Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Introduction: A Question of Balance Read chapter Read first chapter

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. The Great Debate on Wireless Technology

Authors : Susan Perry, Claudia Roda

Published in: Human Rights and Digital Technology

Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

As the progress of mobile phone technology accelerates worldwide, the regulatory framework necessary for its safe and extended use has been slow to develop. The hardware delivery of wireless phone technology poses new challenges to our understanding of human rights. This chapter analyses the relationship between scientific knowledge and regulation concerning the health effects of increasing electromagnetic field emissions from mobile phone towers (base transceiver stations). From a conservationist perspective, no other example of industrial impact on the natural environment has achieved such extended penetration so quickly. This presents an ethical conundrum: stakeholders are faced with the difficult choice between waiting for a comprehensive, long-term assessment of health impacts from electromagnetic exposure and immediate application of the precautionary principle. By exploring examples of interaction between citizens, governments, and international bodies, we first analyse the challenges faced by regulators in the presence of uncertain scientific knowledge and standards of measurement. We then highlight the inadequacy of current parameters. Lastly, we expand the debate on how we may use a human rights framework to protect vulnerable populations from digital pollution. We conclude that, because scientific knowledge on the health effects of wireless technology delivery is incomplete, a precautionary approach is better suited to State obligations under international human rights law.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Introduction: A Question of Balance
next chapter User Privacy in a World of Digital Surveillance
Literature
Abdel-Rassoul G., El-Fateh O., Salem M., Michael A., Farahat F., El-Batanouny M., Salem E. (2007). Neurobehavioral effects among inhabitants around mobile phone base stations. Neurotoxicology, 28(2), 434–440.
Abeille, L. (2015). Exposition aux ondes électromagnétiques: deuxième lecture, Assemblée nationale, XIVe législature, Session ordinaire de 2014–2015, Compte rendu intégral, Première séance du jeudi 29 janvier 2015, p. 5. Retrieved March 13, 2016, from http://​www.​assemblee-nationale.​fr (home page).
Abelin, T., Altpeter, E., & Röösli, M. (2005). Sleep disturbances in the vicinity of the short-wave broadcast transmitter Schwarzenburg. Somnologie, 9(4), 203–209.CrossRef
Agarwal A., Desai N., Makker K., Varghese A., Mouradi R., Sabanegh E., Sharma R. (2009). Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: An in-vitro pilot study. Fertility and Sterility, 92(4), 1318–1325.
Aldad T., Gan G., Gao X., Taylor H. (2012). Fetal radiofrequency radiation exposure from 800–1900 Mhz-rated cellular telephones affects neurodevelopment and behavior in mice. Nature Scientific Reports, 2. Article 312.
Aslan A., Atay T., Gulle K., Kırdemir V., Ozden A., Comlekci S., Aydogan N. (2013). Effect of 900 MHz electromagnetic fields emitted from cellular phones on fracture healing: An experimental study on rats. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 47(4), 273–280.
Axelson, O. (2004). Negative and non-positive epidemiological studies. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 17(1), 115–121.
Aydin, D., et al. (2011). Mobile phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents: A multicenter case-control study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 103(16), 1264–1276.CrossRef
Baan R., Grosse Y., Lauby-Secretan B., El Ghissassi F., Bouvard V., Benbrahim-Tallaa L., et al. on Behalf of the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group. (2011). Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. The Lancet Oncology, 12, 624–626.
Belyaev, I. Y. (2010). Dependence of non-thermal biological effects of microwaves on physical and biological variables: Implications for reproducibility and safety standards. European Journal of Oncology, 5, 187–217.
Bioinitiative Report. (2007). A rationale for a biologically-based public exposure standard for electromagnetic fields (ELF and RF). Retrieved July 12, 2012, from http://​www.​bioinitiative.​org (home page).
Blackman, C. (2009). Cell phone radiation: Evidence from ELF and RF studies supporting more inclusive risk identification and assessment. Pathophysiology, 16, 205–216.CrossRef
Blair A., Stewart P., Lubin J., Forastiere F. (2007). Methodological issues regarding confounding and exposure misclassification in epidemiological studies of occupational exposures. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 50, 199–207.
Blank, M., & Goodman, R. (2009). Electromagnetic fields stress living cells. Pathophysiology, 16, 71–78.CrossRef
Blank, M., & Goodman, R. (2011). DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 87, 409–415.CrossRef
Böschen, S., Böschen, S., Kastenhofe K., Rust I., Soentgen J., Wehling P. (2010). Scientific non knowledge and its political dynamics: The cases of agri-biotechnology and mobile phoning. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35, 783–811.
Brandt, A. (2007). The cigarette century: The rise, fall, and deadly persistence of the product that defined America. New York: Basic Books.
Brigaudeau, C. (2012, February 20). Ils disent non à l’antenne-relais. Le Parisien.
Byun, Y. H., Ha , M., Kwon, H., Hong, Y., Leem, J., Sakong, J., et al. (2013). Mobile phone use, blood lead levels, and attention deficit hyperactivity symptoms in children: A longitudinal study. PLoS One, 8(3), e59742.
Chen, Q., et al. (2013). A meta-analysis on the relationship between exposure to ELF-EMFs and the risk of female breast cancer. PLoS One, 8(7), e69272.
Christ, A., Gosselin M., Christopoulou M., Kühn S., Kuster N. (2010). Age-dependent tissue-specific exposure of cell phone users. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 55, 1767.
Commissariat Générale au Développement Durable. (2009). Annual report to parliament on implementing France’s environmental roundtable commitments. Ministère de l’Ecologie, de l’Energie, du Développement durable et de la Mer.
Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2013). General comment no. 16 on state obligations regarding the impact of the business sector on children’s rights. United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Consales, C., Merla, C., Marino, C.,Benassi, B., (2012). Electromagnetic fields, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration. International Journal of Cell Biology, 2012, 1–16.
Council of European Communities. (1983). Council directive 83/447/EEC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to asbestos at work. European Commission. Retrieved March 13, 2016, from https://​ec.​europa.​eu (home page).
Cour d’Appel de Versailles. (8/09/2010). SAS Adia c/ comité d’entreprise de la Société Adia, 14ème chambre, Arret No. 324.
Crawford, S. (2013). Captive audience: The telecom industry and monopoly power in the new gilded age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Cucurachi, S., Tamis, W., Vijver, M., Peijnenburg, W., Bolte, J., de Snoo, G. (2013). A review of the ecological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). Environment International, 51, 116–140.
Davis, D. (2010). Disconnect: The truth about cell phone radiation, what the industry has done to hide it, and how to protect your family. New York: Dutton Adult.
Davis, D., Kesari S., Soskolne, C., Miller, A., Stein Y. (2013). Swedish review strengthens grounds for concluding that radiation from cellular and cordless phones is a probable human carcinogen. Pathophysiology, 20(2), 123–129.
Direction Générale de la Prévention des Risques du Ministère de l’Ecologie, du Développement Durable et de l’Energie et al. (2013). Diminution de l’exposition aux ondes électromagnétique émises par les antennes-relais de téléphonie mobile, Rapport de Synthèse des Experimentations du COPIC. Retrieved September 10, 2013, from http://​www.​developpementdur​able.​gouv.​fr/​document138630
Divan, H. A., Kheifets, L., Obel, C., Olsen, J. (2008). Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology, 19, 523–529.
Divan, H., Kheifets, L., Obel, C., Olsen, J. (2012). Cell phone use and behavioral problems in young children. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 66, 524–529.
Erren, T. C. (2001). A meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies of electric and magnetic fields and breast cancer in women and men. Bioelectromagnetics, 22(Suppl. 5), S105–S119.CrossRef
Feychting, M., & Forssen, U. (2006). Electromagnetic fields and female breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control, 17(4), 553–558.CrossRef
Foliart, D. E., Pollock, B. H., Mezei, G ., Iriye,R .,Silva, J, M.,Ebi, K. L.,et al. (2006). Magnetic field exposure and long-term survival among children with leukaemia. British Journal of Cancer, 94(1), 161–164.
Fragopoulou, Grigoriev, Y., Johansson, O., Margaritis, L.H., Morgan, L., Richter, E., Sage, C. (2010). Scientific panel on electromagnetic field health risks: Consensus points, recommendations, and rationales. Reviews on Environmental Health, 25(4), 307–317.
Gaestel, M. (2010). Biological monitoring of non-thermal effects of mobile phone radiation: Recent approaches and challenges. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 85(3), 489–500.
Georgiou, C. D. (2010). Oxidative stress-induced biological damage by low-level EMFs: Mechanism of free radical pair electron spin polarization and biochemical amplification. European Journal of Oncology, 5, 63–113.
Gollier, C. (2001). Should we beware of the precautionary principle? Economic Policy, 16(33), 301–328.CrossRef
Gutschi, T., Mohamad Al-Ali, B., Shamloul, R., Pummer, K., Trummer, H. (2011). Impact of cell phone use on men’s semen parameters. Andrologia, 43(5), 312–316.
Hagström, M., Auranen, J., & Ekman, R. (2013). Electromagnetic hypersensitive Finns: Symptoms, perceived sources and treatments, a questionnaire study. Pathophysiology, 20(2), 117–122.CrossRef
Han, Y., Gandhi, O. P., DeSalles, A., Herberman, R. B., Davis, D. L. (2010). Comparative assessment of models of electromagnetic absorption of the head for children and adults indicates the need for policy changes. European Journal of Oncology, 5, 103.
Hansson, B., Thors, B., & Törnevik, C. (2011). Analysis of the effect of mobile phone base station antenna loading on localized SAR and its consequences for measurements. Bioelectromagnetics, 32(8), 664–672.CrossRef
Hardell, L., Carlberg, M., & Hansson Mild, K. (2005). Case-control study on cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for acoustic neuroma or meningioma in patients diagnosed 2000–2003. Neuroepidemiology, 25(3), 120–128.CrossRef
Hardell, L., Carlberg, M., & Hansson Mild, K. (2013). Use of mobile phones and cordless phones is associated with increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. Pathophysiology, 20(2), 85–110.CrossRef
Hayes, K., & Burge, R. (2003). Coltan mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo: How tantalum-using industries can commit to the reconstruction of the DRC. Cambridge: Fauna & Flora International, NHBS.
Heaven v. Pender. (1883). Trading as West India Graving Dock Company, 11 QBD 503, Court of Appeal, United Kingdom.
House of Representatives. (1993a). Children’s electromagnetic field risk reduction Act, 1st Session, 103rd Congress, H.R. 1494, The Library of Congress. Retrieved March 13, 2016, from https://​www.​loc.​gov (home page).
House of Representatives. (1993b). Electromagnetic Labeling Act, 103rd Congress, 1st Session, H.R. 1665, The Library of Congress. Retrieved March 13, 2016, from https://​www.​loc.​gov (home page).
House of Representatives. (2012). Cell Phone Right to Know Act, 112th Congress, 2nd Session, H.R. 6358, Library of Congress. Retrieved March 13, 2016, from https://​www.​loc.​gov (home page).
Hug, K., Roosli, M., & Rapp, R. (2006). Magnetic field exposure and neurodegenerative diseases—recent epidemiological studies. Sozial und Praventivmedizin, 51(4), 210–220.CrossRef
Huss, Jean. (2011). Document 12608: The potential dangers of electromagnetic fields and their effect on the environment. Committee on the Environment, Agriculture and Local and Regional Affairs, Council of Europe. Retrieved March 12, 2016, from http://​www.​coe.​int (home page).
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (1999). C95.1–1999 IEEE Standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz. Retrieved March 13, 2016, from https://​www.​ieee.​org (home page).
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (2005). C95.1–2005—IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz. Retrieved March 13, 2016, from https://​www.​ieee.​org
International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2011). IARC classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans. Lyon, France: World Health Organization. Press release No. 208.
International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection. (1998). Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Physics, 4(4), 494–522.
International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection. (2009a). Exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (100 kHz–300 GHz). INCPR. Retrieved March 13, 2016, from http://​www.​icnirp.​org (home page).
International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection. (2009b). Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Physics, 97(3), 11.
de Jong, A., Wardekker, J. A., & van der Sluijs, J. P. (2012). Assumptions in quantitative analyses of health risks of overhead power lines. Environmental Science & Policy, 16(10), 114–121.CrossRef
Kheifets, L., Ahlbom, A., Crespi, C. M., Draper, G., Hagihara, J., Lowenthal, R. M.,et al. (2010). Pooled analysis of recent studies on magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia. British Journal of Cancer, 103(7), 1128–1135.
Khurana, V. G., Hardell, L., Everaert, J., Bortkiewicz, A., Carlberg, M., Ahonen, M. (2010). Epidemiological evidence for a health risk from mobile phone base stations. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 16(3), 263–267.
Kluger, R. (1996). Ashes to ashes: America’s hundred-year cigarette war, the public health, and the unabashed triumph of Philip Morris. New York: Vintage.
Knopf, A., & Glantz, S. (1996). The cigarette papers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kostoff, R. N., & Lau, C. G. Y. (2013). Combined biological and health effects of electromagnetic fields and other agents in the published literature. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(7), 1331–1349.CrossRef
La Vignera, S., Condorelli, R. A., Vicari, E., D'Agata, R., Calogero, A. E. (2012). Effects of the exposure to mobile phones on male reproduction: A review of the literature. Journal of Andrology, 33(3), 350–356.
Levis, A. G., Minicuci, N., Ricci, P., Gennaro, V., Garbisa, S. (2011). Mobile phones and head tumours. The discrepancies in cause-effect relationships in the epidemiological studies—How do they arise? Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 10, 59.
Levitt, B., & Lai, H. (2010). Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell tower base stations and other antenna arrays. Environmental Review, 18(1), 369–395.CrossRef
Li, D. K., Ferber, J. R., Odouli, R., Quesenberry, Jr C. P. (2012). A prospective study of in-utero exposure to magnetic fields and the risk of childhood obesity. Nature Scientific Reports 2. Article 540.
Loi no. 2015-136 du 9 février 2015 relative à la sobriété, à la transparence, à l’information et à la concertation en matière d’exposition aux ondes électromagnétiques (Loi Abeille), JORF no 0034 du 10 février 2015, page 2346, texte no 1.
Lowenthal, R. M., Tuck, D. M., & Bray, I. C. (2007). Residential exposure to electric power transmission lines and risk of lymphoproliferative and myeloproliferative disorders: A case-control study. Internal Medicine Journal, 37(9), 614–619.CrossRef
Maussion, C. (2011, October 19). 4G: la suspension des antennes irrite Besson. Liberation.
Merhi, Z. O. (2012). Challenging cell phone impact on reproduction: A review. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 29(4), 293–297.CrossRef
Mettler, S. (2010). Reconstituting the submerged state: The challenges of social policy reform in the Obama era. Perspectives on Politics, 8(3), 803–824.CrossRef
Montague, D. (2002, Winter–Spring). Stolen goods: Coltan and conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. SAIS Review, 22(1), 103–118.
O’Connor, E. (2013, February 20). Statement to European Commission stakeholder dialogue group. Brussels: EM Radiation Research Trust, European Commission.
Otitoloju, A. A., Obe, I. A., Adewale, O. A., Otubanjo, O. A., Osunkalu, V. O. (2010). Preliminary study on the induction of sperm head abnormalities in mice, Mus musculus, exposed to radiofrequency radiations from global system for mobile communication base stations. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 84(1), 51–54.
Panagopoulos, D. J. (2011). Analyzing the health impacts of modern telecommunications microwaves. Advances in Medicine and Biology, 17, 1–54.
Panagopoulos, D. J., & Margaritis, L. H. (2010). The effect of exposure duration on the biological activity of mobile telephony radiation. Mutation Research, 699(1–2), 17–22.CrossRef
Parliamentary Assembly. (2011). Resolution 1815: On the potential dangers of electromagnetic fields and their effect on the environment. Council of Europe. Retrieved March 12, 2016, from http://​www.​coe.​int (home page).
Perry, S. (2015). L’Illusion Pixel. Paris: Lemieux Éditeur.
Peyman, Gabriel, C., Grant, E. H., Vermeeren, G., Martens, L. (2009). Variation of the dielectric properties of tissues with age: The effect on the values of SAR in children when exposed to walkie-talkie devices. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 54(2), 227–241.
Posner, E. (2014). The twilight of human rights law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Proctor, R. (2012). Golden holocaust: Origins of the cigarette catastrophe and the case for abolition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Roda, C., & Perry, S. (2014). Mobile phone infrastructure regulation in Europe: Scientific challenges and human rights protection. Environmental Science and Policy, 37, 204–214.CrossRef
Ruggie, J. (2011). United Nations guiding principles on business and human rights. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved March 10, 2016, from http://​www.​ohchr.​org (home page).
Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks. (2015). Potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields. European Commission. Retrieved March 6, 2016, from http://​ec.​europa.​eu (home page).
Shahbazi-Gahrouei, D., Karbalae, M., Moradi, H. A., Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi, M. (2014). Health effects of living near mobile phone base transceiver station (BTS) antennae: A report from Isfahan, Iran. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 33(3), 206–201.
Smith, E. F. (2010, Winter). Right to remedies and the inconvenience of Forum Non Conveniens: Opening U.S. courts to victims of corporate human rights abuses. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 44, 145.
Sommer, C., Stadtfeld, M., Murphy, G. J., Hochedlinger, K., Kotton, D. N,, Mostoslavsky, G. (2009). Induced pluripotent stem cell generation using a single lentiviral stem cell cassette. Stem Cells, 27(3), 543–549.
Stop Smart Meter. (2014). Some PG&E customs getting fees reversed as CPUC endlessly delays smart meter “Opt Out” decision. Retrieved August 15, 2014, from http://​stopsmartmeters.​org (home page).
Sudan, M., Kheifets,L., Arah, O., Olsen, J., Zeltzer, L. (2012). Prenatal and postnatal cell phone exposures and headaches in children. The Open Pediatric Medicine Journal, 6, 46–52.
Sunstein, C. (2005). Laws of fear: Beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Tribunal des Conflits (14/05/2012) C3848, Publié au recueil Lebon, Legifrance.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science: New Series, 211(4481), 453–458.CrossRef
United Nations Commission on Human Rights. (2004). Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights, Panel Discussion, 60th Session.
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1989). G.A. res. 44/25, annex, 44 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 49) at 167, U.N. Doc. A/44/49, entered into force 2 September 1990.
Valentini, E., Curcio, G., Moroni, F., Ferrara,M., De Gennaro, L., Bertini, M. (2010). Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychomotor effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 67(10), 708–716.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. (1969). 1155 U.N.T.S. 331, U.S. No. 58 (1980), reprinted in I.L.M. 679 (1969), entered into force, 27 January 1980.
Ville de Paris. (2003). Charte relative aux antennes relais de téléphonie mobile, Au sens de l’article 1 du décret n° 2002-775 du 3 mai 2002.
Ville de Paris. (2012). Charte relative à la téléphonie mobile, Au sens de l’article 1 du décret n° 2002-775 du 3 mai 2002.
Wiart, J., Hadjem, A., Wong, M. F., Bloch, I. (2008). Analysis of RF exposure in the head tissues of children and adults. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 53(13), 3681–3695.
Metadata
Title
The Great Debate on Wireless Technology
Authors
Susan Perry
Claudia Roda
Copyright Year
2017
Book
Human Rights and Digital Technology

Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58804-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-137-58805-0

Copyright Year: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58805-0_2