Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cognitive Processing 4/2018

20-04-2018 | Research Report

The role of sparsely distributed representations in familiarity recognition of verbal and olfactory materials

Authors: Sverker Sikström, Johan Hellman, Mats Dahl, Georg Stenberg, Marcus Johansson

Published in: Cognitive Processing | Issue 4/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We present the generalized signal detection theory (GSDT), where familiarity is described by a sparse binomial distribution of binary node activity rather than by normal distribution of familiarity. Items are presented in a distributed representation, where each node receives either noise only, or signal and noise. An old response (i.e., a “yes” response) is made if at least one node receives signal plus noise that is larger than the activation threshold, and item variability is determined by the distribution of activated nodes as the threshold is varied. A distinct representation leads to better performance and a lower ratio of new to old item variability, than a more distributed and less distinct representations. Here we apply the GSDT to empirical data on verbal and olfactory memory and suggest that verbal memory relies on a distinct neural item representation, whereas olfactory memory has a fuzzy neural representation leading to poorer memory and inducing a larger ratio of new to old item variability.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Arndt J, Reder LM (2002) Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process interpretation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 28(5):830–842CrossRef Arndt J, Reder LM (2002) Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process interpretation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 28(5):830–842CrossRef
go back to reference Ashton R, White KD (1980) Sex differencers in imagery vividness: an artefact of the test. Br J Psychol 71:35–38CrossRef Ashton R, White KD (1980) Sex differencers in imagery vividness: an artefact of the test. Br J Psychol 71:35–38CrossRef
go back to reference Cain WS, Potts BC (1996) Switch and bait: probing the discriminative basis of odor identification via recognition memory. Chem Senses 21(1):35–44CrossRef Cain WS, Potts BC (1996) Switch and bait: probing the discriminative basis of odor identification via recognition memory. Chem Senses 21(1):35–44CrossRef
go back to reference Cain WS, de Wijk R, Lulejian C, Schiet F, See LC (1998) Odor identification: perceptual and semantic dimensions. Chem Senses 23(3):309–326CrossRef Cain WS, de Wijk R, Lulejian C, Schiet F, See LC (1998) Odor identification: perceptual and semantic dimensions. Chem Senses 23(3):309–326CrossRef
go back to reference DeCarlo LT (2002) Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory. Psychol Rev 109(4):710–721CrossRef DeCarlo LT (2002) Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory. Psychol Rev 109(4):710–721CrossRef
go back to reference Doty RL, Shaman P, Dann M (1984) Development of the University of Pennsylvania smell identification test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiol Behav 32(3):489–502CrossRef Doty RL, Shaman P, Dann M (1984) Development of the University of Pennsylvania smell identification test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiol Behav 32(3):489–502CrossRef
go back to reference Doty RL, Frye RE, Agrawal U (1989) Internal consistency reliability of the fractionated and whole University of Pennsylvania smell identification test. Percept Psychophys 45(5):381–384CrossRef Doty RL, Frye RE, Agrawal U (1989) Internal consistency reliability of the fractionated and whole University of Pennsylvania smell identification test. Percept Psychophys 45(5):381–384CrossRef
go back to reference Dunn JC (2004) Remember-know: a matter of confidence. Psychol Rev 111(2):524–542CrossRef Dunn JC (2004) Remember-know: a matter of confidence. Psychol Rev 111(2):524–542CrossRef
go back to reference Egan JP (1958) Recognition memory and the operating characteristic. Technical note AFCRC-TN-58-51, Hearing and communication laboratory, Indiana University Egan JP (1958) Recognition memory and the operating characteristic. Technical note AFCRC-TN-58-51, Hearing and communication laboratory, Indiana University
go back to reference Frank RA, Rybalsky K, Brearton M, Mannea E (2011) Odor recognition memory as a function of odor-naming performance. Chem Senses 36(1):29–41CrossRef Frank RA, Rybalsky K, Brearton M, Mannea E (2011) Odor recognition memory as a function of odor-naming performance. Chem Senses 36(1):29–41CrossRef
go back to reference Glanzer M, Kim K, Hilford A, Adams JK (1999) Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 25(2):500–513CrossRef Glanzer M, Kim K, Hilford A, Adams JK (1999) Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 25(2):500–513CrossRef
go back to reference Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley, New York Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley, New York
go back to reference Hertz J, Krogh A, Palmer RG (1991) Introduction to the theory of neural computation. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Boston Hertz J, Krogh A, Palmer RG (1991) Introduction to the theory of neural computation. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Boston
go back to reference Hilford A, Glanzer M, Kim K, DeCarlo LT (2002) Regularities of source recognition: ROC analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen 131(4):494–510CrossRef Hilford A, Glanzer M, Kim K, DeCarlo LT (2002) Regularities of source recognition: ROC analysis. J Exp Psychol Gen 131(4):494–510CrossRef
go back to reference Jönsson FU, Olsson MJ (2003) Olfactory metacognition. Chem Senses 28(7):651–658CrossRef Jönsson FU, Olsson MJ (2003) Olfactory metacognition. Chem Senses 28(7):651–658CrossRef
go back to reference Koen JD, Yonelinas AP (2010) Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 36(6):1536–1542CrossRef Koen JD, Yonelinas AP (2010) Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 36(6):1536–1542CrossRef
go back to reference Koen JD, Aly M, Wang W-C, Yonelinas AP (2013) Still no evidence for the encoding variability hypothesis: a reply to Jang, Mickes, and Wixted (2012) and Starns, Rotello, and Ratcliff (2012). J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 39(1):304–312CrossRef Koen JD, Aly M, Wang W-C, Yonelinas AP (2013) Still no evidence for the encoding variability hypothesis: a reply to Jang, Mickes, and Wixted (2012) and Starns, Rotello, and Ratcliff (2012). J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 39(1):304–312CrossRef
go back to reference Lambon Ralph MA, Sage K, Roberts J (2000) Classical anomia: a neuropsychological perspective on speech production. Neuropsychologia 38(2):186–202CrossRef Lambon Ralph MA, Sage K, Roberts J (2000) Classical anomia: a neuropsychological perspective on speech production. Neuropsychologia 38(2):186–202CrossRef
go back to reference Larsson M, Bäckman L (1993) Semantic activation and episodic odor recognition in young and older adults. Psychol Aging 8(4):582–588CrossRef Larsson M, Bäckman L (1993) Semantic activation and episodic odor recognition in young and older adults. Psychol Aging 8(4):582–588CrossRef
go back to reference Lawless HT (1997) Olfactory psychophysics. In: Beauchamp G, Bartoshuk L (eds) Tasting and smelling. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 125–174CrossRef Lawless HT (1997) Olfactory psychophysics. In: Beauchamp G, Bartoshuk L (eds) Tasting and smelling. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 125–174CrossRef
go back to reference Lockhart RS, Murdock BB (1970) Memory and the theory of signal detection. Psychol Bull 74(2):100–109CrossRef Lockhart RS, Murdock BB (1970) Memory and the theory of signal detection. Psychol Bull 74(2):100–109CrossRef
go back to reference Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (2005) Detection theory: a user’s guide. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (2005) Detection theory: a user’s guide. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
go back to reference Mickes L, Wixted JT, Wais PE (2007) A direct test of the unequal-variance signal detection model of recognition memory. Psychon Bull Rev 14(5):858–865CrossRef Mickes L, Wixted JT, Wais PE (2007) A direct test of the unequal-variance signal detection model of recognition memory. Psychon Bull Rev 14(5):858–865CrossRef
go back to reference Miles C, Hodder K (2005) Serial position effects in recognition memory for odors: a reexamination. Mem Cognit 33(7):1303–1314CrossRef Miles C, Hodder K (2005) Serial position effects in recognition memory for odors: a reexamination. Mem Cognit 33(7):1303–1314CrossRef
go back to reference Rabin MD, Cain WS (1984) Odor recognition: familiarity, identifiability, and encoding consistency. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 10(2):316–325CrossRef Rabin MD, Cain WS (1984) Odor recognition: familiarity, identifiability, and encoding consistency. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 10(2):316–325CrossRef
go back to reference Ratcliff R, Sheu C-F, Gronlund SD (1992) Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychol Rev 99:518–535CrossRef Ratcliff R, Sheu C-F, Gronlund SD (1992) Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychol Rev 99:518–535CrossRef
go back to reference Ratcliff R, McKoon G, Tindall M (1994) Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 20(4):763–785CrossRef Ratcliff R, McKoon G, Tindall M (1994) Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 20(4):763–785CrossRef
go back to reference Repovs G, Baddeley A (2006) The multi-component model of working memory: explorations in experimental cognitive psychology. Neuroscience 139(1):5–21CrossRef Repovs G, Baddeley A (2006) The multi-component model of working memory: explorations in experimental cognitive psychology. Neuroscience 139(1):5–21CrossRef
go back to reference Rolls ET, Treves A (2011) The neuronal encoding of information in the brain. Prog Neurobiol 95(3):448–490CrossRef Rolls ET, Treves A (2011) The neuronal encoding of information in the brain. Prog Neurobiol 95(3):448–490CrossRef
go back to reference Rotello CM, Macmillan NA, Reeder JA (2004) Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: a two-dimensional signal-detection model. Psychol Rev 111(3):588–616CrossRef Rotello CM, Macmillan NA, Reeder JA (2004) Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: a two-dimensional signal-detection model. Psychol Rev 111(3):588–616CrossRef
go back to reference Rouder JN, Pratte MS, Morey RD (2010) Latent mnemonic strengths are latent: a comment on Mickes, Wixted, and Wais (2007). Psychon Bull Rev 17(3):427–435CrossRef Rouder JN, Pratte MS, Morey RD (2010) Latent mnemonic strengths are latent: a comment on Mickes, Wixted, and Wais (2007). Psychon Bull Rev 17(3):427–435CrossRef
go back to reference Schooler LJ, Shiffrin RM (2005) Efficiently measuring recognition performance with sparse data. Behav Res Methods 37(1):3–10CrossRef Schooler LJ, Shiffrin RM (2005) Efficiently measuring recognition performance with sparse data. Behav Res Methods 37(1):3–10CrossRef
go back to reference Sikström S (2001) The variance theory for the mirror effect. Psychon Bull Rev 8(3):408–438CrossRef Sikström S (2001) The variance theory for the mirror effect. Psychon Bull Rev 8(3):408–438CrossRef
go back to reference Stevenson RJ (2009) Phenomenal and access consciousness in olfaction. Conscious Cogn 18:1004–1017CrossRef Stevenson RJ (2009) Phenomenal and access consciousness in olfaction. Conscious Cogn 18:1004–1017CrossRef
go back to reference White TL, Treisman M (1997) A comparison of the encoding of content and order in olfactory memory and in memory for visually presented verbal materials. Br J Psychol 88(Pt 3):459–472CrossRef White TL, Treisman M (1997) A comparison of the encoding of content and order in olfactory memory and in memory for visually presented verbal materials. Br J Psychol 88(Pt 3):459–472CrossRef
go back to reference Wixted JT (2007) Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychol Rev 114(1):152–176CrossRef Wixted JT (2007) Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychol Rev 114(1):152–176CrossRef
go back to reference Yonelinas AP (1994) Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 20:1341–1354CrossRef Yonelinas AP (1994) Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 20:1341–1354CrossRef
go back to reference Yonelinas AP (2001) Consciousness, control, and confidence: the 3 Cs of recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Gen 130(3):361–379CrossRef Yonelinas AP (2001) Consciousness, control, and confidence: the 3 Cs of recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Gen 130(3):361–379CrossRef
go back to reference Yonelinas AP, Parks CM (2007) Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. Psychol Bull 133(5):800–832CrossRef Yonelinas AP, Parks CM (2007) Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. Psychol Bull 133(5):800–832CrossRef
go back to reference Zucco GM (2003) Anomalies in cognition: olfactory memory. Eur Psychol 8:77–86CrossRef Zucco GM (2003) Anomalies in cognition: olfactory memory. Eur Psychol 8:77–86CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The role of sparsely distributed representations in familiarity recognition of verbal and olfactory materials
Authors
Sverker Sikström
Johan Hellman
Mats Dahl
Georg Stenberg
Marcus Johansson
Publication date
20-04-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Cognitive Processing / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1612-4782
Electronic ISSN: 1612-4790
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0862-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Cognitive Processing 4/2018 Go to the issue