Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

11. University Incubators May Be Socially Valuable, but How Effective Are They? A Case Study on Business Incubators at Universities

Authors : Dag Bennett, Diana Pérez-Bustamante Yábar, José Ramón Saura

Published in: Entrepreneurial Universities

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

To counter the high failure rate of small entrepreneurial start-up companies, many universities set up business incubators that nurture start-ups until they are prepared to stand on their own. There are many different types of incubator, and while the evidence of their success is inconsistent, some research suggests that they do succeed in one of their primary goals because start-ups that begin in incubators have a higher survival rate (c.f. J Technol Transf 48(5):692–710, 2004) compared to non-incubator companies.
Traditional definitions of incubators (J Technol Transf 29(1):55–82, 2004) generally include: (a) Shared office space rented at favourable rates, (b) Shared support services that reduce overhead costs, (c) Professional business support, advice and mentoring, and (d) Professional and trade networking. While each of these aspects has been studied by academics, the general consensus is that the most important factor for start-up success is the final factor—organized networking (Int J Entrepreneur Innovat Manage 4(2–3):248–270, 2004). Recent work has shifted the focus of research on the role played by incubators as a mechanism for embedding a company within networks, recognizing that much of the entrepreneurial literature stresses that access to networks plays a crucial role for start-ups and small companies.
In recent years, the business world has seen major changes in the way that organizations manage their network interactions and interactions with customers. One of the main factors in this change is new technology and data transmission capabilities. However little research has yet looked at networking and cooperation activities within incubators or how entrepreneurs use these technology-enabled networks to support development and growth.
The aim of this chapter is to examine non-profit university-based incubators focusing on their role in business networking and cooperative activities. The study is exploratory and focuses on incubators at two large public universities in Spain and the UK. The main contribution of this chapter is to confirm that effectiveness assessment of incubators is so far un-systematic. This is dangerous because the lack of rigorous assessment tools and methodologies feeds the uncertainty surrounding business incubator effectiveness and ultimately threatens their ability to make meaningful contributions to the success of the companies they nurture.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Aaboen, L. (2009). Explaining incubators using firm analogy. Technovation, 29(1), 657–670.CrossRef Aaboen, L. (2009). Explaining incubators using firm analogy. Technovation, 29(1), 657–670.CrossRef
go back to reference Aernoudt, R. (2004). Incubators: Tool for entrepreneurship? Small Business Economics, 23(2), 127–135.CrossRef Aernoudt, R. (2004). Incubators: Tool for entrepreneurship? Small Business Economics, 23(2), 127–135.CrossRef
go back to reference Ahmad, A. J., & Ingle, S. (2011). Relationships matter: Case study of a university campus incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 17(6), 626–644.CrossRef Ahmad, A. J., & Ingle, S. (2011). Relationships matter: Case study of a university campus incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 17(6), 626–644.CrossRef
go back to reference Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: Sage. Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: Sage.
go back to reference Allen, D. (1985). Small business incubators and enterprise development. Reports prepared for the U.S. Department of Commerce, Pennsylvania State University. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 17(6), 626–644. Allen, D. (1985). Small business incubators and enterprise development. Reports prepared for the U.S. Department of Commerce, Pennsylvania State University. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 17(6), 626–644.
go back to reference Barney, J. (1991). Learning activities, exploration, and the performance of strategic initiatives. Journal of Management, 1(42), 769–802. Barney, J. (1991). Learning activities, exploration, and the performance of strategic initiatives. Journal of Management, 1(42), 769–802.
go back to reference Bøllingtoft, A., & Ulhøi, J. (2005). The networked business incubator—Leveraging entrepreneurial agency? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 265–290.CrossRef Bøllingtoft, A., & Ulhøi, J. (2005). The networked business incubator—Leveraging entrepreneurial agency? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 265–290.CrossRef
go back to reference Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Campbell, C. (1989). Change agents in the new economy: Business incubators and economic development. Economic Development Review, 7(2), 56–66. Campbell, C. (1989). Change agents in the new economy: Business incubators and economic development. Economic Development Review, 7(2), 56–66.
go back to reference Clausen, T., & Korneliussen, T. (2012). The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and speed to the market: The case of incubator firms in Norway. Technovation, 32(9–10), 560–567.CrossRef Clausen, T., & Korneliussen, T. (2012). The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and speed to the market: The case of incubator firms in Norway. Technovation, 32(9–10), 560–567.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRef Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRef
go back to reference Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31(7), 1103–1122.CrossRef Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31(7), 1103–1122.CrossRef
go back to reference Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095–1121.CrossRef Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095–1121.CrossRef
go back to reference Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48, 692–710.CrossRef Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48, 692–710.CrossRef
go back to reference Haapasalo, H., & Ekholm, T. (2004). A profile of European incubators: A framework for commercialising innovations. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 4(2–3), 248–270.CrossRef Haapasalo, H., & Ekholm, T. (2004). A profile of European incubators: A framework for commercialising innovations. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 4(2–3), 248–270.CrossRef
go back to reference Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2004). A systematic review of business incubation research. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 55–82.CrossRef Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2004). A systematic review of business incubation research. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 55–82.CrossRef
go back to reference Hoskisson, R. E., & Busenitz, L. W. (2002). Market uncertainty and learning distance in corporate entrepreneurship entry mode choice. In M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp, & D. L. Sexton (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset (pp. 151–172). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers. Hoskisson, R. E., & Busenitz, L. W. (2002). Market uncertainty and learning distance in corporate entrepreneurship entry mode choice. In M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp, & D. L. Sexton (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset (pp. 151–172). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
go back to reference Hughes, M., Ireland, R. D., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Stimulating dynamic value: Social capital and business incubation as a pathway to competitive success. Long Range Planning, 40(2), 154–177.CrossRef Hughes, M., Ireland, R. D., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Stimulating dynamic value: Social capital and business incubation as a pathway to competitive success. Long Range Planning, 40(2), 154–177.CrossRef
go back to reference Liebeskind, J. P., Oliver, A. L., Zucker, L., & Brewer, M. (1996). Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organization Science, 7(4), 428–443.CrossRef Liebeskind, J. P., Oliver, A. L., Zucker, L., & Brewer, M. (1996). Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organization Science, 7(4), 428–443.CrossRef
go back to reference Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–267.CrossRef Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–267.CrossRef
go back to reference Redford, D. T. (2006). Entrepreneurship education in Portugal: 2004/2005 national survey. Comportamento Organizacional e Gestão, 12(1), 19–41. Special Issue: New Challenges in Entrepreneurship. Redford, D. T. (2006). Entrepreneurship education in Portugal: 2004/2005 national survey. Comportamento Organizacional e Gestão, 12(1), 19–41. Special Issue: New Challenges in Entrepreneurship.
go back to reference Roper, S. (1999). Israel’s technology incubators: Repeatable success or costly failure. Regional Studies, 33(2), 175–180.CrossRef Roper, S. (1999). Israel’s technology incubators: Repeatable success or costly failure. Regional Studies, 33(2), 175–180.CrossRef
go back to reference Rothaermel, F., & Thursby, M. (2005). Incubator firm failure or graduation? The role of university linkages. Research Policy, 34(7), 1076–1090.CrossRef Rothaermel, F., & Thursby, M. (2005). Incubator firm failure or graduation? The role of university linkages. Research Policy, 34(7), 1076–1090.CrossRef
go back to reference Singh, R., & Jain, R. K. (2003). Improving local economies through technology transfer: Utilizing incubators to facilitate cluster development. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 2(3), 249–262.CrossRef Singh, R., & Jain, R. K. (2003). Improving local economies through technology transfer: Utilizing incubators to facilitate cluster development. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 2(3), 249–262.CrossRef
go back to reference Smilor, R. W. (1987). Managing the incubator system: Critical success factors to accelerate new company development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34(4), 146–156.CrossRef Smilor, R. W. (1987). Managing the incubator system: Critical success factors to accelerate new company development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34(4), 146–156.CrossRef
go back to reference Stagars, M. (2014). University startups and spin-offs: Guide for entrepreneurs in academia. New York: Apress. Stagars, M. (2014). University startups and spin-offs: Guide for entrepreneurs in academia. New York: Apress.
go back to reference Tamàsy, C. (2007). Rethinking technology-oriented business incubators: Developing a robust policy instrument for entrepreneurship, innovation, and regional development? Growth and Change, 6(3), 460–473.CrossRef Tamàsy, C. (2007). Rethinking technology-oriented business incubators: Developing a robust policy instrument for entrepreneurship, innovation, and regional development? Growth and Change, 6(3), 460–473.CrossRef
go back to reference Tavoletti, E. (2013). Business incubators: Effective infrastructures or waste of public money? Looking for a theoretical framework, guidelines and criteria. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4, 423–443.CrossRef Tavoletti, E. (2013). Business incubators: Effective infrastructures or waste of public money? Looking for a theoretical framework, guidelines and criteria. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4, 423–443.CrossRef
go back to reference Volberda, H. W. (1996). Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science, 7(4), 359–374.CrossRef Volberda, H. W. (1996). Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science, 7(4), 359–374.CrossRef
go back to reference Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3.
go back to reference Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307–1314.CrossRef Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307–1314.CrossRef
go back to reference Zack, D. (2015). Networking for people who hate networking. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc. Zack, D. (2015). Networking for people who hate networking. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Metadata
Title
University Incubators May Be Socially Valuable, but How Effective Are They? A Case Study on Business Incubators at Universities
Authors
Dag Bennett
Diana Pérez-Bustamante Yábar
José Ramón Saura
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47949-1_11

Premium Partner