5. The New Interdisciplinary Frontiers

The dimensions of the landscape themselves anticipate the complexity of the landscape issue.

The situated goods are considered as goods in which the measure of their value would decrease if they were moved. It is J. Levy’s expression “Il ya du monde ici”.

According to Mumford the medieval archetype of the city is that one of Ambrogio Lorenzetti’s.

Cfr. Directive 2001/42/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programs on the environment.

Some important considerations can be found in the Carte per il Patrimonio: International Charter for the Conservation and the Restoration of Monuments and Sites (Venice Charter) Venice 1964. La Carta UNESCO: Recommendation for the Protection of Movable Cultural Property, General Conference—20th Session, Paris 1978.

In general cfr. the C.A.R.T. project for the Emilia-Romagna.

For the United Kingdom, the fundamental documents are: The Ancient Monument and Archaeological Areas Act of 1979, overcome by the Planning Police Guidance 16: Archaeology and Planning (PPG16, 1990). The main legislation is the National Heritage Act 1984, Local Government Act 1985, Town and Country Planning Act 1990, Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. The Practices can be distinguished as follows: Planning Police Guidance 16: Archaeology and Planning (PPG16) 1990, Planning Police Guidance 15: Planning and Historic Environment (PPG15) 1994. Also, English Heritage Urban Archaeological databases programs and York City Council 1992, in: www.​york.​gov.​uk/​leisure/​local_​history_​and_​heritage/​archaeology/​surveys/​arch_​summ/​. For France see B. Boissavit Camus, “Les services territoriaux, une alternative pou l’archéologie urbaine”, in: Nouvelles de l’archéologie 71, 1988, pp. 52–53; AA.VV., Conserver ou détruire les vestiges archéologiques; la carte archéologique; l’archéologie dans l’aménagement du territoire, Actes des quatrième et cinquième rencontres nazionales de l’archéologie (Montpellier avril 1992 et Marseille octobre 1993), Atelier du patrimoine de la ville de Marsille, De Boccard-Diffusion, Document d’archéologie, d’histoire et d’architecture, 3; Documents d’evaluation du patrimoine archéologique urbain, Centre National d’Archeologie urbaine, DEPAU, Tours; H. Galinié, “La gestion des Archives du sol en ville”, in Jornadas Internacionales de Arqueologia de Intervencion (Donostia 1991), Bilbao 1992, pp. 137–164; pp. 23–36. For Greece cfr. AA.VV., The city beneath the city. Antiquities from the Metropolitan Raiway Excavation, Athens, Kapon Ed. 2000.

A consistent disciplinary support in the debate on the requalification of the historical urban heritage takes place in parallel, leading to advanced reflections, from the historicism to Giovannoni.

See the world of perception in K. Lynch.

The methods of the Forma Italiae, Ancient City in Italy, Forma Maris Antiqui, Tabula Imperii Romani. Codified methods guaranteeing the comparison and juxtaposition of the data that today represent the best in innovation for what concerns the field of the archeological science in relation to the urban and territorial analysis for the periods of the antiquity and Middle Ages.

The note is by Antonio Cederna.

The reasons which led to the decision of drafting, less than 4 years from the adoption of the Consolidating Statute, a “new” code for the cultural heritage, are formally expressed by art. 10 of the Law 137 of 2002, synthesizable as follows: to adapt the regulation on the cultural and environmental heritage to articles 117 and 118 of the Constitution, modified with the reform of its Title V, to the communitarian regulation and to the international agreements; to improve the effectiveness of the actions concerning goods and cultural activities; to simplify and abbreviate the procedures; to update the tools of individuation, conservation and protection of the cultural goods.

Cfr. Legislative Decree 22 January 2004, n. 42, Part I. General Dispositions art. 3. It has been widely noticed that it is unclear where the protection entrusted to the state ends and where the enhancement, competence of the regions, begins, and how this fact generates conflicts and problems.