Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Earth Science Informatics
Published in: Earth Science Informatics 3/2015

01-09-2015 | Research Article

Towards intelligent GIServices

Authors: Peng Yue, Peter Baumann, Kaylin Bugbee, Liangcun Jiang

Published in: Earth Science Informatics | Issue 3/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Distributed information infrastructures are increasingly used in the geospatial domain. In the infrastructures, data are being collected by distributed sensor services, served by distributed geospatial data services, transformed by processing services and workflows, and consumed by smart clients. Consequently, Geographical Information Systems (GISs) are moving from GISystems to GIServices. Intelligent GIServices are enriched with new capabilities including knowledge representation, semantic reasoning, automatic workflow composition, and quality and traceability. Such Intelligent GIServices facilitate information discovery and integration over the network and automate the assembly of GIServices to provide value-added products. This paper provides an overview of intelligent GIServices. The concept of intelligent GIServices is described, followed by a review of the state-of-the-art technologies and methodologies relevant to intelligent GIServices. Visions on how GIServices can perceive, reason, learn, and act intelligently are highlighted. The results can provide better services for big data processing, semantic interoperability, knowledge discovery, and cross-discipline collaboration in Earth science applications.
previous article Editorial: intelligent GIServices
next article Designing sea ice web APIs for ice information services

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
Aalst W, Hofstede A (2005) YAWL: yet another workflow language. Inf Syst 30(4):245–275CrossRef
Agrawal D, Das S, El Abbadi A (2011) Big data and cloud computing: current state and future opportunities. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Extending Database Technology, ACM, pp 530–533
Albrecht J (1997) Universal analytical GIS operations: a task-oriented systematization of data structure-independent GIS functionality. In: Craglia M, Onsrud H (eds) Geographic Information research: transatlantic perspectives. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 577–91
Anderson JR (1986) In: Michalski RS, Carbonell JG, Mitchell TM (eds) Machine learning: an artificial intelligence approach, vol 2. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington
Arasu A, Babcock B, Babu S, Cieslewicz J, Datar M, Ito K, Motwani R, Srivastava U, Widom J (2004) STREAM: the Stanford data stream management system. Technical report. Stanford InfoLab. 21pp
Aslett M (2011) How will the database incumbents respond to NoSQL and NewSQL. San Francisco, The 451, pp 1–5
Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The internet of things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805CrossRef
Baader F, Nutt W (2003) Basic description logics. In: Baader F, Calvanese D, McGuinness D, Nardi D, Patel-Schneider P (eds) The description logic handbook. Theory, implementation and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 43–95
Barker A, Van Hemert J (2008) Scientific workflow: a survey and research directions. In 7th International Conference Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics, Gdansk, Poland, September 9–12, 2007, Springer Berlin Heidelberg 4967:746–753
Barnaghi P, Presser M, Moessner K (2010) Publishing linked sensor data. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Semantic Sensor Networks (SSN), Organised in conjunction with the International Semantic Web Conference 668
Barto AG (1998) Reinforcement learning: an introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge
Bastin L, Cornford D, Jones R, Heuvelink G, Pebesma E, Stasch C, Nativi S, Mazzetti P, Williams M (2013) Managing uncertainty in integrated environmental modelling: the UncertWeb framework. Environ Model Software 39:116–134CrossRef
Baumann P (2010) The OGC Web Coverage Processing Service (WCPS) standard. Geoinformatica 14(4):447–479CrossRef
Baumann P, Dumitru A, Merticariu V, Misev D, Rusu M (2013) Breaking the big data barrier by enhancing on-board sensor flexibility. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Analytics for Big Geospatial Data. ACM 32–36
Baumann P, Mazzetti P, Ungar J, Barbera R, Barboni D, Beccati A, Bigagli L, Boldrini E, Bruno R, Calanducci A, Campalani P, Clements O, Dumitru A, Grant M, Herzig P, Kakaletris G, Laxton J, Koltsida P, Lipskoch K, Mahdiraji A R, Mantovani S, Merticariu V, Messina A, Misev D, Natali S, Nativi S, Oosthoek J, Passmore J, Pappalardo M, Rossi A P, Rundo F, Sen M, Sorbera V, Sullivan D, Torrisi M, Trovato L, Veratelli M G, Wagner S (2014) Big data analytics for earth sciences: the EarthServer approach. Int J Digital Earth (submitted)
Bernard L, Mäs S, Müller M, Henzen C, Brauner J (2014) Scientific geodata infrastructures: challenges, approaches and directions. Int J Digital Earth 7(7):613–633CrossRef
Berrick S, Leptoukh G, Farley J, Rui H (2009) Giovanni: a web service workflow-based data visualization and analysis system. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 47(1):106–113CrossRef
Bhatnagar RK, Kanal LN (1986) Handling uncertain information: a review of numeric and non-numeric methods. In: Kanal LN, Lemmer JF (eds) Uncertainty in AI. Elsevier North-Holland, New York, pp 3–26
Bizer C, Heath T, Idehen K, Berners-Lee T (2008) Linked data on the web. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, ACM, Beijing 1265–1266
Boccaletti S, Bianconi G, Criado R, Del Genio C I, Gómez-Gardeñes J, Romance M, Zanin M (2014). The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks. Physics Reports
Botts M, Percivall G, Reed C, Davidson J (2008) OGC® sensor web enablement: overview and high level architecture. In GeoSensor networks, Springer Berlin Heidelberg 175–190
Boulos MNK, Warren J, Gong J, Yue P (2010) Web GIS in practice VIII: HTML5 and the canvas element for interactive online mapping. Int J Health Geogr 9(1):14CrossRef
Bradley ES, Roberts DA, Dennison PE, Green RO, Eastwood M, Lundeen SR, Leifer I (2011) Google earth and Google fusion tables in support of time-critical collaboration: mapping the deepwater horizon oil spill with the AVIRIS airborne spectrometer. Earth Sci Inf 4(4):169–179CrossRef
Bröring A, Echterhoff J, Jirka S et al (2011a) New generation sensor web enablement. Sensors 11(3):2652–2699CrossRef
Bröring A, Maué P, Janowicz K, Nüst D, Malewski C (2011b) Semantically-enabled sensor plug & play for the sensor web. Sensors 11(8):7568–7605CrossRef
Buyya R, Yeo CS, Venugopal S, Broberg J, Brandic I (2009) Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility. Futur Gener Comput Syst 25(6):599–616CrossRef
Castronova AM, Goodall JL, Elag MM (2013) Models as web services using the open geospatial consortium (ogc) web processing service (wps) standard. Environ Model Software 41:72–83CrossRef
Cattell R (2011) Scalable SQL and NoSQL data stores. ACM SIGMOD Rec 39(4):12–27CrossRef
Chen H, Chiang RH, Storey VC (2012) Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q 36(4):1165–1188
Chen N, Chen X, Wang K, Niu X (2013) Progress and challenges in the architecture and service pattern of earth observation sensor Web for digital earth. Int J Digital Earth 17. doi:10.​1080/​17538947.​2013.​834385
Cios KJ, Pedrycz W, Swiniarsk RM (1998) Data mining methods for knowledge discovery. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 9(6):1533–1534CrossRef
Clark DA (1990) Numerical and symbolic approaches to uncertainty management in AI. Artif Intell Rev 4:109–146CrossRef
Condie T, Mineiro P, Polyzotis N, Weimer M (2013) Machine learning for big data. In Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Management of data, ACM 939–942
Cox S, Schade S (2010) Linked data: what does it offer earth sciences?. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts 12:2079
de Jesus J, Walker P, Grant M, Groom S (2012) WPS orchestration using the Taverna workbench: the eScience approach. Comput Geosci 47:75–86CrossRef
Dean J, Ghemawat S (2008) MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Commun ACM 51(1):107–113CrossRef
Di L (2007) Geospatial sensor web and self-adaptive Earth predictive systems (SEPS). In Proceedings of the Earth Science Technology Office (ESTO)/Advanced Information System Technology (AIST) Sensor Web Principal Investigator (PI) Meeting, San Diego, USA, pp. 1–4
Di L, Moe K, van Zyl TL (2010) Earth observation sensor web: an overview. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 3(4):415–417CrossRef
Di L, Yue P, Ramapriyan HK, King RL (2013) Geoscience data provenance: an overview. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 51(11):5065–5072CrossRef
Dumitru A, Merticariu V, Baumann P (2014) exploring cloud opportunities from an array database perspective. Proc ACM SIGMOD workshop on data analytics in the cloud (DanaC’2014), June 22–27, 2014, Snowbird, USA 1–4
Echterhoff J, Everding T (2011) OGC Event service-review and current state. Version . OGC 11-088r1. Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. 33 pp
Egenhofer MJ (2002) Toward the semantic geospatial Web. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Mclean, VA, USA, 8–9 November 2002, pp 1–4
Evangelidis K, Ntouros K, Makridis S, Papatheodorou C (2014) Geospatial services in the cloud. Comput Geosci 63:116–122CrossRef
Fan M, Fan H, Chen N, Chen Z, Du W (2013) Active on-demand service method based on event-driven architecture for geospatial data retrieval. Comput Geosci 56:1–11CrossRef
Fayyad U, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Smyth P (1996) From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AI Mag 17(3):37
Filipponi L, Vitaletti A, Landi G, Memeo V, Laura G, Pucci P (2010) Smart city: an event driven architecture for monitoring public spaces with heterogeneous sensors. In 2010 Fourth International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications (SENSORCOMM), IEEE, pp 281–286
Foerster T, Brühl A, Schäffer B (2011) RESTful web processing service. In Proceedings 14th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Utrecht, Netherlands
Frew J, Bose R (2001) Earth system science workbench: a data management infrastructure for earth science products. Proc Thirteenth Int Conf Sci Stat Database Manag IEEE 180–189
Gao S, Mioc D, Yi X (2009) The measurement of geospatial Web service quality in SDIs. In: Proceedings 17th International Conference on Geoinformatics, Fairfax, USA pp 1–6
Garijo D, Gil Y (2011) A new approach for publishing workflows: abstractions, standards, and linked data. In Proceedings of the 6th workshop on Workflows in support of large-scale science, ACM, pp 47–56
Gil Y, Ratnakar V, Kim J, González-Calero PA, Groth P, Moody J, Deelman E (2011) Wings: intelligent workflow-based design of computational experiments. IEEE Intell Syst 26(1):62–72CrossRef
Gil Y, Greaves M, Hendler J, Hirsh H (2014) Amplify scientific discovery with artificial intelligence. Science 346(6206):171–172CrossRef
Gong J, Xiang L, Chen J, Yue P, Liu Y (2011) GeoGlobe: a virtual globe for multi-source geospatial information integration and service. Advances in Web-based GIS, Mapping Services and Applications, Taylor & Francis Publication
Goodchild MF, Guo H, Annoni A, Bian L, de Bie K, Campbell F, Woodgate P (2012) Next-generation digital earth. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(28):11088–11094CrossRef
Granell C (2014) Robust workflow systems + flexible geoprocessing services = geo-enabled model Web? In: Pourabbas E (ed) Geographical information systems: trends and technologies. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 172–204
Granell C, Fernández ÓB, Díaz L (2014) Geospatial information infrastructures to address spatial needs in health: collaboration, challenges and opportunities. Futur Gener Comput Syst 31:213–222CrossRef
Gunay A, Akcay O, Altan MO (2014) Building a semantic based public transportation geoportal compliant with the INSPIRE transport network data theme. Earth Sci Inf 7(1):25–37CrossRef
Gyrard A, Bonnet C, Boudaoud K (2014) Enrich machine-to-machine data with semantic web technologies for cross-domain applications. In 2014 I.E. World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), IEEE 559–564
Han J, Haihong E, Le G, Du J (2011) Survey on NoSQL databases. In 6th international conference on Pervasive computing and applications (ICPCA), IEEE 363–366
Hatzi O, Vrakas D, Nikolaidou M, Bassiliades N, Anagnostopoulos D, Vlahavas L (2012) An integrated approach to automated semantic web service composition through planning. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 5(3):319–332CrossRef
He L, Yue P, Di L, Zhang M, Hu L (2015a) Adding geospatial data provenance into SDI—a service-oriented approach. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 8(2):926–936CrossRef
He L, Yue P, Jiang L, Zhang M (2015b) Fuzzy spatial relation ontology driven detection of complex geospatial features in a web service environment. Earth Sci Inf 8(1):63–76CrossRef
Hey T, Trefethen AE (2005) Cyberinfrastructure for e-science. Science 308(5723):817–821CrossRef
Hofer B (2013) Geospatial cyberinfrastructure and geoprocessing Web—a review of commonalities and differences of e-science approaches. ISPRS Int J Geogr Inf 2(3):749–765CrossRef
Hopgood AA (2011) Intelligent systems for engineers and scientists. CRC press, Boca Raton
INSPIRE (2008) INSPIRE Network Services Architecture 30
Janowicz K, Bröring A, Stasch C, Schade S, Everding T, Llaves A (2013) A restful proxy and data model for linked sensor data. Int J Digital Earth 6(3):233–254CrossRef
Jara AJ, Olivieri AC, Bocchi Y, Jung M, Kastner W, Skarmeta AF (2014) Semantic Web of things: an analysis of the application semantics for the IoT moving towards the IoT convergence. Int J Web Grid Serv 10(2):244–272CrossRef
Ji C, Li Y, Qiu W, Awada U, Li K (2012) Big data processing in cloud computing environments. In Proceedings of the 2012 12th International Symposium on Pervasive Systems, Algorithms and Networks. IEEE Comput Soc 17–23
Jungmann A, Kleinjohann B (2012) Towards the application of reinforcement learning techniques for quality-based service selection in automated service composition. In 2012 I.E. Ninth International Conference on Services Computing (SCC), IEEE, pp 701–702
Karimi HA (Ed.) (2014). Big Data: techniques and technologies in geoinformatics. CRC Press
Karpagam GR, Bhuvaneswari A (2011) AI planning-based semantic web service composition. Int J Innov Comput Appl 3(3):126–135CrossRef
Katasonov A, Kaykova O, Khriyenko O, Nikitin S, Terziyan VY (2008) Smart semantic middleware for the internet of things. ICINCO-ICSO 8:169–178
Kouicem A, Chibani A, Tari A, Amirat Y, Tari Z (2014) Dynamic services selection approach for the composition of complex services in the web of objects. In 2014 I.E. World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), IEEE, pp 298–303
Krishnakumar K (2003) Intelligent systems for aerospace engineering - an overview. National Aeronautics and space administration Moffett Field CA Ames Research Center
Kuzu M, Cicekli NK (2012) Dynamic planning approach to automated web service composition. Appl Intell 36(1):1–28CrossRef
Lacasta J, Nogueras-Iso J, Béjar R, Muro-Medrano PR, Zarazaga-Soria FJ (2007) A Web ontology service to facilitate interoperability within a spatial data infrastructure: applicability to discovery. Data Knowl Eng 63(3):947–971CrossRef
Lacoche J, Duval T, Arnaldi B, et al (2014) A survey of plasticity in 3D user interfaces, 7th Workshop on Software Engineering and Architectures for Realtime Interactive Systems
Laniak GF, Olchin G, Goodall J, Voinov A, Hill M, Glynn P, Whelan G, Geller G, Quinn N, Blind M, Peackham S, Reaney S, Gaber N, Kennedy R, Hughes A (2013) Integrated environmental modeling: a vision and roadmap for the future. Environ Model Software 39:3–23CrossRef
Lanter DP (1991) Design of a lineage-based meta-data base for GIS. Cartogr Geogr Inf Syst 18(4):255–261CrossRef
Li L, Li S, Zhao S (2014b) QoS-aware scheduling of services-oriented internet of things. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 10(2):1497–1505CrossRef
Maguire D, Longley P (2005) The emergence of geoportals and their role in spatial data infrastructures. Comput Environ Urban Syst 29(1):3–14CrossRef
Manyika J, Chui M, Brown B, Bughin J, Dobbs R, Roxburgh C, Byers A (2011) Big data: The next frontier for innovation, Competition, and Productivity. McKinsey Global Institute
Maué P, Michels H, Roth M (2012) Injecting semantic annotations into (geospatial) web service descriptions. Semant Web J 3(4):385–395
Mazzetti P, Nativi S, Caron J (2009) RESTful implementation of geospatial services for earth and space science applications. Int J Digital Earth 2(S1):40–61CrossRef
McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5(4):115–133CrossRef
McFerren G, Van Zyl T, Vahed A (2012) FOSS geospatial libraries in scientific workflow environments: experiences and directions. Appl Geomatics 4(2):85–93CrossRef
Michelson BM (2006) Event-driven architecture overview. Patricia Seybold Group
Michener WK, Allard S, Budden A et al (2012) Participatory design of DataONE—enabling cyberinfrastructure for the biological and environmental sciences. Ecol Inf 11:5–15CrossRef
Misev D, Baumann P (2014) Extending the SQL array concept to support scientific analytics. Proc. Intl. Conf. on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM’2014), June 30 - July 2, 2014, Aalborg, Denmark, paper #10
Moses R (2011) Enabling quality of geospatial Web services. In: Zhao P, Di L (eds.) Geospatial Web services: advances in information interoperability. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 33–63
Müller M, Bernard L, Brauner J (2010) Moving code in spatial data infrastructures–web service based deployment of geoprocessing algorithms. Trans GIS 14(s1):101–118CrossRef
Müller M, Bernard L, Kadner D (2013) Moving code–sharing geoprocessing logic on the Web. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 83:193–203CrossRef
Nativi S, Craglia M, Pearlman J (2013a) Earth science infrastructures interoperability: the brokering approach. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 6(3):1118–1129CrossRef
Nativi S, Mazzetti P, Geller G (2013b) Environmental model access and interoperability: the GEO model Web initiative. Environ Model Software 39:214–228CrossRef
Negnevitsky M (2005) Artificial intelligence: a guide to intelligent systems. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River
Neumeyer L, Robbins B, Nair A, Kesari A (2010) S4: Distributed stream computing platform. In 2010 I.E. International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), IEEE, pp 170–177
Ngan LD, Kanagasabai R (2013) Semantic Web service discovery: state-of-the-art and research challenges. Pers Ubiquit Comput 17(8):1741–1752CrossRef
NSF (2007) Cyberinfrastructure vision for 21st Century Discovery, National Science Foundation, USA, March, 2007, 64 pp
OGC (2015) 3D Portrayal Service Candidate Standard, OGC 15–001, Open Geospatial Consortium
Onchaga R (2004) Modelling for quality of services in distributed geoprocessing. In: Proceedings XXth ISPRS Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, pp 212–217
Page KR, De Roure DC, Martinez K, Sadler JD, Kit OY (2009) Linked sensor data: Restfully serving rdf and gml. Proc Semant Sens Netw 49
Paik I, Chen W, Kumara BT, Tanaka T, Li Z, Yaguchi Y (2014) Linked data-based service publication for service clustering. In Advanced in Computer Science and its Applications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1429–1435
Papazoglou MP (2003) Service-oriented computing: concepts, characteristics and directions. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE), IEEE, pp 3–12
Patni H, Sahoo S, Henson C, Sheth A (2010) Provenance aware linked sensor data. In Proceedings of the second workshop on trust and privacy on the social and semantic web
Perry M, Herring J (2012) OGC GeoSPARQL - a geographic query language for RDF data. Version 1.0, OGC 11-052r4, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc
Pistore M, Barbon F, Bertoli P, Shaparau D, Traverso P (2004) Planning and monitoring web service composition. In artificial intelligence: methodology, systems, and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 106–115CrossRef
Pouchard LC, Branstetter ML, Cook RB, Devarakonda R, Green J, Palanisamy G, Noy NF (2013) A linked science investigation: enhancing climate change data discovery with semantic technologies. Earth Sci Inf 6(3):175–185CrossRef
Pratt A, Peters C, Siddeswara G, Lee B, Terhorst A (2010) Exposing the Kepler scientific workflow system as an OGC web processing service. Proceedings of iEMSs (International Environmental Modelling and Software Society)
Royan J, Gioia P, Cavagna R et al (2007) Network-based visualization of 3d landscapes and city models. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 27(6):70–79CrossRef
Rudas IJ, Fodor J (2008) Intelligent systems. Int J Comput Commun Control 3(Suppl):132–138
Russell S, Norvig P (1995) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Schadt EE, Linderman MD, Sorenson J, Lee L, Nolan GP (2010) Computational solutions to large-scale data management and analysis. Nat Rev Genet 11(9):647–657CrossRef
Scharl A, Tochtermann K (2009) The geospatial web: how geobrowsers, social software and the Web 2.0 are shaping the network society. Springer, London
Sheth A, Henson C, Sahoo SS (2008) Semantic sensor web. IEEE Internet Comput 12(4):78–83CrossRef
Simonis I, Dibner P (2007) OpenGIS sensor planning service implementation specification. Implementation specification OGC
Slavakis K, Giannakis G, Mateos G (2014) Modeling and optimization for big data analytics: (Statistical) learning tools for our era of data deluge. IEEE Signal Process Mag 31(5):18–31CrossRef
ITU Strategy and Policy Unit (SPU) (2005) ITU internet reports 2005: the internet of things. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
Sun Z, Yue P, Di L (2012) GeoPWTManager: a task-oriented web geoprocessing system. Comput Geosci 47:34–45CrossRef
Tamayo A, Granell C, Huerta J (2012) Measuring complexity in OGC web services XML schemas: pragmatic use and solutions. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 26(6):1109–1130CrossRef
Tao F, Cheng Y, Xu LD, Zhang L, Li BH (2014) CCIoT-CMfg: cloud computing and internet of things based cloud manufacturing service system. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 10(2):1435–1442CrossRef
Tilmes C, Fleig AJ (2008) Provenance tracking in an earth science data processing system. In Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 221–228
Toshniwal A, Taneja S, Shukla A, Ramasamy K, Patel JM, Kulkarni S, Jackson J, Gade K, Fu M, Donham J, Bhagat N, Mittal S, Ryaboy D (2014) Storm@ twitter. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, ACM, pp 147–156
Vaccari L, Craglia M, Fugazza C, Nativi S, Santoro M (2012) Integrative research: the EuroGEOSS experience. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 5(6):1603–1611CrossRef
van Zyl TL, Vahed A, McFerren G, Hohls D (2012) Earth observation scientific workflows in a distributed computing environment. Trans GIS 16(2):233–248CrossRef
Vokrinek J, Komenda A, Pechoucek M (2011) Abstract architecture for task-oriented multi-agent problem solving. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 41(1):31–40CrossRef
Wang H, Zhou X, Zhou X, Liu W, Li W, Bouguettaya A (2010) Adaptive service composition based on reinforcement learning. SOC 6470:92–107
Wang X, Yu J, Baumann P (2011) A Web coverage ontology for geospatial Web applications. Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Semantic Computing (ICSC’2011), Palo Alto, USA, September 18–21, 2011, pp. 216–223
Wang S, Anselin L, Bhaduri B, Crosby C, Goodchild MF, Liu Y, Nyerges TL (2013) CyberGIS software: a synthetic review and integration roadmap. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 27(11):2122–2145CrossRef
WfMC (2008) Process definition interface—XML process definition language. Workflow Management Coalition, Cohasset, p 217
White T (2009) Hadoop: the definitive guide: the definitive guide. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol
Witten IH, Frank E (2005) Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington
Wright DJ, Wang S (2011) The emergence of spatial cyberinfrastructure. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(14):5488–5491CrossRef
Yang C, Raskin R, Goodchild M, Gahegan M (2010) Geospatial cyberinfrastructure: past, present and future. Comput Environ Urban Syst 34:264–277CrossRef
Yang C, Xu Y, Nebert D (2013) Redefining the possibility of digital earth and geosciences with spatial cloud computing. Int J Digital Earth 6(4):297–312CrossRef
Yuan J, Yue P, Gong J, Zhang M (2013) A linked data approach for geospatial data provenance. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 51(11):5105–5112CrossRef
Yue P, Di L, Yang W, Yu G, Zhao P (2007) Semantics-based automatic composition of geospatial Web services chains. Comput Geosci 33(5):649–665CrossRef
Yue P, Di L, Yang W, Yu G, Zhao P, Gong J (2009) Semantic web services—based process planning for earth science applications. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 23(9):1139–1163CrossRef
Yue P, Gong J, Di L, Yuan J, Sun L, Sun Z, Wang Q (2010) GeoPW: laying blocks for the geospatial processing web. Trans GIS 14(6):755–772CrossRef
Yue P, Gong J, Di L, He L, Wei Y (2011a) Integrating semantic web technologies and geospatial catalog services for geospatial information discovery and processing in cyberinfrastructure. Geoinformatica 15(2):273–303CrossRef
Yue P, Wei Y, Di L, He L, Gong J, Zhang L (2011b) Sharing geospatial provenance in a service-oriented environment. Comput Environ Urban Syst 35(4):333–343CrossRef
Yue P, Di L, Wei Y, Han W (2013a) Intelligent services for discovery of complex geospatial features from remote sensing imagery. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 83:151–164CrossRef
Yue P, Zhou H, Gong J, Hu L (2013b) Geoprocessing in cloud computing platforms—a comparative analysis. Int J Digital Earth 6(4):404–425CrossRef
Yue P, Jiang L, Hu L (2014a) Google fusion tables for managing soil moisture sensor observations. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 7(11):4414–4421CrossRef
Yue P, Tan Z, Zhang M (2014b) GeoQoS: delivering quality of services on the Geoprocessing Web. In: Proceedings of OSGeo’s European Conference on Free and Open Source Software for Geospatial (FOSS4G-Europe 2014), 15–17 July 2014, Bremen, Germany, 11pp
Yue P, Zhang M, Tan Z (2015) A geoprocessing workflow system for environmental monitoring and integrated modelling. Environ Model Software 69:128--140
Zhao P, Di L (2010) Geospatial Web services: advances in information interoperability. IGI Global publisher, Hershey, p 552
Zhao P, Foerster T, Yue P (2012a) The geoprocessing web. Comput Geosci 47(10):3–12CrossRef
Zhao P, Di L, Han W, Li X (2012b) Building a Web-services based geospatial online analysis system. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 5(6):1780–1792CrossRef
Zhou M, Ma Y (2013) QoS-aware computational method for IoT composite service. J China Univ Posts Telecommun 20:35–39CrossRef
Zikopoulos P, Eaton C (2011) Understanding big data: analytics for enterprise class hadoop and streaming data. McGraw-Hill Osborne Media, New York
Metadata
Title
Towards intelligent GIServices
Authors
Peng Yue
Peter Baumann
Kaylin Bugbee
Liangcun Jiang
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Earth Science Informatics / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1865-0473
Electronic ISSN: 1865-0481
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-015-0229-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Earth Science Informatics 3/2015 Go to the issue

Methodology Article

A semantically enabled metadata repository for scientific data

Research Article

Application of remote sensing and GIS for evaluation of the recent morphological characteristics of the lower Brahmaputra-Jamuna River, Bangladesh

Research Article

A Map-Reduce based parallel approach for improving query performance in a geospatial semantic web for disaster response

Research Article

Evaluation of urban growth effects on surface runoff using SCS-CN method and Green-Ampt infiltration model

Software Article

DrinC: a software for drought analysis based on drought indices

Methodology Article

Organization of a geophysical information space by using an event-bush-based collaborative tool

Premium Partner

    Image Credits