Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Empirical Economics 5/2023

30-06-2023

The impact of fiscal rules on government debt: evidence from the CFA zone

Author: Christine Olivia Strong

Published in: Empirical Economics | Issue 5/2023

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper uses the difference-in-differences method and the synthetic control method (SCM) to estimate the effect of adopting numerical fiscal rules on the debt-to-GDP ratio of CFA zone countries. Using the SCM addresses the self-selection bias issue that has plagued previous studies on the impact of fiscal rules. The SCM compares the post-treatment trajectory of the treated CFA zone countries to that of a counterfactual constructed using similar but untreated donor countries. Our results show that, overall, adopting a stringent numerical debt rule is associated with a statistically significant decrease in the level of debt for CFA zone countries. The effect is stronger for West African CFA zone countries, suggesting that enforcement mechanisms and strong institutions are the key determinants of the de facto effectiveness of fiscal rules.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Source: World Bank Economic Prospect.
 
2
Source: China Africa Research Initiative.
 
3
The CFA zone is the second-largest currency union in the world, which consists of two different zones: The West African zone (WAEMU) and the Central African zone (CAEMC). We provide more details about the zone in Sect. 3 of the paper.
 
4
WAEMU stands for West African Economic and Monetary Union. CAEMC stands for Central African Economic and Monetary Community.
 
5
We discuss these issues in detail in Sect. 5.
 
6
BEAC stands for Banque des Etats de l’Afrique Centrale in French.
 
7
BCEAO stands for Banque Centrale des Etats de l’Afrique de l’Ouest in French.
 
8
This used to be the case for BCEAO as well, but since 2020, there are no longer any French representatives on its board of directors.
 
9
Source: The World Bank.
 
10
Before the devaluation, 1 French franc = 50 francs CFA but after the devaluation, 1 French franc = 100 francs CFA.
 
11
Source: IMF.
 
12
To test this, we simply regress each of the covariates described above on our treatment, and our analysis shows that there is a statistically significant relationship between these variables and our treatment.
 
13
We also perform a more standard DID regression where all treated units are included as a treated group for each zone. Results are similar to the individual effects and are available upon request.
 
14
Note that these characteristics may include the pre-intervention values of the outcome variable as well.
 
15
See Abadie et al. (2010).
 
16
Either prior to or the same year that CFA zone countries adopted a debt rule. Examples include countries such as Kenya which adopted a debt rule in 1997 and Namibia, in 2001.
 
17
In the Appendix, Tables 8 and 9 report the countries included in the counterfactual for each country as well as their weights.
 
18
EAMU countries adopted a debt rule in 2013 and although the post-treatment period is less than 10 years, we test for the effect of adopting this rule on government debt for our 4 countries. The result was statistically significant for Rwanda only. Results are available upon request.
 
19
We thank an anonymous referee for making this suggestion.
 
20
7 of our donor countries do not have enough data, reducing our number of donor countries to 20.
 
Literature
go back to reference Abadie A (2019) Using synthetic controls: feasibility, data requirements, and methodological aspects. J Econ Lit 59:391–425CrossRef Abadie A (2019) Using synthetic controls: feasibility, data requirements, and methodological aspects. J Econ Lit 59:391–425CrossRef
go back to reference Abadie A, Gardeazabal J (2003) The economic costs of conflict: a case study of the Basque Country. Am Econ Rev 93(1):113–132 Abadie A, Gardeazabal J (2003) The economic costs of conflict: a case study of the Basque Country. Am Econ Rev 93(1):113–132
go back to reference Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2010) Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. J Am Stat Assoc 105(490):493–505CrossRef Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2010) Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. J Am Stat Assoc 105(490):493–505CrossRef
go back to reference Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2015) Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. Am J Political Sci 59(2):495–510 Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2015) Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. Am J Political Sci 59(2):495–510
go back to reference Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1369–1401 Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1369–1401
go back to reference Alt JE, Lassen DD (2006) Fiscal transparency, political parties, and debt in OECD countries. Eur Econ Rev 50(6):1403–1439CrossRef Alt JE, Lassen DD (2006) Fiscal transparency, political parties, and debt in OECD countries. Eur Econ Rev 50(6):1403–1439CrossRef
go back to reference Arkhangelsky D, Imbens GW (2022) Doubly robust identification for causal panel data models. Econom J 25(3):649–674 Arkhangelsky D, Imbens GW (2022) Doubly robust identification for causal panel data models. Econom J 25(3):649–674
go back to reference Bleaney M, Ozkan FG (2011) The structure of public debt and the choice of exchange rate regime. Can J Econ/rev Can D’economie 44(1):325–339 Bleaney M, Ozkan FG (2011) The structure of public debt and the choice of exchange rate regime. Can J Econ/rev Can D’economie 44(1):325–339
go back to reference Block SA (2002) Political business cycles, democratization, and economic reform: the case of Africa. J Dev Econ 67(1):205–228CrossRef Block SA (2002) Political business cycles, democratization, and economic reform: the case of Africa. J Dev Econ 67(1):205–228CrossRef
go back to reference Bohn H, Inman RP (1996) Balanced-budget rules and public deficits: evidence from the US states. In: Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy, vol 45. North-Holland, pp 13–76 Bohn H, Inman RP (1996) Balanced-budget rules and public deficits: evidence from the US states. In: Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy, vol 45. North-Holland, pp 13–76
go back to reference Bove V, Elia L, Smith RP (2014) The relationship between panel and synthetic control of the effect of civil war Bove V, Elia L, Smith RP (2014) The relationship between panel and synthetic control of the effect of civil war
go back to reference Brender A, Drazen A (2005) Political budget cycles in new versus established democracies. J Monet Econ 52(7):1271–1295CrossRef Brender A, Drazen A (2005) Political budget cycles in new versus established democracies. J Monet Econ 52(7):1271–1295CrossRef
go back to reference Caetano C, Callaway B, Payne S, Rodrigues HSA (2022) Difference in differences with time-varying covariates. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.02903 Caetano C, Callaway B, Payne S, Rodrigues HSA (2022) Difference in differences with time-varying covariates. arXiv preprint arXiv:​2202.​02903
go back to reference Canova F, Pappa E (2006) The elusive costs and the immaterial gains of fiscal constraints. J Public Econ 90(8–9):1391–1414CrossRef Canova F, Pappa E (2006) The elusive costs and the immaterial gains of fiscal constraints. J Public Econ 90(8–9):1391–1414CrossRef
go back to reference Debrun X, Masson P, Pattillo C (2005) Monetary union in west Africa: Who might gain, who might lose, and why? Can J Econ 38(2):454–481CrossRef Debrun X, Masson P, Pattillo C (2005) Monetary union in west Africa: Who might gain, who might lose, and why? Can J Econ 38(2):454–481CrossRef
go back to reference Eichengreen B, Bayoumi T (1994) The political economy of fiscal restrictions: implications for Europe from the United States. Eur Econ Rev 38(3–4):783–791 Eichengreen B, Bayoumi T (1994) The political economy of fiscal restrictions: implications for Europe from the United States. Eur Econ Rev 38(3–4):783–791
go back to reference Eslava M (2011) The political economy of fiscal deficits: a survey. J Econ Surv 25(4):645–673CrossRef Eslava M (2011) The political economy of fiscal deficits: a survey. J Econ Surv 25(4):645–673CrossRef
go back to reference Fatás A, Mihov I (2003a) The case for restricting fiscal policy discretion. Q J Econ 118(4):1419–1447CrossRef Fatás A, Mihov I (2003a) The case for restricting fiscal policy discretion. Q J Econ 118(4):1419–1447CrossRef
go back to reference Fatás A, Mihov I (2003b) On constraining fiscal policy discretion in EMU. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 19(1):112–131CrossRef Fatás A, Mihov I (2003b) On constraining fiscal policy discretion in EMU. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 19(1):112–131CrossRef
go back to reference Filc G, Scartascini C (2005) Budget institutions and fiscal outcomes. Int J Public Budg 59:81–138 Filc G, Scartascini C (2005) Budget institutions and fiscal outcomes. Int J Public Budg 59:81–138
go back to reference Galiani S, Quistorff B (2017) The synth_runner package: utilities to automate synthetic control estimation using synth. Stata J 17(4):834–849 Galiani S, Quistorff B (2017) The synth_runner package: utilities to automate synthetic control estimation using synth. Stata J 17(4):834–849
go back to reference Gulde AM, Tsangarides CG (eds) (2008). International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC Gulde AM, Tsangarides CG (eds) (2008). International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC
go back to reference Hadjimichael MMT, Galy MM (1997) The CFA franc zone and the EMU. International Monetary Fund Hadjimichael MMT, Galy MM (1997) The CFA franc zone and the EMU. International Monetary Fund
go back to reference Hallerberg M, Scartascini C, Stein E (2009) The budget process as a political arena. Who Decides the Budget 295–320 Hallerberg M, Scartascini C, Stein E (2009) The budget process as a political arena. Who Decides the Budget 295–320
go back to reference Hitaj ME, Onder YK (2013) Fiscal discipline in WAEMU: rules, institutions, and markets (No. 13-216). International Monetary Fund Hitaj ME, Onder YK (2013) Fiscal discipline in WAEMU: rules, institutions, and markets (No. 13-216). International Monetary Fund
go back to reference Kopits MG, Symansky MSA (1998) Fiscal policy rules. International monetary fund. Kopits MG, Symansky MSA (1998) Fiscal policy rules. International monetary fund.
go back to reference Kose MA, Kurlat S, Ohnsorge F, Sugawara N (2022) A cross-country database of fiscal space. J Int Money Financ 128:102682CrossRef Kose MA, Kurlat S, Ohnsorge F, Sugawara N (2022) A cross-country database of fiscal space. J Int Money Financ 128:102682CrossRef
go back to reference Leiner-Killinger N, Nerlich C (2019) Fiscal rules in the euro area and lessons from other monetary unions. Econ Bull Artic 3 Leiner-Killinger N, Nerlich C (2019) Fiscal rules in the euro area and lessons from other monetary unions. Econ Bull Artic 3
go back to reference Mandon P (2014) Evaluating treatment effect and causal effect of fiscal rules on procyclicality new assessments on old debate: rules vs. discretion Mandon P (2014) Evaluating treatment effect and causal effect of fiscal rules on procyclicality new assessments on old debate: rules vs. discretion
go back to reference Nordhaus WD (1975) The political business cycle. Rev Econ Stud 42(2):169–190CrossRef Nordhaus WD (1975) The political business cycle. Rev Econ Stud 42(2):169–190CrossRef
go back to reference Rogoff K (1990) Equilibrium political business cycles. Am Econ Rev 80(1):21–36 Rogoff K (1990) Equilibrium political business cycles. Am Econ Rev 80(1):21–36
go back to reference Schaechter A, Kinda T, Budina NT, Weber A (2012) Fiscal rules in response to the crisis-toward the next-generation rules: A new dataset. IMF Working Paper. WP/12/187. Schaechter A, Kinda T, Budina NT, Weber A (2012) Fiscal rules in response to the crisis-toward the next-generation rules: A new dataset. IMF Working Paper. WP/12/187.
go back to reference Strauss-Kahn MO (2003) Regional currency areas: a few lessons from the experiences of the Eurosystem and the CFA franc zone. BIS Pap 17:42–57 Strauss-Kahn MO (2003) Regional currency areas: a few lessons from the experiences of the Eurosystem and the CFA franc zone. BIS Pap 17:42–57
go back to reference Vegh CA, Vuletin G (2015) How is tax policy conducted over the business cycle? Am Econ J Econ Pol 7(3):327–370CrossRef Vegh CA, Vuletin G (2015) How is tax policy conducted over the business cycle? Am Econ J Econ Pol 7(3):327–370CrossRef
go back to reference Velasco A (1999) A model of endogenous fiscal deficits and delayed fiscal reforms. Fiscal institutions and fiscal performance. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 37–58 Velasco A (1999) A model of endogenous fiscal deficits and delayed fiscal reforms. Fiscal institutions and fiscal performance. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 37–58
go back to reference Volkerink B, De Haan J (2001) Fragmented government effects on fiscal policy: new evidence. Public Choice 109(3–4):221–242CrossRef Volkerink B, De Haan J (2001) Fragmented government effects on fiscal policy: new evidence. Public Choice 109(3–4):221–242CrossRef
go back to reference Von Hagen J (1991) A note on the empirical effectiveness of formal fiscal restraints. J Public Econ 44(2):199–210CrossRef Von Hagen J (1991) A note on the empirical effectiveness of formal fiscal restraints. J Public Econ 44(2):199–210CrossRef
go back to reference Von Hagen J (2006) Fiscal rules and fiscal performance in the European Union and Japan. Monet Econ Stud 24(1):25–60 Von Hagen J (2006) Fiscal rules and fiscal performance in the European Union and Japan. Monet Econ Stud 24(1):25–60
go back to reference Wyplosz C (2012) Fiscal rules: theoretical issues and historical experiences. Fiscal policy after the financial crisis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 495–525 Wyplosz C (2012) Fiscal rules: theoretical issues and historical experiences. Fiscal policy after the financial crisis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 495–525
Metadata
Title
The impact of fiscal rules on government debt: evidence from the CFA zone
Author
Christine Olivia Strong
Publication date
30-06-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Empirical Economics / Issue 5/2023
Print ISSN: 0377-7332
Electronic ISSN: 1435-8921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-023-02430-w

Other articles of this Issue 5/2023

Empirical Economics 5/2023 Go to the issue

Premium Partner