Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2/2012

01-02-2012 | Perspectives

The many faces of nano in newspaper reporting

Authors: Max Boholm, Åsa Boholm

Published in: Journal of Nanoparticle Research | Issue 2/2012

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The morpheme nano in languages such as Swedish and English is a constituent of many words. This article linguistically analyses the meaning potential of nano by focusing on word use in a Swedish newspaper corpus comprising 2,564 articles (1.6 million words) covering a 22-year period (1988–2010). Close to 400 word forms having nano as a constituent have been identified and analyzed. The results suggest that nano covers a broad and heterogeneous conceptual field: (i) as a prefix of the SI system; (ii) in relation to the scientific activities of nanoscience and nanotechnology, including their sub-processes and actors; and (iii) in relation to objects. The identified meanings of nano, besides the standard definition (i.e. ‘billionth part’ in relation to SI units), are ‘operating at the nanometre level’ in relation to activities and their actors and ‘nanometre sized’ and ‘nanotechnological’ in relation to objects; in addition, the less precise and non-technical meaning ‘very small’ is identified. We discuss the implications of the findings for a hypothesis about media influence on public understanding of technology, suggesting that repeated findings in Europe and the USA of little self-reported understanding and knowledge of nanotechnology or nanoscience among the public make sense in light of the polysemy of nano reflected in its broad variety of verbal forms and usages.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
The fifteen most frequently represented newspapers in the corpus, accounting for 75% of the articles, are the respected national morning papers Svenska Dagbladet (269 articles) and Dagens Nyheter (200 articles), the national daily evening tabloids Aftonbladet (120 articles), Expressen (68 articles), and GT (27 articles), the free daily morning paper Metro (101 articles), the daily local/regional morning papers Sydsvenskan (383 articles), Göteborgs Posten (267 articles), Helsingborgs Dagblad (124 articles), Borås Tidning (83 articles), Nerikes Allehanda (67 articles), Hallands Nyheter (49 articles), Västerbottens Kuriren (37 articles), and Dala Demokraten (33 articles) and the national business-oriented newspaper Dagens Industri (110 articles).
 
2
Many of the proper names excluded from analysis are indeed related to the Greek word nanos meaning ‘dwarf’, for example, Ipod Nano, the Tata Nano, and the company name Nanosolar, but these proper names are excluded due to space limitations. Furthermore, determining whether or not two or more words are homonyms can be exacting, so apparent homonyms might indeed be related to the Greek word for dwarf in the way that, for example, the female name Sophia is related to the Greek word sophia for ‘wisdom’, as in philosophy (meaning ‘love of wisdom’). Until a detailed etymological analysis of these supposed homonyms is conducted, this possibility cannot ultimately be ruled out.
 
3
The polysemous word word is referred to in the sense of lexeme (or lemma), i.e., an abstract notion for a set of word forms related by inflection (Lyons 1968; Stubbs 2002). For example, the lemma nanoteknologi (‘nanotechnology’), a noun, includes the word forms nanoteknologi (‘nanotechnology’), i.e., the singular form, nanoteknologier (‘nanotechnologies’), i.e., the plural form, and the genitive forms of these, nanoteknologis (‘nanotechnology’s’) and nanoteknologiers (‘nanotechnologies’). In Swedish, definiteness is also indicated by inflection, for example, nanoteknologin (‘the nanotechnology’). This means that the words (lexemes) referred to below, and their frequencies, often encompass many inflected word forms in the corpus.
 
4
Both words are here translated as ‘nanotechnology’. Etymologically, teknologi in Swedish, and technology in English, would stand for ‘the knowledge of technique’, and teknik for the practical application of knowledge or skill, as in the English word technique. However, the word teknik is (today) often used as more or less synonymous with teknologi.
 
5
The philosopher Bertrand Russell (1923) argued that all words are more or less vague.
 
6
A Swedish mil is ten kilometers, approximately six English miles.
 
7
A nanosatellite is not a nanosized satellite (1–100 nm); rather, it is a satellite weighing 1–10 kg, making it small in relation to others.
 
8
The distinction between count and mass nouns, or non-count nouns, is less trivial than it first may seem. It would perhaps be better to distinguish count and non-count (mass) uses of nouns. See, for example, Collins and Hollo (2010) for a standard textbook discussion of the distinction in linguistics, and Laycock (2005) for a philosophical/ontological discussion of problems with the distinction.
 
9
The word nanofabrik (‘nanofactory’) is not used as a counterpart to nanolaboratory for the commercial application of nanotechnology. It instead refers to a hypothetical system of nanolevel machines able to construct atomically precise nanostructures, which would in turn be components of macro-level devices.
 
10
An alternative explanation is that these words are instances of the less precise meaning of nano, namely, ‘very small’ as in nanobil (‘nanocar’), nanosattelite (‘nanosatellite’) or nanoblogg (‘nanoblog’) (see next section), and hence need not be modified by any rhetorical exaggeration.
 
Literature
go back to reference Allan S, Anderson A, Petersen A (2010) Framing risk: nanotechnology in the news. J Risk Res 13(1–2):29–44CrossRef Allan S, Anderson A, Petersen A (2010) Framing risk: nanotechnology in the news. J Risk Res 13(1–2):29–44CrossRef
go back to reference Allwood J (1998) Semantics as meaning determination with semantic–epistemic operations. In: Allwood J, Gärdenfors P (eds) Cognitive semantics: meaning and cognition. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp 1–18 Allwood J (1998) Semantics as meaning determination with semantic–epistemic operations. In: Allwood J, Gärdenfors P (eds) Cognitive semantics: meaning and cognition. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp 1–18
go back to reference Allwood J (2003) Meaning potential and context: some consequences for the analysis of variation in meaning. In: Cuyckens H, Dirven R, Taylor JR (eds) Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, pp 29–66CrossRef Allwood J (2003) Meaning potential and context: some consequences for the analysis of variation in meaning. In: Cuyckens H, Dirven R, Taylor JR (eds) Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, pp 29–66CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson A, Allan S, Petersen A, Wilkinson C (2005) The framing of nanotechnologies in the British newspaper press. Sci Commun 27:200–220CrossRef Anderson A, Allan S, Petersen A, Wilkinson C (2005) The framing of nanotechnologies in the British newspaper press. Sci Commun 27:200–220CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson A, Petersen A, Wilkinson C, Allan S (2009) Nanotechnology, risk and communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, New YorkCrossRef Anderson A, Petersen A, Wilkinson C, Allan S (2009) Nanotechnology, risk and communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, New YorkCrossRef
go back to reference Balzani V (2005) Nanoscience and nanotechnology: a personal view of a chemist. Small 1(3):278–283CrossRef Balzani V (2005) Nanoscience and nanotechnology: a personal view of a chemist. Small 1(3):278–283CrossRef
go back to reference Collins P, Hollo C (2010) English grammar: an introduction. Palgrave Macmillan, London Collins P, Hollo C (2010) English grammar: an introduction. Palgrave Macmillan, London
go back to reference Cormick C (2009) Why do we need to know what the public thinks about nanotechnology? Nanoethics 3:167–173CrossRef Cormick C (2009) Why do we need to know what the public thinks about nanotechnology? Nanoethics 3:167–173CrossRef
go back to reference Crichton M (2002) Prey. HarperCollins, New York Crichton M (2002) Prey. HarperCollins, New York
go back to reference Drexler E (1986) Engines of creation: the coming era of nanotechnology. Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City Drexler E (1986) Engines of creation: the coming era of nanotechnology. Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City
go back to reference Dudo AD, Choi D-H, Scheufele DA (2011) Food nanotechnology in the news: coverage patterns and thematic emphases during the last decade. Appetite 56(1):78–89CrossRef Dudo AD, Choi D-H, Scheufele DA (2011) Food nanotechnology in the news: coverage patterns and thematic emphases during the last decade. Appetite 56(1):78–89CrossRef
go back to reference Entman RM (1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 43(4):51–58CrossRef Entman RM (1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 43(4):51–58CrossRef
go back to reference Faber B (2006) Popularizing nanoscience: the public rhetoric of nanotechnology, 1986–1999. Tech Commun Q 15(2):141–169CrossRef Faber B (2006) Popularizing nanoscience: the public rhetoric of nanotechnology, 1986–1999. Tech Commun Q 15(2):141–169CrossRef
go back to reference Faber B, Mackinnon J, Petroccione M (2005) Media portraits of nanotech in North American written media: 1986–2000. Nanotechnol Law Bus 2(4):248–363 Faber B, Mackinnon J, Petroccione M (2005) Media portraits of nanotech in North American written media: 1986–2000. Nanotechnol Law Bus 2(4):248–363
go back to reference Fillmore CJ (1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6(2):222–254 Fillmore CJ (1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6(2):222–254
go back to reference Friedman SM, Egolf BP (2005) Nanotechnology: risks and the media. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 24:5–11CrossRef Friedman SM, Egolf BP (2005) Nanotechnology: risks and the media. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 24:5–11CrossRef
go back to reference Gaskell G, Eyck TT, Jackson J (2005) Imagining nanotechnology: cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States. Public Underst Sci 14:81–90CrossRef Gaskell G, Eyck TT, Jackson J (2005) Imagining nanotechnology: cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States. Public Underst Sci 14:81–90CrossRef
go back to reference Goffman E (1974) Frame analysis: an essay on the organisation of experience. Pengiun Books, Harmondsworth Goffman E (1974) Frame analysis: an essay on the organisation of experience. Pengiun Books, Harmondsworth
go back to reference Gorss J, Lewenstein B (2005) The salience of the small: nanotechnology coverage in the American press, 1986–2004. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, May 27, New York Gorss J, Lewenstein B (2005) The salience of the small: nanotechnology coverage in the American press, 1986–2004. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, May 27, New York
go back to reference Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL (eds) Syntax and semantics: speech acts, vol 3. Academic Press, New York, pp 41–58 Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL (eds) Syntax and semantics: speech acts, vol 3. Academic Press, New York, pp 41–58
go back to reference Halliday MAK (1973) Explorations in the functions of language. Edward Arnold, London Halliday MAK (1973) Explorations in the functions of language. Edward Arnold, London
go back to reference Hunston S, Francis G (2000) Pattern grammar: a corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. John Benjamins, Amsterdam Hunston S, Francis G (2000) Pattern grammar: a corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
go back to reference Kahan DM, Braman D, Slovic P, Gastil J, Cohen G (2008) Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nat Nanotechnol 4:87–90CrossRef Kahan DM, Braman D, Slovic P, Gastil J, Cohen G (2008) Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nat Nanotechnol 4:87–90CrossRef
go back to reference Kjølberg KL (2009) Representations of nanotechnology in Norwegian newspapers: implications for public participation. Nanoethics 3(1):61–72CrossRef Kjølberg KL (2009) Representations of nanotechnology in Norwegian newspapers: implications for public participation. Nanoethics 3(1):61–72CrossRef
go back to reference Landau J, Groscurth CR, Wright L, Condit CM (2009) Visualizing nanotechnology: the impact of visual images on lay American audience associations with nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 18(3):325–337CrossRef Landau J, Groscurth CR, Wright L, Condit CM (2009) Visualizing nanotechnology: the impact of visual images on lay American audience associations with nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 18(3):325–337CrossRef
go back to reference Laycock H (2005) Mass nouns, count nouns and non-count nouns. In: Brown K (ed) Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 534–538 Laycock H (2005) Mass nouns, count nouns and non-count nouns. In: Brown K (ed) Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 534–538
go back to reference Lösch A (2006) Anticipating the futures of nanotechnology: visionary images as means of communication. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 18(3/4):393–409 Lösch A (2006) Anticipating the futures of nanotechnology: visionary images as means of communication. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 18(3/4):393–409
go back to reference Lyons J (1968) Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Lyons J (1968) Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Matthiessen CMIM (2009) Meaning in the making: meaning potential emerging from acts of meaning. Lang Learn 59(1):206–229CrossRef Matthiessen CMIM (2009) Meaning in the making: meaning potential emerging from acts of meaning. Lang Learn 59(1):206–229CrossRef
go back to reference Nerlich B (2008) Powered by imagination: nanobots at the Science Photo Library. Sci Cult 17(3):269–292CrossRef Nerlich B (2008) Powered by imagination: nanobots at the Science Photo Library. Sci Cult 17(3):269–292CrossRef
go back to reference Neuman WR, Just MR, Cringler AN (1992) Common knowledge: news and the construction of political meaning. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London Neuman WR, Just MR, Cringler AN (1992) Common knowledge: news and the construction of political meaning. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London
go back to reference Pidgeon N, Harthorn BH, Bryant H, Rogers-Hayden T (2009) Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nat Nanotechnol 4:95–98CrossRef Pidgeon N, Harthorn BH, Bryant H, Rogers-Hayden T (2009) Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nat Nanotechnol 4:95–98CrossRef
go back to reference Priest S, Greenhalgh T, Kramer V (2010) Risk perceptions starting to shift? U.S. citizens are forming opinions about nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 12:11–20CrossRef Priest S, Greenhalgh T, Kramer V (2010) Risk perceptions starting to shift? U.S. citizens are forming opinions about nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 12:11–20CrossRef
go back to reference Recanati F (2004) Literal meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Recanati F (2004) Literal meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Scheufele DA (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. J Commun 49(1):103–122CrossRef Scheufele DA (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. J Commun 49(1):103–122CrossRef
go back to reference Scheufele DA, Lewenstein BV (2005) The public and nanotechnology: how citizens make sense of emerging technologies. J Nanopart Res 7:659–667CrossRef Scheufele DA, Lewenstein BV (2005) The public and nanotechnology: how citizens make sense of emerging technologies. J Nanopart Res 7:659–667CrossRef
go back to reference Scheufele DA, Corley EA, Shih T, Dalrymple KE, Ho SS (2008) Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. Nat Nanotechnol 4:91–94CrossRef Scheufele DA, Corley EA, Shih T, Dalrymple KE, Ho SS (2008) Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. Nat Nanotechnol 4:91–94CrossRef
go back to reference Schmidt Kjaergard R (2010) Making a small country count: nanotechnology in Danish newspapers from 1996–2006. Public Underst Sci 19(1):80–97CrossRef Schmidt Kjaergard R (2010) Making a small country count: nanotechnology in Danish newspapers from 1996–2006. Public Underst Sci 19(1):80–97CrossRef
go back to reference Schütz H, Wiedemann PM (2008) Faming effects on risk perception of nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 17:369–379CrossRef Schütz H, Wiedemann PM (2008) Faming effects on risk perception of nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 17:369–379CrossRef
go back to reference Siegrist M, Keller C, Kastenholz H, Frey S, Wiek A (2007) Laypeople’s and experts’ perception of nanotechnology hazards. Risk Anal 27(1):59–69CrossRef Siegrist M, Keller C, Kastenholz H, Frey S, Wiek A (2007) Laypeople’s and experts’ perception of nanotechnology hazards. Risk Anal 27(1):59–69CrossRef
go back to reference Siegrist M, Stampfli N, Kastenholz H, Keller C (2008) Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging. Appetite 51(2):283–290CrossRef Siegrist M, Stampfli N, Kastenholz H, Keller C (2008) Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging. Appetite 51(2):283–290CrossRef
go back to reference Simons J, Zimmer R, Vierboom C, Härlen I, Hertel R, Böl G-F (2009) The slings and arrows of communication on nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 11:1555–1571CrossRef Simons J, Zimmer R, Vierboom C, Härlen I, Hertel R, Böl G-F (2009) The slings and arrows of communication on nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 11:1555–1571CrossRef
go back to reference Sinclair J (1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press, Oxford Sinclair J (1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
go back to reference Sperber D, Wilson D (1995, orig. 1986) Relevance: communication and cognition, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford Sperber D, Wilson D (1995, orig. 1986) Relevance: communication and cognition, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford
go back to reference Stephens LF (2005) News narratives about nano S&T in major U.S. and non-U.S. newspapers. Sci Commun 27:175–199CrossRef Stephens LF (2005) News narratives about nano S&T in major U.S. and non-U.S. newspapers. Sci Commun 27:175–199CrossRef
go back to reference Stubbs M (2002) Words and phrases: corpus studies of lexical semantics. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford Stubbs M (2002) Words and phrases: corpus studies of lexical semantics. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford
go back to reference Te Kulve H (2006) Evolving repertoires: nanotechnology in daily newspapers in the Netherlands. Sci Cult 15(4):367–382CrossRef Te Kulve H (2006) Evolving repertoires: nanotechnology in daily newspapers in the Netherlands. Sci Cult 15(4):367–382CrossRef
go back to reference Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458CrossRef Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458CrossRef
go back to reference Weaver DA, Lively E, Bimber B (2009) Searching for a frame: news media tell the story of technological progress, risk, and regulation. Sci Commun 31:139–166CrossRef Weaver DA, Lively E, Bimber B (2009) Searching for a frame: news media tell the story of technological progress, risk, and regulation. Sci Commun 31:139–166CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The many faces of nano in newspaper reporting
Authors
Max Boholm
Åsa Boholm
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Nanoparticle Research / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 1388-0764
Electronic ISSN: 1572-896X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-0722-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2/2012 Go to the issue

Premium Partners