Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Economics and Finance 2/2015

01-04-2015

Two-step acquisitions and liquidity spread

Authors: Mufaddal Baxamusa, Dobrina Georgieva

Published in: Journal of Economics and Finance | Issue 2/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We hypothesize that macro-level liquidity affects the choice between tender-mergers and mergers. We employ a novel methodology to test this relationship. This method finds structural breaks in the number of tender-mergers relative to mergers and finds that the structural breaks coincide strikingly well with major changes in macro-level liquidity. Consistent with our hypotheses our regression analysis finds that the number of tender offers increases with liquidity and also that the acquirer’s share of synergy increases as tender-mergers increase.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
A tender-merger is an acquisition which consists of two steps. In the first step the majority of the stocks of the target firm are acquired through a tender offer. In the second step the remaining stocks are acquired through a merger.
 
2
The other major action by the Fed during this period is the decrease in Fed funds rate during 2001. This is a reaction to the bursting of the
 
Literature
go back to reference Altman E (1992) Revisiting the high-yield bond market. Financ Manag 21(2):78–92CrossRef Altman E (1992) Revisiting the high-yield bond market. Financ Manag 21(2):78–92CrossRef
go back to reference Asquith P (1983) Merger bids, uncertainty, and stockholder returns. J Financ Econ 11:51–83CrossRef Asquith P (1983) Merger bids, uncertainty, and stockholder returns. J Financ Econ 11:51–83CrossRef
go back to reference Asquith P, Bruner R, Mullins D (1987) “Merger returns and the form of financing” Working paper, MIT Asquith P, Bruner R, Mullins D (1987) “Merger returns and the form of financing” Working paper, MIT
go back to reference Bai J, Perron P (1998) Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica 66:47–78CrossRef Bai J, Perron P (1998) Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica 66:47–78CrossRef
go back to reference Bange M, Mazzeo M (2004) Board composition, board effectiveness, and the observed form of takeover bids. Rev Financ Stud 17:1185–1215 Bange M, Mazzeo M (2004) Board composition, board effectiveness, and the observed form of takeover bids. Rev Financ Stud 17:1185–1215
go back to reference Berkovitch E, Khanna N (1991) A theory of acquisition markets: mergers versus tender-mergers, and golden parachutes. J Financ Res 4:149–174 Berkovitch E, Khanna N (1991) A theory of acquisition markets: mergers versus tender-mergers, and golden parachutes. J Financ Res 4:149–174
go back to reference Betton S, Eckbo BE, Thorburn KS (2008) “Does industry competition affect takeover bids?” Working Paper, Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH Betton S, Eckbo BE, Thorburn KS (2008) “Does industry competition affect takeover bids?” Working Paper, Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH
go back to reference Bruner R (2004) Applied mergers and acquisitions. JohnWiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ Bruner R (2004) Applied mergers and acquisitions. JohnWiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ
go back to reference Chow G (1960) Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28(3):591–605CrossRef Chow G (1960) Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28(3):591–605CrossRef
go back to reference Comment R, Schwert W (1995) Poison or placebo? Evidence on the deterrence and wealth effects of modern antitakeover measures. J Financ Econ 39:3–43 Comment R, Schwert W (1995) Poison or placebo? Evidence on the deterrence and wealth effects of modern antitakeover measures. J Financ Econ 39:3–43
go back to reference Dennis D, McConnell J (1986) Corporate mergers and security returns. J Financ Econ 16:143–187CrossRef Dennis D, McConnell J (1986) Corporate mergers and security returns. J Financ Econ 16:143–187CrossRef
go back to reference Dodd P (1980) Merger proposals, management discretion and stockholder wealth. J Financ Econ 8:105–137CrossRef Dodd P (1980) Merger proposals, management discretion and stockholder wealth. J Financ Econ 8:105–137CrossRef
go back to reference Dodd P, Ruback R (1977) Tender offers and stockholder returns: an empirical analysis. J Financ Econ 5(3):351–373 Dodd P, Ruback R (1977) Tender offers and stockholder returns: an empirical analysis. J Financ Econ 5(3):351–373
go back to reference Enders W, Sandler T (2005) After 9/11: is it all different now? J Confl Resolut 49(2):259–277CrossRef Enders W, Sandler T (2005) After 9/11: is it all different now? J Confl Resolut 49(2):259–277CrossRef
go back to reference Fama E (1998) Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance. J Financ Econ 49(3):283–306CrossRef Fama E (1998) Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance. J Financ Econ 49(3):283–306CrossRef
go back to reference Hansen B (2001) The new econometrics of structural change. J Econ Perspect 15(4):117–128CrossRef Hansen B (2001) The new econometrics of structural change. J Econ Perspect 15(4):117–128CrossRef
go back to reference Jensen M, Ruback R (1983) The market for corporate control. J Financ Econ 11:5–50 Jensen M, Ruback R (1983) The market for corporate control. J Financ Econ 11:5–50
go back to reference Khanna N (1997) Optimal bidding for tender offers. J Financ Res 20:323–342 Khanna N (1997) Optimal bidding for tender offers. J Financ Res 20:323–342
go back to reference Kohers N, Kohers G, Kohers T (2007) Glamour, value, and the form of takeover. J Econ Bus 59:74–87CrossRef Kohers N, Kohers G, Kohers T (2007) Glamour, value, and the form of takeover. J Econ Bus 59:74–87CrossRef
go back to reference Lang L, Stulz R, Walkling R (1989) Managerial performance, Tobin’s Q, and the gains from successful tender offers. J Financ Econ 24:137–154CrossRef Lang L, Stulz R, Walkling R (1989) Managerial performance, Tobin’s Q, and the gains from successful tender offers. J Financ Econ 24:137–154CrossRef
go back to reference Lang LHP, Stulz RM, Walking RA (1991) A test of the free cash flow hypothesis: the case of bidder returns. J Financ Econ 29:315–335 Lang LHP, Stulz RM, Walking RA (1991) A test of the free cash flow hypothesis: the case of bidder returns. J Financ Econ 29:315–335
go back to reference Lemmon M, Roberts M (2010) The response of corporate financing and investment to changes in the supply of credit. J Financ Quant Anal 45(3):555–587CrossRef Lemmon M, Roberts M (2010) The response of corporate financing and investment to changes in the supply of credit. J Financ Quant Anal 45(3):555–587CrossRef
go back to reference Martin K, McConnell J (1991) Corporate performance, corporate takeovers, and management turnover. J Financ 46:671–687 Martin K, McConnell J (1991) Corporate performance, corporate takeovers, and management turnover. J Financ 46:671–687
go back to reference Mitchell M, Mulherin J (1996) The impact of industry shocks on takeover and restructuring activities. J Financ Econ 41:193–229CrossRef Mitchell M, Mulherin J (1996) The impact of industry shocks on takeover and restructuring activities. J Financ Econ 41:193–229CrossRef
go back to reference Moeller S, Schlingemann F, Stulz R (2003) “Do shareholders of acquiring firms gain from acquisitions?” NBER working paper 9523 Moeller S, Schlingemann F, Stulz R (2003) “Do shareholders of acquiring firms gain from acquisitions?” NBER working paper 9523
go back to reference Officer M (2007) The price of corporate liquidity: acquisition discounts for unlisted targets. J Financ Econ 83:571–598CrossRef Officer M (2007) The price of corporate liquidity: acquisition discounts for unlisted targets. J Financ Econ 83:571–598CrossRef
go back to reference Pastor L, Stambaugh R (2003) Liquidity risk and expected stock returns. J Polit Econ 111:642–685CrossRef Pastor L, Stambaugh R (2003) Liquidity risk and expected stock returns. J Polit Econ 111:642–685CrossRef
go back to reference Rosen R (2006) Merger momentum and investor sentiment: the stock market reaction to merger announcements. J Bus 79(2):987–1017CrossRef Rosen R (2006) Merger momentum and investor sentiment: the stock market reaction to merger announcements. J Bus 79(2):987–1017CrossRef
go back to reference Sadka R (2006) Momentum and post-earnings- announcement drift anomailes: the role of liquidity risk. J Financ Econ 80:309–349CrossRef Sadka R (2006) Momentum and post-earnings- announcement drift anomailes: the role of liquidity risk. J Financ Econ 80:309–349CrossRef
go back to reference Servaes H (1991) Tobin’s q, agency costs, and corporate control: an empirical analysis of firm specific parameters. J Financ 46:409–419CrossRef Servaes H (1991) Tobin’s q, agency costs, and corporate control: an empirical analysis of firm specific parameters. J Financ 46:409–419CrossRef
go back to reference Shliefer A, Vishny R (1992) Liquidation values and debt capacity. J Financ 32:337–347 Shliefer A, Vishny R (1992) Liquidation values and debt capacity. J Financ 32:337–347
go back to reference Shliefer A, Vishny R (2003) Stock market driven acqusitions. J Financ Econ 70:295–311CrossRef Shliefer A, Vishny R (2003) Stock market driven acqusitions. J Financ Econ 70:295–311CrossRef
go back to reference Singh R (1998) Takeover bidding with toeholds: the case of the owner’s curse. Rev Financ Stud 11(4):679–704CrossRef Singh R (1998) Takeover bidding with toeholds: the case of the owner’s curse. Rev Financ Stud 11(4):679–704CrossRef
go back to reference Travlos N (1987) Corporate takeover bids, methods of payment, and bidding firms’ stock returns. J Financ 42(4):943–963 Travlos N (1987) Corporate takeover bids, methods of payment, and bidding firms’ stock returns. J Financ 42(4):943–963
go back to reference Villalonga B (2004) Does diversification cause the “diversification discount”? Financ Manag 33(2):5–27 Villalonga B (2004) Does diversification cause the “diversification discount”? Financ Manag 33(2):5–27
go back to reference Wang C, Xie F (2009) Corporate governance transfers and synergistic gains from mergers and acqusitions. Rev Financ Stud 22(2):829–858CrossRef Wang C, Xie F (2009) Corporate governance transfers and synergistic gains from mergers and acqusitions. Rev Financ Stud 22(2):829–858CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Two-step acquisitions and liquidity spread
Authors
Mufaddal Baxamusa
Dobrina Georgieva
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Economics and Finance / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1055-0925
Electronic ISSN: 1938-9744
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-012-9247-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Journal of Economics and Finance 2/2015 Go to the issue