Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

24. The Paradox of Risk Management: A Supply Management Practice Perspective

Author : Sudipa Sarker

Published in: Revisiting Supply Chain Risk

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

How are risks managed in organizations? A conformist answer to this question is that all the plausible risks are first identified, then assessed and finally mitigated or treated. Grounded on a single in-depth case study of a leading global manufacturing organization and anchored in David Whetten’s framework for theoretical contributions, this chapter reveals that risk management in practice is not as holistic, single-level and time-independent activity as it is presumed to be in the theory and widely referred to standards. The findings suggest that different risks are managed using a multitude of methods during diverse activities within the supply management process by different personnel positioned at various hierarchical levels of the organization. Consequently, this paper contributes to an alternative understanding of risk management, referred to as the paradox of risk management which is a fragmented, multilevel and time-dependent process. Though this chapter draws on a single case of a large global organization and reveals risk management from the supply management practice perspective, the results may plausibly be valid for other large organizations operating in the supply chain context. As a result, this paper is expected to support the research community in developing practically rational models as well as provide assistance to managers of large complex organizations in forming a holistic understanding of supply chain risk management.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Asbjørnslett, B. E. (2008). Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains. In G. A. Zsidisin & B. Ritchie (Eds.), Supply chain risk (pp. 15–33). New York: Springer. Asbjørnslett, B. E. (2008). Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains. In G. A. Zsidisin & B. Ritchie (Eds.), Supply chain risk (pp. 15–33). New York: Springer.
go back to reference Benbasat, I. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems case research. MIS Quarterly, 3(3), 369–386.CrossRef Benbasat, I. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems case research. MIS Quarterly, 3(3), 369–386.CrossRef
go back to reference Cagliano, A. C., De Marco, A., Grimaldi, S., & Rafele, C. (2012). An integrated approach to supply chain risk analysis. Journal of Risk Research, 15(7), 817–840.CrossRef Cagliano, A. C., De Marco, A., Grimaldi, S., & Rafele, C. (2012). An integrated approach to supply chain risk analysis. Journal of Risk Research, 15(7), 817–840.CrossRef
go back to reference Canbolat, Y. B., Gupta, G., Matera, S., & Chelst, K. (2007). Analysing risk in sourcing design and manufacture of components and sub-systems to emerging markets. International Journal of Production Research, 46(18), 5145–5164.CrossRef Canbolat, Y. B., Gupta, G., Matera, S., & Chelst, K. (2007). Analysing risk in sourcing design and manufacture of components and sub-systems to emerging markets. International Journal of Production Research, 46(18), 5145–5164.CrossRef
go back to reference Choi, T. Y., & Krause, D. R. (2006). The supply base and its complexity: implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 637–652.CrossRef Choi, T. Y., & Krause, D. R. (2006). The supply base and its complexity: implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 637–652.CrossRef
go back to reference Christopher, M., Peck, H., Rutherford, C., & Jüttner, U. (2003). Understanding supply chain risk: A self-assessment workbook. Cranfield University: Department for Transport. Christopher, M., Peck, H., Rutherford, C., & Jüttner, U. (2003). Understanding supply chain risk: A self-assessment workbook. Cranfield University: Department for Transport.
go back to reference Dani, S., & Ranganathan, R. (2008). Agility and supply chain uncertainty: A scenario planning perspective. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 3(3/4), 178–191.CrossRef Dani, S., & Ranganathan, R. (2008). Agility and supply chain uncertainty: A scenario planning perspective. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 3(3/4), 178–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Dooley, K. (2002). Organizational complexity. In International encyclopedia of business and management (pp. 5013–5022). Dooley, K. (2002). Organizational complexity. In International encyclopedia of business and management (pp. 5013–5022).
go back to reference Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.CrossRef Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.CrossRef
go back to reference Ellegaard, C. (2008). Supply risk management in a small company perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(6), 425–434.CrossRef Ellegaard, C. (2008). Supply risk management in a small company perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(6), 425–434.CrossRef
go back to reference Fraser, J. P., Leenders, M. R., & Flynn, E. A. (2011). Purchasing and supply management. New York: McGraw-Hill. Fraser, J. P., Leenders, M. R., & Flynn, E. A. (2011). Purchasing and supply management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Ganguly, K. K., & Guin, K. K. (2011). understanding supply risk in supply chain: A fuzzy framework. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 8(3), 267–283.CrossRef Ganguly, K. K., & Guin, K. K. (2011). understanding supply risk in supply chain: A fuzzy framework. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 8(3), 267–283.CrossRef
go back to reference Ghadge, A., Dani, S., & Kalawsky, R. (2012). Supply chain risk management: present and future scope. International Journal of Logistics Management, 23(3), 313–339.CrossRef Ghadge, A., Dani, S., & Kalawsky, R. (2012). Supply chain risk management: present and future scope. International Journal of Logistics Management, 23(3), 313–339.CrossRef
go back to reference Griffis, S. E., & Whipple, J. M. (2012). A comprehensive risk assessment and evaluation model: proposing a risk priority continuum. Transportation Journal, 51(4), 428–451.CrossRef Griffis, S. E., & Whipple, J. M. (2012). A comprehensive risk assessment and evaluation model: proposing a risk priority continuum. Transportation Journal, 51(4), 428–451.CrossRef
go back to reference Gualandris, J., & Kalchschmidt, M. (2014). A model to evaluate upstream vulnerability. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 17(3), 249–268.CrossRef Gualandris, J., & Kalchschmidt, M. (2014). A model to evaluate upstream vulnerability. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 17(3), 249–268.CrossRef
go back to reference Hallikas, J., Puumalainen, K., Vesterinen, T., & Virolainen, V.-M. (2005). Risk-based classification of supplier relationships. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 11(2–3), 72–82.CrossRef Hallikas, J., Puumalainen, K., Vesterinen, T., & Virolainen, V.-M. (2005). Risk-based classification of supplier relationships. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 11(2–3), 72–82.CrossRef
go back to reference Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 7543(September), 1–39. Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 7543(September), 1–39.
go back to reference ISO. (2009). ISO 31000:2009—Risk Management—Principles and Guidelines, 2009. ISO. (2009). ISO 31000:2009—Risk Management—Principles and Guidelines, 2009.
go back to reference Kayis, B., & Karningsih, P. D. (2012). SCRIS: A knowledge-based system tool for assisting manufacturing organizations in identifying supply chain risks. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(7), 834–852.CrossRef Kayis, B., & Karningsih, P. D. (2012). SCRIS: A knowledge-based system tool for assisting manufacturing organizations in identifying supply chain risks. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(7), 834–852.CrossRef
go back to reference Kraljic, P. (1983). Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review, 61(5), 109–117. Kraljic, P. (1983). Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review, 61(5), 109–117.
go back to reference Kumar, S., Boice, B. C., & Shepherd, M. J. (2013). Risk assessment and operational approaches to manage risk in global supply chains. Transportation Journal, 52(3), 391–411.CrossRef Kumar, S., Boice, B. C., & Shepherd, M. J. (2013). Risk assessment and operational approaches to manage risk in global supply chains. Transportation Journal, 52(3), 391–411.CrossRef
go back to reference Li, J., Wang, S., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2010). Competition and cooperation in a single-retailer two-supplier supply chain with supply disruption. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 137–150.CrossRef Li, J., Wang, S., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2010). Competition and cooperation in a single-retailer two-supplier supply chain with supply disruption. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 137–150.CrossRef
go back to reference Lockamy, A. I., & McCormack, K. (2012). Modeling supplier risks using Bayesian networks. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(2), 313–333.CrossRef Lockamy, A. I., & McCormack, K. (2012). Modeling supplier risks using Bayesian networks. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(2), 313–333.CrossRef
go back to reference Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008). Global supply chain risk management strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(3), 192–223.CrossRef Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008). Global supply chain risk management strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(3), 192–223.CrossRef
go back to reference Norrman, A., & Jansson, U. (2004). Ericsson’s proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(5), 434–456.CrossRef Norrman, A., & Jansson, U. (2004). Ericsson’s proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(5), 434–456.CrossRef
go back to reference Purdy, G. (2010). ISO 31000:2009—Setting a new standard for risk management. Risk Analysis, 30(6), 881–886.CrossRef Purdy, G. (2010). ISO 31000:2009—Setting a new standard for risk management. Risk Analysis, 30(6), 881–886.CrossRef
go back to reference Radivojević, G., & Gajović, V. (2014). Supply chain risk modeling by AHP and fuzzy AHP methods. Journal of Risk Research, 17(3), 337–352.CrossRef Radivojević, G., & Gajović, V. (2014). Supply chain risk modeling by AHP and fuzzy AHP methods. Journal of Risk Research, 17(3), 337–352.CrossRef
go back to reference Reuter, C., Foerstl, K., Hartmann, E., & Blome, C. (2010). Sustainable global supplier management: the role of dynamic capabilities in achieving competitive advantage. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(2), 45–63.CrossRef Reuter, C., Foerstl, K., Hartmann, E., & Blome, C. (2010). Sustainable global supplier management: the role of dynamic capabilities in achieving competitive advantage. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(2), 45–63.CrossRef
go back to reference Ritchie, B., & Brindley, C. (2007). an emergent framework for supply chain risk management and performance measurement. The Journal of Operational Reseach Society, 58(11), 1398–1411.CrossRef Ritchie, B., & Brindley, C. (2007). an emergent framework for supply chain risk management and performance measurement. The Journal of Operational Reseach Society, 58(11), 1398–1411.CrossRef
go back to reference Ruiz-Torres, A. J., & Mahmoodi, F. (2007). The optimal number of suppliers considering the costs of individual supplier failures. Omega, 35(1), 104–115.CrossRef Ruiz-Torres, A. J., & Mahmoodi, F. (2007). The optimal number of suppliers considering the costs of individual supplier failures. Omega, 35(1), 104–115.CrossRef
go back to reference Singhal, P., Agarwal, G., & Lal Mittal, M. (2011). Supply chain risk management: review, classification and future research directions. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 6(3), 15–42. Singhal, P., Agarwal, G., & Lal Mittal, M. (2011). Supply chain risk management: review, classification and future research directions. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 6(3), 15–42.
go back to reference Sodhi, M. S., Son, B.-G., & Tang, C. S. (2012). Researchers’ perspectives on supply chain risk management. Production and Operations Management, 21(1), 1–13.CrossRef Sodhi, M. S., Son, B.-G., & Tang, C. S. (2012). Researchers’ perspectives on supply chain risk management. Production and Operations Management, 21(1), 1–13.CrossRef
go back to reference Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451–488.CrossRef Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451–488.CrossRef
go back to reference Tummala, R., & Schoenherr, T. (2011). Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk management process (SCRMP). Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(6), 474–483.CrossRef Tummala, R., & Schoenherr, T. (2011). Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk management process (SCRMP). Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(6), 474–483.CrossRef
go back to reference Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490.CrossRef Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490.CrossRef
go back to reference Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). California: Sage Inc. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). California: Sage Inc.
go back to reference Zsidisin, G. A. (2003). A grounded definition of supply Risk. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(5–6), 217–224.CrossRef Zsidisin, G. A. (2003). A grounded definition of supply Risk. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(5–6), 217–224.CrossRef
go back to reference Zsidisin, G. A., & Ellram, L. M. (2003). An agency theory investigation of supply risk management. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39(2), 15–27.CrossRef Zsidisin, G. A., & Ellram, L. M. (2003). An agency theory investigation of supply risk management. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39(2), 15–27.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Paradox of Risk Management: A Supply Management Practice Perspective
Author
Sudipa Sarker
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03813-7_24

Premium Partner