Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Integrating Perspectives on Adaptive Capacity and Environmental Governance Read chapter Read first chapter

2010 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

10. The Learning Dimension of Adaptive Capacity: Untangling the Multi-level Connections

Author : Alan Diduck

Published in: Adaptive Capacity and Environmental Governance

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter summarizes learning processes at individual, action group, organizational, network, and societal levels of analysis, and details connections linking learning outcomes across multiple levels. The discussion highlights how learning processes may not adequately accommodate contested values, power imbalances, and socio-economic constraints. The chapter casts light on adaptive capacity in multi-level governance by developing the concept of multi-level learning, suggesting ways to produce complementarity across multiple organizational levels, and supporting the proposition that relational spaces enhance adaptive capacity. The chapter also reveals the need for further theoretical development, including fully accounting for network and societal levels of analysis, assessing promising linking institutions (such as community-based social marketing and adaptive co-management), and addressing power asymmetries in learning dynamics. A promising avenue regarding the last point is giving more attention in theory and practice to critical, non-formal education. Further, the chapter emphasizes the need for place-based empirical studies of existing institutions.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Institutional Fit and Interplay in a Dryland Agricultural Social–Ecological System in Alberta, Canada
next chapter Adaptive Capacity as a Dynamic Institutional Process: Conceptual Perspectives and Their Application
Footnotes
1
My definition of governance is similar to the one adopted in Chap.​ 1: the processes and institutions used to address challenges and create opportunities in society (Armitage et al. 2009).
 
2
I have adopted Young’s (2002, p. 286) definition of institutions, which is similar in approach and breadth to the definition used in the first chapter: “institutions are the conventions, norms and formally sanctioned rules of a society. They provide expectations, stability and meaning essential to human existence and coordination. Institutions regularize life, support values and produce and protect interest”.
 
3
Organizational theory describes three similar forms of learning (Argyris 1977, 1990; Argyris and Schön 1978; Easterby-Smith et al. 2000; Flood and Romm 1996). Single-loop learning involves improving efficacy, or getting better at fulfilling existing purposes in the context of a given set of fundamental governing variables. Double-loop learning involves evaluation of and changes to both instrumental means and ends and fundamental governing variables. Triple-loop learning asks if power structures act too much in support of selected and privileged definitions of rightness. Additionally, emancipatory learning was influenced by Paulo Freire’s “pedagogy of the oppressed” (Freire 1970, 1973). This educational approach is intended specifically to counter power asymmetries and hegemonic influences. It looks to empower the disenfranchised, challenge socio-political and economic presuppositions, foster emancipatory learning, and mobilize concerted action for structural change.
 
4
I adopt Woodhill’s (2002) definition of social learning as my definition of societal learning minus the restrictive sustainability criterion – see Sect. 3.2.5.
 
5
Nonformal adult learning results from deliberate education for adults occurring outside of educational institutions, such as facilitated activities found in community groups and organizations. Nonformal learning is different from informal learning, which refers to the experiences of everyday living from which individuals learn something (Merriam et al. 2007).
 
6
I have adopted an expansive definition of power: an expression of human agency in the context of enduring structural preconditions that has coercive, constraining, and systemic consent-producing dimensions (Raik et al. 2008).
 
Literature
Alexander D (1999) Planning as learning: sustainability and the education of citizen activists. Environments 27(2):79–87
Andrews KM, Delahaye BL (2000) Influences of knowledge process in organizational learning: the psychosocial filter. J Manage Stud 37(6):797–810CrossRef
Argyris C (1977) Double loop learning in organizations. Harv Bus Rev 55:115–125
Argyris C (1990) Overcoming organizational defenses: facilitating organizational learning. Allyn and Bacon, Wellesley
Argyris C, Schön DA (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Armitage D (2005) Adaptive capacity and community-based natural resource management. Environ Manage 35(6):703–715CrossRef
Armitage D, Berkes F, Doubleday N (eds) (2007) Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. UBC, Vancouver
Armitage D, Marschke M, Plummer R (2008) Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Glob Environ Change 18(1):86–98CrossRef
Armitage D, Plummer R, Berkes F, Arthur R, Davidson-Hunt I, Diduck AP, Doubleday N, Johnson D, Marschke M, McConney P, Pinkerton E, Wollenberg L (2009) Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity. Front Ecol Environ 7(2):95–102CrossRef
Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Bapuji H, Crossan M (2004) From questions to answers: reviewing organizational learning research. Manage Learn 35(4):397–417CrossRef
Blackler F, McDonald S (2000) Power, mastery and organizational learning. J Manage Stud 37(6):833–851CrossRef
Blackmore C (2007) What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas?: a theoretical overview. Environ Sci Policy 10(6):512–525CrossRef
Bouwen R, Taillieu T (2004) Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 14:137–153CrossRef
Brown ML (2006) What have we learned about organizational learning? In: Brown ML, Lenney M, Zarkin M (eds) Organizational learning in the global context. Ashgate, Hampshire, pp 255–261
Coopey J, Burgoyne J (2000) Politics and organizational learning. J Manage Stud 37(6):869–885CrossRef
Crossan MM, Lane H, White RE (1999) An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Acad Manage Rev 24(3):522–537
Daniels SE, Walker GB (1996) Collaborative learning: improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management. Environ Impact Assess Rev 16(2):71–102CrossRef
Dewey J, Sidorsky D (1977) John Dewey: the essential writings. Harper & Row, New York
Diduck AP (1999) Critical education in resource and environmental management: learning and empowerment for a sustainable future. J Environ Manage 57(2):85–97CrossRef
Diduck AP, Mitchell B (2003) Learning, public involvement and environmental assessment: a Canadian case study. J Environ Assess Policy Manage 5(3):339–364CrossRef
Diduck AP, Sinclair AJ (1997) The concept of critical environmental assessment (EA) education. Can Geogr 41(4):294–307CrossRef
Easterby-Smith M, Crossan M, Nicolini D (2000) Organizational learning: debates past, present and future. J Manage Stud 36(6):783–796CrossRef
Elkjaer B (2004) Organizational learning: the ‘third way’. Manage Learn 35(4):419–434CrossRef
Ferdinand J (2004) Power, politics and state intervention in organizational learning. Manage Learn 35(4):435–450CrossRef
Fitzpatrick P (2006) In it together: organizational learning through participation in environmental assessment. Environ Assess Policy Manage 8(2):157–182CrossRef
Fitzpatrick P, Sinclair AJ (2003) Learning through public involvement environmental assessment hearings. J Environ Manage 67(2):161–174CrossRef
Flood RL, Romm NRA (1996) Diversity management: triple loop learning. Wiley, Chichester
Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analysis. Global Environ Change 16(3):253–267CrossRef
Folke C, Colding J, Berkes F (2003) Synthesis: building resilience and adaptive capacity in socio-ecological systems. In: Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J (eds) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 352–387
Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury, New York
Freire P (1973) Education for critical consciousness. Seabury, New York
Friedmann J (1987) Planning in the public domain: from knowledge to action. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Glasser R, Manty D, Nehman G (1975) Public participation in water resource planning. International Water Resources Association and UNESCO Seminar, Paris and Strasbourg
Haas PM (2000) International institutions and social learning in the management of global environmental risks. Policy Stud J 28(3):558–575CrossRef
Habermas J (1979) Communication and the evolution of society. Beacon, Boston
Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action. Beacon, Boston
Hayward G, Diduck AP, Mitchell B (2007) Social learning outcomes in the Red River Floodway environmental assessment. Environ Pract 9(4):239–250
Hedberg B (1981) How organizations learn and unlearn. In: Nystrom PC, Starbuck WH (eds) Handbook of organization design, vol 1, Adapting organizations to their environments. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–27
Holden M (2008) Social learning in planning: Seattle’s sustainable development codebooks. Prog Plann 69(1):1–40CrossRef
Holling CS (ed) (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Wiley, Chichester
Keen M, Brown VA, Dyball R (2005) Social learning: a new approach to environmental management. In: Keen M, Brown VA, Dyball R (eds) Social learning in environmental management: towards a sustainable future. Earthscan, London, pp 3–21
Knight L, Pye A (2004) Exploring the relationships between network change and network learning. Manage Learn 35(4):473–490CrossRef
Knight L, Pye A (2005) Network learning: an empirically derived model of learning by groups of organizations. Hum Relat 58(3):369–392CrossRef
Korten D (1980) Community organization and rural development: a learning process approach. Public Adm Rev 40(5):480–511CrossRef
Leeuwis C, Pyburn R (eds) (2002) Wheel-barrows full of frogs: Social learning in rural resource management. Koninklijke Van Gorcum, Assen
Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annu Rev Sociol 14:319–340CrossRef
Levy JS (1994) Learning and foreign policy: sweeping a conceptual minefield. Int Organ 48(2):279–312CrossRef
Lundholm C, Plummer R (2010) Resilience and learning: a conspectus for environmental education. Environmental Education Research (in press)
Maarleveld M, Dangbégnon C (1999) Managing natural resources: a social learning perspective. Agric Human Values 16:267–280CrossRef
McKenzie-Mohr D, Smith W (1999) Fostering sustainable behavior: an introduction to community-based social marketing. New Society, Gabriola Island
Merriam SB, Caffarella RS, Baumgartner LM (2007) Learning in adulthood: a comprehensive guide. Wiley, San Francisco
Mezirow J (ed) (1990) Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: a guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Mezirow J (1991) Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Mezirow J (ed) (2000) Learning as transformation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Montuori A (2005) Literature review as creative inquiry: reframing scholarship as a creative process. J Transformative Educ 3(4):374–393CrossRef
Muro M, Jeffrey P (2008) A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes. J Environ Plann Manage 51(3):325–344CrossRef
North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
Olivera F (2000) Memory systems in organizations: an empirical investigation of mechanisms for knowledge collection, storage and access. J Manage Stud 37(6):811–832CrossRef
Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004a) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ Manage 34(1):75–90CrossRef
Olsson P, Folke C, Hughes TP (2008) Navigating the transition to ecosystem-based management of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(28):9489–9494CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl C, Tàbara D, Bouwen R, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Ridder D, Taillieu T (2008) The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management. Ecol Econ 64(4):484–495CrossRef
Parson EA, Clark WC (1995) Sustainable development as social learning: theoretical perspectives and practical challenges for the design of a research program. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (eds) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 428–460
Pelling M, High C, Dearing J, Smith D (2008) Shadow spaces for social learning: a relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organisations. Environ Plann A 40:867–884CrossRef
Raik DB, Wilson AL, Decker DJ (2008) Power in natural resources management: an application of theory. Soc Nat Resour 21(8):729–739CrossRef
Rist S, Chidambaranathan M, Escobar C, Wiesmann U, Zimmermann A (2007) Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: the role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. J Rural Stud 23(1):23–37CrossRef
Röling NG (2002) Beyond the aggregation of individual preferences. In: Leeuwis C, Pyburn R (eds) Wheel-barrows full of frogs: social learning in rural resource management. Koninklijke Van Gorcum, Assen, pp 25–47
Röling N, Maarleveld M (1999) Facing strategic narratives: an argument for interactive effectiveness. Agric Hum Values 16(3):295–308CrossRef
Salomon G, Perkins DN (1998) Individual and social aspects of learning. Rev Res Educ 23(1):1–24CrossRef
Schusler TM, Decker DJ, Pfeffer MJ (2003) Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 16(4):309–326CrossRef
Sinclair AJ, Diduck AP (2001) Public involvement in environmental assessment in Canada: a transformative learning perspective. Environ Impact Assess Rev 21(2):113–136CrossRef
Steyaert P, Jiggins J (2007) Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: A synthesis of SLIM’s lessons for research, policy and practice. Environ Sci Policy 10(6):575–586CrossRef
Tetlock PE (1991) Learning in U.S. and Soviet foreign policy: in search of an elusive concept. In: Breslauer GW, Tetlock PE (eds) Learning in US and Soviet foreign policy. Westview, Boulder, pp 20–61
Torraco RJ (2005) Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Hum Resour Dev Rev 4(3):356–367CrossRef
Waddell SJ (2005) Societal learning and change: how governments, business and civil society are creating solutions to complex multi-stakeholder problems. Greenleaf, Pensacola
Webler T, Kastenholz H, Renn O (1995) Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective. Environ Impact Assess Rev 15(5):443–463CrossRef
Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Wiklund H (2005) In search of arenas for democratic deliberation: a Habermasian review of environmental assessment. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal 23(4):281–292CrossRef
Woodhill J (2002) Sustainability, social learning and the democratic imperative. In: Leeuwis C, Pyburn R (eds) Wheel-barrows full of frogs: social learning in rural resource management. Koninklijke Van Gorcum, Assen, pp 317–331
Young OR (2002) Institutional interplay: the environmental consequences of cross-scale interactions. In: Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolsak N, Stern PC, Stonich S, Weber EU (eds) The drama of the commons. National Academy, Washington, DC, pp 263–291
Metadata
Title
The Learning Dimension of Adaptive Capacity: Untangling the Multi-level Connections
Author
Alan Diduck
Copyright Year
2010
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Book
Adaptive Capacity and Environmental Governance

Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12193-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-12194-4

Copyright Year: 2010

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12194-4_10