Skip to main content
Top

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

14. The Innovation Process: Sparking Creativity by Cross-Industry Analogies

Authors : Marco Zeschky, Prof. Dr., Oliver Gassmann, Prof. Dr.

Published in: Business Innovation: Das St. Galler Modell

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

From invention to innovation – the distinction of the two concepts is critical if firms are to successfully introduce new products into the market. Invention, that is, a new solution to a problem – be it a technical concept, an outline of a manufacturing process, or a service concept – only transforms into an innovation if it takes the form of a product for which the market is willing to pay. The innovation process is a structured approach that links invention and innovation and helps developing early stage ideas and concepts (i.e., inventions) to marketable products, processes, or services. Today, the innovation process is a constituting part of every successful company. With respect to the St. Gallen Business Innovation framework, the innovation process is the vehicle by which products and services as well as entire processes and business models can be systematically innovated.
In this chapter, the focus is on the early phase of the innovation process where new product ideas are generated – the very first phase in the innovation process of the St. Gallen Business Innovation framework. This phase is coined by individual and collective creativity as vital preconditions for new ideas and, therefore, for any physical product development activities. First, the innovation process in a wider sense is described with a focus on its early phase. The chapter continues by focusing on the specific use of analogical thinking in the early phase to spark creativity and increase the number of highly novel product ideas. Finally, based on four cases where analogical thinking across industry boundaries has led to successful product innovations, we describe the Cross-Industry Innovation (CII) process that entails the use of analogical thinking within the wider frame of the innovation process. The chapter concludes by providing guidelines to management practice regarding critical success factors in the CII process.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
For reasons of simplicity we refer to “product” as an umbrella term that includes product, process, and service solutions.
 
Literature
go back to reference Brockhoff K (1994) Forschung und Entwicklung. Planung und Kontrolle. Oldenbourg, München Brockhoff K (1994) Forschung und Entwicklung. Planung und Kontrolle. Oldenbourg, München
go back to reference Cooper R (1990) Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Bus Horizons 33(3):44–54CrossRef Cooper R (1990) Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Bus Horizons 33(3):44–54CrossRef
go back to reference Cooper R (1994) Third-generation new product processes. J Product Innovation Manag 11(1):3–14CrossRef Cooper R (1994) Third-generation new product processes. J Product Innovation Manag 11(1):3–14CrossRef
go back to reference Dahl DW, Moreau P (2002) The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. J Marketing Res 39(1):47CrossRef Dahl DW, Moreau P (2002) The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. J Marketing Res 39(1):47CrossRef
go back to reference De Bono E (2000) Six Thinking Hats. Penguin Books, London De Bono E (2000) Six Thinking Hats. Penguin Books, London
go back to reference Gagne CL, Shoben EJ (1997) Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. J Experimental Psychol: Learning, Memory and Cognition 23(1):71 Gagne CL, Shoben EJ (1997) Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. J Experimental Psychol: Learning, Memory and Cognition 23(1):71
go back to reference Gassmann O, Zeschky M, Wolff T, Stahl M (2010) Crossing the industry-line: breakthrough innovation through cross-industry alliances with ‘non-suppliers’. Long Range Planning 43(5–6):639–654CrossRef Gassmann O, Zeschky M, Wolff T, Stahl M (2010) Crossing the industry-line: breakthrough innovation through cross-industry alliances with ‘non-suppliers’. Long Range Planning 43(5–6):639–654CrossRef
go back to reference Gavetti G, Rivkin JW (2005) How strategists really think. Harvard Business Rev 83:152 Gavetti G, Rivkin JW (2005) How strategists really think. Harvard Business Rev 83:152
go back to reference Gentner D, Rattermann MJ (1993) The roles of similarity in transfer: separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychol 25(4):524CrossRef Gentner D, Rattermann MJ (1993) The roles of similarity in transfer: separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychol 25(4):524CrossRef
go back to reference Hampton JA (1998) Conceptual combination: Conjunction and negation of natural concepts. Memory & Cognition 25(6):888CrossRef Hampton JA (1998) Conceptual combination: Conjunction and negation of natural concepts. Memory & Cognition 25(6):888CrossRef
go back to reference Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology Brokering and Innovation in a Product Development Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(4):716–749CrossRef Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology Brokering and Innovation in a Product Development Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(4):716–749CrossRef
go back to reference Herstatt C, Kalogerakis K (2005) How to use analogies for breakthrough innovations. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 2(3):331–347CrossRef Herstatt C, Kalogerakis K (2005) How to use analogies for breakthrough innovations. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 2(3):331–347CrossRef
go back to reference Holyoak KJ, Thagard P (1995) Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. MIT Press, Cambridge MA Holyoak KJ, Thagard P (1995) Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. MIT Press, Cambridge MA
go back to reference Khurana A, Rosenthal S (1997) Integrating the Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development. Sloan Management Review 38(2):103–105 Khurana A, Rosenthal S (1997) Integrating the Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development. Sloan Management Review 38(2):103–105
go back to reference Kim J, Wilemon D (2002) Focusing the fuzzy front end in new product development. R&D Manag 32(4):269–279CrossRef Kim J, Wilemon D (2002) Focusing the fuzzy front end in new product development. R&D Manag 32(4):269–279CrossRef
go back to reference Reid S, de Bretani U (2004) The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: a theoretical model. J Product Innovation Manag 21(3):170–184CrossRef Reid S, de Bretani U (2004) The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: a theoretical model. J Product Innovation Manag 21(3):170–184CrossRef
go back to reference Ross BH (1989) Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems. J Experimental Psychol: Learning, Memory and Cognition 15(3):456 Ross BH (1989) Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems. J Experimental Psychol: Learning, Memory and Cognition 15(3):456
go back to reference Ward TB (2004) Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship. J Bus Venturing 19(2):173CrossRef Ward TB (2004) Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship. J Bus Venturing 19(2):173CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Innovation Process: Sparking Creativity by Cross-Industry Analogies
Authors
Marco Zeschky, Prof. Dr.
Oliver Gassmann, Prof. Dr.
Copyright Year
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07167-7_14

Premium Partner