Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
E-Government 2.0: Back to Reality, a 2.0 Application to Vet Read chapter Read first chapter

2015 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

9. Twitter and 2013 Pakistan General Election: The Case of David 2.0 Against Goliaths

Authors : Saifuddin Ahmed, Marko Skoric

Published in: Case Studies in e-Government 2.0

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study followed the online activity on Twitter during Pakistan’s landmark 2013 General Election, also hailed as Pakistan’s first Twitter election, which marked the first ever transfer of power between two elected civilian governments. This election saw the unexpected emergence of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI), the political underdog which followed close at the heels of well-established dynastic parties to grab the third-largest number of seats in the National Assembly. The rise of this party and its leader is attributed to the estimated 30 million young Pakistanis who voted for the first time and the advent of social media, as well as the leadership of Imran Khan, the most famous sports celebrity in the country. This study focused on the Twitter campaigns of Pakistan’s political parties with the aim to investigate how the medium was used by political parties for information dissemination, interaction, mobilization and engagement of voters. Our investigation was related and discussed in the context of the actual success achieved by each party. The approach followed was systematic automatic and manual content analyses and a social network analysis of the tweets (n = 10,140) posted by the top four political parties and their leaders in the month leading up to Pakistan’s general election. Our findings identify that every party used Twitter for different purposes. PTI used Twitter in the most diverse ways—they interacted with voters, provided real time detailed campaign updates, discussed specific social and political issues and called for a greater mobilization of citizens to vote. Through triangulation of our findings with the publically available election data provided by the Election Commission of Pakistan we further conclude that the success story of PTI, especially at the provincial level, was a blend of the party riding on personality politics paradigm with a combination of an increase in voter turnout and strategized online-offline campaigning targeted at the youth.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Brazil Towards Government 2.0: Strategies for Adopting Open Government Data in National and Subnational Governments
next chapter The Decalogue of Policy Making 2.0: Results from Analysis of Case Studies on the Impact of ICT for Governance and Policy Modelling
Literature
Ahmed, S., & Skoric, M. M. (Jan 2014). My name is Khan: The use of Twitter in the campaign for 2013 Pakistan General Election. Proceedings of the 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 2242–2251). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC.
Ammann, S. (2010). A political campaign message in 140 characters or less: The use of Twitter by US Senate candidates in 2010. Available at SSRN 1725477.
Aragón, P., Kappler, K. E., Kaltenbrunner, A., Laniado, D., & Volkovich, Y. (2013). Communication dynamics in twitter during political campaigns: The case of the 2011 Spanish national election. Policy & Internet, 5(2), 183–206.CrossRef
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (May 2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM) (pp. 361–362).
Bermingham, A., & Smeaton, A. (2011). On using twitter to monitor political sentiment and predict election results. Proceeding of IJCNLP conference, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. European Consortium for Political Research conference, 25–27 August 2011. Reykjavík.
Bruns, A., & Highfield, T. (2013). Political networks on twitter: Tweeting the Queensland state election. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 667–691.CrossRef
Christensen, C. (2013). Wave-riding and hashtag-jumping: Twitter, minority ‘third parties’ and the 2012 US elections. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 646–666.CrossRef
Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2013). Twitter use by presidential primary candidates during the 2012 campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1596–1610.CrossRef
Feinberg, J. (2010). Wordle. In J. Steele & N. Iliinsky (Eds.), Beautiful Vizualization: Looking a data through eyes of experts (pp. 37–58). O’Reilly Media: CA.
Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., & van’t Haar, G. (2013). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters: The use of Twitter during the 2010 UK general election campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 692–716.CrossRef
Grant, W. J.,Moon, B., & Busby Grant, J. (2010). Digital dialogue? Australian politicians’ use of the social network tool Twitter. Australian Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 579–604.
Grusell, M., & Nord, L. W. (May 2011). Small talk, huge impact? The Role of Twitter in the National Election Campaign in Sweden in 2010. In IAMCR 2011-Istanbul.
Harfoush, R. (2009). Yes we did! An inside look at how social media built the Obama brand. Berkeley: New Riders.
Hendricks, J. A., & Kaid, L. L. (2010). Techno politics in presidential campaigning. New York: Routledge.
Hong, S., & Nadler, D. (June 2011). Does the early bird move the polls?: The use of the social media tool ‘Twitter’ by US politicians and its impact on public opinion. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times (pp. 182–186). ACM.
Kim, D. (2011). Tweeting politics: Examining the motivations for Twitter use and the impact on political participation. 61st Annual Conference of the International Communication Association.
Larsson, A. O., & Moe, H. (2012). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society, 14(5), 729–747.CrossRef
Lassen, D. S., & Brown, A. R. (2011). Twitter the electoral connection? Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 419–436.CrossRef
Livne, A., Simmons, M. P., Adar, E., & Adamic, L. A. (July 2011). The party is over here: Structure and content in the 2010 election. Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
Metzgar, E., & Maruggi, A. (2009). Social media and the 2008 US presidential election. Journal of New Communications Research, 4(1), 141–165.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Sang, E. T. K., & Bos, J. (April 2012). Predicting the 2011 Dutch senate election results with twitter. Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Analysis in Social Media (pp. 53–60). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Skoric, M., Poor, N., Achananuparp, P., Lim, E. P., & Jiang, J. (Jan 2012). Tweets and votes: A study of the 2011 Singapore general election. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS) (pp. 2583–2591). IEEE.
Strandberg, K. (2013). A social media revolution or just a case of history repeating itself? The use of social media in the 2011 Finnish parliamentary elections. New Media & Society, 15(8), 1329–1347.CrossRef
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2010). Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. ICWSM, 10, 178–185.
Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2013). Follow the leader! Direct and indirect flows of political communication during the 2013 general election campaign. New Media & Society, 1461444813511038.
Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2013). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning. The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics, 19(3), 477–501.CrossRef
Wayne, S. J. (2011). Personality and politics: Obama for and against himself. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zhang, W., Seltzer, T., & Bichard, S. L. (2013). Two sides of the coin assessing the influence of social network site use during the 2012 US presidential campaign. Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 542–551.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Twitter and 2013 Pakistan General Election: The Case of David 2.0 Against Goliaths
Authors
Saifuddin Ahmed
Marko Skoric
Copyright Year
2015
Book
Case Studies in e-Government 2.0

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08080-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-08081-9

Copyright Year: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08081-9_9