Top

Journal of Business Ethics

Published in:

01-08-2012

Understanding the Nature of Stakeholder Relationships: An Empirical Examination of a Conflict Situation

Authors: Johanna Kujala, Anna Heikkinen, Hanna Lehtimäki

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 1/2012

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This article examines stakeholder relationships in a conflict situation. The focus of analysis is on how to understand stakeholder relationships as both ethical and strategic, and further, how the interests of different stakeholders become justified. To describe stakeholder relationships, we use media texts reporting on the case of a foreign investment project. The description shows how relationships evolve and how they constitute different episodes related to the conflict. We address the episodes by analysing stakeholder relationships and their salience. Furthermore, we examine how different stakeholder interests are justified in relation to the conflict. By providing a rich detailed qualitative analysis, we elaborate on the strategic and ethical nature of stakeholder relationships.

previous article How Do European SME Owner–Managers Make Sense of ‘Stakeholder Management’?: Insights from a Cross-National Study

next article Stakeholder Management Theory, Firm Strategy, and Ambidexterity

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J., & Oijala, T. (2008). Stakeholder salience in global projects. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 509–516.CrossRef

Calvano, L. (2008). Multinational corporations and local communities: A critical analysis of conflict. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 793–805.CrossRef

Clarkson, M. B. E. (1994). A risk-based model of stakeholder theory. In: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Stakeholder Theory. University of Toronto, The Centre for Corporate Social Performance & Ethics, Toronto.

Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.CrossRef

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

Freeman, R. E., & Evan, W. M. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19, 337–359.CrossRef

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders. Survival reputation and success. London: Yale University Press.

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory. The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.

Gamson, W. A., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373–393.CrossRef

Gamson, W., & Lasch, K. (1983). The political culture of welfare policy. In S. E. Spiro (Ed.), Evaluating the welfare state. New York: Academic Press.

Garriga, E. (2009). Cooperation in stakeholder networks: Firms’ ‘Tertius Iungens role’. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 623–637.CrossRef

Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1), 53–73.

Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.CrossRef

Hendry, J. R. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: An empirical exploration. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 79–99.CrossRef

Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRef

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lamberg, J., Pajunen, K., Parvinen, P., & Savage, G. T. (2008). Stakeholder management and path dependence in organizational transitions. Management Decision, 46(6), 846–863.CrossRef

Mahon, J. F., Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Lametrz, K. (2004). Social networks and non-market strategy. Journal of Public Affairs, 4(2), 170–189.CrossRef

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

Näsi, J. (1995). What is stakeholder thinking? In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 19–32). Helsinki: LSR.

Neville, B. A., & Menguc, B. (2006). Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 377–391.CrossRef

Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45, 6–28.

Rehbein, K., Waddock, S., & Graves, S. B. (2004). Understanding stakeholder activism: Which corporations are targeted? Business & Society, 43, 239–267.CrossRef

Roloff, J. (2008). Learning from multi-stakeholder networks: Issue-focussed stakeholder management. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 233–250.CrossRef

Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910.

Rowley, T. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204–219.

Santana, A., Vaccaro, A., & Wood, D. J. (2009). Ethics and the networked business. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 661–681.CrossRef

Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 61–75.

Wiio, J. (2006). Media uudistuvassa yhteiskunnassa. Median muuttuvat pelisäännöt [Media in renewing society. The changing rules of the media]. Sitran raportteja 65, Edita, Helsinki.

Zietsma, C., & Winn, M. I. (2008). Building chains and directing flows: Strategies and tactics of mutual influence in stakeholder conflict. Business & Society, 47(1), 68–101.CrossRef

Title: Understanding the Nature of Stakeholder Relationships: An Empirical Examination of a Conflict Situation
Authors: Johanna Kujala
Anna Heikkinen
Hanna Lehtimäki
Publication date: 01-08-2012
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1379-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Stakeholder Management Theory, Firm Strategy, and Ambidexterity

Stakeholder Theory(ies): Ethical Ideas and Managerial Action

A Stakeholder Approach to the Ethicality of BRIC-firm Managers’ Use of Favors

Stakeholder Theory, Fact/Value Dichotomy, and the Normative Core: How Wall Street Stops the Ethics Conversation

Stakeholder Duties: On the Moral Responsibility of Corporate Investors

Stakeholders and Sustainability: An Evolving Theory

Premium Partner