Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2/2009

01-02-2009 | Original Article

The ‘hidden’ social costs of forestry offsets

Authors: Colin Hunt, Seth Baum

Published in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | Issue 2/2009

Login to get access

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The article quantifies the size of ‘hidden’ social costs that are incurred by forestry offsets in the voluntary market that promise to offset present emissions sometime in the future. It does this by estimating the difference between the social costs of carbon (C) emitted and of costs offset by removal of C from the atmosphere by reforestation/afforestation. All current attempts to make forestry offsets more reliable focus on quality control rather than the mismatch of the timing of emissions and their offset. Recommendations that follow from the analysis are twofold. First, that markets for carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) removals by voluntary offsets should be confined to the annual incremental removals actually achieved. Second, the promoters of voluntary offsets projects should declare the annual stream of carbon credits and debits expected so that buyers can place a present value on such projects.
Literature
go back to reference Arrow KJ, Cline W, Maler K, Munasinghe M, Squitieri R, Stiglitz J (1996) Intertemporal equity, discounting and economic efficiency. In: Bruce J, Lee H, Haites E (eds) Climate change in 1995 – economic and social dimensions of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp 125–144 Arrow KJ, Cline W, Maler K, Munasinghe M, Squitieri R, Stiglitz J (1996) Intertemporal equity, discounting and economic efficiency. In: Bruce J, Lee H, Haites E (eds) Climate change in 1995 – economic and social dimensions of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp 125–144
go back to reference Australian Government (2006a) Greenhouse friendly guidelines. Department of Environment and Heritage, Canberra Australian Government (2006a) Greenhouse friendly guidelines. Department of Environment and Heritage, Canberra
go back to reference Australian Government (2006b) Planning forest sink projects. Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra Australian Government (2006b) Planning forest sink projects. Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra
go back to reference Australian Government (2007) The national carbon accounting toolbox. Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra Australian Government (2007) The national carbon accounting toolbox. Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra
go back to reference Bayon R, Hawn A, Hamilton K (2007) In: Voluntary carbon markets: An international business guide to what they are and how they work. Earthscan, London/Sterling VA Bayon R, Hawn A, Hamilton K (2007) In: Voluntary carbon markets: An international business guide to what they are and how they work. Earthscan, London/Sterling VA
go back to reference Birdsey R (1996) Carbon storage for major forest types and regions in the coterminous United States. In: Sampson R, Hair D (eds) Forests and global change. Forest management opportunities for mitigating carbon emissions, vol. 2. American Forests, Washington DC, pp 1–26 Birdsey R (1996) Carbon storage for major forest types and regions in the coterminous United States. In: Sampson R, Hair D (eds) Forests and global change. Forest management opportunities for mitigating carbon emissions, vol. 2. American Forests, Washington DC, pp 1–26
go back to reference Brand D, Meizlish M (2007) An investor’s perspective on the voluntary carbon market. In: Bayon R, Hawn A, Hamilton K (eds) Voluntary carbon markets: An international business guide to what they are and how they work. Earthscan, London/Sterling VA, pp 87–90 Brand D, Meizlish M (2007) An investor’s perspective on the voluntary carbon market. In: Bayon R, Hawn A, Hamilton K (eds) Voluntary carbon markets: An international business guide to what they are and how they work. Earthscan, London/Sterling VA, pp 87–90
go back to reference California Environmental Protections Agency (2007) Climate action team proposed early actions to mitigate climate change in California, Draft for public review. California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento California Environmental Protections Agency (2007) Climate action team proposed early actions to mitigate climate change in California, Draft for public review. California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento
go back to reference Europa (2008) Questions and answers on the Commission’s proposal to revise the EU Emissions Trading System. http://europa.eu. Cited 25 April 2008 Europa (2008) Questions and answers on the Commission’s proposal to revise the EU Emissions Trading System. http://​europa.​eu. Cited 25 April 2008
go back to reference Houghton T, Filho M, Bruce L, Lee H, Callander B, Haites E et al (1994) In: Climate change 1994: Radiative forcing of climate change and an evaluation of the 1992 IPCC IS92 emissions scenario. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK Houghton T, Filho M, Bruce L, Lee H, Callander B, Haites E et al (1994) In: Climate change 1994: Radiative forcing of climate change and an evaluation of the 1992 IPCC IS92 emissions scenario. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
go back to reference IPCC (2007) Fourth Assessment Report Working Group 1: The physical science base. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. and New York Moura-Costa P, Wilson C (2000) An equivalence factor between CO2 avoided emissions and sequestration – description and applications in forestry. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 5:51–60 doi:10.1023/A:1009697625521 IPCC (2007) Fourth Assessment Report Working Group 1: The physical science base. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. and New York Moura-Costa P, Wilson C (2000) An equivalence factor between CO2 avoided emissions and sequestration – description and applications in forestry. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Chang 5:51–60 doi:10.​1023/​A:​1009697625521
go back to reference Nabuurs G, Masera O, Andrasko K, Benitez-Ponce P, Boer R, Dutschke M et al (2007) Forestry. In: Metz B, Davidson O, Bosch P, Dave R, Meyer L (eds) Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. and New York Nabuurs G, Masera O, Andrasko K, Benitez-Ponce P, Boer R, Dutschke M et al (2007) Forestry. In: Metz B, Davidson O, Bosch P, Dave R, Meyer L (eds) Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. and New York
go back to reference Neeff T, Eicher L, Deecke I, Fehse J (2007) Update on markets for forestry offsets, Tropical agricultural research and higher education center (CATIE). Turrialba, Costa Rica Neeff T, Eicher L, Deecke I, Fehse J (2007) Update on markets for forestry offsets, Tropical agricultural research and higher education center (CATIE). Turrialba, Costa Rica
go back to reference Newell R, Pizer W (2000) Discounting the distant future: How much do uncertain rates increase valuations? Discussion Paper 00-45, Resources for the Future, Washington DC Newell R, Pizer W (2000) Discounting the distant future: How much do uncertain rates increase valuations? Discussion Paper 00-45, Resources for the Future, Washington DC
go back to reference Nordhaus W (1994) Managing the global commons. MIT, Cambridge, MA Nordhaus W (1994) Managing the global commons. MIT, Cambridge, MA
go back to reference Stavins R, Richards K (2005) The cost of U.S. forest-based carbon sequestration. Pew Centre, Arlington VA Stavins R, Richards K (2005) The cost of U.S. forest-based carbon sequestration. Pew Centre, Arlington VA
go back to reference Thamer P (2006) Net carbon sequestration in forest plantations: Implications for carbon accounting methodology. Dissertation, The School for Field Studies, Australia Thamer P (2006) Net carbon sequestration in forest plantations: Implications for carbon accounting methodology. Dissertation, The School for Field Studies, Australia
go back to reference UNFCC (2005) Report of the parties serving as the meeting of the parties to the Kyoto Protocol, Montreal. United Nations, New York UNFCC (2005) Report of the parties serving as the meeting of the parties to the Kyoto Protocol, Montreal. United Nations, New York
go back to reference UNFCC (2008a) Kyoto protocol to the united nations framework convention on climate change. United Nations, New York UNFCC (2008a) Kyoto protocol to the united nations framework convention on climate change. United Nations, New York
go back to reference Yohe G, Lasco R, Ahmad Q, Arnell N, Cohen S, Hope C et al (2007) Perspectives on climate change and sustainability. In: Parry M, Canziani O, Palutikof J, van der Linden P, Hanson C (eds) Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group ii to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp 811–841 Yohe G, Lasco R, Ahmad Q, Arnell N, Cohen S, Hope C et al (2007) Perspectives on climate change and sustainability. In: Parry M, Canziani O, Palutikof J, van der Linden P, Hanson C (eds) Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group ii to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp 811–841
Metadata
Title
The ‘hidden’ social costs of forestry offsets
Authors
Colin Hunt
Seth Baum
Publication date
01-02-2009
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change / Issue 2/2009
Print ISSN: 1381-2386
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-008-9153-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2009

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2/2009 Go to the issue