Skip to main content
Top

2014 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

The Structure of Voters’ Preferences Induced by the Dual Culture Condition

Authors : William V. Gehrlein, Souvik Roy

Published in: Voting Power and Procedures

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We consider the case of three-candidate elections with large electorates under the assumption of the Dual Culture Condition. It is well known that a perfect relationship does not exist between the probability that Condorcet’s Paradox will be observed and a simple measure of the social homogeneity of voters’ preferences under these conditions. However, we show that this intuitively appealing relationship actually is found to hold on an expected value basis, except for an aberration in one very small region of possible voter situations, and this aberration is completely explainable. It is also found that the expected value of the Condorcet Efficiency of Borda Rule consistently increases as the simple measure of social homogeneity increases, except in the same small region of aberration for voting situations that is noted above.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Abrams, R. (1976). The voter’s paradox and the homogeneity of individual preference orders. Public Choice, 26, 19–27.CrossRef Abrams, R. (1976). The voter’s paradox and the homogeneity of individual preference orders. Public Choice, 26, 19–27.CrossRef
go back to reference Fishburn, P. C. (1973). Voter concordance, simple majority, and group decision methods. Behavioral Science, 18, 364–376.CrossRef Fishburn, P. C. (1973). Voter concordance, simple majority, and group decision methods. Behavioral Science, 18, 364–376.CrossRef
go back to reference Fishburn, P. C., & Gehrlein, W. V. (1980). Social homogeneity and Condorcet’s paradox. Public Choice, 35, 403–420.CrossRef Fishburn, P. C., & Gehrlein, W. V. (1980). Social homogeneity and Condorcet’s paradox. Public Choice, 35, 403–420.CrossRef
go back to reference Gehrlein W.V. (1981). Non-profile specific measures of social homogeneity. Proceedings of Southeast Decision Sciences Institute (pp. 167–169). Charlotte, NC. Gehrlein W.V. (1981). Non-profile specific measures of social homogeneity. Proceedings of Southeast Decision Sciences Institute (pp. 167–169). Charlotte, NC.
go back to reference Gehrlein, W. V. (1987). A comparative analysis of measures of social homogeneity. Quality and Quantity, 21, 219–231.CrossRef Gehrlein, W. V. (1987). A comparative analysis of measures of social homogeneity. Quality and Quantity, 21, 219–231.CrossRef
go back to reference Gehrlein, W. V. (1999). The Condorcet efficiency of Borda Rule under the dual culture condition. Social Science Research, 28(1999), 36–44.CrossRef Gehrlein, W. V. (1999). The Condorcet efficiency of Borda Rule under the dual culture condition. Social Science Research, 28(1999), 36–44.CrossRef
go back to reference Gehrlein, W. V. (2006). Condorcet’s paradox. Berlin: Springer. Gehrlein, W. V. (2006). Condorcet’s paradox. Berlin: Springer.
go back to reference Gehrlein, W. V., & Lepelley, D. (2012). The value of research based on simple assumptions about voters’ preferences. In D. S. Felsenthal & M. Machover (Eds.), Electoral systems: Paradoxes, assumptions and procedures (pp. 173–199). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Gehrlein, W. V., & Lepelley, D. (2012). The value of research based on simple assumptions about voters’ preferences. In D. S. Felsenthal & M. Machover (Eds.), Electoral systems: Paradoxes, assumptions and procedures (pp. 173–199). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Jamison, D., & Luce, E. (1972). Social homogeneity and the probability of intransitive majority rule. Journal of Economic Theory, 5, 79–87.CrossRef Jamison, D., & Luce, E. (1972). Social homogeneity and the probability of intransitive majority rule. Journal of Economic Theory, 5, 79–87.CrossRef
go back to reference Kuga, K., & Nagatani, H. (1974). Voter antagonism and the paradox of voting. Econometrica, 42, 1045–1067.CrossRef Kuga, K., & Nagatani, H. (1974). Voter antagonism and the paradox of voting. Econometrica, 42, 1045–1067.CrossRef
go back to reference de Laplace PS. (1795). Analytic theory of probabilities. In F. Sommerlad & I. McLean (1991, Eds.), The political theory of Condorcet II (pp. 282–287). Oxford: University of Oxford, Working Paper. de Laplace PS. (1795). Analytic theory of probabilities. In F. Sommerlad & I. McLean (1991, Eds.), The political theory of Condorcet II (pp. 282–287). Oxford: University of Oxford, Working Paper.
go back to reference May, R. M. (1971). Some mathematical remarks on the paradox of voting. Behavioral Science, 16, 143–151.CrossRef May, R. M. (1971). Some mathematical remarks on the paradox of voting. Behavioral Science, 16, 143–151.CrossRef
go back to reference Niemi, R. G. (1969). Majority decision-making under partial unidimensionality. American Political Science Review, 63, 488–497.CrossRef Niemi, R. G. (1969). Majority decision-making under partial unidimensionality. American Political Science Review, 63, 488–497.CrossRef
go back to reference Sen, A. K. (1970). Collective choice and social welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day. Sen, A. K. (1970). Collective choice and social welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
Metadata
Title
The Structure of Voters’ Preferences Induced by the Dual Culture Condition
Authors
William V. Gehrlein
Souvik Roy
Copyright Year
2014
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05158-1_19