Top

Urban Ecosystems

Published in:

10-07-2023

Urban development reduces bee abundance and diversity

Authors: Vera Pfeiffer, David W. Crowder, Janet Silbernagel

Published in: Urban Ecosystems | Issue 6/2023

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Wild bee communities persist in cities despite major disruption of nesting and food resources by urban development. Bee diversity and abundance is key for urban agriculture and maintenance of plant diversity, and assessing what aspects of cities enhance bee populations will promote our capacity to retain and provision bee habitat. Here, we assessed how variation in land cover and neighborhood development history affected bee communities in the midwestern US urban landscape of Madison, Wisconsin. We sampled bee communities across 38 stratified sites with relatively high (>55%) or low (<30%) levels of impervious surface, and assessed effects of land use and neighborhood development history on bee abundance and species richness. We show abundance and richness of soil nesting bees was lower in newer neighborhoods. Soil nesting bees and bee community richness decreased as cover of impervious surface increased, but above ground nesting bees were minimally impacted. Bee community similarity varied spatially and based on dissimilar local land cover, only for soil nesting bees, and the overall bee community. Impervious surface limited bee abundance and diversity, but new neighborhoods were associated with greater negative effects. We suggest that enhancing the structural diversity of new neighborhoods in urban ecosystems may imitate the structural benefits of older neighborhoods for bee populations.

previous article Floral resources encourage colonisation and use of green roofs by invertebrates

next article Are the same factors determining biodiversity in cities across different regions? Comparing drivers of urban bird richness patterns in Southern Asia vs. Western Europe

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Ascher JS, Pickering J (2013) Discover Life bee species guide and world checklist (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila). http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20q?guide=Apoidea_species. Accessed Oct 2018.

Banaszak-Cibicka W, Zmihorski M (2020) Are cities hotspots for bees? Local and regional diversity patterns lead to different conclusions. Urban Ecosyst 23:713–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00972-wCrossRef

Biesmeijer J et al (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351–354. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127863CrossRefPubMed

Buchholz S, Egerer MH (2020) Functional ecology of wild bees in cities: towards a better understanding of trait-urbanization relationships. Biodivers Conserv 29:2779–2801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02003-8CrossRef

Cane JH, Minckley RL, Kervin LJ, Roulston TH, Williams NM (2006) Complex responses within a desert bee guild (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) to urban habitat fragmentation. Ecol Appl 15(2):632–644. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0632:CRWADB]2.0.CO;2CrossRef

Carpenter SR, Benson BJ, Biggs R, Chipman JW, Foley JA, Golding SA, Hammer RB, Hanson PC, Johnson PTJ, Kamarainen AM, Kratz TK, Lathrop RC, McMahon KD, Provencher B, Rusak JA, Solomon CT, Stanley EH, Turner MG, Vander Zanden MJ, Wu CH, Yuan H (2007) Understanding regional change: a comparison of two lake districts. Bioscience 57:323–335. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570407CrossRef

Cohen H, Philpott SM, Liere H, Lin BB, Jha S (2020) The relationship between pollinator community and pollination services is mediated by floral abundance in urban landscapes. Urban Ecosystems 24:275–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-01024-zCrossRef

Cusser S, Neff JL, Jha S (2018) Land-use history drives contemporary pollinator community similarity. Landscape Ecol 33:1335–1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0668-2CrossRef

Daily GC (1997) Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC

Daniels B, Jedamski J, Ottermanns R, Ross-Nickoll M (2020) A “plan bee” for cities: Pollinator diversity and plant-pollinator interactions in urban green spaces. PLoS ONE 15:e0235492. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235492CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ferrari A, Polidori C (2022) How city traits affect taxonomic and functional diversity of urban wild bee communities: insights from a worldwide analysis. Apidologie 53:46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-022-00950-5CrossRef

Fetridge ED, Ascher JS, Langellotto GA (2008) The bee fauna of residential gardens in a suburb of New York City (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Ann Entomol Soc Am 101:1067–1077. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746-101.6.1067CrossRef

Fortel L, Henry M, Guilbaud L, Guirao AL, Kuhlmann M, Mouret H, Vaissière BE (2014) Decreasing abundance, increasing diversity and changing structure of the wild bee community (Hymenoptera: Anthophila) along an urbanization gradient. PLoS ONE 9(8):e104679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104679CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fox J, Weisberg S, Price B, Adler D, Bates D, Baud-Bovy G, Bolker B, Ellison S, Firth D, Friendly M, et al. (2018) ‘car’ R package. Version 3.0–2

Frankie GW, Thorp RW, Hernandez J et al (2009) Native bees are a rich natural resource in urban California gardens. Calif Agric 63:113–120. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v063n03p113CrossRef

Gathof AK, Grossmann AJ, Herrmann J, Buchholz S (2022) Who can pass the urban filter? A multi-taxon approach to disentangle pollinator trait-environmental relationships. Oecologia 199:165–179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gibbs J (2011) Revision of the metallic Lasioglossum (Dialictus) of eastern North America (Hymenoptera: Halictidae: Halictini). Zootaxa 3073:1–216CrossRef

Goddard MA, Benton DAJ, TG, (2010) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol 25:90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.016CrossRefPubMed

González-Varo JP, Biesmeijer JC, Bommarco R, Potts SG, Schweiger O, Smith HG, Steffan-Dewenter I, Szentgyörgyi H, Woyciechowski M, Vilà M (2013) Combined effects of global change pressures on animal-mediated pollination. Trends Ecol Evol 28:524–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.008CrossRefPubMed

Goslee S, Urban D (2017) ‘ecodist’: R package for dissimilarity-based functions for ecological analysis. Version 2:1

Hall DM, Camilo GR, Tonietto RK, Ollerton J, Ahrne K, Arduser M, Ascher JS, Baldock KCR, Fowler R, Frankie G, Goulson D, Gunnarsson B, Hanley ME, Jackson JI, Langellotto G, Lowenstein D, Minor ES, Philpott SM, Potts SG, Sirohi MH, Spevak EM, Stone GN, Threlfall CG (2016) The city as a refuge for insect pollinators. Conserv Biol 31:24–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12840CrossRef

Hodgson K, Caton Campbell M, Bailkey M (2011) Urban Agriculture: Growing Healthy, Sustainable Places. American Planning Association, Chicago

Hoehn P, Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Steffan-Dewenter I (2008) Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield. Proc Biol Sci 7:2283–2291. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0405CrossRef

Jha S, Kremen C (2013) Urban land use limits regional bumble bee gene flow. Mol Ecol 22(9):2483–2495

Larsen TH, Williams N, Kremen C (2005) Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. Ecol Lett 8:538–547CrossRefPubMed

Locke DH, Polsky C, Grove JM, Groffman PM, Nelson KC et al (2019) Residential household yard care practices along urban-exurban gradients in six climatically-diverse U.S. metropolitan areas. PloS One 14(11):e0222630CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Martins AC, Goncalves RB, Melo GAR (2013) Changes in wild bee fauna of a grassland in Brazil reveal negative effects associated with growing urbanization during the last 40 years. Zoologia 30:157–176. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702013000200006CrossRef

Matteson KC, Ascher JS, Langellotto GA (2008) Bee richness and abundance in New York City urban gardens. Ann Entomol Soc Am 101:140–150. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2008)101[140:BRAAIN]2.0.CO;2CrossRef

McFrederick QS, LeBuhn G (2006) Are urban parks refuges for bumble bees Bombus spp. (Hymenoptera:Apidae)? Biol Conserv 129:372–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.11.004CrossRef

McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11:161–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4CrossRef

Mitchell TB (1960) Bees of the eastern United States. Technical Bulletin (North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station), 141:1–538

Muggeo VM (2008) segmented: an R Package to Fit Regression Models with Broken-Line Relationships. R News 8(1):20–25. https://cran.r-project.org/doc/Rnews/

O’Connell M, Jordan Z, McGilvray E, Cohen H, Liere H, Lin BB, Philpott SM, Jha S (2021) Reap what you sow: local plant composition mediates bumblebee foraging patterns within urban garden landscapes. Urban Ecosyst 24:391–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-01043-wCrossRef

Oksanen J, Guillaume Blanchet F, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Henry M, Stevens H, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2018) ‘vegan’ R package: community ecology package. Version 2.5–3

Ossola A, Locke D, Lin B, Minor E (2019) Greening in style: Urban form, architecture and the structure of front and backyard vegetation. Landsc Urban Plan 185:141–157CrossRef

Pereira FW, Carneiro L, Goncalves RB (2021) More losses than gains in ground-nesting bees over 60 years of urbanization. Urban Ecosyst 24:233–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-01030-1CrossRef

Persson AS, Ekroos J, Olsson P, Smith HG (2020) Wild bees and hoverflies respond differently to urbanization, human population density and urban form. Landsc Urban Plan 204:103901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103901CrossRef

Rebele F (1994) Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett 4:173–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2997649CrossRef

Reeher P, Novotny JL, Mitchell RJ (2020) Urban bumble bees are unaffected by the proportion of intensely developed land within urban environments of the industrial Midwestern USA. Urban Ecosyst 23:703–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00965-9CrossRef

Renner SS, Graf MS, Hentschel Z, Krause H, Fleischmann A (2021) High honeybee abundances reduce wild bee abundances on flowers in the city of Munich. Oecologia 195:825–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-04862-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Riera JP, Voss R, Carpenter SR, Kratz TK, Lillesand TM, Schnaiberg JA, Turner MG, Wegener MW (2001) Nature, society and history in two contrasting landscapes in Wisconsin, USA: interactions between lakes and humans during the 20th century. Land Use Policy 18:41–51CrossRef

Ripley B, Venables B, Bates DM, Hornik K, Gebhardt A, Firth D (2018) MASS R package. Version 7(3–51):1

Rosenzweig ML (2003) Reconciliation ecology and the future of species diversity. Oryx 37:194–205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605303000371CrossRef

Sakagami SF, Michener CD (1962) The nest architecture of the sweat bees (Halictinae): a comparative study of behavior. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence

Schnore LF, Klaff VZ (1972) Suburbanization in the Sixties: A Preliminary Analysis. Land Econ 48:23–33CrossRef

Sexton A, Benton S, Browning AC, Emery SM (2021) Reproductive patterns of solitary cavity-nesting bees responsive to both local and landscape factors. Urban Ecosyst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01116-4CrossRef

Silva JLS, de Oliveira MTP, Cruz-Neto O, Tabarelli M, Valentina Lopes A (2021) Plant–pollinator interactions in urban ecosystems worldwide: A comprehensive review including research funding and policy actions. Ambio 50:884–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01410-zCrossRefPubMed

Steffan-Dewenter I, Munzenberg U, Burger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2002) Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83:1421–1432. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1421:SDEOLC]2.0.CO;2CrossRef

Stone B (2004) Paving over paradise: how land use regulations promote residential imperviousness. Landsc Urban Plan 69:101–113CrossRef

Theodorou P, Radzevidiute R, Settele J, Schweiger O, Murray TE, Paxton RJ (2016) Pollination services enhanced with urbanization despite increasing pollinator parasitism. Proceedings R Soc B 283:20160561. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0561CrossRef

Theodorou P, Herbst SD, Kahnt B, Landaverde-Gonzalez P, Baltz LM, Osterman J, Paxton R (2020) Urban fragmentation leads to lower floral diversity, with knock-on impacts on bee biodiversity. Sci Rep 10:21756. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78736-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Threlfall CG, Walker K, Williams NSG, Hahs AK, Mata L, Stork N, Livesley SJ (2015) The conservation value of urban green space habitats for Australian native bee communities. Biol Cons 187:240–248CrossRef

Tonietto R, Fant J, Ascher J, Ellis K, Larkin D (2011) A comparison of bee communities of Chicago green roofs, parks, and prairies. Landsc Urban Plan 103:102–108CrossRef

Turo KJ, Spring MR, Sivakoff FS, Delgado de la flor YA, Gardiner MM, (2019) Conservation in post-industrial cities: How does vacant lot management and landscape configuration influence urban bees. J Appl Ecol 58:58–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13773CrossRef

U.S. Census Bureau (2010) Madison city, Wisconsin Populations and People. U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved 23 Apr 2023, from https://data.census.gov/

USGS 1-foot urban aerial ortho photographs (2010) Accessed via WisconsinView data portal. http://relief.ersc.wisc.edu/wisconsinview/form.php

Wegener MW (2001) Long-term land use/cover change patterns in the Yahara Lakes region and their impact on runoff volume to Lake Mendota. Master’s thesis. University of Wisconsin, Madison

Wilson CJ, Jamieson MA (2019) The effects of urbanization on bee communities depends on floral resource availability and bee functional traits. PLoS ONE 14(12):e0225852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225852CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Winfree R, Vazquez AR, DP, LeBuhn G, Aizen MA, (2009) A meta-analysis of bees’ responses to anthropogenic disturbance. Ecology 90:2068–2076. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1245.1CrossRefPubMed

Wojcik VA, Frankie GW, Thorp RW, Hernandz JL (2008) Seasonality in bees and their floral resource plants at a constructed urban bee habitat in Berkeley, California. J Kansas Entomol Soc 81:15–28. https://doi.org/10.2317/JKES-701.17.1CrossRef

Title: Urban development reduces bee abundance and diversity
Authors: Vera Pfeiffer
David W. Crowder
Janet Silbernagel
Publication date: 10-07-2023
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Urban Ecosystems / Issue 6/2023
Print ISSN: 1083-8155
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1642
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01393-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 6/2023

Stratifying the urban matrix using zoning laws: a protocol for bats and their pathogens

First steps of pollinator-promoting interventions in Eastern European urban areas – positive outcomes, challenges, and recommendations

Lessons learned about steering a large urban wildlife research network from theory to practice

Metabolic adjustment in urban birds: glycometabolic enzyme activities in urban and rural tree sparrows (passer montanus)

Florivory on an alien tree as a potential case of biotic resistance provided by urban parrots

Not all cities are the same: variation in animal phenotypes across cities within urban ecology studies