Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

The Role of European Institutions in Promoting Decent Work in the “Collaborative Economy”

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter aims at discussing the European approach to regulating the so-called “collaborative economy”, by looking at the main legislative initiatives regarding this set of fast-growing digital companies. Despite the potential efficiencies and benefits for customers, more recently, a counter-narrative has started revealing the “broken promise” of managing a contingent workforce mobilised on a “just in time” and “just in case” basis. The second section briefly describes the “collaborative economy” landscape and the dissemination of the heterogeneous category of “non-standard forms of employment” in the European scenario. The third section discusses the Uber case, the most visible symptom of a consolidated tendency towards fragmentation of the once solid relationship between the worker and the employing entity. In this respect, a recent ruling by the European Court of Justice on the nature of the service provided by the “transport platform” is analysed in depth. The fourth section investigates the European communications and resolutions which adapt the current legal framework and provide guidelines for regulating work in the collaborative economy, namely the Communication on the European agenda for the collaborative economy, the European Pillar of Social Rights, and other Parliamentary initiatives. The study is based on a theoretical and descriptive methodology. This chapter concludes by recommending a cautious regulatory approach. It has been highlighted that many online platforms are still in their business “infancy”, and experts genuinely do not know how they will develop. Consequently, legislative headlong rushes may end up crystallising the present state of the art, thus hindering “peripheral” entrepreneurial initiatives and blocking innovation. Surgical regulatory interventions shall help platform companies to adjust and improve their business model, in order to enter a new phase of “shared social responsibility”.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
See, for example, Amazon Mechanical Turk’s Participation Agreement: https://​www.​mturk.​com/​mturk/​conditionsofuse.
 
2
The report defines 5 key sectors (peer-to-peer accommodation, peer-to-peer transportation, on-demand household services, on-demand professional services, collaborative finance). According to the authors, there are 275 collaborative economy platforms in 9 member states (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden, The Netherlands, and the UK).
 
3
O’Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No C-13-3826 EMC, 2015.
 
4
Case C-434/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Mercantil No 3 de Barcelona (Spain) 7 August 2015 – Associación Profesional Élite v Uber System Spain, S. L., OJ 2015, C. 363/21.
 
5
Case 2202551/2015 & others, Aslam, Farrar & Ors v. Uber BV & Ors, judgement of 28 Oct. 2016.
 
6
Directive 2006/123/EC on services in the internal market, O.J. 2006, L. 376/36. This Directive excludes from its scope of application: transportation services, financial services, healthcare services, temporary work agencies and social services.
 
7
See Article 1(2) of Directive 98/34/EC as amended by Directive 98/48/EC.
 
8
See also Commission Staff Working Document accompanying the Document Consultation Document Second phase consultation of Social Partners under Article 154 TFEU on a possible revision of the Written Statement Directive (Directive 91/533/EEC) in the framework of the European Pillar of Social Rights, p. 10 (providing an overview of the results of the first phase consultation and an analytical background to a second phase consultation of the European social partners on possible legislative action).
 
9
Para. 15.
 
10
See european commission (2017), Statement of President Juncker on the Proclamation of the European Pillar of Social Rights, retrieved from http://​europa.​eu/​rapid/​press-release_​STATEMENT-17-4706_​en.​htm.
 
Literature
go back to reference Böckmann, M. (2013). The Shared Economy: It is time to start caring about sharing; value creating factors in the shared economy, University of Twente, Faculty of Management and Governance. Böckmann, M. (2013). The Shared Economy: It is time to start caring about sharing; value creating factors in the shared economy, University of Twente, Faculty of Management and Governance.
go back to reference Bruns, A. (2009). From prosumer to produser: Understanding user-led content creation. London: Transforming Audiences. Bruns, A. (2009). From prosumer to produser: Understanding user-led content creation. London: Transforming Audiences.
go back to reference Cauffman, C., & Smits, J. (2016). The sharing economy and the law: food for European lawyers. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 23, 6.CrossRef Cauffman, C., & Smits, J. (2016). The sharing economy and the law: food for European lawyers. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 23, 6.CrossRef
go back to reference Codagnone, C., Abadie, F., & Biagi, F. (2016a). The future of work in the ‘collaborative economy’: Market efficiency and equitable opportunities or unfair precarisation?. JRC Science for Policy Report, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union Studies. Codagnone, C., Abadie, F., & Biagi, F. (2016a). The future of work in the ‘collaborative economy’: Market efficiency and equitable opportunities or unfair precarisation?. JRC Science for Policy Report, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union Studies.
go back to reference Codagnone, C., Abadie, F., & Biagi, F. (2016b). The future of work in the ‘sharing economy’. market efficiency and equitable. opportunities or unfair precarisation? JRC Science for Policy Report, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union Studies. Codagnone, C., Abadie, F., & Biagi, F. (2016b). The future of work in the ‘sharing economy’. market efficiency and equitable. opportunities or unfair precarisation? JRC Science for Policy Report, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union Studies.
go back to reference Collins, H. (1990). Independent contractors and the challenge of vertical disintegration to employment protection laws. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 10, 353–380.CrossRef Collins, H. (1990). Independent contractors and the challenge of vertical disintegration to employment protection laws. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 10, 353–380.CrossRef
go back to reference Das, Acevedo D. (2016). Regulating workforce relationships in the sharing economy. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 20, 1. Das, Acevedo D. (2016). Regulating workforce relationships in the sharing economy. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 20, 1.
go back to reference De Franceschi, A. (2016). The adequacy of Italian law for the platform economy. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 5, 1. De Franceschi, A. (2016). The adequacy of Italian law for the platform economy. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 5, 1.
go back to reference De Groen, W. P., & Maselli, I. (2015). The Impact of the Collaborative Economy on the Labour Market, CEPS Special Report No. 138. De Groen, W. P., & Maselli, I. (2015). The Impact of the Collaborative Economy on the Labour Market, CEPS Special Report No. 138.
go back to reference Dokka, J., Munforf, M., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2015). Workers and the online gig economy, The Hamilton Project. Dokka, J., Munforf, M., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2015). Workers and the online gig economy, The Hamilton Project.
go back to reference EU-OSHA (2015). A review on the future of work: Online labour exchanges, or ‘crowdsourcing’: Implications for occupational safety and health. EU-OSHA (2015). A review on the future of work: Online labour exchanges, or ‘crowdsourcing’: Implications for occupational safety and health.
go back to reference Fabo, B., Karanovic, J., & Dukova, K. (2017). In search of an adequate European policy response to the platform economy. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research.CrossRef Fabo, B., Karanovic, J., & Dukova, K. (2017). In search of an adequate European policy response to the platform economy. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research.CrossRef
go back to reference Garben, S. (2017). Protecting workers in the online platform economy: An overview of regulatory and policy developments in the EU, European Risk Observatory Discussion Paper. Garben, S. (2017). Protecting workers in the online platform economy: An overview of regulatory and policy developments in the EU, European Risk Observatory Discussion Paper.
go back to reference Harris, S. D., & Krueger, A. B. (2015). A proposal for modernizing labor laws for twenty-first-century work: The “independent worker”, The Hamilton Project. Harris, S. D., & Krueger, A. B. (2015). A proposal for modernizing labor laws for twenty-first-century work: Theindependent worker”, The Hamilton Project.
go back to reference Hatzopoulos, V., & Roma, S. (2017). Caring for sharing? The collaborative economy under EU law. Common Market Law Review, 54(1), 81. Hatzopoulos, V., & Roma, S. (2017). Caring for sharing? The collaborative economy under EU law. Common Market Law Review, 54(1), 81.
go back to reference Hendrickx, F. (2017). The European Pillar of Social Rights: Interesting times ahead. European Labour Law Journal, 8, 3.CrossRef Hendrickx, F. (2017). The European Pillar of Social Rights: Interesting times ahead. European Labour Law Journal, 8, 3.CrossRef
go back to reference Huws, U., Spencer, N. H., & Joyce, S. (2016). Crowd work in Europe. Preliminary results from a survey in the UK, Sweden, Germany, Austria and The Netherlands, Feps Studies. Huws, U., Spencer, N. H., & Joyce, S. (2016). Crowd work in Europe. Preliminary results from a survey in the UK, Sweden, Germany, Austria and The Netherlands, Feps Studies.
go back to reference International Labour Office ILO (2016). Non-standard employment around the world: Understanding challenges, shaping prospects, Geneva. International Labour Office ILO (2016). Non-standard employment around the world: Understanding challenges, shaping prospects, Geneva.
go back to reference Mandl, I., Curtarelli, M., Riso, S., Vargas, O., & Gerogiannis, E. (2015). New forms of employment, Eurofound Report. Mandl, I., Curtarelli, M., Riso, S., Vargas, O., & Gerogiannis, E. (2015). New forms of employment, Eurofound Report.
go back to reference Noto la Diega, G. (2016). Uber law and awareness by design. An empirical study on online platforms and dehumanised negotiations. Revue Européenne de droit de la Consommation/European Journal of Consumer Law, 2. Noto la Diega, G. (2016). Uber law and awareness by design. An empirical study on online platforms and dehumanised negotiations. Revue Européenne de droit de la Consommation/European Journal of Consumer Law, 2.
go back to reference PricewaterhouseCoopers (2015). Costumer intelligence series: the sharing economy. PricewaterhouseCoopers (2015). Costumer intelligence series: the sharing economy.
go back to reference Todolí-Signes, A. (2017). The ‘gig economy’: Employee, self-employed or the need for a special employment regulation? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(1).CrossRef Todolí-Signes, A. (2017). The ‘gig economy’: Employee, self-employed or the need for a special employment regulation? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(1).CrossRef
go back to reference Vaughan, R., & Daverio, R. (2016). Assessing the size and presence of the collaborative economy in Europe, PwC UK, Impulse paper for the European Commission. Vaughan, R., & Daverio, R. (2016). Assessing the size and presence of the collaborative economy in Europe, PwC UK, Impulse paper for the European Commission.
go back to reference Wallsten, S. (2015). The competitive effects of the sharing economy: How is Uber changing taxis?. Technology Policy Institute, 22. Wallsten, S. (2015). The competitive effects of the sharing economy: How is Uber changing taxis?. Technology Policy Institute, 22.
go back to reference Weil, D. (2014). The fissured workplace: Why work became so bad for so many and what can be done to improve it. Massachusetts and London, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Weil, D. (2014). The fissured workplace: Why work became so bad for so many and what can be done to improve it. Massachusetts and London, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Role of European Institutions in Promoting Decent Work in the “Collaborative Economy”
Author
Antonio Aloisi
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78099-3_11