Skip to main content
Top

2010 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

16. Three Roads to Cultural Recurrence

Author : Robert Aunger

Published in: Evolutionary Psychology and Information Systems Research

Publisher: Springer US

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Social scientists have long remarked that there is consistency in what people believe and value over time, especially within definable groups. Anthropologists call this body of information “culture.” There are (at least) three causal mechanisms that can explain the recurrence of cultural traits. Recurrence can occur through (1) strong individual learning biases; (2) population-level normalizing effects on what is adopted; and (3) replicator-based inheritance. Each of these mechanisms is favored by a particular brand of evolutionary theorizing about human society. Evolutionary psychologists (EPs) advocate the first option, which emphasizes the ability of universal structures in the evolved mind to come up with the same responses to environmental conditions time and again. What explains cultural consistency over time, then, is evolved psychological decision-making processes in the face of common environmental challenges. A group I call “cultural selectionists” (CSs) prefer the second option, which notes that even poor social learning abilities can still produce consistently shared features at the level of the group if there are widely shared psychological preferences for traits or the types of individuals from whom to acquire culture. The third option, based on replication of the same information from generation to generation, is the memetic position. In this scenario, the cultural features that keep popping up are the phenotypic expressions of memes, or cultural replicators, disseminating through the population via social communication or mediated transmission via information machines such as computer networks. This variety in the possible explanations for cultural evolution is not generally recognized nor do advocates of one position generally acknowledge the validity of others. But I will argue in this chapter that all three of these possibilities are viable in our present state of ignorance about the means through which cultural traits reappear each generation; any one of them may account for a particular aspect of cultural inheritance.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
In a similar fashion, prions only account for a small proportion of diseases, but the peculiar pathologies they do cause – transmissible spongiform encephalopathies like “mad cow” disease – nevertheless represent an interesting species of disease which requires its own kinds of analysis and treatment. The same would be true of memetic culture: significant interest would attend the discovery of memes, and projects to uncover the replicative abilities of cultural traits and the unique kinds of dynamics they introduce would naturally develop.
 
Literature
go back to reference Atran S (2001) The trouble with memes: Inference versus imitation in cultural evolution. Hum Nature 12:351–381CrossRef Atran S (2001) The trouble with memes: Inference versus imitation in cultural evolution. Hum Nature 12:351–381CrossRef
go back to reference Aunger R (2000) The life history of culture learning in a face-to-face society. Ethos 28(2):1–38 Aunger R (2000) The life history of culture learning in a face-to-face society. Ethos 28(2):1–38
go back to reference Aunger R (2002a) The electric meme: a new theory of how we think and communicate. The Free Press, New York Aunger R (2002a) The electric meme: a new theory of how we think and communicate. The Free Press, New York
go back to reference Aunger R (2002b) Exposure versus susceptibility in the epidemiology of everyday beliefs. J Cogn Cult 2(2):113–154CrossRef Aunger R (2002b) Exposure versus susceptibility in the epidemiology of everyday beliefs. J Cogn Cult 2(2):113–154CrossRef
go back to reference Aunger R (2006) What’s the matter with memes? In: Grafen A, Ridley M (eds) Richard Dawkins: how a scientist changed the way we think. Oxford University Press, Oxford Aunger R (2006) What’s the matter with memes? In: Grafen A, Ridley M (eds) Richard Dawkins: how a scientist changed the way we think. Oxford University Press, Oxford
go back to reference Aunger R (2010a) Types of technology. Technol Forecasting Soc Change 77:762–782 Aunger R (2010a) Types of technology. Technol Forecasting Soc Change 77:762–782
go back to reference Aunger R (2010b) What’s special about human technology? Camb J of Econ 34:115–123 Aunger R (2010b) What’s special about human technology? Camb J of Econ 34:115–123
go back to reference Blackmore S (1999) The Meme Machine. Oxford University Press, Oxford Blackmore S (1999) The Meme Machine. Oxford University Press, Oxford
go back to reference Boyd R, Richerson PJ (2000) Memes: universal acid or a better mouse trap? In: Aunger R (ed) Darwinizing culture: the status of memetics as a science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 143–162 Boyd R, Richerson PJ (2000) Memes: universal acid or a better mouse trap? In: Aunger R (ed) Darwinizing culture: the status of memetics as a science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 143–162
go back to reference Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford
go back to reference Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype. Oxford University Press, Oxford Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype. Oxford University Press, Oxford
go back to reference Dawkins R (1999) Introduction to Blackmore (1999) Dawkins R (1999) Introduction to Blackmore (1999)
go back to reference Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1979) Animal signals: Information or manipulation? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioral ecology. Blackwell, London, pp 282–309 Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1979) Animal signals: Information or manipulation? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioral ecology. Blackwell, London, pp 282–309
go back to reference Freeman WJ (1999) How brains make up their minds. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London Freeman WJ (1999) How brains make up their minds. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London
go back to reference Gil-White FJ (2001) L’evolution culturelle a-t-elle des règles? La rechérche Hors Série No. 5(Avril):92–97 Gil-White FJ (2001) L’evolution culturelle a-t-elle des règles? La rechérche Hors Série No. 5(Avril):92–97
go back to reference Henrich J, Boyd R (2002) On modeling cognition and culture: why cultural evolution does not require replication of representations, J Cogn Cult 2:87–112CrossRef Henrich J, Boyd R (2002) On modeling cognition and culture: why cultural evolution does not require replication of representations, J Cogn Cult 2:87–112CrossRef
go back to reference McCrone J (1999) Going inside: a tour round a single moment of consciousness. Faber and Faber, London McCrone J (1999) Going inside: a tour round a single moment of consciousness. Faber and Faber, London
go back to reference Miller GF (1999) Sexual selection for cultural displays. In: Dunbar R, Knight C, Power C (eds) The evolution of culture. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh Miller GF (1999) Sexual selection for cultural displays. In: Dunbar R, Knight C, Power C (eds) The evolution of culture. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
go back to reference Pinker S (1997) How the mind works. Penguin, London Pinker S (1997) How the mind works. Penguin, London
go back to reference Sperber D (2000) An objection to the memetic approach to culture. In: Aunger R (ed) Darwinizing culture: the status of memetics as a science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 163–74 Sperber D (2000) An objection to the memetic approach to culture. In: Aunger R (ed) Darwinizing culture: the status of memetics as a science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 163–74
go back to reference Sperber D (1996) Explaining culture: a naturalistic approach. Blackwell, Cambridge Sperber D (1996) Explaining culture: a naturalistic approach. Blackwell, Cambridge
go back to reference Sperber D, Wilson D (1986) Relevance: communication and cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Sperber D, Wilson D (1986) Relevance: communication and cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Tooby J, Cosmides L (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 19–136 Tooby J, Cosmides L (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In: Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 19–136
Metadata
Title
Three Roads to Cultural Recurrence
Author
Robert Aunger
Copyright Year
2010
Publisher
Springer US
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6139-6_16