Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

13. The Just Deserts Economy

Author : Joseph de la Torre Dwyer

Published in: Chance, Merit, and Economic Inequality

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter notes that, were the Just Deserts proposal in fact implemented, the economy would look much different. As such, the chapter highlights three areas of impact: philanthropy, women, and disability. By separating chance from merit, philanthropic organizations will see the characteristics of their beneficiaries radically change. Surprisingly, and justly, the economic gender gap will disappear. Lastly, disability is likely to receive increased attention as ability, opportunity, and desert begin to play such an important role in people’s lives. The hope is that philanthropists, feminists, and stakeholders in the disability field will consider Just Deserts an ally and will seek to further its aims by refining its estimates of merit.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Cf. Arneson (2007), 270–210.
 
2
Anderson (1999), 289; Sugin (2011).
 
3
Nagel (1979), 24.
 
4
Of course, Just Deserts can accommodate any sex or gender classification beyond individual control that humans can measure.
 
5
Anderson (1999).
 
6
Abramovitz (1996).
 
7
Weichselbaumer and Winter-Ebmer (2005).
 
8
Brault (2012), 10–12, also cf. Table 1. Note, by individuals I refer to civilian, non-institutionalized persons.
 
9
Arneson (2007).
 
10
Scanlon (1986), 116–117.
 
11
Lake (2001), 57.
 
12
Dworkin argues that individuals should be responsible for preferences with which they identify. Dworkin (1981a); Fleurbaey is also very interested in the subjective elements of responsibility. Fleurbaey (2008), chap. 6.
 
13
Preferences should here be understood to mean first-order or second-order desires or volitions as long as such may be exogenously dependent upon circumstances of chance. Frankfurt (1971), 7–14.
 
14
Cohen (1989); Roemer (2012), 166.
 
15
Admittedly, I would like to give more thought to the question of what we owe, if anything, to children under a Just Deserts proposal. Here I proceed tentatively and assume that the skeptic has not persuaded us that post-birth humans are moral agents.
 
Literature
go back to reference 26 U.S. Code § 63 - Taxable Income Defined. 2000. 26 U.S. Code § 63 - Taxable Income Defined. 2000.
go back to reference Aaberge, Rolf, Magne Mogstad, and Vitorocco Peragine. 2011. Measuring Long-Term Inequality of Opportunity. Journal of Public Economics 95 (3): 193–204.CrossRef Aaberge, Rolf, Magne Mogstad, and Vitorocco Peragine. 2011. Measuring Long-Term Inequality of Opportunity. Journal of Public Economics 95 (3): 193–204.CrossRef
go back to reference Abramovitz, Mimi. 1996. Regulating the Lives of Women: Social Welfare Policy from Colonial Times to the Present. Boston, MA: South End Press. Abramovitz, Mimi. 1996. Regulating the Lives of Women: Social Welfare Policy from Colonial Times to the Present. Boston, MA: South End Press.
go back to reference Adler, Matthew. 2011. Well-Being and Fair Distribution: Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Adler, Matthew. 2011. Well-Being and Fair Distribution: Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Allaire, J.J., et al. 2018. rmarkdown: Dynamic Documents for R. R package version 1.11. Allaire, J.J., et al. 2018. rmarkdown: Dynamic Documents for R. R package version 1.11.
go back to reference Almås, Ingvild, et al. 2011. Measuring Unfair (in)Equality. Journal of Public Economics 95 (7–8): 488–499.CrossRef Almås, Ingvild, et al. 2011. Measuring Unfair (in)Equality. Journal of Public Economics 95 (7–8): 488–499.CrossRef
go back to reference Alperovitz, Gar, and Lew Daly. 2008. Unjust Deserts: How the Rich Are Taking Our Common Inheritance and Why We Should Take It Back. New York, NY: The New Press. Alperovitz, Gar, and Lew Daly. 2008. Unjust Deserts: How the Rich Are Taking Our Common Inheritance and Why We Should Take It Back. New York, NY: The New Press.
go back to reference Alstott, Anne, and Bruce A. Ackerman. 1999. The Stakeholder Society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Alstott, Anne, and Bruce A. Ackerman. 1999. The Stakeholder Society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
go back to reference Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. What Is the Point of Equality? Ethics 109 (2): 287–337.CrossRef Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. What Is the Point of Equality? Ethics 109 (2): 287–337.CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson, Elizabeth. 2015. The Fundamental Disagreement Between Luck Egalitarians and Relational Egalitarians. In Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage: G. A. Cohen’s Egalitarianism, ed. Alexander Kaufman, 21–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Anderson, Elizabeth. 2015. The Fundamental Disagreement Between Luck Egalitarians and Relational Egalitarians. In Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage: G. A. Cohen’s Egalitarianism, ed. Alexander Kaufman, 21–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean Ethics. 2nd ed. Trans. Terence Irwin. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean Ethics. 2nd ed. Trans. Terence Irwin. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
go back to reference Arneson, Richard J. 1989. Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Philosophical Studies 56 (1): 77–93.CrossRef Arneson, Richard J. 1989. Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Philosophical Studies 56 (1): 77–93.CrossRef
go back to reference Arneson, Richard J. 1990. Liberalism, Distributive Subjectivism, and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Philosophy & Public Affairs 19 (2): 158–194. Arneson, Richard J. 1990. Liberalism, Distributive Subjectivism, and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Philosophy & Public Affairs 19 (2): 158–194.
go back to reference Arneson, Richard J. 2003. The Smart Theory of Moral Responsibility. In Desert and Justice, ed. Serena Olsaretti, 233–258. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Arneson, Richard J. 2003. The Smart Theory of Moral Responsibility. In Desert and Justice, ed. Serena Olsaretti, 233–258. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Metadata
Title
The Just Deserts Economy
Author
Joseph de la Torre Dwyer
Copyright Year
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21126-4_13