Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Empirical Software Engineering 2/2019

06-09-2018

The impact of human factors on the participation decision of reviewers in modern code review

Authors: Shade Ruangwan, Patanamon Thongtanunam, Akinori Ihara, Kenichi Matsumoto

Published in: Empirical Software Engineering | Issue 2/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Modern Code Review (MCR) plays a key role in software quality practices. In MCR process, a new patch (i.e., a set of code changes) is encouraged to be examined by reviewers in order to identify weaknesses in source code prior to an integration into main software repositories. To mitigate the risk of having future defects, prior work suggests that MCR should be performed with sufficient review participation. Indeed, recent work shows that a low number of participated reviewers is associated with poor software quality. However, there is a likely case that a new patch still suffers from poor review participation even though reviewers were invited. Hence, in this paper, we set out to investigate the factors that are associated with the participation decision of an invited reviewer. Through a case study of 230,090 patches spread across the Android, LibreOffice, OpenStack and Qt systems, we find that (1) 16%-66% of patches have at least one invited reviewer who did not respond to the review invitation; (2) human factors play an important role in predicting whether or not an invited reviewer will participate in a review; (3) a review participation rate of an invited reviewers and code authoring experience of an invited reviewer are highly associated with the participation decision of an invited reviewer. These results can help practitioners better understand about how human factors associate with the participation decision of reviewers and serve as guidelines for inviting reviewers, leading to a better inviting decision and a better reviewer participation.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
14
We provide a full list of questions online at https://​goo.​gl/​forms/​Du48JXAsbBhKSeSx​2.
 
Literature
go back to reference Ackerman AF, Buchwald LS, Lewski FH (1989) Software inspections: an effective verification process. IEEE Softw 6(3):31–36CrossRef Ackerman AF, Buchwald LS, Lewski FH (1989) Software inspections: an effective verification process. IEEE Softw 6(3):31–36CrossRef
go back to reference Armstrong F, Khomh F, Adams B (2017) Broadcast vs. unicast review technology: does it matter?. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on software testing, verification and validation (ICST), pp 219–229 Armstrong F, Khomh F, Adams B (2017) Broadcast vs. unicast review technology: does it matter?. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on software testing, verification and validation (ICST), pp 219–229
go back to reference Bacchelli A, Bird C (2013) Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review. In: Proceedings of the 35th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 712–721 Bacchelli A, Bird C (2013) Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review. In: Proceedings of the 35th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 712–721
go back to reference Balachandran V (2013) Reducing human effort and improving quality in peer code reviews using automatic static analysis and reviewer recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 35th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 931–940 Balachandran V (2013) Reducing human effort and improving quality in peer code reviews using automatic static analysis and reviewer recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 35th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 931–940
go back to reference Bavota G, Russo B (2015) Four eyes are better than two: on the impact of code reviews on software quality. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on software maintenance and evolution (ICSME), pp 81–90 Bavota G, Russo B (2015) Four eyes are better than two: on the impact of code reviews on software quality. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on software maintenance and evolution (ICSME), pp 81–90
go back to reference Baysal O, Kononenko O, Holmes R, Godfrey MW (2013) The influence of non-technical factors on code review. In: Proceedings of the 20th working conference on reverse engineering (WCRE), pp 122–131 Baysal O, Kononenko O, Holmes R, Godfrey MW (2013) The influence of non-technical factors on code review. In: Proceedings of the 20th working conference on reverse engineering (WCRE), pp 122–131
go back to reference Beller M, Bacchelli A, Zaidman A, Juergens E (2014) Modern code reviews in open-source projects: which problems do they fix?. In: Proceedings of the 11th working conference on mining software repositories (MSR), pp 202–211 Beller M, Bacchelli A, Zaidman A, Juergens E (2014) Modern code reviews in open-source projects: which problems do they fix?. In: Proceedings of the 11th working conference on mining software repositories (MSR), pp 202–211
go back to reference Bettenburg N, Hassan AE, Adams B, German DM (2015) Management of community contributions - A case study on the Android and Linux software ecosystems. Empirical Software Engineering (EMSE) 20(1):252–289CrossRef Bettenburg N, Hassan AE, Adams B, German DM (2015) Management of community contributions - A case study on the Android and Linux software ecosystems. Empirical Software Engineering (EMSE) 20(1):252–289CrossRef
go back to reference Bird C, Nagappan N, Murphy B, Gall H, Devanbu P (2011) Don’t touch my code!: examining the effects of ownership on software quality. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSOFT symposium and the 13th european conference on foundations of software engineering (ESEC/FSE), pp 4–14 Bird C, Nagappan N, Murphy B, Gall H, Devanbu P (2011) Don’t touch my code!: examining the effects of ownership on software quality. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSOFT symposium and the 13th european conference on foundations of software engineering (ESEC/FSE), pp 4–14
go back to reference Bosu A, Carver JC (2014) Impact of developer reputation on code review outcomes in oss projects: an empirical investigation. In: Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement (ESEM), pp 33:1–33:10 Bosu A, Carver JC (2014) Impact of developer reputation on code review outcomes in oss projects: an empirical investigation. In: Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement (ESEM), pp 33:1–33:10
go back to reference Brier GW (1950) Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Mon Weather Rev 78(1):1–3CrossRef Brier GW (1950) Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Mon Weather Rev 78(1):1–3CrossRef
go back to reference Carr DB, Littlefield RJ, Nichloson WL, Littlefield JS (1987) Scatterplot matrix techniques for large N. Journal of the American Statistical Association (JASA) 82(398):424–436MathSciNet Carr DB, Littlefield RJ, Nichloson WL, Littlefield JS (1987) Scatterplot matrix techniques for large N. Journal of the American Statistical Association (JASA) 82(398):424–436MathSciNet
go back to reference Cliff N (1993) Dominance statistics: ordinal analyses to answer ordinal questions. Multivar Behav Res 114(3):494–509 Cliff N (1993) Dominance statistics: ordinal analyses to answer ordinal questions. Multivar Behav Res 114(3):494–509
go back to reference Cliff N (1996) Answering ordinal questions with ordinal data using ordinal statistics. Multivar Behav Res 31(3):331–350CrossRef Cliff N (1996) Answering ordinal questions with ordinal data using ordinal statistics. Multivar Behav Res 31(3):331–350CrossRef
go back to reference Croux C, Dehon C (2010) Influence functions of the Spearman and Kendall correlation measures. Statistical Methods &, Applications (SMA) 19(4):497–515MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Croux C, Dehon C (2010) Influence functions of the Spearman and Kendall correlation measures. Statistical Methods &, Applications (SMA) 19(4):497–515MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
go back to reference Edmundson A, Holtkamp B, Rivera E, Finifter M, Mettler A, Wagner D (2013) An empirical study on the effectiveness of security code review. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on engineering secure software and systems (ESSoS), pp 197–212 Edmundson A, Holtkamp B, Rivera E, Finifter M, Mettler A, Wagner D (2013) An empirical study on the effectiveness of security code review. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on engineering secure software and systems (ESSoS), pp 197–212
go back to reference Efron B (1983) Estimating the error rate of a prediction rule: improvement on cross-validation. Journal of the American Statistical Association (JASA) 78(382):316–331MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Efron B (1983) Estimating the error rate of a prediction rule: improvement on cross-validation. Journal of the American Statistical Association (JASA) 78(382):316–331MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
go back to reference Elish KO, Elish MO (2008) Predicting defect-prone software modules using support vector machines. J Syst Softw 81(5):649–660CrossRef Elish KO, Elish MO (2008) Predicting defect-prone software modules using support vector machines. J Syst Softw 81(5):649–660CrossRef
go back to reference Fagan ME (1976) Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development. IBM Syst J 15(3):182–211CrossRef Fagan ME (1976) Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development. IBM Syst J 15(3):182–211CrossRef
go back to reference Fagan ME (1986) Advances in software inspections. Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE) 12(7):744–751CrossRef Fagan ME (1986) Advances in software inspections. Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE) 12(7):744–751CrossRef
go back to reference Foo KC, Jiang ZMJ, Adams B, Hassan AE, Zou Y, Flora P (2015) An industrial case study on the automated detection of performance regressions in heterogeneous environments. In: Proceedings of the 37th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 159–168 Foo KC, Jiang ZMJ, Adams B, Hassan AE, Zou Y, Flora P (2015) An industrial case study on the automated detection of performance regressions in heterogeneous environments. In: Proceedings of the 37th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 159–168
go back to reference Freeman LC (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Networks 1(3):215–239CrossRef Freeman LC (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Networks 1(3):215–239CrossRef
go back to reference Goeminne M, Mens T (2011) Evidence for the pareto principle in open source software activity. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on model driven software maintenance (MDSM) and 5th international workshop on software quality and maintainability (SQM), pp 74–82 Goeminne M, Mens T (2011) Evidence for the pareto principle in open source software activity. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on model driven software maintenance (MDSM) and 5th international workshop on software quality and maintainability (SQM), pp 74–82
go back to reference Guzzi A, Bacchelli A, Lanza M, Pinzger M, van Deursen A (2013) Communication in open source software development mailing lists. In: Proceedings of the 10th working conference on mining software repositories (MSR), pp 277–286 Guzzi A, Bacchelli A, Lanza M, Pinzger M, van Deursen A (2013) Communication in open source software development mailing lists. In: Proceedings of the 10th working conference on mining software repositories (MSR), pp 277–286
go back to reference Hahn J, Moon JY, Zhang C (2008) Emergence of new project teams from open source software developer networks: impact of prior collaboration ties. Inf Syst Res 19 (3):369–391CrossRef Hahn J, Moon JY, Zhang C (2008) Emergence of new project teams from open source software developer networks: impact of prior collaboration ties. Inf Syst Res 19 (3):369–391CrossRef
go back to reference Hamasaki K, Kula RG, Yoshida N, Cruz AEC, Fujiwara K, Iida H (2013) Who does what during a code review? Datasets of OSS peer review repositories. In: Proceedings of the 10th working conference on mining software repositories (MSR), pp 49–52 Hamasaki K, Kula RG, Yoshida N, Cruz AEC, Fujiwara K, Iida H (2013) Who does what during a code review? Datasets of OSS peer review repositories. In: Proceedings of the 10th working conference on mining software repositories (MSR), pp 49–52
go back to reference Hanley J, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143(4):29–36CrossRef Hanley J, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143(4):29–36CrossRef
go back to reference Harrell FE Jr (2002) Regression modeling strategies, 1st edn. Springer Harrell FE Jr (2002) Regression modeling strategies, 1st edn. Springer
go back to reference Harrell FE Jr (2015b) Regression modeling strategies, 2nd edn. Springer Harrell FE Jr (2015b) Regression modeling strategies, 2nd edn. Springer
go back to reference Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG (1998) Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences, 4th edn. Houghton Mifflin Boston Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG (1998) Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences, 4th edn. Houghton Mifflin Boston
go back to reference Huizinga D, Kolawa A (2007) Automated defect prevention: best practices in software management. Wiley Huizinga D, Kolawa A (2007) Automated defect prevention: best practices in software management. Wiley
go back to reference Kononenko O, Baysal O, Guerrouj L, Cao Y, Godfrey MW (2015) Investigating code review quality: do people and participation matter?. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on software maintenance and evolution (ICSME), pp 111–120 Kononenko O, Baysal O, Guerrouj L, Cao Y, Godfrey MW (2015) Investigating code review quality: do people and participation matter?. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on software maintenance and evolution (ICSME), pp 111–120
go back to reference Kononenko O, Baysal O, Godfrey MW (2016) Code review quality: how developers see it. In: Proceedings of the 38th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 1028–1038 Kononenko O, Baysal O, Godfrey MW (2016) Code review quality: how developers see it. In: Proceedings of the 38th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 1028–1038
go back to reference Lanubile F, Ebert C, Prikladnicki R, Vizcaíno A (2010) Collaboration tools for global software engineering. Software 27(2):52–55CrossRef Lanubile F, Ebert C, Prikladnicki R, Vizcaíno A (2010) Collaboration tools for global software engineering. Software 27(2):52–55CrossRef
go back to reference Lee A, Carver JC, Bosu A (2017) Understanding the impressions, motivations, and barriers of one time code contributors to FLOSS projects: a survey. In: Proceedings of the 39th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 187–197 Lee A, Carver JC, Bosu A (2017) Understanding the impressions, motivations, and barriers of one time code contributors to FLOSS projects: a survey. In: Proceedings of the 39th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 187–197
go back to reference Liang J, Mizuno O (2011) Analyzing involvements of reviewers through mining a code review repository. In: Proceedings of the 21st international workshop on software measurement and the 6th international conference on software process and product measurement (IWSM-Mensura), pp 126–132 Liang J, Mizuno O (2011) Analyzing involvements of reviewers through mining a code review repository. In: Proceedings of the 21st international workshop on software measurement and the 6th international conference on software process and product measurement (IWSM-Mensura), pp 126–132
go back to reference Mason CH, Perreault WD Jr (1991) Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) 28(3):268–280CrossRef Mason CH, Perreault WD Jr (1991) Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) 28(3):268–280CrossRef
go back to reference McIntosh S, Kamei Y, Adams B, Hassan AE (2014) The impact of code review coverage and code review participation on software quality: a case study of the Qt, VTK, and ITK projects. In: Proceedings of the 11th working conference on mining software repositories (MSR), pp 192–201 McIntosh S, Kamei Y, Adams B, Hassan AE (2014) The impact of code review coverage and code review participation on software quality: a case study of the Qt, VTK, and ITK projects. In: Proceedings of the 11th working conference on mining software repositories (MSR), pp 192–201
go back to reference McIntosh S, Kamei Y, Adams B, Hassan AE (2016) An empirical study of the impact of modern code review practices on software quality. Empirical Software Engineering (EMSE) 21(5):2146–2189CrossRef McIntosh S, Kamei Y, Adams B, Hassan AE (2016) An empirical study of the impact of modern code review practices on software quality. Empirical Software Engineering (EMSE) 21(5):2146–2189CrossRef
go back to reference Meyer B (2008) Design and code reviews in the age of the internet. Commun ACM 51(9):66–71CrossRef Meyer B (2008) Design and code reviews in the age of the internet. Commun ACM 51(9):66–71CrossRef
go back to reference Mishra R, Sureka A (2014) Mining peer code review system for computing effort and contribution metrics for patch reviewers. In: Proceedings of the 4th workshop on mining unstructured data (MUD), pp 11–15 Mishra R, Sureka A (2014) Mining peer code review system for computing effort and contribution metrics for patch reviewers. In: Proceedings of the 4th workshop on mining unstructured data (MUD), pp 11–15
go back to reference Mukadam M, Bird C, Rigby PC (2013) Gerrit software code review data from android. In: Proceedings of the 10th working conference on mining software repositories (MSR), pp 45–48 Mukadam M, Bird C, Rigby PC (2013) Gerrit software code review data from android. In: Proceedings of the 10th working conference on mining software repositories (MSR), pp 45–48
go back to reference Newson R (2002) Parameters behind “non-parametric” statistics: Kendall’s tau, Somers’ D and median differences. Stata J 2(1):45–64. (20)CrossRef Newson R (2002) Parameters behind “non-parametric” statistics: Kendall’s tau, Somers’ D and median differences. Stata J 2(1):45–64. (20)CrossRef
go back to reference Rigby PC, Storey MA (2011) Understanding broadcast based peer review on open source software projects. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 541–550 Rigby PC, Storey MA (2011) Understanding broadcast based peer review on open source software projects. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 541–550
go back to reference Rigby PC, German DM, Storey MA (2008) Open source software peer review practices: a case study of the apache server. In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 541–550 Rigby PC, German DM, Storey MA (2008) Open source software peer review practices: a case study of the apache server. In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 541–550
go back to reference Rigby PC, Cleary B, Painchaud F, Storey MA, German DM (2012) Open source peer review – lessons and recommendations for closed source. IEEE Software Rigby PC, Cleary B, Painchaud F, Storey MA, German DM (2012) Open source peer review – lessons and recommendations for closed source. IEEE Software
go back to reference Rigby PC, German DM, Cowen L, Storey MA (2014) Peer review on open-source software projects: parameters, statistical models, and theory. Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) 23(4):35:1–35:33 Rigby PC, German DM, Cowen L, Storey MA (2014) Peer review on open-source software projects: parameters, statistical models, and theory. Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) 23(4):35:1–35:33
go back to reference Sarle W (1990) The VARCLUS procedure, 4th edn. SAS Institute, Inc Sarle W (1990) The VARCLUS procedure, 4th edn. SAS Institute, Inc
go back to reference Shihab E, Jiang ZM, Hassan AE (2009) Studying the use of developer IRC meetings in open source projects. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on software maintenance (ICSM), pp 147–156 Shihab E, Jiang ZM, Hassan AE (2009) Studying the use of developer IRC meetings in open source projects. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on software maintenance (ICSM), pp 147–156
go back to reference Spearman C (1904) The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology (AJP) 15(1):72–101CrossRef Spearman C (1904) The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology (AJP) 15(1):72–101CrossRef
go back to reference Steinmacher I, Conte T, Gerosa MA, Redmiles D (2015) Social barriers faced by newcomers placing their first contribution in open source software projects. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW), pp 1379–1392 Steinmacher I, Conte T, Gerosa MA, Redmiles D (2015) Social barriers faced by newcomers placing their first contribution in open source software projects. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW), pp 1379–1392
go back to reference Tantithamthavorn C, Hassan AE (2018) An experience report on defect modelling in practice: pitfalls and challenges. In: Proceedings of the 40th international conference on software engineering: software engineering in practice (ICSE-SEIP), pp 286–295 Tantithamthavorn C, Hassan AE (2018) An experience report on defect modelling in practice: pitfalls and challenges. In: Proceedings of the 40th international conference on software engineering: software engineering in practice (ICSE-SEIP), pp 286–295
go back to reference Tantithamthavorn C, McIntosh S, Hassan AE, Ihara A, Matsumoto K (2015) The impact of mislabelling on the performance and interpretation of defect prediction models. In: Proceedings of the 37th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 812–823 Tantithamthavorn C, McIntosh S, Hassan AE, Ihara A, Matsumoto K (2015) The impact of mislabelling on the performance and interpretation of defect prediction models. In: Proceedings of the 37th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 812–823
go back to reference Tantithamthavorn C, McIntosh S, Hassan AE, Matsumoto K (2016) Comments on “Researcher bias: the use of machine learning in software defect prediction”. Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE) 42(11):1092–1094CrossRef Tantithamthavorn C, McIntosh S, Hassan AE, Matsumoto K (2016) Comments on “Researcher bias: the use of machine learning in software defect prediction”. Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE) 42(11):1092–1094CrossRef
go back to reference Tantithamthavorn C, Hassan AE, Matsumoto K (2017a) The impact of class rebalancing techniques on the performance and interpretation of defect prediction models. Under Review at Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE) Tantithamthavorn C, Hassan AE, Matsumoto K (2017a) The impact of class rebalancing techniques on the performance and interpretation of defect prediction models. Under Review at Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE)
go back to reference Tantithamthavorn C, McIntosh S, Hassan AE, Matsumoto K (2017b) An empirical comparison of model validation techniques for defect prediction models. Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE) 43(1):1–18CrossRef Tantithamthavorn C, McIntosh S, Hassan AE, Matsumoto K (2017b) An empirical comparison of model validation techniques for defect prediction models. Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE) 43(1):1–18CrossRef
go back to reference Thongtanunam P, McIntosh S, Hassan AE, Iida H (2015a) Investigating code review practices in defective files: an empirical study of the Qt system. In: Proceedings of the 12th working conference on mining software repositories (MSR), pp 168–179 Thongtanunam P, McIntosh S, Hassan AE, Iida H (2015a) Investigating code review practices in defective files: an empirical study of the Qt system. In: Proceedings of the 12th working conference on mining software repositories (MSR), pp 168–179
go back to reference Thongtanunam P, Tantithamthavorn C, Kula RG, Yoshida N, Iida H, Matsumoto K (2015b) Who should review my code? A file location-based code-reviewer recommendation approach for modern code review. In: Proceedings of the the 22nd international conference on software analysis, evolution, and reengineering (SANER), pp 141–150 Thongtanunam P, Tantithamthavorn C, Kula RG, Yoshida N, Iida H, Matsumoto K (2015b) Who should review my code? A file location-based code-reviewer recommendation approach for modern code review. In: Proceedings of the the 22nd international conference on software analysis, evolution, and reengineering (SANER), pp 141–150
go back to reference Thongtanunam P, McIntosh S, Hassan AE, Iida H (2016a) Review participation in modern code review: an empirical study of the Android, Qt, and OpenStack projects. Empirical Software Engineering (EMSE) 22(2):768–817CrossRef Thongtanunam P, McIntosh S, Hassan AE, Iida H (2016a) Review participation in modern code review: an empirical study of the Android, Qt, and OpenStack projects. Empirical Software Engineering (EMSE) 22(2):768–817CrossRef
go back to reference Thongtanunam P, McIntosh S, Hassan AE, Iida H (2016b) Revisiting code ownership and its relationship with software quality in the scope of modern code review. In: Proceedings of the 38th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 1039–1050 Thongtanunam P, McIntosh S, Hassan AE, Iida H (2016b) Revisiting code ownership and its relationship with software quality in the scope of modern code review. In: Proceedings of the 38th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp 1039–1050
go back to reference Vasilescu B, Serebrenik A, Devanbu P, Filkov V (2014) How social Q&A sites are changing knowledge sharing in open source software communities. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW), pp 342–354 Vasilescu B, Serebrenik A, Devanbu P, Filkov V (2014) How social Q&A sites are changing knowledge sharing in open source software communities. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW), pp 342–354
go back to reference van Wesel P, Lin B, Robles G, Serebrenik A (2017) Reviewing career paths of the openstack developers. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on software maintenance and evolution (ICSME), pp 544–548 van Wesel P, Lin B, Robles G, Serebrenik A (2017) Reviewing career paths of the openstack developers. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on software maintenance and evolution (ICSME), pp 544–548
go back to reference Whitehead J (2007) Collaboration in software engineering: a Roadmap. In: Proceedings of the 2007 future of software engineering (FOSE), pp 214–225 Whitehead J (2007) Collaboration in software engineering: a Roadmap. In: Proceedings of the 2007 future of software engineering (FOSE), pp 214–225
go back to reference Xia X, Lo D, Wang X, Yang X (2015) Who should review this change?: putting text and file location analyses together for more accurate recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on software maintenance and evolution (ICSME), pp 261–270 Xia X, Lo D, Wang X, Yang X (2015) Who should review this change?: putting text and file location analyses together for more accurate recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on software maintenance and evolution (ICSME), pp 261–270
go back to reference Yang X, Kula RG, Yoshida N, Iida H (2016a) Mining the modern code review repositories: a dataset of people, process and product. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on mining software repositories (MSR), pp 460–463 Yang X, Kula RG, Yoshida N, Iida H (2016a) Mining the modern code review repositories: a dataset of people, process and product. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on mining software repositories (MSR), pp 460–463
go back to reference Yang X, Yoshida N, Kula RG, Iida H (2016b) Peer review social network (peRSon) in open source projects. Transactions on Information and Systems E99.D (3):661–670CrossRef Yang X, Yoshida N, Kula RG, Iida H (2016b) Peer review social network (peRSon) in open source projects. Transactions on Information and Systems E99.D (3):661–670CrossRef
go back to reference Yu Y, Wang H, Yin G, Ling CX (2014) Reviewer recommender of pull-requests in GitHub. In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on software maintenance and evolution (ICSME), pp 610–613 Yu Y, Wang H, Yin G, Ling CX (2014) Reviewer recommender of pull-requests in GitHub. In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on software maintenance and evolution (ICSME), pp 610–613
go back to reference Zanjani MB, Kagdi H, Bird C (2016) Automatically recommending peer reviewers in modern code review. Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE) 42 (6):530–543CrossRef Zanjani MB, Kagdi H, Bird C (2016) Automatically recommending peer reviewers in modern code review. Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE) 42 (6):530–543CrossRef
go back to reference Zimmermann T, Zeller A, Weissgerber P, Diehl S (2005) Mining version histories to guide software changes. Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE) 31 (6):429–445CrossRef Zimmermann T, Zeller A, Weissgerber P, Diehl S (2005) Mining version histories to guide software changes. Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE) 31 (6):429–445CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The impact of human factors on the participation decision of reviewers in modern code review
Authors
Shade Ruangwan
Patanamon Thongtanunam
Akinori Ihara
Kenichi Matsumoto
Publication date
06-09-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1382-3256
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7616
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-018-9646-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Empirical Software Engineering 2/2019 Go to the issue

Premium Partner