Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 5/2020

29-05-2020 | Original Paper

Trend in environmental impact of the energy produced and distributed by wind power systems

Authors: Germán Arana-Landín, Beñat Landeta-Manzano, María Begoña Peña-Lang, Naiara Uriarte-Gallastegi

Published in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy | Issue 5/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Wind turbine (WT) manufacturers are focusing on reducing the cost of energy produced by new models; however, the same consideration has not been given to their environmental consequences, nor the academic literature. For these reasons, the case study focuses on the environmental performance of the energy generated and distributed by the models launched from 2010 to 2018 by a world-leading manufacturer. It has been shown that, in relation to the year of release, the impacts per kWh of electricity generated and distributed increase on annual average in the four categories of environmental impact analysed: acidification potential, 11.3%; eutrophication potential, 34.5%; global warming potential, 7.8%; and photochemical ozone, 3.2%. The “Raw material acquisition and WT manufacturing” phase accounts for 49% to 74% of the global impacts generated, depending on the model and the category analysed. This is mainly due to energy consumption in the manufacturing of blades and consumption of electrical and electronic components in cabinets and converter. In the “Construction of wind farms” phase, impacts vary between 21 and 41%. Transport, steel and concrete in the foundations and metals in the transmission network are the most critical aspects. In the “Operation and Maintenance” phase, impacts vary between 3.5 and 27%, but it is the phase with the highest growth in impact, mainly due to the replacement of larger blades. Finally, the “End-of-Life” phase generates the lowest impact (between 0.3 and 4%). The research highlights the need to control the environmental impacts of all energy sources, including renewable energies.

Graphic abstract

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Alsaleh A, Sattler M (2019) Comprehensive life cycle assessment of large wind turbines in the US. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21:887–903CrossRef Alsaleh A, Sattler M (2019) Comprehensive life cycle assessment of large wind turbines in the US. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21:887–903CrossRef
go back to reference Arvesen A, Hertwich EG (2012) Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of wind power: a review of present knowledge and research needs. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(8):5994–6006CrossRef Arvesen A, Hertwich EG (2012) Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of wind power: a review of present knowledge and research needs. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(8):5994–6006CrossRef
go back to reference Asdrubali F, Baldinelli G, D’Alessandro F, Scrucca F (2015) Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: review and results harmonization. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 42:1113–1122CrossRef Asdrubali F, Baldinelli G, D’Alessandro F, Scrucca F (2015) Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: review and results harmonization. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 42:1113–1122CrossRef
go back to reference Atilgan B, Azapagic A (2016) Renewable electricity in Turkey: life cycle environmental impacts. Renew Energy 89:649–657CrossRef Atilgan B, Azapagic A (2016) Renewable electricity in Turkey: life cycle environmental impacts. Renew Energy 89:649–657CrossRef
go back to reference BNEF (2018) Global Wind Turbine Market Shares Bloomberg New Energy Finance, New York City BNEF (2018) Global Wind Turbine Market Shares Bloomberg New Energy Finance, New York City
go back to reference Bonou A, Laurent A, Olsen SI (2016) Life cycle assessment of onshore and offshore wind energy-from theory to application. Appl Energy 180:327–337CrossRef Bonou A, Laurent A, Olsen SI (2016) Life cycle assessment of onshore and offshore wind energy-from theory to application. Appl Energy 180:327–337CrossRef
go back to reference Caduff M, Huijbregts MA, Althaus HJ et al (2012) Wind power electricity: the bigger the turbine the greener the electricity? Environ Sci Technol 46(9):4725–4733CrossRef Caduff M, Huijbregts MA, Althaus HJ et al (2012) Wind power electricity: the bigger the turbine the greener the electricity? Environ Sci Technol 46(9):4725–4733CrossRef
go back to reference CEER (2017) Report on Power Losses Bruxelles. Council of European Energy Regulators, Brussels CEER (2017) Report on Power Losses Bruxelles. Council of European Energy Regulators, Brussels
go back to reference CEN (2013) EN 15804:2012+A1:2013. Sustainability of construction works - Environmental product declarations - Core rules for the product category of construction products. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels CEN (2013) EN 15804:2012+A1:2013. Sustainability of construction works - Environmental product declarations - Core rules for the product category of construction products. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels
go back to reference Chiang AC, Moore MR, Johnson JX, Keoleian GA (2016) Emissions reduction benefits of siting an offshore wind farm: a temporal and spatial analysis of Lake Michigan. Ecol Econ 130:263–276CrossRef Chiang AC, Moore MR, Johnson JX, Keoleian GA (2016) Emissions reduction benefits of siting an offshore wind farm: a temporal and spatial analysis of Lake Michigan. Ecol Econ 130:263–276CrossRef
go back to reference Chipindula J, Botlaguduru V, Du H et al (2018) Life cycle environmental impact of onshore and offshore wind farms in Texas. Sustain 10(6):2022CrossRef Chipindula J, Botlaguduru V, Du H et al (2018) Life cycle environmental impact of onshore and offshore wind farms in Texas. Sustain 10(6):2022CrossRef
go back to reference Demir N, Taşkın A (2013) Life cycle assessment of wind turbines in Pınarbaşı-Kayseri. J Cleaner Prod 54:253–263CrossRef Demir N, Taşkın A (2013) Life cycle assessment of wind turbines in Pınarbaşı-Kayseri. J Cleaner Prod 54:253–263CrossRef
go back to reference Dolan SL, Heath GA (2012) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of utility-scale wind power: systematic review and harmonization. J Ind Ecol 16:S136–S154CrossRef Dolan SL, Heath GA (2012) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of utility-scale wind power: systematic review and harmonization. J Ind Ecol 16:S136–S154CrossRef
go back to reference Greening B, Azapagic A (2013) Environmental impacts of micro-wind turbines and their potential to contribute to UK climate change targets. Energy 59:454–466CrossRef Greening B, Azapagic A (2013) Environmental impacts of micro-wind turbines and their potential to contribute to UK climate change targets. Energy 59:454–466CrossRef
go back to reference Guezuraga B, Zauner R, Pölz W (2012) Life cycle assessment of two different 2 MW class wind turbines. Renew Energy 37(1):37–44CrossRef Guezuraga B, Zauner R, Pölz W (2012) Life cycle assessment of two different 2 MW class wind turbines. Renew Energy 37(1):37–44CrossRef
go back to reference Harrell FE (2015) Ordinal logistic regression. Regression modeling strategies. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 311–325CrossRef Harrell FE (2015) Ordinal logistic regression. Regression modeling strategies. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 311–325CrossRef
go back to reference Hauschild MZ, Goedkoop M, Guinée J et al (2013) Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(3):683–697CrossRef Hauschild MZ, Goedkoop M, Guinée J et al (2013) Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(3):683–697CrossRef
go back to reference Herrmann IT, Moltesen A (2015) Does it matter which Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tool you choose? A comparative assessment of SimaPro and GaBi. J Cleaner Prod 86:163–169CrossRef Herrmann IT, Moltesen A (2015) Does it matter which Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tool you choose? A comparative assessment of SimaPro and GaBi. J Cleaner Prod 86:163–169CrossRef
go back to reference Hertwich EG, Gibon T, Bouman EA et al (2015) Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(20):6277–6282CrossRef Hertwich EG, Gibon T, Bouman EA et al (2015) Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(20):6277–6282CrossRef
go back to reference IRENA (2019) Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2018. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi IRENA (2019) Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2018. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi
go back to reference ISO 14001 (2015) ISO 14001:2015 Environmental management systems. Requirements with guidance for use. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva ISO 14001 (2015) ISO 14001:2015 Environmental management systems. Requirements with guidance for use. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
go back to reference ISO 14025 (2006a) ISO 14025:2006 Environmental Labels and Declarations. Type III Environmental Declarations: Principles and Procedures. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva ISO 14025 (2006a) ISO 14025:2006 Environmental Labels and Declarations. Type III Environmental Declarations: Principles and Procedures. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
go back to reference ISO 14040 (2006b) ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva ISO 14040 (2006b) ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
go back to reference ISO 14044 (2006c) ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva ISO 14044 (2006c) ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
go back to reference ISO 14064 (2006d) ISO 14064:2006 Greenhouse gases. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva ISO 14064 (2006d) ISO 14064:2006 Greenhouse gases. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
go back to reference JRC-IEA (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook: General guide for Life Cycle Assessment, Detailed guidance, 1st edn. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg JRC-IEA (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook: General guide for Life Cycle Assessment, Detailed guidance, 1st edn. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
go back to reference Kaldellis JK, Garakis K, Kapsali M (2012) Noise impact assessment on the basis of onsite acoustic noise immission measurements for a representative wind farm. Renew Energy 41:306–314CrossRef Kaldellis JK, Garakis K, Kapsali M (2012) Noise impact assessment on the basis of onsite acoustic noise immission measurements for a representative wind farm. Renew Energy 41:306–314CrossRef
go back to reference Klain SC, Satterfield T, Sinner J et al (2018) Bird killer industrial intruder or clean energy? Perceiving risks to ecosystem services due to an offshore wind farm. Ecol Econ 143:111–129CrossRef Klain SC, Satterfield T, Sinner J et al (2018) Bird killer industrial intruder or clean energy? Perceiving risks to ecosystem services due to an offshore wind farm. Ecol Econ 143:111–129CrossRef
go back to reference Ladenburg J, Termansen M, Hasler B (2013) Assessing acceptability of two onshore wind power development schemes: a test of viewshed effects and the cumulative effects of wind turbines. Energy 54:45–54CrossRef Ladenburg J, Termansen M, Hasler B (2013) Assessing acceptability of two onshore wind power development schemes: a test of viewshed effects and the cumulative effects of wind turbines. Energy 54:45–54CrossRef
go back to reference Landeta B, Arana G, Calvo PM, Heras I (2018) Wind energy and local communities: a manufacturer’s efforts to gain acceptance. Energy Policy 121:314–324CrossRef Landeta B, Arana G, Calvo PM, Heras I (2018) Wind energy and local communities: a manufacturer’s efforts to gain acceptance. Energy Policy 121:314–324CrossRef
go back to reference Leung DY, Yang Y (2012) Wind energy development and its environmental impact: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(1):1031–1039CrossRef Leung DY, Yang Y (2012) Wind energy development and its environmental impact: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(1):1031–1039CrossRef
go back to reference Liu P, Barlow CY (2017) Wind turbine blade waste in 2050. Waste Manag 62:229–240CrossRef Liu P, Barlow CY (2017) Wind turbine blade waste in 2050. Waste Manag 62:229–240CrossRef
go back to reference Marques AT, Batalha H, Rodrigues S et al (2014) Understanding bird collisions at wind farms: an updated review on the causes and possible mitigation strategies. Biol Conserv 179:40–52CrossRef Marques AT, Batalha H, Rodrigues S et al (2014) Understanding bird collisions at wind farms: an updated review on the causes and possible mitigation strategies. Biol Conserv 179:40–52CrossRef
go back to reference Martínez E, Latorre-Biel JI, Jiménez E et al (2018) Life cycle assessment of a wind farm repowering process. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 93:260–271CrossRef Martínez E, Latorre-Biel JI, Jiménez E et al (2018) Life cycle assessment of a wind farm repowering process. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 93:260–271CrossRef
go back to reference Maxwell JA, Chmiel M (2014) Notes toward a theory of qualitative data analysis. In: Flick U (ed) The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. SAGE Publications Ltd, London, pp 21–34CrossRef Maxwell JA, Chmiel M (2014) Notes toward a theory of qualitative data analysis. In: Flick U (ed) The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. SAGE Publications Ltd, London, pp 21–34CrossRef
go back to reference May R, Gill AB, Köppel J et al (2017) Future research directions to reconcile wind turbine - wildlife interactions. In: Koppel J (ed) Wind Energy and Wildlife Interactions: presentations from the CWW2015 conference. Springer International Publishing, pp 255–276 May R, Gill AB, Köppel J et al (2017) Future research directions to reconcile wind turbine - wildlife interactions. In: Koppel J (ed) Wind Energy and Wildlife Interactions: presentations from the CWW2015 conference. Springer International Publishing, pp 255–276
go back to reference Mendecka B, Lombardi L (2019) Life cycle environmental impacts of wind energy technologies: a review of simplified models and harmonization of the results. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 111:462–480CrossRef Mendecka B, Lombardi L (2019) Life cycle environmental impacts of wind energy technologies: a review of simplified models and harmonization of the results. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 111:462–480CrossRef
go back to reference Ozoemena M (2016) Sustainability Assessment of Wind Turbine Design Variations: An Analysis of the Current Situation and Potential Technology Improvement Opportunities. Ph.D. Dissertation Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne Ozoemena M (2016) Sustainability Assessment of Wind Turbine Design Variations: An Analysis of the Current Situation and Potential Technology Improvement Opportunities. Ph.D. Dissertation Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne
go back to reference Ozoemena M, Cheung WM, Hasan R (2018) Comparative LCA of technology improvement opportunities for a 1.5-MW wind turbine in the context of an onshore wind farm. Clean Technol Environ Policy 20:173–190CrossRef Ozoemena M, Cheung WM, Hasan R (2018) Comparative LCA of technology improvement opportunities for a 1.5-MW wind turbine in the context of an onshore wind farm. Clean Technol Environ Policy 20:173–190CrossRef
go back to reference Ray P (2019) Renewable energy and sustainability. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21:1517–1533CrossRef Ray P (2019) Renewable energy and sustainability. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21:1517–1533CrossRef
go back to reference Razdan P, Garrett P (2015) Life cycle assessment of electricity production from an onshore V100-2.0 MW Wind Plant. Vestas Wind Systems A/S Razdan P, Garrett P (2015) Life cycle assessment of electricity production from an onshore V100-2.0 MW Wind Plant. Vestas Wind Systems A/S
go back to reference Schreiber A, Marx J, Zapp P (2019) Comparative life cycle assessment of electricity generation by different wind turbine types. J Cleaner Prod 233:561–572CrossRef Schreiber A, Marx J, Zapp P (2019) Comparative life cycle assessment of electricity generation by different wind turbine types. J Cleaner Prod 233:561–572CrossRef
go back to reference Singh B, Strømman AH, Hertwich EG (2011) Comparative life cycle environmental assessment of CCS technologies. Int J Greenh Gas Control 5(4):911–921CrossRef Singh B, Strømman AH, Hertwich EG (2011) Comparative life cycle environmental assessment of CCS technologies. Int J Greenh Gas Control 5(4):911–921CrossRef
go back to reference Taylor M, Daniel K, Ilas A, So EY (2015) Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2014. International Renewable Energy Agency January Taylor M, Daniel K, Ilas A, So EY (2015) Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2014. International Renewable Energy Agency January
go back to reference Wang S, Wang S (2015) Impacts of wind energy on environment: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 49:437–443CrossRef Wang S, Wang S (2015) Impacts of wind energy on environment: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 49:437–443CrossRef
go back to reference Wiser R, Jenni K, Seel J et al (2016) Expert elicitation survey on future wind energy costs. Nat Energy 1(10):16135CrossRef Wiser R, Jenni K, Seel J et al (2016) Expert elicitation survey on future wind energy costs. Nat Energy 1(10):16135CrossRef
go back to reference Xue B, Ma Z, Geng Y et al (2015) A life cycle co-benefits assessment of wind power in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:338–346CrossRef Xue B, Ma Z, Geng Y et al (2015) A life cycle co-benefits assessment of wind power in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:338–346CrossRef
go back to reference Yin RK (2017) Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks Yin RK (2017) Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks
Metadata
Title
Trend in environmental impact of the energy produced and distributed by wind power systems
Authors
Germán Arana-Landín
Beñat Landeta-Manzano
María Begoña Peña-Lang
Naiara Uriarte-Gallastegi
Publication date
29-05-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1618-954X
Electronic ISSN: 1618-9558
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01863-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 5/2020 Go to the issue