. Critical reflections on post-positivism in international relations. International Studies Quarterly 33 (3): 263–267.CrossRef
go back to reference Büger, Christian, and Frank Gadinger. 2007. Reassembling and dissecting: International relations practice from a science studies perspective. International Studies Perspectives 8 (1): 90–110.CrossRef Büger, Christian, and Frank Gadinger. 2007. Reassembling and dissecting: International relations practice from a science studies perspective. International Studies Perspectives 8 (1): 90–110.CrossRef
go back to reference Buzan, Barry, and George Lawson. 2016. Theory, history, and the global transformation. International Theory 8 (3): 502–522.CrossRef Buzan, Barry, and George Lawson. 2016. Theory, history, and the global transformation. International Theory 8 (3): 502–522.CrossRef
go back to reference Chacko, Priya. 2012. Indian foreign policy: The politics of postcolonial identity from, 1947 to 2004. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Chacko, Priya. 2012. Indian foreign policy: The politics of postcolonial identity from, 1947 to 2004. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
go back to reference Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference, New Edition. Princeton Studies in Culture/Power/History. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference, New Edition. Princeton Studies in Culture/Power/History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Fierke, Karin M. 2002. Links across the Abyss: Language and logic in international relations. International Studies Quarterly 46 (3): 331–354.CrossRef Fierke, Karin M. 2002. Links across the Abyss: Language and logic in international relations. International Studies Quarterly 46 (3): 331–354.CrossRef
go back to reference Fischer, Frank, and John Forester. 1993a. Editors’ introduction. In The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning, ed. Frank Fischer and John Forester, 1–20. London: UCL. Fischer, Frank, and John Forester. 1993a. Editors’ introduction. In The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning, ed. Frank Fischer and John Forester, 1–20. London: UCL.
go back to reference Fischer, Frank, and John Forester (eds.). 1993b. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. London: UCL. Fischer, Frank, and John Forester (eds.). 1993b. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. London: UCL.
go back to reference Fischer, Frank, and Herbert Gottweis. 2012. The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice. Durham: Duke University Press. Fischer, Frank, and Herbert Gottweis. 2012. The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
go back to reference Fluck, Matthew. 2017. The concept of truth in international relations theory. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Fluck, Matthew. 2017. The concept of truth in international relations theory. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Frost, Mervyn. 1986. Towards a normative theory of international relations: A critical analysis of the philosophical and methodological assumptions in the discipline with proposals towards a substantive normative theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Frost, Mervyn. 1986. Towards a normative theory of international relations: A critical analysis of the philosophical and methodological assumptions in the discipline with proposals towards a substantive normative theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Godement, François. 2015. Introduction: Europe and India. In What does India think?, ed. François Godement, 11–22. London. Godement, François. 2015. Introduction: Europe and India. In What does India think?, ed. François Godement, 11–22. London.
go back to reference Green, Jessica F., and Thomas Hale. 2020. The study and practice of global environmental politics: Policy influence through participation. In Bridging the theory-practice divide in international relations, ed. Daniel Maliniak, Susan Peterson, Ryan Powers, and Michael J. Tierney, 55–74. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.CrossRef Green, Jessica F., and Thomas Hale. 2020. The study and practice of global environmental politics: Policy influence through participation. In Bridging the theory-practice divide in international relations, ed. Daniel Maliniak, Susan Peterson, Ryan Powers, and Michael J. Tierney, 55–74. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Grovogui, Siba N. 2006. Beyond Eurocentrism and anarchy: Memories of international order and institutions. Culture and Religion in International Relations. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Grovogui, Siba N. 2006. Beyond Eurocentrism and anarchy: Memories of international order and institutions. Culture and Religion in International Relations. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Gruffydd Jones, Branwen (ed.). 2010. Decolonizing International Relations. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Gruffydd Jones, Branwen (ed.). 2010. Decolonizing International Relations. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
go back to reference Hofius, Maren, Jan Wilkens, Hannes Hansen-Magnusson, and Sassan Gholiagha. 2014. Den Schleier lichten? Kritische Normenforschung, Freiheit und Gleichberechtigung im Kontext des » Arabischen Frühlings « : Eine Replik auf Engelkamp/Glaab/Renner, Ulbert und Deitelhoff/ Zimmermann. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 21 (2): 85–105. https://doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2014-2-85.CrossRef Hofius, Maren, Jan Wilkens, Hannes Hansen-Magnusson, and Sassan Gholiagha. 2014. Den Schleier lichten? Kritische Normenforschung, Freiheit und Gleichberechtigung im Kontext des » Arabischen Frühlings « : Eine Replik auf Engelkamp/Glaab/Renner, Ulbert und Deitelhoff/ Zimmermann. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 21 (2): 85–105. https://​doi.​org/​10.​5771/​0946-7165-2014-2-85.CrossRef
go back to reference Jabri, Vivienne. 2017. Colonial rationalities, postcolonial subjectivities, and the international. In Against international relations norms: Postcolonial perspectives, vol. 13, ed. Charlotte Epstein, 38–57. Worlding beyond the West. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Jabri, Vivienne. 2017. Colonial rationalities, postcolonial subjectivities, and the international. In Against international relations norms: Postcolonial perspectives, vol. 13, ed. Charlotte Epstein, 38–57. Worlding beyond the West. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
go back to reference Jain, Rajendra K. 2015. India’s relations with the European Union. In Handbook of India’s international relations, ed. David Scott, 223–232. London: Routledge. Jain, Rajendra K. 2015. India’s relations with the European Union. In Handbook of India’s international relations, ed. David Scott, 223–232. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Jones, Lee. 2009. International relations scholarship and the Tyranny of policy relevance. Journal of Critical Globalisation Studies 1: 125–131. Jones, Lee. 2009. International relations scholarship and the Tyranny of policy relevance. Journal of Critical Globalisation Studies 1: 125–131.
go back to reference Krotz, Ulrich. 2011. Flying Tiger: International relations theory and the politics of advanced weapons. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Krotz, Ulrich. 2011. Flying Tiger: International relations theory and the politics of advanced weapons. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Lapid, Yosef. 1989. The third debate: On the prospects of international theory in a post-positivist era. International Studies Quarterly 33 (3): 235–254.CrossRef Lapid, Yosef. 1989. The third debate: On the prospects of international theory in a post-positivist era. International Studies Quarterly 33 (3): 235–254.CrossRef
go back to reference Lätt, Jeanne, Thomas Fues, and Siddharth Mallavarapu. 2010. We will have to learn to be better listeners. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (APUZ)(34–35): 7–14. Lätt, Jeanne, Thomas Fues, and Siddharth Mallavarapu. 2010. We will have to learn to be better listeners. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (APUZ)(34–35): 7–14.
go back to reference Lepgold, Joseph. 1998. Is anyone listening? International relations theory and the problem of policy relevance. Political Science Quarterly 113 (1): 43–62.CrossRef Lepgold, Joseph. 1998. Is anyone listening? International relations theory and the problem of policy relevance. Political Science Quarterly 113 (1): 43–62.CrossRef
go back to reference Malhotra, Shairee. 2015. EU-India relations: A soft power approach. Brussels: EU-Asia at Glance. Malhotra, Shairee. 2015. EU-India relations: A soft power approach. Brussels: EU-Asia at Glance.
go back to reference Maliniak, Daniel, Amy Okes, Susan Peterson, and Michael J. Tierney. 2011. International relations in the US academy. International Studies Quarterly 55 (2): 437–464.CrossRef Maliniak, Daniel, Amy Okes, Susan Peterson, and Michael J. Tierney. 2011. International relations in the US academy. International Studies Quarterly 55 (2): 437–464.CrossRef
go back to reference Maliniak, Daniel, Susan Peterson, Ryan Powers, and Michael J. Tierney. 2020. Explaining the theory-practice divide in international relations: Uncertainty and access. In Bridging the theory-practice divide in international relations, ed. Daniel Maliniak, Susan Peterson, Ryan Powers, and Michael J. Tierney, 1–26. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Maliniak, Daniel, Susan Peterson, Ryan Powers, and Michael J. Tierney. 2020. Explaining the theory-practice divide in international relations: Uncertainty and access. In Bridging the theory-practice divide in international relations, ed. Daniel Maliniak, Susan Peterson, Ryan Powers, and Michael J. Tierney, 1–26. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
go back to reference Moraes y Blanco, Luis Fernando de. 2015. On the uses and functions of ‘strategic partnership’ in international politics: Implications for agency, policy and theory. Bielefeld. Moraes y Blanco, Luis Fernando de. 2015. On the uses and functions of ‘strategic partnership’ in international politics: Implications for agency, policy and theory. Bielefeld.
go back to reference Muenchow-Pohl, Bernd von. 2012. India and Europe in a multipolar world. The Carnegie Papers—South Asia, MA. Muenchow-Pohl, Bernd von. 2012. India and Europe in a multipolar world. The Carnegie Papers—South Asia, MA.
go back to reference Navon, Emmanuel. 2001. The ‘third debate’ revisited. Review of International Relations 27 (4): 611–625. Navon, Emmanuel. 2001. The ‘third debate’ revisited. Review of International Relations 27 (4): 611–625.
go back to reference Nayak, Meghana, and Eric Selbin. 2013. Decentering international relations. London: Zed Books. Nayak, Meghana, and Eric Selbin. 2013. Decentering international relations. London: Zed Books.
go back to reference Olivier, Gerrit, and Lorenzo Fioramonti. 2010. The emerging ‘global south’: The EU in the eyes of India, Brazil and South Africa. In External perceptions of the European Union as a global actor, ed. Sonia Lucarelli and Lorenzo Fioramonti, 105–119. London, New York: Routledge. Olivier, Gerrit, and Lorenzo Fioramonti. 2010. The emerging ‘global south’: The EU in the eyes of India, Brazil and South Africa. In External perceptions of the European Union as a global actor, ed. Sonia Lucarelli and Lorenzo Fioramonti, 105–119. London, New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Saretzki, Thomas. 2014. Aufklärung, Beteiligung und Kritik: Die „argumentative Wende“ in der Policy-Analyse. In Lehrbuch der Politikfeldanalyse, ed. Klaus Schubert and Nils C. Bandelow, 493–522, 3rd edn. Lehr- und Handbücher der Politikwissenschaft. München: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. Saretzki, Thomas. 2014. Aufklärung, Beteiligung und Kritik: Die „argumentative Wende“ in der Policy-Analyse. In Lehrbuch der Politikfeldanalyse, ed. Klaus Schubert and Nils C. Bandelow, 493–522, 3rd edn. Lehr- und Handbücher der Politikwissenschaft. München: De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
go back to reference Seth, Sanjay. 2013. Introduction. In Postcolonial theory and international relations: A critical introduction, ed. Sanjay Seth, 1–12. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis.CrossRef Seth, Sanjay. 2013. Introduction. In Postcolonial theory and international relations: A critical introduction, ed. Sanjay Seth, 1–12. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis.CrossRef
go back to reference Stuenkel, Oliver. 2016. The BRICS: Seeking privileges by constructing and running multilateral institutions. Global Summitry 2 (1): 38–53.CrossRef Stuenkel, Oliver. 2016. The BRICS: Seeking privileges by constructing and running multilateral institutions. Global Summitry 2 (1): 38–53.CrossRef
go back to reference Wiessala, Georg. 2011. Enhancing Asia-Europe co-operation through educational exchange. New York: Routledge.CrossRef Wiessala, Georg. 2011. Enhancing Asia-Europe co-operation through educational exchange. New York: Routledge.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
“The EU Should…!”; “India Needs…!”: Parapublic Underpinnings to Realise Global IR in Policy Analysis of EU–India Relations
Author
Timo Lowinger
Copyright Year
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65044-5_17