Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Introduction: The Origin Story of Global Anti-Corruption Governance Read chapter Read first chapter

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. The Social Construction of Global Problems

Author : Elitza Katzarova

Published in: The Social Construction of Global Corruption

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

One of the key tenets of James Buchanan’s political thought was the centrality of the status quo, embodied in Buchanan’s frequently heard axiom that “we start from where we are.” There is practical political value in “starting from where we are,” because we are in fact there, and not someplace else. Buchanan’s normative concern is that starting from where “we are” means that changes are more likely to be voluntary, and therefore Pareto-improving. The history of this notion of the status quo in contractarian thought is developed briefly, and then a particular example, the Chilean Constitution and its problematic implementation, is discussed.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Corruption and Its Discontents
next chapter Building a New World: Global Claims in the 1970s
Footnotes
1
The term social constructionism is usually used in sociology and the sociology of science, while in the field of IR the term constructivism has become more widely accepted after the seminal article of Onuf (1989). This book uses the terms interchangeably.
 
2
The etymological root of the word problem comes from the Greek verb προβάλλω, which means to highlight or to bring forward. Oxford Dictionaries, s.v. ‘problem,’ accessed October 22, 2017, http://​www.​oxforddictionari​es.​com/​definition/​english/​problem.
 
3
Problematization has a long pedigree of scholarly interest with one of the most prominent examples coming from Foucault (1985).
 
4
Mooney et al. (2011) single out three broader perspectives that have been the most influential on the study of social problems: (1) structural-functionalist; (2) value-conflict; and (3) symbolic interactionist perspectives. Other theories and approaches to the study of social problems can be taxonomically ordered around these three perspectives.
 
5
Blumer (1971) still considers, the study of the ‘objective makeup’ a valuable research agenda, but since the process of collective definition is ultimately politicized in his perspective, ‘the knowledge of the objective makeup of the social problem is of significance only to the extent that the knowledge enters into the process of collective definition’ and this is the process of ‘being seen and defined’ by society that ultimately determines the rise and demise of social problems in the public arena (305).
 
6
Spector and Kitsuse adopt a grassroots approach in which groups try to get governmental recognition and push a putative condition as a ‘formal part of an institutional agenda’ (154). The authors, however, recognize that this is simply one route for agenda-setting in society and quite often the initiative comes from governmental institutions that want to raise a condition to the status of a social problem. The difference between ‘initiator’ and ‘responder’ can be hard to discern, but the initiative in the construction of social problems can come from both grassroots movements and governmental institutions. The major indicator of the successful career of a social problem in both cases, however, remains the raising of an issue as part of an official agenda and the enactment of legislation.
 
7
Even the IMF calls for reform are limited to coordination not of labor market policies, but of fiscal and monetary policies to influence aggregate demand (Blanchard and Gali 2010).
 
8
The notion that the emergence of problems is always triggered by some objectively measured increase or worsening of the condition has been challenged by constructivist scholars. Epstein (2005), for example, argues for the explanatory weakness of material-based factors in the emergence of an international whaling regime by showing the causal irrelevance of the levels of endangerment of whales to the formation of the regime.
 
9
Hülsse (2007) places ontological persuasion as a prerequisite for normative persuasion. During the process of ontological persuasion, other actors with competing interpretations have to be convinced of the existence of the problem, its definitional parameters, as well as the causal connections between the claimed problem and other objectives on the agenda.
 
10
George and Bennett (2005), in a compendium of the same type of data sources, emphasize that classified sources require acquaintance with the wider social context through the reading of journalistic articles from the period corresponding to the archival material (97).
 
Literature
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan Snidal. 2000. “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance.” International Organization 54 (3): 421–456.CrossRef
Abdelal, Rawi, Mark Blyth, and Craig Parsons, eds. 2010. Constructing the International Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Acharya, Amitav, ed. 2016. Why Govern? Rethinking Demand and Progress in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Avant, Deborah D., Martha Finnemore, and Susan K. Sell, eds. 2010. Who Governs the Globe? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baker, Andrew. 2006. The Group of Seven: Finance Ministries, Central Banks and Global Financial Governance. London and New York: Routledge.
Barkin, J. Samuel. 2003. “Realist Constructivism.” International Studies Review 5 (3): 325–342.CrossRef
———. 2011. Realist Constructivism: Rethinking International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barnett, Michael, and Emanuel Adler. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barnett, Michael, and Raymond Duvall. 2005. Power in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
Bernstein, Steven. 2004. “Legitimacy in Global Environmental Governance.” Journal of International Law and International Relations 1: 139.
Bernstein, Steven, and Benjamin Cashore. 2007. “Can Non-state Global Governance Be Legitimate? An Analytical Framework.” Regulation & Governance 1 (4): 347–371.CrossRef
Best, Joel. 1993. “But Seriously, Folks: The Limitations of the Strict Constructionist Interpretation of Social Problems.” In Reconsidering Social Constructionism: Debates in Social Problems Theory, edited by J. Holstein and G. Miller, 129–147. Rutgers, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
———. 2009. Images of Issues: Typifying Contemporary Social Problems. Rutgers, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Biermann, Frank, and Philipp Pattberg. 2008. “Global Environmental Governance: Taking Stock, Moving Forward.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33 (1): 277–294.CrossRef
———, eds. 2012. Global Environmental Governance Reconsidered. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Blanchard, Olivier, and Jordi Gali. 2010. “Labor Markets and Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Model with Unemployment.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2 (2): 1–30.
Blanchard, Olivier, Florence Jaumotte, and Prakash Loungani. 2013. Labor Market Policies and IMF Advice in Advanced Economies During the Great Recession. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, Research Department.
Blumer, Herbert. 1971. “Social Problems as Collective Behavior.” Social Problems 18 (3): 298–306.CrossRef
Boghossian, Paul. 2006. Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Büthe, Tim, and Walter Mattli. 2011. The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Cashore, Benjamin. 2002. “Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non-State Market-Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule-Making Authority.” Governance 15 (4): 503–529.CrossRef
CES/CRC(97)16. Council Resolution on the Classification and Declassification of Information, Adopted by the Council at the 906th Session on 10 July 1997 (29 August 1997). OECD Archives, Paris Headquarters.
Cook-Gumperz, Jenny. 2006. The Social Construction of Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cutler, A. Claire, Virginia Haufler, and Tony Porter, eds. 1999. Private Authority and International Affairs. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Dahl, Robert Alan. 1957. The Concept of Power. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Dubash, Navroz K., and Ann Florini. 2011. “Mapping Global Energy Governance.” Global Policy 2 (1): 6–18.CrossRef
Epstein, Charlotte. 2005. The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fearon, James D., and David D. Laitin. 2000. “Violence and the Social Construction of Ethnic Identity.” International Organization 54 (4): 845–877.CrossRef
Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.CrossRef
Florini, Ann, and Benjamin K. Sovacool. 2009. “Who Governs Energy? The Challenges Facing Global Energy Governance.” Energy Policy 37 (12): 5239–5248.CrossRef
Foucault, Michel. 1985. Discourse and Truth: The Problematization of Parrhesia. Edited by J. Pearson. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
Freudenburg, William. 2000. “Social Constructions and Social Constrictions: Toward Analyzing the Social Construction of ‘the Naturalized’ as Well as ‘the Natural’.” In Environment and Global Modernity, edited by G. Spaargaren, A. P. J. Mol, and F. H. Buttel, 103–119. London: Sage.
George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Girling, John. 1997. Corruption, Capitalism and Democracy. East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Goode, Erich, and Nachman Ben-Yehuda. 2009. Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Goodman, Nelson. 1978. Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
Gopalan, Sandeep. 2008. “A Demandeur-Centric Approach to Regime Design in Transnational Commercial Law.” Georgetown Journal of International Law 39 (2): 22–51.
Grande, Edgar, and Louis W. Pauly, eds. 2007. Complex Sovereignty: Reconstituting Political Authority in the Twenty-First Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Grint, Keith. 2005. “Problems, Problems, Problems: The Social Construction of ‘Leadership’.” Human Relations 58 (11): 1467–1494.CrossRef
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hale, Thomas, David Held, and Kevin Young. 2013. Gridlock: Why Global Cooperation Is Failing When We Need It Most. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hall, Rodney Bruce, and Thomas J. Biersteker. 2002. The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harman, Sophie, and David Williams, eds. 2013. Governing the World? Cases in Global Governance. London and New York: Routledge.
Helleiner, Eric. 2014. The Status Quo Crisis: Global Financial Governance After the 2008 Meltdown. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hofferberth, Matthias, and Christian Weber. 2015. “Lost in Translation: A Critique of Constructivist Norm Research.” Journal of International Relations and Development 18 (1): 75–103.CrossRef
Holstein, James, and Gale Miller. 1993. Reconsidering Social Constructionism: Debates in Social Problems Theory. Rutgers, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Hopf, T., ed. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities & Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hülsse, Rainer. 2007. “Creating Demand for Global Governance: The Making of a Global Money Laundering Problem.” Global Society 21 (2): 155–178.CrossRef
Kahler, Miles, and David A. Lake. 2003. Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kingdon, John W. 2010. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. London: Longman.
Krasner, Stephen D. 1982. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables.” International Organization 36 (2): 185–205.CrossRef
Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lesage, Dries, Thijs Van de Graaf, and Kirsten Westphal. 2016. Global Energy Governance in a Multipolar World. London and New York: Routledge.
Levy, David L., and Peter John Newell. 2005. The Business of Global Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
Love, Maryann Cusimano. 2010. Beyond Sovereignty: Issues for a Global Agenda. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
McCoy, Jennifer L., and Heather Heckel. 2001. “The Emergence of a Global Anti-corruption Norm.” International Politics 38 (1): 65–90.
McGrew, Anthony, and David Held, eds. 2002. Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance. Cambridge: Polity.
Meyer, John W., and Ronald L. Jepperson. 2000. “The ‘Actors’ of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency.” Sociological Theory 18 (1): 100–120.CrossRef
Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mooney, Linda A., David Knox, and Caroline Schacht. 2011. Understanding Social Problems. Toronto: Nelson College Indigenous.
Najam, Adil. 2005. “Developing Countries and Global Environmental Governance: From Contestation to Participation to Engagement.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 5 (3): 303–321.CrossRef
Onuf, Nicholas G. 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Pierre, Jon. 2000. Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Posner, Eric, and Jack L. Goldsmith. 2002. “Moral and Legal Rhetoric in International Relations: A Rational Choice Perspective.” Journal of Legal Studies 31 (1): 115–139.
Ronit, Karsten, and Volker Schneider. 1999. “Global Governance Through Private Organizations.” Governance 12 (3): 243–266.CrossRef
Rosenau, James N. 1995. “Governance in the Twenty-First Century.” Global Governance 1 (1): 13–43.
Rosenau, James N., and Hongying Wang. 2001. “Transparency International and Corruption as an Issue of Global Governance.” Global Governance 7 (1): 25–49.
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge.” International Organization 52 (4): 855–885.CrossRef
Scherer, Andreas Georg, Guido Palazzo, and Dorothée Baumann. 2006. “Global Rules and Private Actors: Toward a New Role of the Transnational Corporation in Global Governance.” Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (4): 505–532.CrossRef
Senturia, Joseph. 1931. “Corruption, Political.” In Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 4, 448–452. New York: Macmillan.
Spector, Malcolm, and John Kitsuse. 1973. “Toward a Sociology of Social Problems.” Social Problems 20: 407–419.CrossRef
———. 1975. “Social Problems and Deviance: Some Parallels.” Social Problems. 22: 584–594.CrossRef
———. 2009. Constructing Social Problems. 4th ed. Rutgers, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Underhill, Geoffrey R. D., and Xiaoke Zhang. 2008. “Setting the Rules: Private Power, Political Underpinnings, and Legitimacy in Global Monetary and Financial Governance.” International Affairs 84 (3): 535–554.CrossRef
Väyrynen, Raimo. 1999. Globalization and Global Governance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Weiss, Thomas G., and Rorden Wilkinson, eds. 2014. International Organization and Global Governance. London and New York: Routledge.
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46 (2): 391–425.CrossRef
———. 1995. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security 20 (1): 71–81.CrossRef
Williams, Michael C. 2004. “Why Ideas Matter in International Relations: Hans Morgenthau, Classical Realism, and the Moral Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 58 (4): 633–665.
Woolgar, Steve, and Dorothy Pawluch. 1985. “Ontological Gerrymandering: The Anatomy of Social Problems Explanations.” Social Problems 32 (3): 214–227.CrossRef
Young, Oran R., ed. 1997. Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
Metadata
Title
The Social Construction of Global Problems
Author
Elitza Katzarova
Copyright Year
2019
Book
The Social Construction of Global Corruption

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98568-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-98569-5

Copyright Year: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98569-5_3