Skip to main content
Top

2024 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Towards a Measurement Instrument for Assessing Capabilities When Innovating Less-Structured Business Processes

Authors : Joklan Imelda Camelia Goni, Amy Van Looy

Published in: Business Process Management Workshops

Publisher: Springer Nature Switzerland

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Many contemporary organizations deal with different types of business processes, including less-structured business processes (LSBP). The latter are characterized by more unpredictable situations, ad-hoc tasks, limited process details, and a stronger emphasis on the human aspects as compared to the more structured business processes (SBP). However, existing BPM approaches often encounter challenges when driving innovation within organizations that have LSBP characteristics. To address this issue, organizations still lack a measurement tool to assess their process innovation capability (PIC) that is tailored towards LSBP (as opposed to generic BPM measurement instruments). Our study fills this gap by gradually building and testing a PIC-LSBP measurement instrument. We rely on empirical data from an international Delphi study, followed by a demonstration in two real-life organizations (i.e., one manufacturing organization in Asia and one service organization in Europe). The study aims at showing the practical application of the uncovered measurement instrument, seeking to identify and effectively address process innovation in more dynamic and complex business environments. The resulting instrument consists of six main capability areas, 18 sub-areas, and 55 formative measurement items. The findings highlight the significance of leveraging an instrument as a means to assess an organization’s current innovation capability with respect to a specific process type. Based on this insight, our research contributes to a broader understanding of how organizations can assess their existing process situation and derive action plans.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
2.
go back to reference Zimmermann, R., Ferreira, L.M.D.F., Carrizo Moreira, A.: The influence of supply chain on the innovation process: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Manage.: Int. J. 21(3), 289–304 (2016) Zimmermann, R., Ferreira, L.M.D.F., Carrizo Moreira, A.: The influence of supply chain on the innovation process: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Manage.: Int. J. 21(3), 289–304 (2016)
3.
go back to reference Jansen, J.J.P., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W.: Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manage. Sci. 52(11), 1661–1674 (2006)CrossRef Jansen, J.J.P., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W.: Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manage. Sci. 52(11), 1661–1674 (2006)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Harmon, P., Wolf, C.: The state of business process management 2014. BPTrends (2014) Harmon, P., Wolf, C.: The state of business process management 2014. BPTrends (2014)
5.
go back to reference Dumas, M., et al.: Introduction to business process management. Fundam. Bus. Process Manage. 1–33 (2018) Dumas, M., et al.: Introduction to business process management. Fundam. Bus. Process Manage. 1–33 (2018)
6.
go back to reference Kerpedzhiev, G.D., et al.: An exploration into future business process management capabilities in view of digitalization. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 63(2), 83–96 (2021)CrossRef Kerpedzhiev, G.D., et al.: An exploration into future business process management capabilities in view of digitalization. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 63(2), 83–96 (2021)CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Vom Brocke, J., Zelt, S., Schmiedel, T.: On the role of context in business process management. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 36(3), 486–495 (2016)CrossRef Vom Brocke, J., Zelt, S., Schmiedel, T.: On the role of context in business process management. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 36(3), 486–495 (2016)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Szelągowski, M., Berniak-Woźny, J.: The knowledge and process continuum. Knowl. Process. Manag. 26(4), 308–320 (2019)CrossRef Szelągowski, M., Berniak-Woźny, J.: The knowledge and process continuum. Knowl. Process. Manag. 26(4), 308–320 (2019)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Di Ciccio, C., Marrella, A., Russo, A.: Knowledge-intensive processes: characteristics, requirements and analysis of contemporary approaches. J. Data Semant. 4, 29–57 (2015)CrossRef Di Ciccio, C., Marrella, A., Russo, A.: Knowledge-intensive processes: characteristics, requirements and analysis of contemporary approaches. J. Data Semant. 4, 29–57 (2015)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Karande, A.M., Kalbande, D.: Business process analyzed factors affecting business model innovation. In: 2015 International Conference on Nascent Technologies in the Engineering Field (ICNTE). IEEE (2015) Karande, A.M., Kalbande, D.: Business process analyzed factors affecting business model innovation. In: 2015 International Conference on Nascent Technologies in the Engineering Field (ICNTE). IEEE (2015)
12.
go back to reference Weber, M.: The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Simon and Schuster (2009) Weber, M.: The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Simon and Schuster (2009)
13.
go back to reference Bandara, W., et al.: A call for ‘holistic’ business process management. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on BPM Problems to Solve Before We Die (PROBLEMS 2021). Sun SITE Central Europe (CEUR) (2021) Bandara, W., et al.: A call for ‘holistic’ business process management. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on BPM Problems to Solve Before We Die (PROBLEMS 2021). Sun SITE Central Europe (CEUR) (2021)
14.
go back to reference Pöppelbuß, J., et al.: Service innovation capability: proposing a new framework. In: 2011 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS). IEEE (2011) Pöppelbuß, J., et al.: Service innovation capability: proposing a new framework. In: 2011 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS). IEEE (2011)
15.
go back to reference Roeser, T., Kern, E.-M.: Surveys in business process management–a literature review. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 21(3), 692–718 (2015)CrossRef Roeser, T., Kern, E.-M.: Surveys in business process management–a literature review. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 21(3), 692–718 (2015)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Boissier, F., Rychkova, I., Grand, B.L.: Challenges in knowledge intensive process management. In: 2019 IEEE 23rd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW), pp. 65–74. IEEE Computer Society (2019) Boissier, F., Rychkova, I., Grand, B.L.: Challenges in knowledge intensive process management. In: 2019 IEEE 23rd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW), pp. 65–74. IEEE Computer Society (2019)
17.
go back to reference Damanpour, F.: Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Manag. J. 34(3), 555–590 (1991)CrossRef Damanpour, F.: Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Manag. J. 34(3), 555–590 (1991)CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Davenport, T.H.: Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology. Harvard Business Review Press (1993) Davenport, T.H.: Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology. Harvard Business Review Press (1993)
19.
go back to reference Camisón, C., Villar-López, A.: Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. J. Bus. Res. 67(1), 2891–2902 (2014)CrossRef Camisón, C., Villar-López, A.: Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. J. Bus. Res. 67(1), 2891–2902 (2014)CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Frishammar, J., et al.: Antecedents and consequences of firms’ process innovation capability: a literature review and a conceptual framework. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 59(4), 519–529 (2012)CrossRef Frishammar, J., et al.: Antecedents and consequences of firms’ process innovation capability: a literature review and a conceptual framework. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 59(4), 519–529 (2012)CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Damanpour, F.: Organizational Innovation: Theory, Research, and Direction (2020) Damanpour, F.: Organizational Innovation: Theory, Research, and Direction (2020)
22.
go back to reference Trkman, P., et al.: From business process management to customer process management. Bus. Process Manage. J. (2015) Trkman, P., et al.: From business process management to customer process management. Bus. Process Manage. J. (2015)
23.
go back to reference Barney, J.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17(1), 99–120 (1991) Barney, J.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17(1), 99–120 (1991)
24.
go back to reference Bowman, C., Ambrosini, V.: How the resource-based view and the dynamic capability views of the firm inform corporate-level strategy. Br. J. Manage. 14, 289–303 (2003) Bowman, C., Ambrosini, V.: How the resource-based view and the dynamic capability views of the firm inform corporate-level strategy. Br. J. Manage. 14, 289–303 (2003)
25.
go back to reference Teece, D.J.: Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Plan. 51(1), 40–49 (2018)CrossRef Teece, D.J.: Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Plan. 51(1), 40–49 (2018)CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Peteraf, M.A.: The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strateg. Manag. J. 14(3), 179–191 (1993)CrossRef Peteraf, M.A.: The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strateg. Manag. J. 14(3), 179–191 (1993)CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Paulk, M.C., et al.: Capability maturity model for software, version 1.1. Technical report. Carnegie Mellon University/Software Engineering Institute), CMU/SEI-93-TR (1993) Paulk, M.C., et al.: Capability maturity model for software, version 1.1. Technical report. Carnegie Mellon University/Software Engineering Institute), CMU/SEI-93-TR (1993)
28.
go back to reference OMG, Business process model and notation (BPMN) version 2.0. OMG Standard (2011) OMG, Business process model and notation (BPMN) version 2.0. OMG Standard (2011)
29.
go back to reference de Bruin, T., Rosemann, M.: Using the Delphi technique to identify BPM capability areas. In: ACIS 2007 Proceedings - 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (2007) de Bruin, T., Rosemann, M.: Using the Delphi technique to identify BPM capability areas. In: ACIS 2007 Proceedings - 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (2007)
30.
go back to reference McCormack, K.P., Johnson, W.C.: Business Process Orientation: Gaining the e-Business Competitive Advantage. CRC Press (2001) McCormack, K.P., Johnson, W.C.: Business Process Orientation: Gaining the e-Business Competitive Advantage. CRC Press (2001)
31.
go back to reference Looy, A.V., Backer, M.D., Poels, G.: A conceptual framework and classification of capability areas for business process maturity. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 8(2), 188–224 (2014)CrossRef Looy, A.V., Backer, M.D., Poels, G.: A conceptual framework and classification of capability areas for business process maturity. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 8(2), 188–224 (2014)CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Van Looy, A.: Capabilities for managing business processes: a measurement instrument. Bus. Process Manage. J. (2019) Van Looy, A.: Capabilities for managing business processes: a measurement instrument. Bus. Process Manage. J. (2019)
33.
go back to reference Leavitt, H.: Applied Organizational Change in Industry. New Perspective in Organization Research. Wiley, New York (1964) Leavitt, H.: Applied Organizational Change in Industry. New Perspective in Organization Research. Wiley, New York (1964)
34.
go back to reference Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I.: Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(3), 192–222 (1991)CrossRef Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I.: Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(3), 192–222 (1991)CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Petter, S., Straub, D., Rai, A.: Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Q. 623–656 (2007) Petter, S., Straub, D., Rai, A.: Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Q. 623–656 (2007)
36.
go back to reference Recker, J., Rosemann, M.: A measurement instrument for process modeling research: development, test and procedural model. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 22(2), 1 (2010) Recker, J., Rosemann, M.: A measurement instrument for process modeling research: development, test and procedural model. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 22(2), 1 (2010)
37.
go back to reference Goni, J.I.C., Van Looy, A.: Process innovation capability in less-structured business processes: a systematic literature review. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 28(3), 557–584 (2022)CrossRef Goni, J.I.C., Van Looy, A.: Process innovation capability in less-structured business processes: a systematic literature review. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 28(3), 557–584 (2022)CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Delbecq, A.L., Van de Ven, A.H., Gustafson, D.H.: Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. In: Delbecq, A.L., Van de Ven, A.H., Gustafson, D.H. (eds.) Management Applications Series. Scott, Foresman, Glenview (1975) Delbecq, A.L., Van de Ven, A.H., Gustafson, D.H.: Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. In: Delbecq, A.L., Van de Ven, A.H., Gustafson, D.H. (eds.) Management Applications Series. Scott, Foresman, Glenview (1975)
39.
go back to reference Okoli, C., Pawlowski, S.D.: The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf. Manage. 42(1), 15–29 (2004)CrossRef Okoli, C., Pawlowski, S.D.: The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf. Manage. 42(1), 15–29 (2004)CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Paré, G., et al.: A systematic assessment of rigor in information systems ranking-type Delphi studies. Inf. Manage. 50(5), 207–217 (2013)CrossRef Paré, G., et al.: A systematic assessment of rigor in information systems ranking-type Delphi studies. Inf. Manage. 50(5), 207–217 (2013)CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Hasson, F., Keeney, S.: Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 78, 1695–1704 (2011)CrossRef Hasson, F., Keeney, S.: Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 78, 1695–1704 (2011)CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5 edn. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2014) Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5 edn. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2014)
43.
go back to reference Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications (1994) Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications (1994)
44.
go back to reference Gerring, J.: Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)CrossRef Gerring, J.: Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Towards a Measurement Instrument for Assessing Capabilities When Innovating Less-Structured Business Processes
Authors
Joklan Imelda Camelia Goni
Amy Van Looy
Copyright Year
2024
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50974-2_18

Premium Partner