Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Uncovering Complexity in the Policy Mix for Sustainability Transitions Read chapter Read first chapter

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

5. Theoretical Reshaping for the Augmented Inequality Dynamics

Author : Seung Jin Baek

Published in: The Political Economy of Neo-modernisation

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter examines whether rising income inequality is the stylised fact for the process of structural transformation by revisiting classical accounts on various theories of normative inequality dynamics, modernisation, and endogenous growth. In addition, a complex interaction between transformational process and income inequality is analysed by exploring the multidimensions of inequality dynamics, including social, economic, political, and moral. This critical review allows us to conclude that rising income inequality is far from inevitable by introducing a proposal for what it calls Augmented Inequality Dynamics which attempts to systematise the endogenous process within a society, underpinned by these multidimensional aspects. Once the inequality dynamics are formed as historically driven systems of social, economic, and political relations that frame the regulation and coordination mechanism that governs a society, the dynamics can be so evolutionary in a way that they structurally transform themselves by interacting with various dimensions and institutions to shape their own pathway. This explains how income inequality is used to incentivise or restrain the process of various societal interactions by itself going Up and Down repeatedly in the context of structural transformation.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Stylised Fact of the Changing Inequality-Growth Landscape
next chapter Can the SDGs Promote Structural Transformation in Africa? An Empirical Analysis
Footnotes
1
This was based on general assumption that income growth leads to improved living standards. However, there were a number of exceptions against convergence of living standards between the two different worlds. For instance, despite income growth in India, living standards (as measured, e.g., by access to toilet or cooking fuel) have not improved much, cf. the differences between income and multidimensional measures of poverty.
 
2
Although Rawls comes down to us mainly as a philosopher rather than as a student of either economic growth or structural transformation, and his framework is not somewhat ‘developmental’, his argument by difference principle would fundamentally be applicable to and still be valid to contemporary development discourses, particularly for inequality debate.
 
3
Each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive basic liberty compatible with a similar liberty for others.
 
4
Particularly, Piketty and Saez (2003) criticised the Kuznets hypothesis, ‘Inequality reduces in mature stage of development’ by putting a compelling case of the US where the level of inequality has grown in recent decades.
 
5
For a more detailed discussion, see Chaps. 3 and 4.
 
6
What is interesting is that his re-investment argument was already identified as one of the conditions in the take-off stage of Rostow’s model. Although Rostow did not explicitly spell out the inequality problem in the take-off stage, he might have implied that continuous capital formation not only promotes re-investment activities but also causes the concentration of capital into the hands of a few capitalists, which could intensify inequality. Importantly, the problem of Rostow’s model here lies in his assumption that re-investing boosts economically focused industrial activities, and not the likes of institutional reforms or education as proposed by Joseph E. Stiglitz.
 
Literature
Aghion, P., and P. Bolton. 1997. A Theory of Trickle-Down Growth and Development. Review of Economic Studies 64: 151–172.CrossRef
Alesina, A., and G.M. Angeletos. 2005. Fairness and Redistribution. American Economic Review 95 (4): 960–980.CrossRef
Alesina, A., and D. Rodrik. 1994. Distribution Politics and Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (2): 465−490.CrossRef
Armah, B., and S.J. Baek. 2015. Can the SDGs Promote Structural Transformation in Africa? An Empirical Analysis. Development 58 (4): 1–19.CrossRef
Armah, B., and S.J. Baek. 2018. Three Interventions to Foster Sustainable Transformation in Africa. Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies 43 (1–2): 3–25.
Arrow, K.J. 1962. The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. Review of Economic Studies 29 (3): 155–173.CrossRef
Bah, E.M. 2011. Structural Transformation Paths Across Countries. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 47 (2): 5–19.CrossRef
Berg, A.G., and J.D. Ostry. 2013. Inequality and Unsustainable Growth: Two Sides of the Same Coin? International Organisations Research Journal 8 (4): 77–99.
Birdsall, N., D. Ross, and R. Sabot. 1997. Education, Growth and Inequality. In Pathways to Growth: Comparing East Asia and Latin America, ed. N. Birdsall and F. Jaspersen, 93–127. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
Chang, Y.S., and S.J. Baek. 2010. Limit to Improvement: Myth or Reality? Empirical Analysis of Historical Improvement on Three Technologies Influential in the Evolution of Civilization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77 (5): 712–729.CrossRef
Chen, B.L. 2003. An Inverted-U Relationship Between Inequality and Long-Run Growth. Economics Letters 78 (2): 205−212.CrossRef
De Gregorio, J., and J.W. Lee. 2002. Education and Income Inequality: New Evidence from Cross-Country Data. Review of Income and Wealth 48 (3): 395–416.CrossRef
Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy 65 (2): 135–150.CrossRef
Dumke, R. 1991. Income Inequality and Industrialization in Germany, 1850−1913: The Kuznets Hypothesis Re-examined. In Income Distribution in Historical Perspective, ed. Y.S. Brenner, H. Kaelble, and M. Thomas, 117–148. Cambridge/Paris: Cambridge University Press.
Easterly, W. 2007. Inequality Does Cause Underdevelopment: Insights from a New Instrument. Journal of Development Economics 84: 755–776.CrossRef
Elgar, F.J., and N. Aitken. 2011. Income Inequality, Trust and Homicide in 33 Countries. European Journal of Public Health 21 (2): 241–246.CrossRef
Engerman, S.L., and K.L. Sokoloff. 2002. Factor Endowments, Inequality, and Paths of Development Among New World Economies. Economia 3 (2): 41–102.
Figueroa, A. 2017. Economics of the Anthropocene Age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Fleming, M. 1955. External Economies and the Doctrine of Balanced Growth. Economic Journal 65: 241–256.CrossRef
Forbes, K. 2000. A Reassessment of the Relationship Between Inequality and Growth. American Economic Review 90 (4): 869–897.CrossRef
Friedman, M. 1953. Choice, Chance and the Personal Distribution of Income. Journal of Political Economy 61 (4): 277–290.CrossRef
Galor, O., and J. Zeira. 1993. Income Distribution and Macroeconomics. Review of Economics Studies 60 (1): 35–52.CrossRef
Giddens, A. 1991. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Guidetti, R. 2014. Theoretical Approaches to Inequality in Economics and Sociology. Transcience 5 (1): 1–15.
Herzer, D., and S. Vollmer. 2012. Inequality and Growth: Evidence from Panel Cointegration. Journal of Economic Inequality 10 (4): 489–503.CrossRef
Hirschman, A.O. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Itagaki, Y. 1963. Criticism of Rostow’s Stage Approach: The Concepts of Stage, System and Type. Developing Economies 1 (1): 1–17.CrossRef
Kaelble, H., and M. Thomas. 1991. Income Distribution in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaldor, N. 1956. Alternative Theories of Distribution. Review of Economic Studies 23: 83–100.CrossRef
Korotayev, A., and J. Zinkina. 2014. On the Structure of the Present-Day Convergence. Campus-Wide Information Systems 31 (2/3): 139–152.CrossRef
Korzeniewicz, R.P., and T.P. Moran. 2005. Theorizing the Relationship Between Inequality and Economic Growth. Theory and Society 34: 277–316.CrossRef
Kuznets, S. 1955. Economic Growth and Income Inequality. American Economic Review 45 (1): 1–28.
———. 1973. Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections. American Economic Review 63 (3): 247–258.
Lewis, W.A. 1954. Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour. Manchester School 22 (2): 139–191.CrossRef
Li, H., and H. Zou. 1998. Income Inequality Is Not Harmful for Growth: Theory and Evidence. Review of Development Economics 2 (3): 318–334.CrossRef
Lissowska, M. 2015. Is Poverty and Inequality Actually Good for Growth? Forum for Social Economics 44 (2): 133–158.CrossRef
Maddison, A. 2008. Shares of the Rich and the Rest in the World Economy: Income Divergence Between Nations, 1820−2030. Asian Economic Policy Review 3 (1): 67–82.CrossRef
McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and J.M. Cook. 2001. Birds of A Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.CrossRef
Milanovic, B. 2000. Determinants of Cross-Country Income Inequality: An ‘Augmented’ Kuznets Hypothesis. In Equality, Participation, Transition: Essays in the Honor of Branko Horvat, ed. M. Uvalic and V. Franicevic, 48–79. London: St. Martin’s.CrossRef
Mills, M. 2009. Globalization and Inequality. European Sociological Review 25 (1): 1–8.CrossRef
Mincer, J. 1974. Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.
Neckerman, K.M., and F. Torche. 2007. Inequality: Causes and Consequences. Annual Review of Sociology 33: 335–357.CrossRef
Nurkse, R. 1953. Problems of Capital Formation in Underdeveloped Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Okun, A.M. 1975. Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Palma, J.G. 2011. Homogeneous Middles vs. Heterogeneous Tails, and the End of the ‘Inverted-U: It’s All About the Share of the Rich. Development and Change 42 (1): 87–153.CrossRef
Parente, S. 2001. The Failure of Endogenous Growth. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 13 (4): 49–58.CrossRef
Perotti, R. 1996. Growth, Income Distribution and Democracy: What the Data Say. Journal of Economic Growth 1 (2): 149–187.CrossRef
Piketty, T. 2013. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Piketty, T., and E. Saez. 2003. Income Inequality in the United States, 1913−1998. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1): 1–39.CrossRef
Ram, R. 1991. Kuznets’s Inverted U-Hypothesis: Evidence from a Highly Developed Country. Southern Economic Journal 57: 1112–1123.CrossRef
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Romer, P.M. 1990. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5): 71–102.CrossRef
Rostow, W.W. 1960. The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communistic Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sachs, J.D., and A.M. Warner. 1997. Fundamental Sources of Long-Run Growth. American Economic Review 87 (2): 184–188.
Schaller, W.E. 1998. Rawls, the Difference Principle, and Economic Inequality. Philosophical Quarterly 79: 368–391.CrossRef
Soderberg, J. 1991. Wage Differentials in Sweden, 1725−1950. In Income Distribution in Historical Perspective, ed. Y.S. Brenner, H. Kaelble, and M. Thomas, 76–95. Cambridge/Paris: Cambridge University Press.
Solow, R.M. 1956. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 (1): 65–94.CrossRef
Stiglitz, J.E. 1996. Some Lessons from the East Asian Miracle. World Bank Research Observer 11 (2): 151–177.CrossRef
Szirmai, A. 2012. Industrialisation as an Engine of Growth in Developing Countries, 1950−2005. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 23 (4): 406–420.CrossRef
Thomas, M. 1991. The Evolution of Inequality in Australia in the Nineteenth Century. In Income Distribution in Historical Perspective, ed. Y.S. Brenner, H. Kaelble, and M. Thomas, 149–173. Cambridge/Paris: Cambridge University Press.
Thorbecke, E., and C. Charumilind. 2002. Economic Inequality and Its Socioeconomic Impact. World Development 30: 1477–1495.CrossRef
Uslaner, E.M., and M. Brown. 2005. Inequality, Trust, and Civic Engagement. American Politics Research 33 (6): 868–894.CrossRef
Voitchovsky, S. 2005. Does the Profile of Income Inequality Matter for Economic Growth? Distinguishing Between the Effects of Inequality in Different Parts of the Income Distribution. Journal of Economic Growth 10 (3): 273–296.CrossRef
Weatherford, R.C. 1983. Defining the Least Advantaged. Philosophical Quarterly 33 (130): 63–69.CrossRef
Wilkinson, R., and K. Pickett. 2010. The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin.
Metadata
Title
Theoretical Reshaping for the Augmented Inequality Dynamics
Author
Seung Jin Baek
Copyright Year
2018
Book
The Political Economy of Neo-modernisation

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91393-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-91394-0

Copyright Year: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91394-0_5

Premium Partners

    Image Credits