Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Empirical Software Engineering 6/2014

01-12-2014

Validating differential relationships between risk categories and project performance as perceived by managers

Author: Wen-Ming Han

Published in: Empirical Software Engineering | Issue 6/2014

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Effectively controlling software risk helps ensure project performance. Although the relationship between risk and software project performance has been continuously examined, project managers who have attempted to apply existing knowledge to mitigate risky areas remain confused. This study presents two distinct risk prioritization strategies to assist practitioners in developing risk mitigation plans when considering the performance aspects that a particular project should pursue. On the basis of data from 139 software projects, this study shows that each aspect related to project performance is influenced by at least two types of software project risks: objective risks and resilience risks. In particular, objective risks negatively influence all aspects of project performance. Finally, the study shows that using either a risk-focused prioritization strategy or a performance-actualized prioritization strategy provides a gradual management foundation for controlling risks without worrying about excess or deficient risk management investments.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Alberts CJ, Dorofee, AJ (2009) A framework for categorizing key drivers of risk. Technical Report, CMU/SEI–2009-TR-007, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University Alberts CJ, Dorofee, AJ (2009) A framework for categorizing key drivers of risk. Technical Report, CMU/SEI–2009-TR-007, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
go back to reference Armstrong J, Overton T (1977) Estimating non-response bias in mail survey. J Marketing Res 14(3):396–402CrossRef Armstrong J, Overton T (1977) Estimating non-response bias in mail survey. J Marketing Res 14(3):396–402CrossRef
go back to reference Armour PG (2005) Project portfolios: organizational management of risk. Commun ACM 48(3):17–20CrossRef Armour PG (2005) Project portfolios: organizational management of risk. Commun ACM 48(3):17–20CrossRef
go back to reference Barki H, Rivard S, Talbot J (1993) Toward an assessment of software development risk. J Manag Inf Syst 10(2):203–225 Barki H, Rivard S, Talbot J (1993) Toward an assessment of software development risk. J Manag Inf Syst 10(2):203–225
go back to reference Boehm BW (1991) Software risk management: principles and practices. Software, IEEE 8(1):32–41CrossRef Boehm BW (1991) Software risk management: principles and practices. Software, IEEE 8(1):32–41CrossRef
go back to reference Carr MJ et al. (1993) Taxonomy-based risk identification. Technical Report, CMU/SEI-93-TR-6, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University. Technical Report, CMU/SEI-93-TR-6 Carr MJ et al. (1993) Taxonomy-based risk identification. Technical Report, CMU/SEI-93-TR-6, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University. Technical Report, CMU/SEI-93-TR-6
go back to reference Crawford SD, Couper MP, Lamias MJ (2001) Web surveys: perceptions of burden. Soc Sci Comput Rev 19(2):146–162CrossRef Crawford SD, Couper MP, Lamias MJ (2001) Web surveys: perceptions of burden. Soc Sci Comput Rev 19(2):146–162CrossRef
go back to reference DeMarco T, Lister T (2003) Risk management during requirements. Software, IEEE 20(5):99–101CrossRef DeMarco T, Lister T (2003) Risk management during requirements. Software, IEEE 20(5):99–101CrossRef
go back to reference Dillman DA, Tortora RD, Bowker D (1998) Influence of plain vs. fancy design on response rates for web surveys. Joint Statistical Meeting of the American Statistical Association Dillman DA, Tortora RD, Bowker D (1998) Influence of plain vs. fancy design on response rates for web surveys. Joint Statistical Meeting of the American Statistical Association
go back to reference Han WM, Huang SJ (2007) An empirical analysis of risk components and performance on software projects. J Syst Software 80(1):42–50CrossRef Han WM, Huang SJ (2007) An empirical analysis of risk components and performance on software projects. J Syst Software 80(1):42–50CrossRef
go back to reference Huang SJ, Han WM (2008) Exploring the relationship between software project duration and risk exposure: a cluster analysis. Inform Manage 45(3):175–182CrossRef Huang SJ, Han WM (2008) Exploring the relationship between software project duration and risk exposure: a cluster analysis. Inform Manage 45(3):175–182CrossRef
go back to reference Jiang JJ, Klein G (1999) Risks to different aspects of system success. Inform Manage 36(5):263–272CrossRef Jiang JJ, Klein G (1999) Risks to different aspects of system success. Inform Manage 36(5):263–272CrossRef
go back to reference Lim WK, Sia SK, Yeow A (2011) Managing risks in a failing IT project: a social constructionist view. J Assoc Inf Syst 12(6):414–440 Lim WK, Sia SK, Yeow A (2011) Managing risks in a failing IT project: a social constructionist view. J Assoc Inf Syst 12(6):414–440
go back to reference Liu J, Wang Q (2009) Moderating effects of uncertainty on the relationship between risk management and information systems project performance. Proceedings of the 2009 1st International Conference on Information Science and Engineering, pp 4390–4393 Liu J, Wang Q (2009) Moderating effects of uncertainty on the relationship between risk management and information systems project performance. Proceedings of the 2009 1st International Conference on Information Science and Engineering, pp 4390–4393
go back to reference Jun L, Qiuzhen W, Qingguo M (2011) The effects of project uncertainty and risk management on IS development project performance: a vendor perspective. Int J Proj Manag 29(7):923–933CrossRef Jun L, Qiuzhen W, Qingguo M (2011) The effects of project uncertainty and risk management on IS development project performance: a vendor perspective. Int J Proj Manag 29(7):923–933CrossRef
go back to reference Ropponen J, Lyytinen K (2000) Components of software development risk: how to address them? A project manager survey. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 26(2):98–112CrossRef Ropponen J, Lyytinen K (2000) Components of software development risk: how to address them? A project manager survey. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 26(2):98–112CrossRef
go back to reference Schmidt R, Lyytinen K, Keil M, Cule P (2001) Identifying software project risks: an international Delphi study. J Manage Inform Syst 17(4):5–36 Schmidt R, Lyytinen K, Keil M, Cule P (2001) Identifying software project risks: an international Delphi study. J Manage Inform Syst 17(4):5–36
go back to reference Takagi Y, Mizuno O, Kikuno T (2005) An empirical approach to characterizing risky software projects based on logistic regression analysis. Empir Softw Eng 10(4):495–515CrossRef Takagi Y, Mizuno O, Kikuno T (2005) An empirical approach to characterizing risky software projects based on logistic regression analysis. Empir Softw Eng 10(4):495–515CrossRef
go back to reference Tiwana A, Keil M (2004) The one-minute risk assessment tool. Commun ACM 47(11):73–77CrossRef Tiwana A, Keil M (2004) The one-minute risk assessment tool. Commun ACM 47(11):73–77CrossRef
go back to reference Wallace L, Keil M, Rai A (2004) How software project risk affects project performance: an investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model. Decision Sci 35(2):289–322CrossRef Wallace L, Keil M, Rai A (2004) How software project risk affects project performance: an investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model. Decision Sci 35(2):289–322CrossRef
go back to reference Wallace L, Keil M (2004) Software project risks and their effect on outcomes. Commun ACM 47(4):68–73CrossRef Wallace L, Keil M (2004) Software project risks and their effect on outcomes. Commun ACM 47(4):68–73CrossRef
go back to reference Wu CH, Wang SL, Fang K (2008) Investigating the relationship between IS project risk and project performance. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology, pp 100–105 Wu CH, Wang SL, Fang K (2008) Investigating the relationship between IS project risk and project performance. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology, pp 100–105
Metadata
Title
Validating differential relationships between risk categories and project performance as perceived by managers
Author
Wen-Ming Han
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 1382-3256
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7616
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-013-9270-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

Empirical Software Engineering 6/2014 Go to the issue

Premium Partner