Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Structure of the Research: Toward Transculturality Read chapter Read first chapter

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs), Holder Communities and Conflicts with Central States: Policies for the Recognition of Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) and Intellectual Property (IP) Regulation

Authors : Carla Zuddas, Andrea Cocco

Published in: Transcultural Diplomacy and International Law in Heritage Conservation

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The paper will focus on the policies aimed at recognizing and protecting the ICH and TCE’s endorsed by some international organizations, such as in particular UNESCO and WIPO. Hence, criticalities emerging from the relations between the international organizations and the central authorities of the States will be analysed. The central States are the signatories of the international conventions. In addition, both the State or the regional authorities can be identified by the same conventions as partners to the international organizations promoting the cited policies. However, when the holder communities of TCEs are in conflict with the State or regional authorities in whose territory the communities are located, there is a risk to compromise or limit the effectiveness of these policies, with damage to “moral” and economic interests of the community. Likewise, some critical matters related to policies based on the use of IPRs and sui generis protection rights, will be discussed, with specific regard to the difficulties in the identification of an owner as well as a work of authorship in a traditional context.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Cultural Heritage in International Law: (Still) Looking for a Definition? The Taxonomy of Cultural Heritage Across the Spectrum of UNESCO Conventions and Beyond
next chapter Cultural Diplomacy in India: Dispersal, Heritage Representation, Contestation, and Development
Footnotes
Literature
Augé, M., & Colleyn, J. P. (2006). L’Antropologia del Mondo Contemporaneo, Milano (p. 59). Milano: Eleuthera.
Blake, J. (2001). Developing a new standard-setting instrument for the safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage elements for consideration. Paris: UNESCO.
Blake, J. (2014). Seven years of implementing UNESCO’s 2003 intangible heritage convention—Honeymoon period or the “seven-year itch”? International Journal of Cultural Property, 21, 291ff.
Bortolotto, C. (2011). Le trouble du patrimoine culturel immatériel. Le patrimoine culturel immatériel: enjeux d’une nouvelle catégorie. Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, collection «Cahiers d’ethnologie de la France». Paris.
Bortolotto, C. (2012). Gli inventari del patrimonio culturale intangibile – Quale “partecipazione” per quali “comunità”? In Scovazzi, Ubertazzi, Zagato (Ed.), Il patrimonio intangibile nelle sue diverse dimensioni (p. 75ff.). Milano: Giuffrè.
Boynton, S. (2003). Orality, literacy, and the early notation of the office hymns. Journal of the American Musicological Society, 56(1), 99ff.
Bronson, B. H. (1951). Melodic stability in oral transmission. Journal of the International Folk Music Council, 3, 50ff.
Ciminelli, M. L. (2008). Salvaguardia del patrimonio culturale immateriale e possibili effetti collaterali: etnomimesi ed etnogenesi. In Zagato (Ed.), Le identità culturali nei recenti strumenti UNESCO. Un approccio nuovo alla costruzione della pace? (p. 99ff.). Padova: CEDAM.
Dei, F. (2013). Da Gramsci all’UNESCO. Antropologia, cultura popolare e beni intangibili. Parolechiave (p. 131ff.).
De Sanctis, V. (1967). La Conferenza diplomatica di Stoccolma della proprietà intellettuale. IDA (Il Diritto d’Autore) (p. 303ff.).
Fabietti U., Malighetti R., & Matera V. (2002). Dal tribale al globale. Introduzione all’antropologia (p. 106). Milano: Mondadori.
Ficsor, M. (1998). Attempts to provide international protection for folklore by intellectual property rights. UNESCO-WIPO World Forum on the Protection of Folklore, UNESCO/WIPO, n. LXII (p. 215). Paris/Geneva.
Galtieri, G. (1973). Folclore e diritto d’autore. Dir. Aut. (Il Diritto di autore) (p. 379ff.).
Gibson, J. (2004). Intellectual property systems, traditional knowledge and the legal authority of community. European Intellectual Property Review (p. 280ff.).
Hughes, J. (2012). Traditional knowledge, cultural expression, and the Siren’s call of property. San Diego Law Review, 49, 1215ff.
Janke, T. (1997). UNESCO-WIPO. World forum on the protection of folklore: Lessons for protecting indigenous Australian cultural and intellectual property. Copyright Reporter, XV, 104ff.
Juhász, Z. (2015). A search for structural similarities of oral musical traditions in Eurasia and America using the self organizing cloud algorithm. Journal of New Music Research, 44(3), 196ff.
Kurin, R. (2004). Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage in the 2003 UNESCO Convention: A critical appraisal. Musem International, 56(1–2), 66ff.
Kwok-Wai Ng. (2011). Orality and literacy in the transmission of Japanese Tōgaku: Its past and present. Ethnomusicology Forum, 20(1), 33ff.
LOFFREDO, E. (2003). Profili giuridici della tutela delle produzioni tipiche. Riv. Dir. Ind. (Rivista di Diritto Industriale), I (p. 139 ss.).
Macchiarella, I. (2011). Dove il tocco di Re Mida non arriva. A proposito di proclamazioni Unesco e musica. Ricerca Folklorica, LXIV, 71ff.
Molino, J. (2005). Che cos’è l’oralità musicale. Enciclopedia della Musica Einaudi (pp. 367ff.).
Nordemann, W., Vinck, F., Hertin, P. W., & Meyer, G. (1990). Sub art. 15 BC, No. 6, 158, International copyright and neighbouring rights law: Commentary with special emphasis on the European Community. New York: Wiley VCH.
Petrov, K. V. (1989). Memory and oral tradition. Memory, Butler (Ed.), New York: Blackwell (p. 77ff.).
Pineschi, L. (2008). Convenzione sulla diversità culturale e diritto internazionale dei diritti umani. In Zagato (Ed.), Le identità culturali nei recenti strumenti UNESCO. Un approccio nuovo alla costruzione della pace? (p. 159ff.). Padova: CEDAM.
Rahmatian, A. (2009). Neo-colonial aspects of global intellectual property protection. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 12(1), 40ff.
Rapport, N. (2010). Community. Routledge Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Barnard–Spencer (Ed.). (p. 142ff.). London: Routledge.
Rice, T. (1995). Understanding and producing the variability of oral tradition: Learning from a Bulgarian Bagpiper. The Journal of American Folklore, 108 (p. 266ff.).
Ricketson, S., & Ginsburg, J. C. (2006). International copyright and neighbouring rights (2nd edn, p. 513). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ruesch, M. (2008). Creating culture: Protection of traditional cultural expressions and folklore and the impact on creation and innovation in the marketplace of ideas. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 35(2), 369ff.
Shehan Campbell, P. (1989). Orality, literacy and music’s creative potential: A comparative approach. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 101, 30ff.
Slattery, E. K. (2006). Preserving the United States’ intangible cultural heritage: An evaluation of the 2003 Unesco Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage as a means to overcome the problems posed by Intellectual Property Law. DePaul Journal of Art & Entertainment Law, 5, 201ff.
Stamatoudi, I. (2004). The protection of intangible property by means of the Unesco Convention on the safeguarding of intangible heritage and intellectual property law. Revue Hellénique de droit International, 57, 149ff.
Toynbee, J. (2006). Copyright, the work and phonographic orality in music. Social & Legal Studies, 15(1), 77ff.
Treitler, L. (1984). Orality and literacy in the music of the middle ages. Parergon, 2, 143ff.
Vìcha, O. (2014). The concept of the right to cultural heritage within the Faro Convention. ICLR, 14 (No. 1) (p. 25 ss.).
Von Lewinski, S. (Ed.). (2008). Indigenous heritage and intellectual property, genetic resources, traditional knowledge and folklore. Kluwer Law International: The Netherlands.
Zagato, L. (2008). La Convenzione sulla protezione del patrimonio culturale intangibile. In Zagato (Ed.), Le identità culturali nei recenti strumenti UNESCO. Un approccio nuovo alla costruzione della pace? (p. 27ff.). Padova: CEDAM.
Zuddas, C. (2015). Strumenti e modelli per la tutela giuridica delle espressioni culturali tradizionali. Napoli: ESI.
Metadata
Title
Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs), Holder Communities and Conflicts with Central States: Policies for the Recognition of Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) and Intellectual Property (IP) Regulation
Authors
Carla Zuddas
Andrea Cocco
Copyright Year
2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Book
Transcultural Diplomacy and International Law in Heritage Conservation

Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0308-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-16-0309-9

Copyright Year: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0309-9_14